Home Blog

Trump bashes Greene, Massie after meeting with Tucker Carlson

Trump bashes Greene, Massie after meeting with Tucker Carlson

Administration News — 2026-08-22 12:33:00 — thehill.com

President Trump Responds Forcefully to GOP Criticism Over Tariff Decision

President Trump hit back again on Friday evening at GOP criticism of his administration’s decision to lift certain tariffs on imported ground beef. The president expressed anger over a meeting between conservative podcaster Tucker Carlson and two Republicans that have critiqued this new policy, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and former Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Trump’s Reaction to GOP Dissent

Trump’s response underscores his frustration with members of his own party who have publicly questioned the administration’s move to ease restrictions on imported ground beef. By expressing anger over the meeting between Carlson, Massie, and Greene, Trump signaled his disapproval of internal GOP opposition and sought to reassert his authority over the party’s economic agenda.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Record

While the excerpt does not provide a direct quote or specific false claim from Trump regarding the tariff policy, it clearly attributes his anger and response to the criticism from fellow Republicans. This reaction fits a pattern in which Trump has often dismissed or attacked dissent within his party, framing opposition as disloyalty or obstruction to his administration’s goals.

Conclusion

President Trump’s forceful pushback against GOP critics of his tariff decision highlights ongoing divisions within the party over trade policy. His expressed anger at the meeting between Carlson, Massie, and Greene demonstrates his intolerance for intra-party dissent and his determination to defend his administration’s economic decisions. As the debate over tariffs continues, Trump’s confrontational approach remains a defining feature of his leadership style.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6045142-trump-insults-republicans-over-beef/

Ed Martin leaving Justice Dept. after tumultuous tenure that alienated colleagues

Ed Martin leaving Justice Dept. after tumultuous tenure that alienated colleagues

Politics — 2026-08-21 15:57:00 — www.washingtonpost.com

President Trump Announces Departure of Justice Department Official Ed Martin After Turbulent Tenure

President Donald Trump announced in a social media post Friday that Justice Department official Ed Martin, a staunch ally of the president, is leaving his post following a turbulent tenure. Martin, who clashed with other Trump officials over his undisciplined handling of investigations, became a controversial figure within the administration.

Trump’s announcement comes after a period marked by internal conflict and scrutiny over Martin’s approach to sensitive Justice Department matters. The president’s decision to publicize Martin’s departure highlights ongoing tensions within his administration regarding the management of high-profile investigations.

While Trump did not elaborate on the reasons for Martin’s exit in his social media post, the move follows reports of repeated clashes between Martin and other officials, raising questions about the administration’s oversight and discipline in handling critical legal matters.

The president’s handling of the situation underscores his willingness to publicly address internal disputes, even as critics point to a pattern of discord and instability among his appointees. Trump’s announcement serves as the latest example of his administration’s challenges in maintaining cohesion among top officials.

In summary, President Trump’s public acknowledgment of Ed Martin’s departure after a contentious period reflects ongoing struggles within the Justice Department under his leadership. The episode adds to the record of internal disputes that have characterized Trump’s approach to managing his administration, leaving observers to question the long-term impact on the department’s credibility and effectiveness.

Source article

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/08/21/ed-martin-leaving-justice-dept-after-tumultuous-tenure-that-alienated-colleagues/

Tremendous work has been done on the magnificent BALLROOM/MILITARY COMPLEX being built on the grounds of the White House! Presidents have wanted this for 150 years, and so has everyone else. It will give the White House, and all of D.C., Great National Security. The Project is under budget, and ahead of schedule! The Ballroom will be paid for with ZERO Dollars of Taxpayer Money. Great American Patriots and Companies are footing the entire bill. President DONALD J. TRUMP

Tremendous work has been done on the magnificent BALLROOM/MILITARY COMPLEX being built on the grounds of the White House! Presidents have wanted this for 150 years, and so has everyone else. It will give the White House, and all of D.C., Great National Security. The Project is under budget, and ahead of schedule! The Ballroom will be paid for with ZERO Dollars of Taxpayer Money. Great American Patriots and Companies are footing the entire bill. President DONALD J. TRUMP

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-22 08:32:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Claims White House Ballroom Project Is Historic, Cost-Free, and Under Budget: Fact-Check

President Donald J. Trump has made a series of sweeping claims about a “magnificent BALLROOM/MILITARY COMPLEX” reportedly being built on the grounds of the White House. In his statement, Trump asserts, “Tremendous work has been done on the magnificent BALLROOM/MILITARY COMPLEX being built on the grounds of the White House! Presidents have wanted this for 150 years, and so has everyone else. It will give the White House, and all of D.C., Great National Security. The Project is under budget, and ahead of schedule! The Ballroom will be paid for with ZERO Dollars of Taxpayer Money. Great American Patriots and Companies are footing the entire bill.”

