Donald J. Trump: “RT @realDonaldTrumpWe’re going to bring this heroic young man, and his famil…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-28 12:30:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Promises High Civilian Honor for Heroic Young Man in White House Ceremony

President Donald J. Trump announced on July 28, 2026, that he intends to bring a “heroic young man, and his family, into the White House with, perhaps, the boy he saved, to give him a High Civilian Honor.” Trump praised the individual as “very brave” and declared, “he deserves it!”

Public Recognition for Heroism

In his public statement, Trump highlighted the bravery of a young man who reportedly saved another boy, suggesting both would be honored at the White House. The president’s message emphasized the significance of civilian acts of courage and his willingness to use the platform of the presidency to recognize such deeds.

No Evidence of False Claims or Disparagement

The statement from Trump, as presented, does not contain any apparent false claims, exaggerations, or attacks on others. Instead, it focuses on commending the actions of a private citizen and promising public recognition. There are no fact-checkable misstatements or contradictions within the excerpt.

Conclusion

President Trump’s announcement underscores his intent to celebrate acts of heroism by private citizens with high-profile recognition. While his statement is notable for its praise and promise of a White House ceremony, it does not include any of the false or disparaging remarks that have characterized some of his previous public communications. The focus remains on honoring bravery and bringing positive attention to civilian acts of courage.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40383

Trump to meet with Ukraine's Zelenskyy and Israel's Netanyahu

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-07-28 05:35:00 — www.npr.org

President Trump Announces High-Profile Meetings with Zelenskyy and Netanyahu, Signaling Major Foreign Policy Moves

President Trump has stated that he will meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday, setting the stage for what he describes as a significant day in foreign policy. This announcement places Trump at the center of two of the world’s most closely watched conflicts, as both Ukraine and Israel face ongoing crises.

Trump’s declaration of these meetings underscores his continued engagement with international leaders and signals his intention to play a prominent role in shaping U.S. foreign policy discussions. While the details of the agenda remain unclear, Trump’s move to publicize the meetings highlights his strategy of high-profile diplomacy.

As with previous statements, it is important to scrutinize the context and implications of Trump’s foreign policy announcements. His approach often involves bold claims and headline-grabbing gestures, which can sometimes outpace the substantive outcomes of such meetings. Observers will be watching closely to see whether these discussions lead to concrete policy shifts or serve primarily as opportunities for Trump to project influence on the global stage.

In summary, President Trump’s announcement of back-to-back meetings with President Zelenskyy and Prime Minister Netanyahu marks a notable moment in his foreign policy activity. As these meetings unfold, the public and policymakers alike will be looking for clarity on Trump’s positions and the tangible results of his diplomatic efforts.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/07/28/nx-s1-5909329/trump-to-meet-with-ukraines-zelenskyy-and-israels-netanyahu

Donald J. Trump: “RT @realDonaldTrumpBREAKING NEWS: The Failing New York Times, after 10 years…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-27 18:47:00 — trumpstruth.org

Donald Trump Attacks The New York Times, Vows to Continue Defamation Lawsuit

Donald Trump has once again taken aim at The New York Times, claiming the publication has engaged in “10 years of harassment, slander, and libel.” In a statement, Trump asserted that The Times “just failed again in their desperate attempt to have our powerful Defamation Lawsuit against them dropped.” He further stated that, as requested, a judge has called for an updated complaint, which Trump says will “lay out, in extreme detail, all the ways in which The Times has repeatedly and consistently acted, with actual malice in defaming me, my family, our Great MAGA Movement, and America, itself.”

Trump’s Ongoing Claims of Media Bias

Trump’s remarks continue his longstanding pattern of attacking major media outlets, particularly those that have published critical coverage of him or his associates. In his statement, he accused The Times and its “comrades” in the mainstream media of “publishing, promoting, and dealing in Fake News.” This rhetoric echoes Trump’s frequent use of the term “fake news” to discredit unfavorable reporting, a tactic he has employed throughout his political career.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Accusations

While Trump frames his lawsuit as a defense against “actual malice” and “defamation,” he has not provided specific evidence in this statement to substantiate his claims that The Times acted with malice or published knowingly false information. Legal experts note that for a defamation case to succeed, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with actual malice—meaning they knew the information was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Trump’s broad accusations against The Times and the media at large are consistent with his history of making sweeping, unsubstantiated claims about press coverage.

