[No Title] – Post from July 27, 2026

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-27 12:10:00 — trumpstruth.org

On July 26, 2026, President Donald Trump engaged in a prolific posting spree on Truth Social, sharing 43 posts within six hours during a visit to his Virginia golf club. (thedailybeast.com) The posts included AI-generated images and fake movie posters depicting Trump in exaggerated scenarios, such as a “Trump 2028” campaign and an AI-modified image of himself with John F. Kennedy. This activity follows his record-setting posting habits, including 861 posts in May and over 630 in July up to that point.

Among the posts were offensive and bizarre memes targeting figures like CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, musicians, and comedians. Notably, Trump teased a fourth presidential run by wearing a “Trump 2028” hat and sharing campaign-style images aligned with this theme. (thedailybeast.com)

This digital barrage coincides with reports of Trump behaving increasingly erratically amid growing domestic and international pressure over the ongoing Iran war. The conflict has resulted in high inflation and the deaths of 18 U.S. service members. Despite the constitutional two-term limit, Trump’s promotion of a 2028 campaign raises questions about his intentions and the potential impact on the political landscape.

Trump’s use of AI-generated content and offensive memes has drawn scrutiny from opponents and the media, while his supporters continue to celebrate his unfiltered messaging on Truth Social. The platform remains a central tool for Trump to shape political narratives and rally his base, even as his behavior and content choices prompt ongoing criticism.

Highlights:

• Donald Trump Goes On Wild Truth Social Posting Spree, Published on Sunday, July 26
• Trump Self Soothes With Bonkers AI Posting Spree, Published on Sunday, July 26
• Trump Warns About Imaginary Blue State ‘Ghettos’ in Truth Social Post, Published on Tuesday, July 21

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40308

Trump tells Thune to keep Senate in session to pass SAVE America Act

Donald Trump — 2026-07-27 08:49:00 — www.politico.com

Trump Again Presses Senate GOP Leader to Eliminate Filibuster

President Trump has renewed his call for the Senate GOP leader to abolish the filibuster, a procedural rule that requires a supermajority to advance most legislation in the Senate. This latest push highlights Trump’s ongoing frustration with legislative gridlock and his desire to see the Senate operate under simple majority rules.

Trump’s Position on the Filibuster

The president has repeatedly urged Senate Republicans to “nix the filibuster,” arguing that the rule stands in the way of passing his legislative agenda. By advocating for its removal, Trump is seeking to make it easier for his party to advance bills without needing support from Democrats.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

While Trump frames the filibuster as a primary obstacle to legislative success, experts note that the rule is a longstanding feature of Senate procedure designed to encourage bipartisan cooperation and debate. Eliminating the filibuster would represent a significant shift in how the Senate operates, potentially reducing minority party influence and altering the balance of power.

Conclusion

President Trump’s repeated calls to end the filibuster reflect his impatience with Senate procedures that slow down his legislative priorities. While his position is clear, the debate over the filibuster’s future remains contentious, with significant implications for the functioning of Congress and the passage of major legislation. Readers should be aware of the president’s ongoing efforts to reshape Senate rules to favor his agenda, as well as the broader consequences such changes could bring.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/07/27/congress/trump-thune-senate-recess-01012561

Trump reluctant to pressure China after claiming election interference

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-23 17:45:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump’s Claims on China and Election Security Face Scrutiny

In a recent prime-time address, President Trump asserted that “The People’s Republic of China carried out what is believed to be the largest compromise of election data in history, resulting in China’s illicit acquisition of 220 million U.S. voter files.” This sweeping claim about foreign interference in U.S. elections was presented as a major threat to national security and election integrity.

Downplaying His Own Warning

However, when pressed repeatedly this week on whether he would confront Beijing directly about the alleged breach, Trump appeared to minimize the urgency of his own warning. He stated, “Well, we’re going to talk to them about it. It took place a long time ago. I think China is maybe a little bit different today than it was then. But, look, they’re — they do things and we do things to them. I’ll be honest. We do things to them too. It’s not a one-way street. But we’ll be talking to them, yes.”

Despite the president’s strong rhetoric, Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that the issue was not raised in his meeting with China’s foreign minister, indicating a lack of follow-through on Trump’s public statements.

