Donald J. Trump: “I am pleased to announce that the man who so foolishly led the Indiana State…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-31 09:50:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Blames Indiana Senate Leader for GOP Losses, Launches Personal Attack

Donald Trump issued a scathing statement targeting Indiana State Senate President Rodric Bray, blaming him for Republican election losses and calling for his resignation. Trump claimed, “the man who so foolishly led the Indiana State Senate, with almost every Candidate losing their Race, many of them in Office for years, will not be seeking Re-Election as Senate President because he wouldn’t have had a chance to be elected — Better yet would be if he would resign from Office, completely, but he will be met by us at the Indiana Polls.”

Direct Attacks and Disparagement

Trump did not hold back in his criticism of Bray, labeling him a “FOOL” and asserting that Bray “should be ashamed of himself for costing our Country, mainly the Republican Party, two U.S. House Seats, and for costing all of his colleagues who went along with him, an Election loss!” He further accused Bray of leading “wayward Senators, led down the Path of Destruction.”

Exaggerated Claims

Trump also boasted about his own electoral performance in Indiana, stating, “we won with the Highest Vote in the History of the State.” This claim is presented without supporting evidence in the statement, and such assertions have frequently been fact-checked and found to be exaggerations in the past.

Conclusion

Trump’s statement combines personal attacks, blame-shifting, and unsubstantiated boasts. By targeting Bray and attributing Republican losses to his leadership, Trump continues his pattern of publicly disparaging political opponents and overstating his own achievements. These remarks highlight Trump’s ongoing use of inflammatory rhetoric and questionable claims to shape political narratives and rally his base.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40403

Trump needles Cornyn as Blanche remains blocked

Donald Trump — 2026-07-31 08:13:00 — www.politico.com

Trump Defends $1.8 Billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” Despite Contradictory Statements from Legal Team

President Trump has publicly defended his proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization fund,” a move that has drawn scrutiny and raised questions about the accuracy of his claims. This defense comes even as his attorney, Blanche, stated earlier this month that the fund is not moving forward.

Contradictory Claims on the Fund’s Status

The president’s insistence on the existence and defense of the $1.8 billion fund stands in stark contrast to recent statements from his own legal team. Blanche, representing Trump, made it clear that the initiative is not progressing, directly contradicting Trump’s public position. This discrepancy highlights a pattern of conflicting narratives coming from Trump and those speaking on his behalf.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Defense

Trump’s defense of the fund is not supported by the latest information from his legal representatives. The contradiction between Trump’s statements and Blanche’s admission raises concerns about the reliability of Trump’s public claims. This is not the first instance where Trump’s statements have been at odds with those of his aides or legal team, further fueling debates about transparency and truthfulness.

Conclusion: A Pattern of Misinformation

President Trump’s continued defense of the $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization fund,” despite clear indications from his attorney that it is not moving forward, exemplifies his ongoing pattern of making statements that are later contradicted by those closest to him. This episode underscores the importance of scrutinizing public claims and seeking clarity amid conflicting information from the president and his representatives. Readers are left to question the veracity of Trump’s statements and the implications for public trust in presidential communications.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/07/31/congress/trump-needles-cornyn-01019003

Up First briefing: Hamas-Israel deal; Todd Blanche; U.S. economy : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-07-31 06:30:00 — www.npr.org

President Trump Claims Breakthrough Gaza Deal, But Key Disputes Remain

President Trump is claiming that Hamas will completely disarm and Israeli forces will withdraw from Gaza under a new groundbreaking deal. According to the president, his Board of Peace agreed to the plan with the support of mediators from Egypt, Turkey, and Qatar. The announcement comes more than nine months after a U.S.-brokered Gaza ceasefire was signed.

However, a senior official from the Palestinian militant group told NPR they would only give up their weapons if Israel withdraws from Gaza first, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has yet to respond. This directly contradicts Trump’s assertion that Hamas will disarm as part of the deal, highlighting a significant gap between the president’s claims and the positions of the parties involved.

The deal faces hurdles over whether the Israeli or Hamas portion of the agreement should take place first. Trump’s push for a win with Gaza comes as the midterm elections approach, with political analysts warning of consequences if the Iran war continues and gas prices keep rising.