Conclusion: Trump’s Battle with the Press Continues

Trump’s latest statement underscores his ongoing conflict with The New York Times and the broader media landscape. By pledging to continue his defamation lawsuit and promising an updated complaint, Trump signals that he will persist in his efforts to challenge and discredit media organizations he views as adversarial. As this legal battle unfolds, it remains to be seen whether Trump’s claims will withstand judicial scrutiny or serve primarily as another chapter in his public campaign against the press.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40338

Graham to Be Honored at Funeral Services This Week. Here’s How to Watch.

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-07-28 04:03:00 — www.nytimes.com

Donald Trump Praises Lindsey Graham as “One of the Greatest” at Senator’s Funeral

In the wake of Senator Lindsey Graham’s death, Donald Trump has publicly praised the late senator, describing him as “one of the greatest people and Senators I have ever known,” and adding that Graham was “a natural — very few of them,” and that “he got along with everybody.” Trump’s remarks came as part of a series of tributes from political leaders and world figures ahead of Graham’s funeral services in Washington and South Carolina.

Trump is scheduled to lead the tributes to Graham at the Washington National Cathedral, according to the program released by organizers. The event will also feature remarks from Fox News host Sean Hannity and religious and conservative leaders.

Graham’s relationship with Trump was marked by a dramatic shift. During the 2016 presidential campaign, Graham was a vocal critic, calling Trump a “demagogue” and a “race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot.” However, after Trump took office, Graham became one of his closest allies in the Senate, eventually rising to lead influential committees and playing a key role in foreign policy matters.

Trump’s comments following Graham’s death reflect the senator’s transformation from opponent to confidant, and highlight the political alliances that shaped both men’s careers. As the nation mourns Graham, Trump’s words underscore the complicated legacy of a senator who navigated shifting political tides and ultimately became a central figure in Trump’s orbit.

The funeral services, which will be livestreamed, are expected to draw leaders from around the world, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Graham will be honored for his decades of service in Congress and his outspoken advocacy on foreign policy, particularly his support for Israel and Ukraine.

Trump’s tribute, while effusive, also serves as a reminder of the senator’s controversial journey from critic to ally—a journey that mirrored the broader realignments within the Republican Party during Trump’s presidency. As the ceremonies unfold, the spotlight remains on both Graham’s legacy and Trump’s ongoing influence within the party.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/28/us/politics/lindsey-graham-funeral-watch.html

Fauci, in Private Diary, Reflected on Covid’s Origins and His Own Fame

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-07-27 22:31:00 — www.nytimes.com

President Trump Promoted Lab Leak Theory Amid Early COVID-19 Uncertainty

In the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, President Trump promoted the theory that the coronavirus may have leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. This position became a focal point for some Republicans, who continued to push the lab leak hypothesis even as Democrats argued that Trump was attempting to blame China and distract from his administration’s shortcomings in managing the pandemic’s spread.

The debate over the virus’s origins intensified as new documents and diary entries from Dr. Anthony Fauci, then the government’s top infectious disease expert, were released. These records show Dr. Fauci grappling with evolving scientific opinions and uncertainty about the virus’s origins. While Dr. Fauci maintained openness to the possibility of a lab leak, he consistently stated his belief that the virus was natural in origin.

Despite the lack of consensus among scientists at the time, Trump’s early embrace of the lab leak theory set the stage for a prolonged political battle. When Trump returned to the White House in January 2025, his administration redirected the Covid.gov website to prominently declare, “LAB LEAK: The true origins of Covid-19.”

This episode highlights how President Trump’s public statements and positions on the origins of COVID-19 contributed to ongoing divisions over the pandemic response and the search for the virus’s source. The controversy underscores the lasting impact of presidential rhetoric on public debate and policy direction during a global crisis.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/27/us/politics/fauci-in-private-diary-reflected-on-covids-origins-and-his-own-fame.html

Senate faces packed, complicated agenda as midterms loom

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-27 17:40:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump’s Public Attacks on Senate GOP Leadership Highlight Deep Divisions in Republican Ranks

President Trump has once again taken aim at Senate Republican leadership, publicly criticizing Senate Republican leader John Thune. On TRUTH Social, Trump wrote, “I can’t believe how lucky the Democrats got with this Senate leadership,” a direct jab at Thune and his colleagues. This public airing of grievances is notable, as Thune has pushed back, telling reporters that if Trump wants votes for his agenda, “he needs to work the phones and try and get the votes.”

When asked about his relationship with Thune while on Air Force One, Trump shifted tone, saying, “It’s fine. It’s fine. He’s got to get his job done. It’s fine. I have a good relationship with John Thune. He’s just got to get his job done.” Despite this professed indifference, reporting indicates that Trump is aware he cannot secure the 60 votes needed for much of his agenda, in part because his own attacks have contributed to the end of some senators’ careers.

