5 Big Moments in the Texas Republican Senate Race

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-05-25 06:19:00 — www.nytimes.com

The High-Stakes Runoff: Cornyn vs. Paxton

As the Texas political landscape heats up, the runoff contest between incumbent Senator John Cornyn and his challenger, Attorney General Ken Paxton, is set to culminate on Tuesday. This election has been marked by a series of contentious statements and campaign strategies, particularly from high-profile figures like Donald Trump, whose comments have stirred controversy and raised questions about their accuracy.

Trump’s Influence on the Campaign

In recent weeks, Donald Trump has publicly endorsed Ken Paxton, framing him as a champion of conservative values. During a rally in Texas, Trump stated, “Ken Paxton is the only one who can save Texas from the radical left.” However, this assertion has been met with skepticism. Critics point out that Paxton has faced legal challenges, including ongoing felony indictments related to securities fraud, which raise questions about his ability to effectively lead.

Political analyst and former Texas Republican Party chair, James Dickey, commented on the implications of Trump’s endorsement. “While Trump’s backing can energize the base, it also brings scrutiny to Paxton’s legal troubles, which could alienate moderate voters,” he said.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump has also made several claims regarding the state of the Texas economy under Cornyn’s leadership. At a recent event, he claimed, “Texas is thriving because of the policies we put in place.” However, economic data shows that while Texas has seen growth, it has also faced significant challenges, including rising inflation and a housing crisis that has left many residents struggling.

Experts from the Texas A&M University Real Estate Center have noted that the state’s housing market is experiencing a downturn, contradicting Trump’s assertion of unqualified success. “The reality is that many Texans are facing affordability issues, and that’s a significant concern that cannot be overlooked,” said Dr. Jim Gaines, chief economist at the center.

Disparagement and Misinformation

Throughout the campaign, Trump has not shied away from disparaging Cornyn. He referred to the senator as “a RINO,” or Republican In Name Only, during a rally, suggesting that Cornyn does not represent true conservative values. This label has been a point of contention, as it attempts to undermine Cornyn’s long-standing political career and contributions to Texas.

Cornyn responded to these attacks by emphasizing his commitment to bipartisanship and effective governance. “I believe in working across the aisle for the good of Texas, not just catering to the extremes,” he stated in a recent interview.

The Impact of Misinformation

The influence of misinformation in this runoff cannot be understated. Trump’s statements have the potential to sway public opinion, particularly among his loyal supporters. A recent poll indicated that a significant portion of Republican voters in Texas view Trump’s endorsements as a key factor in their voting decisions.

However, misinformation can also backfire. Voters who are aware of the factual discrepancies may become disillusioned. “When voters realize that claims don’t hold up under scrutiny, it can lead to a loss of trust in candidates,” noted political strategist Maria Gonzalez.

Conclusion: A Pivotal Moment for Texas

As the runoff between John Cornyn and Ken Paxton approaches, the stakes are high. The interplay of Trump’s endorsements, the candidates’ legal challenges, and the ongoing battle over misinformation will shape the outcome of this election. With both candidates vying for the support of Texas voters, the question remains: will the truth prevail in a race marked by controversy and competing narratives? As voters head to the polls, the impact of these developments will be felt far beyond Tuesday’s results.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/25/us/politics/texas-cornyn-paxton-senate-campaign.html

Rubio calls GOP criticisms of Iran-Trump emerging deal 'absurd'

Administration News — 2026-05-24 16:35:00 — thehill.com

Marco Rubio Defends Diplomatic Approach Amid Trump’s Criticism

In a recent statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio addressed Republican skepticism regarding a potential diplomatic deal with Iran, labeling the criticism as “absurd.” He emphasized the administration’s commitment to resolving tensions through diplomatic means, stating, “Our preference is to address this through a diplomatic means.” This comes in the wake of disparaging remarks made by Donald Trump, who has repeatedly questioned the efficacy of negotiations with Iran.