Fact-Check: Intelligence Does Not Back Trump’s Claims

According to documents and intelligence released last week, the evidence does not support Trump’s assertion of a massive Chinese operation targeting U.S. election data. Declassified information shows that China accessed some publicly available voter data records, which are routinely released by most states and accessible to journalists and political parties, sometimes for a fee. There is no evidence that China engaged in the kind of illicit, large-scale data theft described by Trump.

Furthermore, a report prepared by the then director of national intelligence and given to Trump in January 2021 stated that China did not deploy interference efforts and only considered, but did not act on, influence operations. The president also claimed in his speech that China wanted him to lose, but internal intelligence community deliberations did not reach a consensus on this point.

Election Security and Misinformation Concerns

As Trump continues to raise concerns about election integrity, Democrats are warning about misinformation and potential threats to free and fair elections. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer has urged Democrats to prepare for a range of scenarios, including possible federal agent involvement at polling places. Trump has not ruled out such measures, saying, “Well, I want to do whatever it takes to keep elections secure.”

Exaggerated Claims About Noncitizen Voting

Trump also highlighted the issue of noncitizens on voter rolls, referencing a case in New Jersey where over 6,000 noncitizens were accidentally registered and more than 400 reportedly voted. However, this number represents a very small fraction of total voters and would not have changed the outcome of the election. The administration has cited a Department of Homeland Security claim that 250,000 noncitizens were on voter rolls in four states, but officials have not substantiated how this figure was determined or how many actually cast ballots.

Conclusion

President Trump’s recent statements on foreign election interference and noncitizen voting have been met with skepticism and are not fully supported by available intelligence or public records. While he continues to emphasize threats to election security, the facts suggest that many of his claims are exaggerated or unsubstantiated. As the midterm elections approach, the debate over election integrity and misinformation remains a central issue in American politics.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-reluctant-to-pressure-china-after-claiming-election-interference

Former U.S. diplomat breaks down Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-23 17:52:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Ties U.S.-Saudi Nuclear Deal to Abraham Accords, Clashing with Saudi Demands

President Trump has introduced a new condition for a U.S.-Saudi nuclear agreement, stating that the deal will not proceed unless Saudi Arabia signs the Abraham Accords and normalizes relations with Israel. This move directly conflicts with longstanding Saudi policy, as Saudi officials have repeatedly said they will not normalize relations with Israel unless there is a credible pathway to a Palestinian state.

During a recent interview, Timothy Lenderking, former U.S. Special Envoy to Yemen, addressed the implications of Trump’s position. Lenderking, who has extensive experience negotiating with Saudi officials, emphasized that the Saudis remain firm in their requirement for progress toward a Palestinian state before any normalization with Israel. He noted that, despite ongoing discussions about nuclear cooperation and normalization, the Saudis have not seen their threshold for a credible path to Palestinian statehood met and are expected to maintain this stance.

Lenderking’s remarks highlight the disconnect between Trump’s stated condition and the reality of Saudi policy. When asked if the nuclear deal would move forward under Trump’s terms, Lenderking responded that the Saudis would not proceed with any arrangement that excludes a credible pathway to a Palestinian state.

This development underscores the complexities of U.S.-Saudi relations and the broader dynamics of Middle East diplomacy. Trump’s insistence on linking the nuclear deal to the Abraham Accords places the agreement in jeopardy, given Saudi Arabia’s unwavering position on the Palestinian issue.

In summary, President Trump’s newly introduced condition for the U.S.-Saudi nuclear deal is at odds with Saudi demands, raising questions about the feasibility of the agreement and the future of normalization efforts in the region.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/former-u-s-diplomat-breaks-down-houthi-attacks-on-red-sea-shipping

Donald J. Trump: “Congressman Brandon Gill (Texas!) was Fantastic tonight on the Trey Gowdy S…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-26 20:56:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Escalates Attacks on Special Counsel Jack Smith, Repeats Unsubstantiated Claims

Donald Trump has once again intensified his rhetoric against Special Counsel Jack Smith, making a series of unsubstantiated and disparaging remarks following Congressman Brandon Gill’s appearance on the Trey Gowdy Show. Trump praised Gill for his commentary and echoed his own longstanding grievances, labeling Smith as “Deranged” and calling the ongoing investigation an “illegitimate Witch Hunt.”

Trump’s Direct Attacks and False Claims

In his statement, Trump asserted, “The Deranged One stone cold lied before Congress, and worse. He destroyed many lives. Hopefully he will be treated accordingly!” This direct accusation against Jack Smith is not supported by any public evidence or congressional findings. There is no record of Smith lying before Congress, and Trump’s claim that Smith has “destroyed many lives” is a broad and unsubstantiated assertion.