Trump’s Influence on the Republican Agenda

The Senate faces a packed agenda with little time before the midterm elections. Among the priorities are government funding, Iran war funding, reauthorization of FISA spy powers, the annual defense bill, a farm bill, and the elections bill known as the SAVE Act. According to reporting, Trump has made it clear that the SAVE Act must pass or he will not support anything else, positioning himself as a major obstacle to the Republican legislative agenda.

Conclusion

President Trump’s ongoing public criticism of Senate Republican leaders and his demands on legislative priorities continue to create friction within the party. As the Senate races to address a crowded agenda, Trump’s attacks and shifting positions threaten to further complicate efforts to achieve consensus, raising questions about how far he will go to assert his influence over the party’s direction.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/senate-faces-packed-complicated-agenda-as-midterms-loom

Trump Backs New Talks but It’s Unclear What He Hopes to Achieve This Time

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-07-27 19:21:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Claims Iran Requested Talks After U.S. Strikes—Tehran Quickly Denies

President Trump asserted Monday that there is “a good chance” renewed diplomacy with Iran could yield a breakthrough, but warned he would swiftly resume airstrikes if talks falter. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump claimed, “Iran took a beating over the last 14 days, and they asked us very nicely, ‘please stop, let’s meet.’” However, Iranian officials immediately denied making such a request or offering to negotiate in exchange for a pause in U.S. bombing.

Trump’s Assertions and Iran’s Response

Trump insisted that recent U.S. military pressure had forced Iran to the negotiating table, saying, “The only reason they want to meet is because we’ve been hitting them very hard.” Yet, Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, publicly rejected this narrative, stating that Tehran would only communicate with Washington through intermediaries, not directly or as a result of U.S. attacks.

Escalation and Contradictions

After a June cease-fire collapsed, Trump restored a naval blockade and resumed airstrikes, aiming to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to free navigation. While Trump described the cease-fire as reopening the strait, Iran interpreted the agreement as granting it new authority, leading to further conflict and a halt in most shipping. Oil prices surged above $100 per barrel as a result.

Trump also threatened to escalate attacks on Iranian infrastructure, including bridges and suspected nuclear facilities, but reversed course after U.S. officials warned of dwindling missile defenses. Despite this, Trump denied any shortage of munitions, stating, “We have a lot of ammunition,” but added, “I’d like to have more, to be honest, but so much was given to Ukraine.”

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s assertion that Iran requested talks due to U.S. military pressure is directly contradicted by Iranian officials. No evidence has been presented that Iran asked for negotiations as a result of the strikes, and Iran has maintained its refusal to negotiate directly with the U.S. Furthermore, Trump’s claim that the U.S. military is well-stocked with ammunition is at odds with internal warnings about depleted supplies.

Political and Regional Pressures

With the midterm elections approaching, Trump faces growing impatience from Republican leaders to resolve the conflict. Meanwhile, regional allies like Israel are pressing for continued military action, while Western European countries have signaled willingness to help patrol the Strait of Hormuz only if hostilities end.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statements regarding Iran’s willingness to negotiate and the impact of U.S. military actions are disputed by Iranian officials and contradicted by ongoing regional instability. As diplomatic and military strategies continue to shift, the accuracy of Trump’s claims remains in question, highlighting the complexities and risks of the current standoff in the Gulf.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/27/us/politics/trump-iran-talks-negotiations.html

Canada tariff fight hands Democrats cudgel in Michigan midterm races

Administration News — 2026-07-27 16:49:00 — thehill.com

President Trump Escalates Trade Tensions with Canada, Citing “Discriminatory” Practices

President Trump has intensified trade tensions between the United States and Canada by imposing an additional 50 percent tariff on Canadian goods, accusing the neighboring country of engaging in “discriminatory” trade practices. This move comes at a critical time, particularly for Michigan, a battleground state with some of the highest cross-border trade in the nation.

Trump’s decision to levy steep tariffs reflects his long-standing approach to international trade, often marked by aggressive rhetoric and sweeping accusations against U.S. trading partners. By labeling Canada’s trade practices as “discriminatory,” Trump has again positioned himself as a defender of American economic interests, even as such claims have repeatedly been challenged by trade experts and fact-checkers.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

The president’s assertion that Canada is engaging in “discriminatory” trade practices is a serious charge. However, the excerpt does not provide specific evidence or examples to substantiate this claim. Historically, Trump has made similar accusations against U.S. allies without offering detailed proof, and such statements have often been rated as misleading or lacking context by independent fact-checkers.

Impact on Key States

The imposition of new tariffs could have significant economic consequences, especially in Michigan, where cross-border trade with Canada is a vital part of the state’s economy. Trump’s actions and rhetoric are likely to become a focal point for Democratic messaging in the region, as they highlight the potential risks and disruptions caused by escalating trade disputes.

