After court flurry, Missouri officials set aside GOP redistricting : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-09-10 16:02:00 — www.npr.org

Trump-Backed Redistricting Effort in Missouri Blocked Amid Legal Battles

A Republican-led redistricting plan in Missouri, pushed forward at the urging of President Trump, has been blocked by state officials following a series of court interventions. The plan, intended to give Republican candidates an edge in the upcoming midterm elections, faced immediate legal challenges and has now been halted—at least for the time being.

Trump’s Role in Missouri Redistricting

Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, a Republican, instructed local election officials to use a congressional map that was passed last year with President Trump’s encouragement. The Missouri Supreme Court, however, had previously warned Hoskins not to implement the map because the redistricting measure is up for a public vote in November. Despite this, Hoskins initially moved forward after a federal court ordered the GOP map to be used, creating conflicting directives between state and federal courts.

The U.S. Supreme Court stepped in, temporarily blocking the federal order and prompting Hoskins to revert to the old map. The Missouri Supreme Court found Hoskins in contempt but decided not to punish him after he corrected his actions.

A National Trump-Backed Effort

The blocked redistricting plan was part of a broader, Trump-backed national strategy to secure more GOP seats in Congress. In Missouri, the effort specifically targeted the 5th District, currently represented by Democrat Emanuel Cleaver of Kansas City. Republicans openly aimed to redraw the district to unseat Cleaver, aligning with Trump’s push to bolster Republican representation ahead of the midterms.

This aggressive approach to redistricting is not isolated to Missouri. Trump’s involvement set off a wave of mid-decade redistricting efforts in states like Texas, Florida, and Louisiana, resulting in approximately nine additional GOP-leaning seats compared to Democratic gains, mainly in California.

Legal Uncertainty Remains

Although the Missouri Supreme Court’s actions have blocked the Trump-backed map for now, the legal battle is ongoing. The federal case remains unresolved, with an appeals court hearing scheduled just before critical election deadlines. Legal experts note that the Supreme Court’s willingness to stay the GOP map, without dissent, suggests reluctance to reinstate the Trump-backed plan before the November elections.

Conclusion

President Trump’s direct involvement in Missouri’s redistricting highlights a broader Republican strategy to reshape congressional districts in their favor. While the courts have temporarily blocked these efforts in Missouri, the situation remains fluid, and the final outcome could have significant implications for control of the U.S. House. Voters and legal challenges will ultimately determine whether Trump’s push to redraw the political map succeeds.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/09/10/nx-s1-5965533/after-court-flurry-missouri-officials-set-aside-gop-redistricting

Donald J. Trump video post from September 10, 2026

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-09-10 20:19:00 — www.trumpstruth.org

Donald Trump Declares America Will “Never Be a Communist Country” in Latest Speech

In a recent address, Donald Trump made sweeping statements about the future of the United States, vowing, “Together we will defeat communism, socialism and Marxism in America. America will never be a communist country.” This declaration is the latest in a series of remarks where Trump has invoked the specter of communism and socialism as threats to the nation.

Fact-Checking the Claims

Trump’s assertion that America is at risk of becoming a communist country is not supported by current political realities. The United States remains a capitalist democracy, and there is no credible movement or mainstream political party advocating for the adoption of communism or Marxism as national policy. While some progressive lawmakers have proposed policies that expand the social safety net, these measures fall within the bounds of social democracy, not communism or Marxism.

Rhetoric and Exaggeration

Trump’s rhetoric is part of a broader pattern in which he characterizes political opponents and their policies as extreme or dangerous. By framing the debate in terms of an existential threat from communism or socialism, Trump seeks to energize his base and cast himself as a defender of American values. However, such claims are exaggerated and do not reflect the actual policy positions being debated in Congress or among major political parties.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s recent statements about defeating communism, socialism, and Marxism in America continue his trend of using hyperbolic language to describe the nation’s political landscape. While these remarks may resonate with his supporters, they do not align with the facts about the current state of American politics. As with many of Trump’s past statements, these claims should be viewed critically and placed in context to provide a clear understanding of the issues at stake.

Source article

Source: https://www.trumpstruth.org/statuses/41687

‘I’m on the ticket’: Trump implores Republicans to vote in November at unusual midterm convention | Donald Trump

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-09-10 23:24:00 — www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump Urges Supporters to “Pretend” He’s on the Ballot, Calls for “Cheat Like Hell” Tactics at GOP Convention

Donald Trump closed the Republicans’ first ever midterm convention in Dallas by urging his supporters to do him “the biggest favour” and “pretend” they are voting for him in the upcoming November elections. Facing mounting criticism over rising prices and the war in Iran, Trump’s plea came as opinion polls indicated Republicans were likely to lose control of the US House of Representatives and possibly the Senate—developments that could severely limit his power for the remainder of his term.