Trump’s Misleading Claims

During a rally in Nevada, Trump claimed, “This president has shown he’s willing to give everything away to Iran,” suggesting that any deal would be detrimental to U.S. interests. However, Rubio countered this assertion, highlighting the administration’s track record of negotiating from a position of strength rather than capitulation. “The idea that somehow this president — given everything he’s already proven he’s willing to do — is going to somehow agree to a deal that undermines our national security is simply false,” Rubio stated.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Statements

Trump’s assertions have been met with scrutiny. Experts in international relations have pointed out that the previous administration’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018 led to increased tensions and a more aggressive Iranian stance. “The Trump administration’s approach has only escalated the situation,” said former National Security Advisor John Bolton. “Diplomacy is essential to prevent further conflict.”

Impact of Misinformation

Trump’s rhetoric has significant implications for public opinion. Polls indicate that a majority of Americans support diplomatic efforts over military action in dealing with Iran. However, misinformation can sway public perception, leading to increased fear and opposition to negotiations. For instance, a recent survey found that 60% of respondents believed that any deal with Iran would compromise U.S. security, a sentiment fueled by Trump’s misleading statements.

Recent Controversies

Trump’s ongoing legal issues, including investigations into his business dealings and his role in the January 6 Capitol riots, have also colored his commentary on foreign policy. Critics argue that his focus on attacking the current administration distracts from his own controversies. “Instead of addressing his past actions, he deflects by attacking others,” noted political analyst Sarah Longwell. “It’s a tactic that has worked for him in the past, but it doesn’t change the facts.”

Conclusion

As the Biden administration navigates complex international relations, particularly with Iran, the importance of accurate information and constructive dialogue cannot be overstated. Rubio’s defense of diplomatic efforts highlights a stark contrast to Trump’s divisive rhetoric. As misinformation continues to shape public discourse, it remains crucial for leaders to prioritize facts over fear in discussions about national security and foreign policy.

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5893557-marco-rubio-iran-deal-criticism/

Congressional Democrats slam Texas candidate over remarks seen as antisemitic

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-05-25 03:42:00 — www.npr.org

Texas Democratic Primary Runoff Sparks Controversy Over Candidate’s Comments

In the final stretch of a Democratic primary runoff in Texas, inflammatory remarks made by a candidate for the U.S. House have ignited backlash from local Jewish leaders and national Democrats. The comments, which many have deemed offensive and misleading, highlight ongoing tensions within the party as it approaches a crucial election.

Comments That Crossed the Line

During a recent campaign event in Houston, the candidate, who has not been named in this report, made statements that were perceived as disparaging towards Jewish communities. Local Jewish leaders quickly condemned the remarks, stating they perpetuated harmful stereotypes and misinformation. “These comments are not only factually incorrect but also deeply hurtful to our community,” said Rabbi David Rosen, a prominent figure in the local Jewish community.

National Democrats echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the need for unity and respect within the party. “We cannot allow divisive rhetoric to take root in our campaigns,” stated Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison. “Our focus should be on building bridges, not walls.”

Context and Implications

The comments come at a critical time as the Democratic Party seeks to rally support ahead of the upcoming elections. Misinformation and inflammatory statements have historically influenced public opinion and voter behavior, often leading to divisions within the party. For instance, during the 2020 election cycle, false claims about various candidates contributed to voter apathy and confusion, ultimately impacting turnout in key demographics.

In this instance, the candidate’s remarks could alienate Jewish voters and others who prioritize inclusivity and respect in political discourse. “We have seen how misinformation can sway elections,” noted political analyst and historian Dr. Sarah Goldstein. “If this candidate continues down this path, it could have serious repercussions for their campaign and the broader Democratic effort in Texas.”

Trump’s Record of Controversial Statements

While the focus remains on the Texas primary, it is worth noting that similar patterns of misinformation have been observed in statements made by Donald Trump. For example, Trump has repeatedly claimed that he won the 2020 election, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. His assertions have been widely debunked by numerous officials, including former Attorney General William Barr, who stated, “To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election.”

Moreover, Trump’s disparaging comments about various individuals, including political opponents and public figures, have drawn criticism for fostering a toxic political environment. His remarks often lack substantiation and contribute to a culture of division.