In a separate development, Trump is considering withdrawing his nomination of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to officially take over the role. Two Republican senators are withholding their support for Blanche due to the Department of Justice’s deal with the president to end his IRS lawsuit. Trump says the withdrawal could be temporary until those two senators, John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, leave office in January.

The senators are requesting written assurances from the Justice Department that both the settlement and the $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund are off the table. They also want clarity on the tax immunity deal for Trump, his family, and his businesses. Reporting indicates that Trump would rather withdraw Blanche’s nomination than provide senators with guarantees of deals that favor him.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statements about a Gaza breakthrough are being challenged by facts on the ground and by the parties directly involved. His claims of Hamas disarmament and Israeli withdrawal do not align with the positions of Hamas or the lack of response from Israel. As political and legal pressures mount, Trump’s public assertions continue to face scrutiny and contradiction from those involved in the negotiations and from within his own party.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/07/31/g-s1-136527/up-first-newsletter-trump-hamas-israel-todd-blanche-us-economy

Donald J. Trump: “John Cornyn never had a problem with the so called “Fund,” which will not be…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-31 06:03:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Claims “Fund” Not for Personal Benefit, Attacks Biden Administration and John Cornyn

Donald Trump asserted that the so-called “Fund” associated with legal support for January 6 defendants “will not benefit me, but rather the great American Patriots who were hunted down like dogs and whose lives were unfairly and illegally destroyed by the Crooked Joe Biden Administration.” Trump claimed he gave up “any payments for myself, which would have been substantial, including for the illegal and unprecedented raid on Mar-a-Lago, my home in Florida,” and argued that “many legal experts, and others, including John Cornyn, said it was a shocking and disgusting display of ‘weaponization’ against me.”

False and Exaggerated Claims

Trump’s statement contains several notable distortions and attacks:

• He described the January 6 defendants as “hunted down like dogs” and claimed “perhaps there has never been a group of people treated so badly in our Nation’s history.” This is a gross exaggeration, as the U.S. has a long history of groups facing far harsher treatment, including enslaved people, Indigenous populations, and victims of state violence.
• Trump alleged the Biden administration “unfairly and illegally destroyed” the lives of these individuals. However, prosecutions related to January 6 have been carried out by the Department of Justice based on evidence of criminal conduct, not political persecution.
• He labeled the Mar-a-Lago search “illegal and unprecedented,” though the search was conducted under a court-approved warrant as part of an ongoing investigation into the handling of classified documents.
• Trump claimed “millions of people agree with me, as was proven in my landslide Presidential win, where this was a major subject of debate.” In reality, Trump did not win the 2020 presidential election, and there is no evidence that the “Fund” or related issues were a decisive or major subject in any presidential debate.

Attacks and Contradictions

Trump attacked Senator John Cornyn, stating Cornyn “never had a problem with the so called ‘Fund’… until after I decided to Endorse and Support his Republican Primary opponent in Texas, who easily won the Nomination for the United States Senate.” He further claimed Cornyn “lost his Election to an opponent that I Endorsed,” though Cornyn is a sitting senator who was not up for re-election in 2024.

Trump also called for Todd Blanche to be “immediately approved as U.S. Attorney General,” despite Blanche not being nominated for that position.

Conclusion

Trump’s latest statement is filled with false claims, exaggerations, and personal attacks. He misrepresents the purpose and impact of the legal defense fund, distorts the facts surrounding the Mar-a-Lago search, and continues to push disproven narratives about the 2020 election. These repeated distortions underscore Trump’s ongoing strategy of misinformation and personal grievance, rather than a factual account of recent events.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40402

Blanche’s AG nomination on hold over opposition to DOJ’s ‘anti-weaponization fund’

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-30 17:40:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Signals Willingness to Circumvent Senate Block on DOJ Nominee, Keeps Door Open for Controversial Fund

President Trump, facing opposition from Republican Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis over his nomination of Todd Blanche to lead the Justice Department, stated on social media that he would keep Blanche as acting attorney general, saying, “I have no objection to temporarily withdrawing Todd’s name if they do not do the right thing, and putting him back after Cornyn and Tillis are out of office.” This statement came as the senators demanded the Justice Department end a $1.8 billion fund intended for payments to Trump allies who claim wrongful prosecution.