Claims of Historic Demand and National Security

Trump claims that “Presidents have wanted this for 150 years, and so has everyone else.” This assertion suggests a long-standing, universal desire for such a project at the White House. However, the statement lacks supporting evidence within the excerpt and appears to exaggerate the historical demand for a ballroom or military complex on the White House grounds.

He further states that the new facility “will give the White House, and all of D.C., Great National Security.” While any new government facility could potentially have security implications, the excerpt does not provide details or justification for how a ballroom would enhance national security for Washington, D.C.

Financial Claims: No Taxpayer Dollars

Trump insists, “The Ballroom will be paid for with ZERO Dollars of Taxpayer Money. Great American Patriots and Companies are footing the entire bill.” This claim is notable for its absolute language, promising that not a single taxpayer dollar will be used. The excerpt does not provide documentation or evidence to support this funding arrangement, nor does it identify the “Great American Patriots and Companies” involved.

Project Status: Under Budget and Ahead of Schedule

According to Trump, “The Project is under budget, and ahead of schedule!” This is a common refrain in his public statements about construction projects. However, the excerpt does not include independent verification or specific details about the project’s budget or timeline.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statements about the White House ballroom and military complex project are marked by grandiose claims and sweeping assurances. He asserts historic demand, national security benefits, private funding, and efficient progress—all without providing supporting evidence within the excerpt. These statements continue a pattern of exaggeration and unverified claims that have characterized many of Trump’s public pronouncements. Readers should approach these assertions with caution and seek independent verification before accepting them as fact.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41119

Today we brought another American home! Kevin Rideout, a brave Christian missionary, was held hostage by ISIS Jihadists for ten months! We never leave Americans behind, unlike Sleepy Joe and Obama, because we are America First. Today I invited Kevin, his lovely wife, father and beautiful children, to the White House to see the Oval Office, and meet our dedicated hostage recovery team. Welcome back home Kevin — It was an Honor to help you! President DONALD J. TRUMP

Today we brought another American home! Kevin Rideout, a brave Christian missionary, was held hostage by ISIS Jihadists for ten months! We never leave Americans behind, unlike Sleepy Joe and Obama, because we are America First. Today I invited Kevin, his lovely wife, father and beautiful children, to the White House to see the Oval Office, and meet our dedicated hostage recovery team. Welcome back home Kevin — It was an Honor to help you! President DONALD J. TRUMP

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-21 21:15:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Claims “We Never Leave Americans Behind,” Attacks Predecessors in Hostage Recovery Boast

President Donald J. Trump declared, “We never leave Americans behind, unlike Sleepy Joe and Obama, because we are America First,” while announcing the return of Kevin Rideout, described as a Christian missionary held hostage by ISIS for ten months. Trump said he invited Rideout and his family to the White House to meet the Oval Office and the hostage recovery team, calling it “an Honor to help you!”

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s statement that “we never leave Americans behind, unlike Sleepy Joe and Obama,” is a direct attack on his predecessors, specifically Joe Biden and Barack Obama. This assertion is misleading. The United States has a longstanding policy of attempting to recover American hostages, regardless of administration. While there have been high-profile cases where Americans were not immediately rescued, these situations have occurred under multiple presidents, including Trump himself.

The claim also exaggerates Trump’s own record. During his time in office, not all American hostages were successfully brought home, and some cases remained unresolved. The implication that previous administrations routinely abandoned Americans is not supported by the historical record.

Disparagement of Political Opponents

By referring to Joe Biden as “Sleepy Joe” and contrasting his own actions with those of Biden and Obama, Trump continues his pattern of using disparaging nicknames and personal attacks against political rivals. This rhetorical strategy is a hallmark of Trump’s public communications but does not accurately reflect the complexities of hostage recovery efforts by past administrations.

The Broader Context

Trump’s statement highlights his “America First” approach and frames his administration as uniquely effective in bringing Americans home. However, the facts show that hostage recovery is a bipartisan effort, and no administration has a perfect record. The suggestion that Trump’s predecessors were less committed to recovering Americans is not substantiated by evidence.