Pattern of Disparagement and Misinformation

This latest outburst fits a pattern of Trump’s public statements in which he frequently attacks investigators and prosecutors involved in legal actions against him. By labeling Smith as “Deranged” and the investigation as a “Witch Hunt,” Trump continues to use language designed to undermine the legitimacy of the legal process and cast doubt on the integrity of those involved.

Fact-checkers have repeatedly found no credible evidence to support Trump’s claims that the investigations are illegitimate or that Smith has engaged in misconduct. Such statements serve to inflame public opinion but do not align with the available facts.

Conclusion

Trump’s recent comments following Congressman Gill’s television appearance are consistent with his ongoing strategy of attacking legal authorities and spreading unverified claims. By repeating false and disparaging statements about Jack Smith, Trump continues to mislead the public and erode trust in the judicial process. Readers should be aware that these assertions are not grounded in fact and reflect a broader pattern of misinformation.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40299

Netanyahu accuses Mamdani of ‘fomenting hate’ in calls for PM’s arrest | US news

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-07-26 15:43:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump Asserts Netanyahu “Will Not Be Arrested” in the U.S. Amid ICC War Crimes Warrant

Donald Trump has publicly assured Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he “will not be arrested, in any way, shape, or form, while in the United States of America.” Trump’s statement, made in a social media post, comes as international scrutiny intensifies over Israel’s conduct in the war in Gaza and as the International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued a warrant for Netanyahu’s arrest on charges of crimes against humanity.

Trump’s Position on ICC Arrest Warrant

Trump’s unequivocal message to Netanyahu directly addresses calls from some U.S. political figures, including New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, for the federal government to execute the ICC’s arrest warrant if Netanyahu visits the United States. Mamdani, who has been vocal in his criticism of Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, has stated that while the city lacks legal authority to enforce the warrant, he encourages federal authorities to act.

Trump’s statement dismisses the possibility of any such action, signaling clear opposition to the ICC’s authority over U.S. soil and aligning himself with Netanyahu amid growing international pressure.

Context: Rising Tensions and Political Divides

The ICC has accused Netanyahu, along with other Israeli and Hamas leaders, of crimes against humanity related to the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The Palestinian territory’s health ministry reports over 73,000 deaths in Israel’s offensive, with roughly half being women and children. The war, which began after the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel that killed about 1,200 people, has sharply divided international opinion and U.S. political circles.

Netanyahu remains a polarizing figure, and Trump’s intervention places him at the center of a contentious debate over international law, U.S. foreign policy, and the limits of American jurisdiction.

No Evidence of Legal Authority for Arrest

Trump’s assertion that Netanyahu will not be arrested reflects the current legal reality: the U.S. government has not recognized the ICC’s jurisdiction over its citizens or allies, and there is no precedent for a sitting or former foreign head of government being detained on U.S. soil at the request of the ICC. Trump’s statement, while forceful, aligns with longstanding U.S. policy rejecting ICC authority in such matters.

Conclusion

Trump’s public promise to Netanyahu underscores his continued support for the Israeli leader and his rejection of international efforts to hold Netanyahu accountable through the ICC. As the debate over Israel’s actions in Gaza and the role of international law continues, Trump’s stance highlights the deep divisions within U.S. politics and the broader global community on issues of accountability and justice.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/26/netanyahu-mamdani-icc-arrest-gaza-war-united-nations

Trump threatens ‘major military punishment’ after Houthi attacks on tankers in Red Sea

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-23 17:55:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Threatens “Major Military Punishment” Amid Rising Tensions in the Red Sea and Iran

President Trump has issued a stark warning in response to escalating violence in the Red Sea, where Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for attacks on two oil tankers, sending international oil prices soaring above $100 a barrel. Trump declared that if the Houthis attack another ship, the United States would inflict “major military punishment.” He also signaled a willingness to escalate military action inside Iran, following a series of American strikes and ongoing regional hostilities.

Trump’s Position on Houthi and Iranian Actions

Amid fears of global energy disruptions, Trump’s response was direct: “Major military punishment will be inflicted upon Iran and, of course, the Houthis themselves, who I am very disappointed with, in that they have until now acted very professionally and smart.” He further asserted, “We’re doing very well against the Islamic Republic of Iran.” These statements came as tensions rose after a Saudi oil tanker was set ablaze by the Iranian-backed Houthis, who have threatened to block the Bab al-Mandab strait—a critical passage for global oil exports.