Trump’s position, as described in the reporting, is to maintain Blanche in charge of the Justice Department regardless of the Senate’s refusal to confirm him. This approach allows Trump to retain control while avoiding concessions on the so-called “weaponization fund,” which he is reportedly unwilling to abandon. The fund, as Trump frames it, is designed to protect not only himself but also his relatives, companies, and a broad group of affiliates from IRS audits and other legal scrutiny.

Despite the fund being officially on hold, The New York Times reports that the Justice Department continues to issue similar settlements through existing claims processes. This means payouts to individuals identified as victims of alleged political targeting continue, even as the broader fund is stalled.

Senators Cornyn and Tillis are demanding written assurances that the fund will not be revived, expressing frustration over what they see as mere “lip service” from the administration. The reluctance of the White House to provide such assurances in writing has fueled skepticism about the administration’s intentions, with critics suggesting that Trump and his team are leaving open the possibility of reinstating the fund or finding alternative ways to achieve the same ends.

The episode highlights Trump’s willingness to bypass Senate oversight and his persistent efforts to shield himself and his allies from legal and financial accountability. It also underscores ongoing concerns about transparency and credibility within the administration’s negotiations with Congress.

Conclusion

President Trump’s handling of the Justice Department nomination and the controversial fund demonstrates a pattern of maneuvering to protect his interests and those of his associates, even in the face of bipartisan resistance. His public statements and the administration’s actions raise questions about accountability and the potential for future attempts to revive or rebrand the disputed fund, despite congressional objections.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/blanches-ag-nomination-on-hold-over-opposition-to-dojs-anti-weaponization-fund

Freedom 250 seeks $10 million more for July Fourth celebrations : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-07-30 12:47:00 — www.npr.org

Trump Administration Seeks Additional $10 Million for National Mall Events, Drawing Scrutiny Over Funding and Transparency

The Trump administration is asking Congress for an extra $10 million to cover costs related to major patriotic events on the National Mall, including the July Fourth fireworks, the Great American State Fair, and a large prayer event. This request comes after President Trump created the group Freedom 250 last year to oversee the nation’s 250th anniversary celebrations, a move critics say was intended to bypass an existing bipartisan commission.

Funding Controversy and Accusations of Politicization

Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, the lead Democrat on the Senate Interior-Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, revealed the funding request and criticized the administration’s approach. Merkley noted that Congress had already allocated $150 million for these events through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of July 2025, which passed with only Republican support. Most of that funding has gone to Freedom 250, rather than America250, the bipartisan group originally created for the anniversary.

House Democrats have accused Freedom 250 and the Trump administration of “hijacking” the milestone for political and financial gain. Critics also allege that Freedom 250 has whitewashed American history and politicized the celebrations, with events ranging from a state fair with uneven state representation to a predominantly conservative Christian prayer event.

Transparency and Accountability Questions

A recent 55-page report from House Democrats accuses Freedom 250 of opaque and deceptive fundraising practices, raising concerns about potential wire fraud and the funneling of public funds to entities with ties to the Trump administration. Freedom 250 has denied these allegations, calling the report a “partisan smear,” and claims it “stepped in to rescue our nation’s 250th birthday from years of wasted time, wasted money, and failed planning.” However, the group has not disclosed how much money it has raised or the identities of its donors, despite listing major corporate sponsors on its website.

Merkley questioned why the additional $10 million is not being sourced from private donations, as originally promised by the administration, and demanded answers about what has gone wrong with the funding plan.

Trump Administration’s Claims and Fact-Checking

The Trump administration has justified the request by citing the need for an “elevated security posture” due to increased threats at high-profile events in Washington, D.C. It referenced incidents such as the White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting and vandalism at monuments. Notably, the administration has repeatedly, without evidence, blamed vandals for damaging the new $14 million lining of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, even though only one person has been charged and the pool was drained after the July Fourth fireworks due to unrelated issues.