Conclusion

President Trump’s announcement of Kevin Rideout’s release was accompanied by claims that exaggerate his administration’s record and disparage his political opponents. While celebrating the safe return of an American is warranted, Trump’s assertion that “we never leave Americans behind, unlike Sleepy Joe and Obama,” distorts the reality of U.S. hostage recovery efforts. Readers should be aware that such statements often serve to promote a political narrative rather than provide an accurate account of history.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41117

Persuasion, denial and bluster: Trump ‘stuck’ on Iran war ahead of elections | US midterm elections 2026

Persuasion, denial and bluster: Trump ‘stuck’ on Iran war ahead of elections | US midterm elections 2026

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-08-22 04:00:00 — www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump Downplays War’s Economic Toll, Issues Threats Amid Mounting Criticism

As the conflict with Iran drags on and public support wanes, Donald Trump has adopted a pattern of minimizing the war’s economic impact, issuing threats, and making sweeping declarations that have drawn both domestic and international scrutiny.

During a recent appearance at the Nassau County Police Academy in New York, Trump downplayed the effect of the war on rising fuel prices, telling Americans, “Remember that, when you have to pay a little bit more, you’re at $4, it’s OK,” and justifying the increase as necessary to prevent “an evil country” from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

In a Fox News interview, Trump escalated his rhetoric, threatening to “bomb the shit out of” Oman if it “gets in the way” of U.S. efforts to end the conflict with Iran. On social media, he declared the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz a “new US territory”—a claim that was met with mockery in Iran and has no basis in international law.

Recently, Trump has also threatened to unleash “Economic Warfare and Isolation on an unprecedented scale” against Iran, but has offered few specifics, instead vaguely warning that any country providing “any type of lifeline” to Tehran would also face consequences.

Analysts say these fluctuating responses reveal Trump’s frustration and lack of viable options as the war’s unpopularity grows and economic pressures mount. With the ceasefire agreement collapsed and Iran maintaining control over the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices have surged, fueling inflation and raising living costs in the U.S.—a scenario that polling shows is hurting Trump and his party ahead of the midterm elections.

Trump’s approach has been characterized by a mix of half-hearted persuasion, denial, and threatening bluster, with his rationale for the war widely questioned. As the situation deteriorates, Trump faces increasing pressure both at home and abroad, with analysts warning that his inability to change course could have significant political consequences.

As November’s midterms approach, Trump’s record of downplaying economic hardship, issuing threats, and making exaggerated claims is under intense scrutiny, raising questions about his leadership and the future direction of U.S. policy in the region.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/aug/22/trump-iran-war-midterm-elections

With Midterms Approaching, Trump Implores Republicans: Pretend I’m on the Ballot!

With Midterms Approaching, Trump Implores Republicans: Pretend I’m on the Ballot!

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-22 02:12:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Rallies Supporters with Familiar Rhetoric and Attacks

Donald Trump entertained a crowd of Republicans on Friday night, using a mix of humor, attacks on the media, and references to past political controversies to energize his audience. Throughout the event, Trump relied on familiar tactics, including disparaging opponents and invoking divisive themes.

Targeting the Media and Political Opponents

During his appearance, Trump pointedly blamed the news media present in the room, prompting hisses from the crowd. He also reminded attendees of Hillary Clinton’s past remark about some of his supporters being “deplorable,” which led to boos from the audience. These moments highlight Trump’s ongoing strategy of rallying his base by attacking perceived adversaries and revisiting contentious moments from previous campaigns.

Theatrics and Cultural References

Trump kept the crowd engaged with theatrical flair, joking that his wife does not appreciate his dancing to what he called “the gay national anthem,” a theme song he has adopted for his events. He also asked the audience if they wanted to hear “The Snake,” an anti-immigration poem he has recited at rallies for years. “Look, it’s a Friday night, we have plenty of time, right? What the hell do I have to do, go back, bomb Iran a little bit more?” Trump quipped, blending humor with references to foreign policy.

Energizing the Base

Trump’s performance underscored his ability to command a room full of supporters, eliciting laughter, applause, and boos on cue. As he left the stage, he wished a supporter “Good luck, Darline,” while the Village People’s music played, capping off an evening designed to energize his base ahead of upcoming political contests.

Conclusion

Trump’s rally demonstrated his continued reliance on divisive rhetoric, attacks on the media, and theatrical performances to maintain support among Republican voters. By invoking past controversies and targeting opponents, he seeks to keep his base engaged and motivated, even as questions remain about whether these tactics will translate into votes at the ballot box.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/21/us/politics/trump-darline-graham-south-carolina.html

‘I’m on the ballot’: Trump lends a hand to struggling Darline Graham

‘I’m on the ballot’: Trump lends a hand to struggling Darline Graham

Politics — 2026-08-21 19:36:00 — www.politico.com

Trump Rallies for Darline Graham, Downplays National Security Concerns and Urges Voters to Treat Her as His Stand-In

President Donald Trump returned to the campaign trail in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, on Friday, aiming to bolster Sen. Darline Graham’s candidacy after a debate misstep raised doubts about her readiness to replace her late brother, Lindsey Graham. Speaking days before a crucial Senate runoff, Trump called on voters to back Darline Graham, positioning her as a champion for South Carolina and a steadfast supporter of his agenda.