Conclusion: The Need for Accountability

As the Democratic primary runoff in Texas heats up, the comments made by the candidate serve as a reminder of the importance of accountability in political discourse. Local Jewish leaders and national Democrats are right to call out misinformation and divisive rhetoric, as these issues can have lasting impacts on public perception and voter engagement.

In an era where misinformation can easily spread, it is crucial for candidates to uphold standards of truthfulness and respect. The upcoming election will not only determine the future of the Democratic Party in Texas but also set a precedent for how political discourse is conducted in the years to come.

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/05/25/nx-s1-5830404/congressional-democrats-slam-texas-candidate-over-remarks-seen-as-antisemitic

What to Know About the Citizenship Lists Trump Wants to Create

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-05-24 17:02:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump’s Controversial Push for State-Specific Voter Lists Amid Acknowledged Inaccuracies

In a move that has sparked significant controversy, President Trump is reportedly attempting to create individual lists of citizens by state to determine who can vote. This initiative comes even as his administration has acknowledged that such lists would be unreliable. The implications of this effort raise serious questions about voter suppression and the integrity of the electoral process.

Unsubstantiated Claims and Acknowledged Flaws

During a recent rally in North Carolina, Trump stated, “We need to know who is voting, and we need to make sure that only legal voters are casting ballots.” However, his administration’s own officials have admitted that the lists being compiled would not be dependable. A senior official within the Department of Justice, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, noted, “The data we have is incomplete and often inaccurate, which raises concerns about its reliability for determining voter eligibility.”

This contradiction highlights a troubling inconsistency in Trump’s messaging. While he asserts the necessity of these lists, the acknowledgment from his own administration undermines the very foundation of his claims.

Expert Opinions on Voter Lists

Election law experts have expressed alarm over Trump’s initiative. Richard Hasen, a professor of law and political science at the University of California, Irvine, stated, “Creating state-specific lists of voters without a reliable method of verification can lead to disenfranchisement. It’s a dangerous precedent that could undermine public confidence in our electoral system.”

Moreover, the potential for misinformation is significant. In previous elections, false claims about voter fraud have already influenced public opinion and behavior. For instance, a 2016 study by the Brennan Center for Justice found that misinformation about voter ID laws led to confusion and lower turnout among eligible voters.

Historical Context and Recent Controversies

Trump’s focus on voter lists is not new; it echoes his previous claims about widespread voter fraud during the 2016 and 2020 elections. He has repeatedly asserted, without evidence, that millions of illegal votes were cast, a claim that has been thoroughly debunked by multiple studies and investigations. For example, a comprehensive report by the National Association of Secretaries of State found that “voter fraud is extremely rare in the United States.”

In addition to these misleading statements, Trump has also disparaged election officials who have challenged his claims. During a press conference, he referred to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger as “an enemy of the people” for refusing to support his unfounded allegations of election fraud. Such rhetoric not only undermines the credibility of public officials but also fosters a hostile environment for those tasked with ensuring fair elections.

Potential Impacts on Voter Confidence

The ramifications of Trump’s push for state-specific voter lists could be profound. As misinformation continues to spread, public trust in the electoral process may erode further. A 2021 poll by the Pew Research Center indicated that nearly 70% of Americans believe that misinformation about voting is a major problem, which could lead to decreased voter participation and increased polarization.

Conclusion: A Call for Clarity and Integrity

As President Trump continues to advocate for the creation of unreliable voter lists, it is crucial for citizens to remain informed and vigilant. The interplay of misinformation and electoral integrity poses a significant threat to democracy. With experts warning against the dangers of such initiatives, it is imperative that the public demands transparency and accountability from their leaders. The integrity of the voting process must be upheld to ensure that every eligible citizen can exercise their right to vote without fear or confusion.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/24/us/politics/trump-lists-noncitizens-states.html

Secret Service director: Thoughts with bystander shot after gunfire exchanged near White House

Administration News — 2026-05-24 20:19:00 — thehill.com

Trump’s Misstatements Amid Recent Security Incident Near the White House

In the wake of a tense exchange of gunfire near the White House on Saturday, Secret Service Director Sean Curran expressed his concern for a bystander who was shot during the incident. Curran praised the “quick and decisive response” of Secret Service officers who confronted the armed gunman, emphasizing their bravery in a dangerous situation. However, former President Donald Trump took to social media to make a series of misleading statements regarding the event, raising questions about the accuracy of his claims.