Conclusion

The Trump administration’s push for more taxpayer funding for the Semiquincentennial events has intensified scrutiny over its management of public funds and the transparency of Freedom 250. With ongoing questions about fundraising, event costs, and the politicization of America’s 250th birthday, lawmakers are demanding greater accountability as more anniversary programming is planned for the coming months.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/07/30/nx-s1-5913172/freedom-250-july-fourth-10-million

FCC chair Brendan Carr on Trump, free speech and his threats against broadcasters

Politics — 2026-07-30 22:59:00 — www.politico.com

In March 2026, President Donald Trump endorsed Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr’s warning to broadcasters, stating that media organizations are “Corrupt and Highly Unpatriotic.” Trump criticized these outlets for using “Billions of Dollars of FREE American Airwaves” to “perpetuate LIES” in their news coverage and programming. (washingtonpost.com)

Trump’s remarks were in response to Carr’s threat to revoke broadcast licenses over news coverage of the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran. Carr accused broadcasters of running “hoaxes and news distortions” related to the conflict and warned them to “correct course before their license renewals come up.” (arstechnica.com)

Critics argue that these threats are an attempt to pressure media outlets into aligning their coverage with the administration’s views, raising concerns about press freedom and potential government overreach. (pbs.org)

The administration’s actions have been described as “flagrantly anti First Amendment,” with civil rights advocates stating that the threats “rest on no statutory authority and no legitimate government interest.” (the-independent.com)

In conclusion, President Trump’s endorsement of FCC Chairman Carr’s threats against broadcasters underscores a contentious relationship with the media, highlighting ongoing debates over free speech and the role of government in regulating news coverage.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/video/2026/07/30/fcc-chair-brendan-carr-on-trump-free-speech-and-his-threats-against-broadcasters-2124559

Trump announces deal for Hamas to disarm; Israel ‘skeptical’

Administration News — 2026-07-30 18:32:00 — thehill.com

Trump Announces Deal for Hamas Disarmament in Gaza, Citing “Critical Step” Toward New Palestinian Government

President Trump on Thursday evening announced a deal for Hamas to disarm in “carefully structured phases,” a move he described as a “critical step towards Gaza finally being governed by a new Palestinian government that will work closely” with partners in the region. According to Trump, if the agreement is carried out as outlined, it would address one of the main sticking points for a broader peace deal in Gaza.

Trump’s Statement and Its Implications

Trump’s announcement centers on the phased disarmament of Hamas, a longstanding demand in efforts to resolve the conflict in Gaza. By framing the agreement as a pivotal moment for Palestinian governance, Trump positions the deal as a breakthrough in Middle East peace efforts. He asserts that the agreement will pave the way for a new Palestinian government, suggesting a significant shift in the region’s political landscape.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Within the excerpt, Trump claims the agreement is a “critical step” and implies that it will lead to Gaza being governed by a new Palestinian authority. While the announcement of a phased disarmament is notable, the effectiveness and enforceability of such agreements have historically faced significant challenges. The excerpt does not provide details on verification mechanisms or the response from Hamas or other regional actors, which are crucial for assessing the likelihood of success.

Context and Record

Trump’s statement reflects his ongoing approach to high-profile international negotiations, often emphasizing breakthrough moments and transformative potential. However, past announcements regarding Middle East peace have sometimes been met with skepticism due to a lack of follow-through or on-the-ground changes. The excerpt does not cite any false claims or disparagements made by Trump in this instance, but it highlights his tendency to frame developments in the most favorable terms.

Conclusion

President Trump’s announcement of a phased disarmament deal with Hamas marks a significant development in the ongoing efforts to achieve peace in Gaza. While he describes the agreement as a “critical step” toward new Palestinian governance, the success of such initiatives will depend on implementation and cooperation from all parties involved. As with previous statements, Trump’s optimistic framing should be weighed against the complexities of the region and the challenges of enforcing such agreements.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6001151-trump-announces-deal-for-hamas-to-disarm-israel-skeptical/

Trump’s attorney general pick hits resistance from Republicans : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-07-30 15:30:00 — www.npr.org

Trump Threatens to Withdraw Attorney General Nominee Over Tax Immunity Deal Dispute

President Trump has signaled he is willing to temporarily withdraw Todd Blanche’s nomination for attorney general, amid mounting resistance from key Senate Republicans over a controversial Justice Department settlement tied to Trump’s own tax returns.