“We’re going to elect Senator Darline Graham to fight, fight, fight for South Carolina and to always put America first,” Trump said at the rally. “You vote for her, you’re going to be very proud of that vote.” He also invoked his close relationship with the late Lindsey Graham, stating, “I think Lindsey respected Darline more than any other person he knows, including me.”

Despite recent setbacks for Trump-endorsed candidates in several states—including South Carolina, Wyoming, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, and Iowa—Trump continued to tout the value of his endorsement. He urged South Carolina Republicans to view the Senate race as a referendum on himself, telling the crowd, “What I really want you to do is pretend, please, that I’m on the ballot. Just come and vote. It’s so important. Just say that I’m on the ballot one more time.”

The rally came after Darline Graham admitted during a debate that she was “not that informed on national security” and that “national security is not my thing,” sparking criticism from within her own party. Trump, however, dismissed concerns about her qualifications, telling reporters, “She was just being honest. It hasn’t been her thing, but she’s surrounded by very good people, and she said that she’s totally for the military.” He added, “She’s going to do what the military wants, and really what the president wants. She understands that national security is my thing.”

Trump also addressed the broader stakes of the midterm elections, warning that a Democratic victory could lead to investigations and impeachment proceedings against him. “You’re going to lose everything,” he said. “I’m going to have to go through impeachment.”

The president’s appearance in South Carolina marks a rare in-person rally for a Senate candidate in a battleground state, as he has mostly relied on social media and remote events elsewhere. Trump also stated he would spend “a lot of that money” from his $403 million super PAC war chest to support Republican candidates he deems worthy, though he did not specify which races.

Conclusion

Trump’s rally for Darline Graham underscores his strategy of tying candidates’ fortunes to his own brand, even as his endorsement faces diminishing returns after a string of primary losses. By downplaying concerns about Graham’s national security knowledge and urging voters to treat her as a proxy for himself, Trump continues to prioritize loyalty to his agenda over traditional qualifications. As the midterms approach, his rhetoric signals a campaign focused on personal stakes and party control, with the specter of impeachment looming large in his appeals to Republican voters.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/21/ballot-trump-darline-graham-01046646

U.S. imposes 50% tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian products : NPR

U.S. imposes 50% tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian products : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-08-21 23:36:00 — www.npr.org

President Donald Trump’s decision to impose 50% tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian products has triggered a swift and escalating trade conflict with the United States’ closest ally. Trump’s import taxes, which impact about 5% of Canada’s annual exports to the U.S., are part of his ongoing push to bring manufacturing back to the United States. This move comes after last-minute negotiations failed, with both sides blaming each other for the collapse of talks.

Trump’s approach to Canada represents a stark departure from decades of cooperation between the two countries. According to the excerpt, Trump has repeatedly made inflammatory comments about turning Canada into America’s 51st state, further straining relations. The tariffs, which cover goods from hockey sticks to tongue depressors, follow earlier duties imposed by Trump on Canadian steel, aluminum, autos, and lumber.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney responded by pledging to match the U.S. tariffs dollar for dollar, calling the last-minute changes in U.S. terms “unfair, uneconomic, and [calling] into question the reliability of any deal.” The Canadian public’s frustration is evident, with a petition to expel the U.S. ambassador—described as a Trump ally—gathering nearly 248,000 signatures, in part for “normalizing” Trump’s talk of annexing Canada.

The economic consequences are significant, but the political fallout may be even greater. Trump’s actions have cast doubt on the future of the North American trade pact between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, a deal he once praised as a triumph. The excerpt also notes that the Trump administration might be wary of the political risks of higher tariffs ahead of the November midterm elections, as American voters are already frustrated with the high cost of living.

Trump’s repeated exaggerations and provocative statements about Canada, combined with his administration’s hardline trade stance, have led to a breakdown in trust and cooperation. As both countries dig in, the prospect of a quick resolution appears increasingly remote, threatening not only economic stability but also the longstanding partnership between the United States and Canada.