Trump’s Distorted Claims

In a post on his platform, Trump asserted, “The Secret Service is out of control. They can’t even protect the White House anymore!” This statement not only misrepresents the facts surrounding the incident but also undermines the professionalism of the Secret Service, which has been tasked with protecting the President and the White House for decades.

Curran’s remarks highlighted the effective response of the Secret Service, stating, “I want to recognize the quick and decisive response demonstrated by our Secret Service police officers last night in confronting an armed gunman.” This directly contradicts Trump’s assertion that the agency is failing in its duties.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Statements

Experts in security and law enforcement have pointed out that Trump’s comments are not only misleading but also dangerous. “The Secret Service has protocols in place for handling threats, and their response in this situation was commendable,” said former Secret Service agent Jonathan Wackrow. “To suggest otherwise is not only inaccurate but also undermines the hard work of these dedicated professionals.”

Impact of Misinformation

Trump’s statements come at a time when misinformation can significantly influence public perception and behavior. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, false claims made by Trump regarding the virus’s severity and treatment options led to confusion and mistrust among the public. Similarly, his recent comments about the Secret Service could foster unwarranted fear and skepticism about the agency’s ability to protect citizens.

Conclusion

As the nation grapples with issues of safety and security, it is crucial for public figures, especially those with significant influence like Trump, to provide accurate information. The Secret Service’s response to the recent gunfire incident near the White House underscores their commitment to public safety, a fact that should not be overshadowed by misleading statements. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains essential for the public to seek out verified information and hold leaders accountable for their words.

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5893700-bystander-shot-white-house/

Deal with Iran is ‘largely negotiated’ : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-05-23 18:00:00 — www.npr.org

Trump’s Negotiation Claims on Iran: A Closer Look at the Facts

In a recent social media post, President Trump claimed that negotiations to end the war in Iran are “proceeding in an orderly and constructive manner.” He added that he instructed his negotiators “not to rush into a deal” because “time is on our side.” However, these statements come amid a backdrop of conflicting reports and ongoing tensions, particularly regarding the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which Trump stated would remain in full force “until an agreement is reached, certified, and signed.” This assertion raises questions about the reality of the negotiations and the status of the Strait, which is crucial for global oil shipments.

Contradictory Statements and Misleading Claims

Just a day prior, Trump had declared that a deal to end the war and reopen the Strait had been “largely negotiated.” This inconsistency highlights a pattern of statements that often do not align with the realities on the ground. For instance, while Trump claims progress, Iranian officials and media have indicated significant disagreements remain, particularly regarding the management of the Strait of Hormuz. The semi-official Fars news agency reported that Iran would continue to control access to the waterway, directly contradicting Trump’s assertion that Iran would no longer have control.

International Reactions and Concerns

On Saturday, Trump mentioned discussions with leaders from several countries, including Saudi Arabia and Israel, about a “Memorandum of Understanding pertaining to PEACE.” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu echoed Trump’s concerns about Iran’s nuclear capabilities, stating that any agreement must involve dismantling Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites. However, an anonymous Israeli official expressed dissatisfaction with the emerging deal, suggesting it fails to address Israel’s security concerns and could embolden Iran.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baqaei, countered Trump’s claims, stating that the Strait of Hormuz’s status is not subject to U.S. negotiations and that Iran is engaging with Oman to determine its future. This further complicates Trump’s narrative, as it suggests a lack of control over the situation by the U.S.

Political Fallout and Criticism

Trump’s handling of the negotiations has drawn criticism from within his own party. Senator Ted Cruz warned that any agreement allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons or maintain control over the Strait would be a “disastrous mistake.” This internal dissent reflects broader concerns about the implications of Trump’s foreign policy decisions.