Escalation and Diplomatic Stalemate

Trump’s warnings come after the U.S. conducted its twelfth consecutive day of strikes against Iranian targets, actions that the administration claims are degrading Iran’s control over key maritime routes. Despite Iran’s continued missile attacks on U.S. allies in the region, Trump has dismissed the prospect of diplomatic engagement, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio stating, “The president doesn’t see a lot of utility in responding to their overtures at this point, because, frankly, Iran is clearly not ready to make a deal, at least not one they’re willing to live by.”

Impact on Global Markets

The president’s threats and the ongoing conflict have contributed to a spike in gas prices, pushing oil to its highest level since May. The situation remains volatile, with American forces positioned for potential escalation across the region.

Conclusion

President Trump’s rhetoric and posture signal a readiness to intensify military action in response to further attacks by the Houthis or Iran, while dismissing diplomatic solutions. As tensions mount and global energy markets react, the administration’s approach underscores the risks of further escalation in a region already on edge.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-threatens-major-military-punishment-after-houthi-attacks-on-tankers-in-red-sea

Pentagon Changes How It Reports Casualties in Iran War

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-07-26 19:14:00 — www.nytimes.com

President Trump Claims New Escalation in Iran War Is Separate Conflict, as Pentagon Alters Casualty Reporting

President Trump has asserted to lawmakers that the latest escalation in the war with Iran represents a new conflict, not a continuation of the hostilities he began with Israel in February. According to Trump, that earlier conflict ended in April when a cease-fire took effect. On July 10, he formally notified Congress that hostilities with Iran had resumed, a move that administration officials argue allows them to reset the timeline for the war and, by extension, how they classify U.S. military casualties.

This position comes amid mounting criticism over the administration’s handling and reporting of U.S. casualties. The Pentagon recently changed its method for reporting casualties, separating deaths and injuries since July 7 onto a new webpage labeled “overseas operations casualties.” This change makes it more difficult to obtain a full accounting of the total number of U.S. service members killed or wounded since the conflict began.

The revised system restored the deaths of four soldiers killed last weekend—previously removed from the website—but placed them in a separate, unexplained category. The number of wounded was also raised by 142, bringing the total to 207 since July 7 and 624 since the war began in February. The total number of U.S. service members killed is now listed as 18.

Last week, the Pentagon’s chief spokesman, Sean Parnell, insisted that fewer than 100 U.S. troops had been injured since July 7, and denied accusations of concealment. However, it later emerged that several Iranian strikes on U.S. bases had not been previously disclosed, raising further questions about transparency.

The administration’s shifting casualty figures and reporting methods have drawn bipartisan criticism from lawmakers, veterans, and military families. A group of Democratic senators has requested a comprehensive accounting of the human costs of the conflict, noting that the Department of Defense has not consistently provided timely and comprehensive public casualty reporting.

Trump’s claim that the renewed fighting constitutes a new war, rather than a continuation of previous hostilities, is central to the administration’s approach to both reporting casualties and complying with the War Powers Act. The Act requires the president to end military operations within 60 days unless Congress authorizes continued engagement. The House has twice voted to direct Trump to end the war in Iran or seek explicit authorization, reflecting growing bipartisan discontent.

Conclusion

President Trump’s assertion that the latest escalation in Iran marks a new conflict, combined with the Pentagon’s revised and more opaque casualty reporting, has fueled criticism and confusion about the true costs of the war. Lawmakers and the public continue to demand full transparency and accountability regarding U.S. military operations and their consequences.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/26/us/politics/pentagon-casualties-iran-war.html

Trump imposes double-digit tariffs on dozens of countries as stopgap 10% levies expire Friday

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-23 18:04:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Pushes Ahead with New Tariffs After Supreme Court Defeat, Citing Forced Labor Concerns

President Donald Trump is moving forward with new double-digit tariffs on imports from 60 countries, just as temporary levies he imposed after a Supreme Court setback are set to expire. The administration will impose taxes of 10% to 12.5% on countries that, according to Trump, have failed to adequately enforce bans on goods produced by forced labor.

Trump’s Tariff Strategy and Legal Setbacks

Trump argues that high tariffs will revive American manufacturing. Last year, he overturned decades of U.S. policy favoring lower tariffs and freer trade, invoking the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify broad double-digit tariffs. He claimed that America’s longstanding trade deficit constituted a national emergency. However, the Supreme Court ruled that IEEPA did not authorize tariffs, forcing the administration to refund importers who had paid them.