Conclusion

President Trump’s decision to impose a 50 percent tariff on Canada, accompanied by his accusation of “discriminatory” trade practices, underscores his combative approach to international trade. While the president frames these actions as necessary to protect American interests, the lack of supporting evidence for his claims raises questions about the accuracy and effectiveness of his strategy. As trade tensions rise, the economic and political fallout will be closely watched, particularly in states like Michigan that are directly affected by cross-border commerce.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5992967-trump-canada-tariffs-michigan-economy/

Trump Asks Supreme Court to Allow Order Restricting Mail Voting

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-07-27 16:25:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Pushes for Mail-In Voting Restrictions, Courts Cite False Claims and Constitutional Limits

President Trump has repeatedly criticized mail-in voting, seeking to impose restrictions through executive action and public statements. For years, Trump has made unfounded claims that mail-in voting enables widespread fraud, despite a lack of evidence supporting these assertions. His administration recently asked the Supreme Court to allow an executive order that would restrict voting by mail, after lower courts blocked key parts of the order.

Legal Showdown Over Executive Order

The executive order, signed by Trump in late March, aimed to limit mail-in voting by directing the Department of Homeland Security to create state-by-state citizen lists to determine voter eligibility and instructing the Postal Service to use these lists to decide who could vote by mail. More than 20 Democratic attorneys general challenged the order, arguing it violated the Constitution by giving the executive branch control over election functions typically regulated by Congress and the states.

Federal courts have consistently ruled against Trump’s efforts. Judge Indira Talwani, a federal district judge in Massachusetts, concluded that “the Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections.” A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld her decision, warning that Trump’s order could “sow confusion and threaten disenfranchisement of many eligible voters.”

False Claims About Mail-In Voting

Trump has repeatedly made baseless statements sowing doubt about the integrity of mail-in voting. The excerpt notes that he has claimed, without evidence, that mail-in voting allows widespread fraud. These claims have been widely debunked by election experts and rejected by the courts.

Supreme Court Skepticism

The Supreme Court has shown skepticism toward Trump’s efforts to restrict mail-in voting. In a recent decision, the justices upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within five business days, rejecting the Trump administration’s attempt to overturn the statute. After the decision, Trump posted on social media, calling the ruling a “tremendous loss” and urging Congress to pass legislation imposing new restrictions on mail-in ballots and requiring additional voter identification.

Conclusion

Trump’s ongoing campaign against mail-in voting is built on repeated falsehoods about voter fraud and has faced strong resistance from the courts, which have emphasized that the Constitution does not grant the president authority over election administration. As the legal battle continues, the judiciary’s rulings underscore the limits of executive power and the importance of evidence-based claims in shaping election policy.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/27/us/politics/supreme-court-trump-mail-ballots.html

[No Title] – Post from July 27, 2026

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-27 12:10:00 — trumpstruth.org

On July 26, 2026, President Donald Trump engaged in a prolific posting spree on Truth Social, sharing 43 posts within six hours during a visit to his Virginia golf club. (thedailybeast.com) The posts included AI-generated images and fake movie posters depicting Trump in exaggerated scenarios, such as a “Trump 2028” campaign and an AI-modified image of himself with John F. Kennedy. This activity follows his record-setting posting habits, including 861 posts in May and over 630 in July up to that point.

Among the posts were offensive and bizarre memes targeting figures like CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, musicians, and comedians. Notably, Trump teased a fourth presidential run by wearing a “Trump 2028” hat and sharing campaign-style images aligned with this theme. (thedailybeast.com)

This digital barrage coincides with reports of Trump behaving increasingly erratically amid growing domestic and international pressure over the ongoing Iran war. The conflict has resulted in high inflation and the deaths of 18 U.S. service members. Despite the constitutional two-term limit, Trump’s promotion of a 2028 campaign raises questions about his intentions and the potential impact on the political landscape.

Trump’s use of AI-generated content and offensive memes has drawn scrutiny from opponents and the media, while his supporters continue to celebrate his unfiltered messaging on Truth Social. The platform remains a central tool for Trump to shape political narratives and rally his base, even as his behavior and content choices prompt ongoing criticism.

Highlights:

• Donald Trump Goes On Wild Truth Social Posting Spree, Published on Sunday, July 26
• Trump Self Soothes With Bonkers AI Posting Spree, Published on Sunday, July 26
• Trump Warns About Imaginary Blue State ‘Ghettos’ in Truth Social Post, Published on Tuesday, July 21

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40308