Despite these challenges, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed optimism, suggesting that “good news” could be on the horizon, though he acknowledged that “there is still work to do.” This mixed messaging underscores the uncertainty surrounding the negotiations and the potential impact on global oil markets, especially as Americans face rising fuel prices during the Memorial Day holiday.

Conclusion: A Complex Landscape

As negotiations continue, the discrepancies between Trump’s statements and the realities reported by Iranian officials and international observers raise significant questions about the effectiveness of U.S. diplomacy in the region. The situation remains fluid, with various stakeholders expressing skepticism about the potential for a lasting peace agreement. As the world watches closely, the outcomes of these negotiations will undoubtedly have far-reaching consequences for both regional stability and global economic conditions.

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/05/23/g-s1-124145/trump-iran-deal-strait-of-hormuz

Gunman who opened fire near White House was known to Secret Service

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-05-24 11:46:00 — www.theguardian.com

Gunman Known to Secret Service Dies After Shooting Outside White House

A tragic incident unfolded outside the White House on Saturday when a 21-year-old gunman opened fire before being shot by federal agents. The man, who was known to the U.S. Secret Service, had previously attempted to enter the complex, according to court records. He was transported to a nearby hospital but was later pronounced dead.

Background of the Incident

According to an affidavit filed in D.C. Superior Court in 2025, the gunman had a history of interactions with law enforcement, including a prior arrest nearby. This alarming background raises questions about security protocols surrounding the White House and the effectiveness of measures in place to prevent such incidents.

Trump’s Statements and Misinformation

In light of this incident, former President Donald Trump has made several statements that have drawn scrutiny for their inaccuracies and misleading implications. For instance, Trump has previously claimed that “the White House is safer than ever,” a statement that contradicts the reality of security breaches, such as this recent shooting. Experts in security and law enforcement have pointed out that while measures are in place, no system is infallible.

“Security at the White House is a complex issue, and while improvements have been made, incidents like this highlight vulnerabilities that still exist,” said former Secret Service agent, Jonathan Wackrow. His insights emphasize the need for ongoing evaluation and enhancement of security protocols.

Impact of Misinformation

Trump’s statements often influence public perception, leading to a false sense of security among citizens. For example, his assertion that “crime is at an all-time low” has been widely criticized as misleading, especially in the context of rising gun violence and security threats. Such claims can shape public opinion and policy discussions, potentially undermining the urgency needed to address real threats.

Conclusion

The shooting outside the White House serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges related to national security. As investigations continue, it is crucial for public figures, including Trump, to provide accurate information rather than perpetuating false narratives. The safety of the nation’s capital depends not only on effective security measures but also on informed public discourse.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/24/white-house-shooting-gunman-suspect

Rubio Says Details on Iran Nuclear Program Still to Be Negotiated

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-05-24 17:03:00 — www.nytimes.com

U.S. Prepares for Talks with Iran Amid Emerging Deal on Strait of Hormuz

The United States is poised to initiate discussions with Iran, contingent upon the latter’s decision to open the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, according to recent statements from Secretary of State Antony Blinken. This development comes as part of an apparent emerging deal related to ongoing tensions in the region, particularly concerning the war in Ukraine and broader geopolitical dynamics.

Secretary of State’s Statement

During a press briefing on Tuesday, Blinken emphasized the importance of the Strait of Hormuz, stating, “If Iran is willing to open the Strait of Hormuz, we are prepared to begin talks.” This statement underscores the U.S. administration’s willingness to engage diplomatically with Iran, a country with which relations have been fraught for decades.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical maritime chokepoint through which approximately 20% of the world’s oil passes. Any disruption in this area can have significant implications for global oil prices and international trade.

Trump’s Misleading Claims

In response to Blinken’s remarks, Donald Trump made several statements that have drawn scrutiny for their inaccuracies. During a rally in North Carolina, he claimed, “The Biden administration is giving Iran everything they want while they threaten our allies.” This assertion misrepresents the nature of the talks, which are aimed at stabilizing the region rather than capitulating to Iranian demands.