In response to the court’s decision, Trump announced 10% worldwide tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, but those levies can only be used for 150 days and are now expiring. Trump is now relying on Section 301 of the Trade Act, which allows the president to impose import taxes on countries engaged in “unjustifiable,” “unreasonable,” or “discriminatory” trade practices. He previously used Section 301 to impose tariffs on China, which survived court challenges.

Economic and Political Risks

The new tariffs, which exempt certain products like oil, gas, and fertilizer, as well as goods qualifying for duty-free status under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, will be paid by U.S. companies importing foreign products. These costs are typically passed on to American consumers, who are already frustrated by the high cost of living. The administration is taking a political risk by rolling out new tariffs ahead of the November 3 midterm elections.

Skepticism and Impact

Human rights advocates acknowledge that the tariffs could pressure countries to address forced labor but caution that blanket tariffs can be blunt instruments. Experts warn that without a comprehensive approach—including transparency in investigations and aid for enforcement—tariffs alone may not be effective. Some countries, such as India, have already amended their trade policies in response to the impending tariffs.

Conclusion

Trump’s tariff policy continues to generate controversy, especially after the Supreme Court’s rejection of his earlier legal justification. While the administration frames the new tariffs as a tool to combat forced labor, critics question both the motivation and the effectiveness of this approach. As the tariffs take effect, their impact on global trade, American consumers, and the fight against forced labor remains to be seen.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-imposes-double-digit-tariffs-on-dozens-of-countries-as-stopgap-10-levies-expire-friday

New U.S. tariffs linked to claims of foreign forced labor dismay and anger trading partners

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-24 11:57:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump’s New Tariffs Spark Global Backlash Over Unfounded Forced Labor Claims

U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration has triggered a wave of criticism from major trading partners after announcing new tariffs of 10% to 12.5% on goods from 60 economies. The administration justified these tariffs by claiming that the targeted countries failed to adequately enforce bans on goods made with forced labor.

Trading Partners Reject Forced Labor Allegations

Australia, New Zealand, Japan, the European Union, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand, and China have all strongly objected to the tariffs, with officials labeling the U.S. claims as “completely unjustified” and lacking meaningful evidence. Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell specifically rejected the Trump administration’s attempt to link Australia’s exports to modern slavery, stating that Australia takes the issue of modern slavery seriously and will continue to lobby for the removal of all tariffs on its goods.

New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon echoed these objections, calling the tariffs “extremely disappointing” and “harmful to trade.” He pointed out that the U.S. investigation underpinning the tariffs did not provide substantial evidence to support the forced labor allegations.

European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas also questioned the U.S. position, noting that European labor laws and conditions are strong and “not really grounded” in the claims made by the Trump administration.

Tariffs Take Effect Amid Legal and Economic Doubts

The new tariffs took effect immediately after the expiration of previous stopgap levies imposed by Trump following a Supreme Court defeat. Japan protested the move, highlighting that the Trump administration had previously reassured Tokyo that no further tariffs would be imposed beyond an earlier agreement.

China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterated its opposition to “all forms of unilateral tariffs,” warning that tariff wars do not serve anyone’s interests. Trade tensions between China and the U.S. have already led to a sharp drop in Chinese exports to the U.S. since Trump’s earlier “Liberation Day” tariffs.

Fact-Check: Lack of Evidence for Forced Labor Claims

A key fact-check from the excerpt is that the U.S. investigation cited by the Trump administration as the basis for the tariffs “did not provide meaningful evidence to support allegations of forced labor.” Multiple countries and officials have challenged the validity of the administration’s claims, suggesting that the tariffs are being used as a protectionist tool rather than a genuine response to labor abuses.

Conclusion: International Pushback and Higher Costs

Trump’s latest tariffs have drawn widespread condemnation from America’s trading partners, who argue that the forced labor justification is unfounded and harmful to global trade. Experts warn that while the tariffs are lower than previous rounds, they will still contribute to higher prices for consumers and businesses. The international backlash underscores ongoing concerns about the Trump administration’s use of trade policy and the credibility of its claims regarding labor practices abroad.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/new-u-s-tariffs-linked-to-claims-of-foreign-forced-labor-dismay-and-anger-trading-partners