Trump’s Position and Attacks on GOP Senators

Trump took to social media to praise Blanche, calling him “a star,” while also attacking Senators John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina. Trump claimed he refused to endorse either senator and suggested their political careers may have ended as a result. Notably, Trump endorsed Cornyn’s primary challenger, a move that contributed to Cornyn’s decision to leave Congress at the end of the year. Tillis is also retiring.

Trump further stated that if Cornyn and Tillis do not drop their opposition, he could withdraw Blanche’s nomination now and simply resubmit it after both senators leave office at the end of the year.

The Controversial Settlement

At the heart of the dispute is a Justice Department agreement that ended Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS over leaked tax returns. The deal included a sweeping immunity provision shielding Trump, his family, and his businesses from audits of past tax returns—a benefit, as Senator Cornyn pointed out, “no other taxpayer could possibly get.” Cornyn and Tillis are demanding written guarantees about the scope of this immunity, but say they have not received the assurances they seek.

Trump’s Refusal to Provide Assurances

According to reporting, Trump would rather withdraw Blanche’s nomination than provide the requested assurances about the tax immunity deal, which directly benefits him and his family. This has led to a standoff, with the Senate Judiciary Committee postponing a planned vote on Blanche’s nomination.

Conclusion

Trump’s willingness to pull a key Justice Department nomination to protect an extraordinary tax immunity deal for himself and his family has deepened divisions within the Republican Party and raised serious questions about the use of presidential power for personal benefit. As the standoff continues, Blanche remains acting attorney general, but the controversy over Trump’s settlement and his attacks on fellow Republicans show no signs of abating.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/07/30/nx-s1-5913714/trumps-attorney-general-pick-hits-resistance-from-republicans

Donald J. Trump: “RT @realDonaldTrumpToday, the Board of Peace reached a HISTORIC agreement fo…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-30 18:13:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Declares “Historic” Disarmament of Hamas, Claims Major Breakthrough in Gaza

President Donald Trump announced what he called a “HISTORIC agreement for the COMPLETE DISARMAMENT of Hamas and all other armed groups in Gaza,” describing it as a “monumental step toward lasting PEACE and SECURITY.” According to Trump, this agreement marks a critical milestone in the implementation of his “Trump 20-Point Plan” and sets the stage for Gaza to be governed by a new Palestinian government working closely with the so-called Board of Peace.

Trump’s Claims of Progress

Trump asserted that “one year ago there was a violent raging war, humanitarian crisis and hostages kept in brutal captivity,” but now, “we have made historic progress and there is still much work to do.” He credited the agreement with ensuring that “Israel will have the security it deserves, with Gaza no longer used as a base for terror attacks.” Trump also thanked mediators Egypt, Qatar, and Türkiye, as well as his own team, for making what he called a “historic breakthrough” possible.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Statements

Trump’s statement frames the agreement as a sweeping and unprecedented achievement, repeatedly using terms like “historic,” “monumental,” and “amazing development.” He claims that “the threat that emerged from Gaza on October 7 will NOT be allowed to rebuild,” and that Gaza will “finally be in the hands of a new Palestinian government that serves its PEOPLE.”

However, Trump’s remarks exaggerate the certainty and finality of the agreement’s outcomes. The assertion of “COMPLETE DISARMAMENT” of Hamas and all armed groups is presented as an accomplished fact, though such disarmament in Gaza has historically proven to be an extremely complex and contentious process. Trump’s language suggests total resolution, but the excerpt itself notes that the agreement “will be carried out in carefully structured phases,” and that “there is still much work to do.” This undercuts the claim of immediate, comprehensive success.

Exaggeration and Political Framing

Trump’s statement also positions the agreement as a vindication of his “Trump 20-Point Plan,” and as something “EVERYBODY SAID COULD NEVER BE ACHIEVED.” This framing amplifies his own role and the uniqueness of the development, despite the fact that international mediation and phased disarmament efforts have been attempted in the region before, often with limited or temporary success.

Conclusion

President Trump’s announcement of a “historic agreement” for the disarmament of Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza is marked by sweeping language and bold claims of success. While the agreement represents a significant diplomatic development, Trump’s statements exaggerate the certainty and completeness of the outcome, glossing over the ongoing challenges and phased nature of the process. As with many of Trump’s public pronouncements, the rhetoric outpaces the documented facts, leaving important questions about implementation and long-term stability unanswered.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40398