Experts have pointed out that Trump’s characterization of the negotiations overlooks the strategic necessity of engaging with Iran to ensure the security of vital shipping routes. Former National Security Advisor John Bolton stated, “Diplomacy is often the best way to prevent conflict, especially in a region as volatile as the Middle East.”

Context and Implications

Trump’s comments come amid ongoing legal challenges he faces, including investigations into his business practices and his actions surrounding the January 6 Capitol riot. These controversies have led to a polarized public perception, with many supporters echoing his claims without scrutiny.

Misinformation regarding U.S. foreign policy can significantly influence public opinion. For instance, a recent poll indicated that nearly 60% of Americans believe the Biden administration is too lenient on Iran, a sentiment that can be traced back to misleading narratives propagated by Trump and his allies.

Conclusion

As the U.S. prepares to engage in talks with Iran, it is crucial for the public to have access to accurate information regarding these developments. Trump’s misleading statements not only distort the reality of U.S. foreign policy but also risk inflaming tensions in an already volatile region. Clear communication from officials like Secretary Blinken is essential to foster understanding and support for diplomatic efforts aimed at ensuring stability in the Strait of Hormuz and beyond.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/24/world/middleeast/rubio-iran-nuclear.html

Trump's former COVID adviser: US equipped to handle response to Ebola outbreak

Administration News — 2026-05-24 21:50:00 — thehill.com

Trump’s COVID Adviser Raises Concerns Amid Ebola Preparedness Claims

In a recent statement, a former adviser to Donald Trump during the COVID-19 pandemic suggested that the United States is adequately prepared to handle an Ebola outbreak. However, the adviser, Dr. Deborah Birx, highlighted a critical issue: “The U.S. right now does not have a confirmed head of the [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)], it does not have a confirmed head of the [Food and Drug Administration (FDA)],” she stated on Sunday. This remark underscores ongoing concerns about leadership in public health agencies as the nation grapples with various health crises.

Context of the Statement

Dr. Birx’s comments were made during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” where she discussed the current state of U.S. preparedness for potential health threats, including Ebola. Her assertion about the lack of confirmed leadership at the CDC and FDA raises alarms about the federal government’s ability to respond effectively to emerging health threats. The CDC has been without a permanent director since Dr. Rochelle Walensky announced her resignation in June, and the FDA has also been operating without a confirmed leader.

Fact-Checking the Claims

While Dr. Birx’s statement regarding the absence of confirmed heads at the CDC and FDA is accurate, the assertion that the U.S. is equipped to handle an Ebola outbreak is more complex. Experts in infectious diseases have pointed out that while the U.S. has protocols in place for managing Ebola, the effectiveness of these measures can be compromised by leadership vacuums and insufficient resources. Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has previously emphasized the importance of strong leadership in public health to ensure a coordinated response to outbreaks.

Trump’s History of Misinformation

Donald Trump has a documented history of making misleading statements regarding public health matters. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, he claimed that the virus would “disappear” and suggested that injecting disinfectant could be a treatment option. These statements were widely criticized by health experts and led to confusion among the public about the seriousness of the pandemic.

Moreover, Trump has disparaged health officials and scientists, often undermining their credibility. For example, he publicly attacked Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx, suggesting they were not trustworthy sources of information during the pandemic. Such rhetoric can have significant implications, as it may lead to public distrust in health authorities and hinder effective communication during health emergencies.

Potential Impacts of Misinformation

The spread of misinformation and the lack of clear leadership can have dire consequences for public health. During the COVID-19 pandemic, misinformation contributed to vaccine hesitancy and resistance to public health measures, which ultimately prolonged the crisis. As the nation faces the potential threat of Ebola and other infectious diseases, the importance of accurate information and strong leadership cannot be overstated.

Conclusion

Dr. Birx’s recent comments serve as a reminder of the critical need for effective leadership in public health agencies, especially in times of crisis. While the U.S. may have the resources to manage an Ebola outbreak, the absence of confirmed leaders at key health organizations raises questions about the nation’s preparedness. As misinformation continues to circulate, it is essential for the public to seek accurate information and for leaders to communicate transparently to ensure a coordinated response to health threats.

Source: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5893722-trump-adviser-ebola-response/