In summary, President Trump’s tariffs and rhetoric have pushed U.S.-Canada relations to a breaking point, with both sides now entrenched in a public and economic standoff that could have lasting consequences for North America.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/08/22/nx-s1-5941584/us-canada-tariffs

Trump, his clout on the line, stumps for Graham in South Carolina

Trump, his clout on the line, stumps for Graham in South Carolina

Politics — 2026-08-21 18:50:00 — www.washingtonpost.com

Donald Trump Seeks to Reassert Influence Amid Setbacks in South Carolina

President Donald Trump traveled to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, on Friday night to support Darline Graham’s Senate campaign, aiming to provide her campaign with a boost and secure a much-needed victory for himself. This appearance comes at a critical time for Trump, as a series of primary-season defeats have eroded one of his most significant political assets: his reputation as the Republican Party’s kingmaker.

Trump’s visit underscores his ongoing efforts to maintain his standing within the GOP, especially as recent losses have raised questions about his influence over the party’s direction and its candidates. The string of setbacks has directly challenged the narrative that Trump’s endorsement is a decisive factor in Republican primaries.

While Trump’s reputation as a kingmaker has been a cornerstone of his political identity, the recent electoral outcomes suggest that his grip on the party may be loosening. This shift is particularly notable given how central his endorsements have been to Republican campaigns in recent years.

The situation in South Carolina highlights the stakes for Trump as he seeks to demonstrate that he can still sway key races and shape the party’s future. The outcome of Graham’s Senate campaign, with Trump’s backing, will serve as a test of whether he can reclaim his status as the GOP’s most influential figure.

In conclusion, President Trump’s appearance in Myrtle Beach is more than just a campaign stop—it is a strategic effort to reassert his authority within the Republican Party at a time when his role as kingmaker is under scrutiny. The results of this and other races will determine whether Trump can restore his reputation or if the party is moving beyond his influence.

Source article

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/08/21/trump-heads-south-carolina-campaign-darline-graham/

Donald J. Trump: “Tucker Carlson just met with Lightweight “Former” Congressman, Thomas Massie…

Donald J. Trump: “Tucker Carlson just met with Lightweight “Former” Congressman, Thomas Massie…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-21 21:37:00 — trumpstruth.org

Donald Trump Launches String of Personal Attacks and Disparagements Against Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Thomas Massie

In a recent public statement, Donald Trump unleashed a barrage of personal attacks and disparaging remarks targeting Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Thomas Massie. Trump labeled Carlson as a “Lightweight” and “a very Low I.Q. individual,” claiming that “Tucker’s ‘Views’ have fallen through the floor, and will only get worse.” He further questioned Carlson’s academic credentials, suggesting, “He could barely get out of College, and maybe he didn’t, but only really dumb people can’t make it through that wonderful four year time in life!” Trump also asserted, without evidence, that Carlson “wants to run for political office, but he should be required to take a cognitive test,” and declared, “Tucker is a loser, and always has been!”

Turning his attention to Marjorie Taylor Greene, whom he mockingly referred to as “Marjorie Taylor Brown,” Trump described her as “a highly neurotic young woman” and accused her of shifting from “Ultra Conservative to a Liberal ‘Fool,’ all in a matter of weeks, because I refused to return her phone calls.” Trump claimed that Greene “was way down in the Polls in Georgia (because I took away my Endorsement), and would have had no chance at winning, so she, just like everyone else, ‘QUIT!’”

Trump also disparaged Thomas Massie, calling him “a failed politician, and a real JERK,” and criticized Massie’s legislative record by stating, “He thought it was really wonderful to vote, ‘NO,’ on everything, no matter how good, strong, or proper the Legislation would be.”

Throughout his statement, Trump repeatedly used derogatory language and made a series of unsubstantiated claims about the individuals’ intelligence, political prospects, and motivations. He concluded with a sweeping insult, suggesting the only chance for the trio “is to join the Radical Left Dumocrats, and try breaking into the Primary System,” and ended with, “To all of them I say, PRAISE BE TO ALLAH! President DONALD J. TRUMP.”

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s remarks are notable for their personal nature and lack of substantiation. His assertion that Tucker Carlson is “totally irrelevant” and “could barely get out of College” is not supported by any evidence; Carlson graduated from Trinity College in Connecticut. The claim that Marjorie Taylor Greene “would have had no chance at winning” without Trump’s endorsement is contradicted by Greene’s continued prominence in Georgia politics and her ability to win elections. Trump’s characterization of Thomas Massie as a “failed politician” also ignores Massie’s repeated electoral successes and his ongoing role in Congress.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s latest statement is marked by a series of personal attacks, exaggerations, and unsubstantiated claims directed at Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Thomas Massie. The remarks highlight Trump’s ongoing use of inflammatory rhetoric and his willingness to disparage former allies and political figures. As with previous statements, many of Trump’s assertions do not withstand factual scrutiny, underscoring the importance of critical evaluation of his public comments.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41118