In a striking moment, Trump directed a crowd of about 20,000 to raise their right hands and repeat: “I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States, that loves us so much he can’t even breathe, that I will go out with my family, my friends, I’ll do it any way – I don’t care if I’m registered or not, I’m going to try to cheat like hell like they do.” This improvised pledge, encouraging supporters to “cheat like hell,” has drawn immediate criticism and raised concerns about undermining election integrity.

Trump also reiterated his controversial promise of a “Trump dividend” of $5,000 for every US adult if Republicans win both chambers of Congress. The proposal has been dismissed by Democrats as a bribe, and economists have warned that it would cost more than $1 trillion, casting doubt on its feasibility.

Throughout the convention, Trump continued to draw sharp contrasts between his self-proclaimed accomplishments and what he described as threats posed by Democrats. He claimed, “Less than two years ago, the American people gave us a mandate to save America – and in 19 months, I’ve delivered on every single promise I made.” He went on to make exaggerated claims about the state of the country before his presidency, stating, “They gave us wide open borders with 25 million people pouring in from all over the globe. They turned our cities into scenes of death and misery, murder, poverty and destruction, and made America a laughingstock all over world. But we took that dark age of America and turned it into the golden age of America.”

Fact-checkers and critics have pointed out that Trump’s statements about “25 million people pouring in” and cities being “scenes of death and misery” are significant exaggerations not supported by available data. His assertion of delivering on “every single promise” has also been widely disputed.

Trump further suggested that the reduction of prescription drug prices “should get us a big victory in our midterms,” touting it as a major achievement, though the overall impact and scope of such reductions remain contested.

The event, which resembled a Trump rally more than a traditional party meeting, was marked by a combative tone and repeated attacks on Democrats, whom Trump and other speakers branded as extremists and communists.

Conclusion

Trump’s closing message at the Dallas convention was marked by hyperbole, unsubstantiated claims, and an unprecedented call for supporters to “cheat like hell.” As the Republican party faces tough electoral prospects, Trump’s rhetoric continues to draw sharp criticism for its divisive and misleading nature, raising questions about the integrity of the upcoming elections and the future direction of the party.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/11/donald-trump-republican-midterm-convention

Trump, in interview, abruptly shifts tone on midterms’ urgency

Donald Trump — 2026-09-10 20:32:00 — www.politico.com

Donald Trump Vows to Be a “Block” on Democrats if GOP Loses Congressional Majority

In a recent interview with Fox News, Donald Trump stated that he will be a “block” on Democrats if Republicans lose their majority in Congress. This remark highlights Trump’s ongoing strategy of positioning himself as a key obstacle to Democratic initiatives, even if his party loses control of the legislative branch.

Trump’s Statement and Its Implications

Trump’s comment to Fox News underscores his intention to maintain significant influence over the political process, regardless of the outcome of congressional elections. By pledging to act as a “block,” Trump is signaling to his supporters and opponents alike that he will continue to resist Democratic policies and push back against their legislative agenda.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Record of Obstruction

Trump’s assertion aligns with his previous actions and rhetoric, where he has frequently positioned himself as a counterforce to Democratic leadership. Throughout his political career, Trump has often exaggerated the threat posed by his opponents and has made numerous claims about his ability to single-handedly halt or reverse Democratic initiatives. While the effectiveness of such a “block” depends on the actual balance of power in Congress, Trump’s statement reflects his ongoing posture of confrontation and resistance.

Conclusion: Trump’s Continued Influence

Trump’s vow to be a “block” on Democrats if the GOP loses its majority demonstrates his persistent role as a polarizing figure in American politics. His statement to Fox News serves as a reminder of his commitment to opposing Democratic policies and maintaining a prominent voice in national debates, regardless of his party’s standing in Congress. As the political landscape evolves, Trump’s approach ensures that he will remain a central figure in the ongoing partisan divide.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/10/trump-in-interview-abruptly-shifts-tone-on-midterms-urgency-01071916

Top Republicans didn’t expect Trump’s dividends. Now they’re scrambling.

Politics — 2026-09-10 17:33:00 — www.politico.com

Trump’s $5,000 Check Promise Blindsides GOP, Sparks Doubts Over Feasibility and Motives

President Donald Trump has pledged to send $5,000 checks to every adult American if Republicans retain control of Congress—a move that has caught top GOP lawmakers off guard and ignited a scramble within the party over how to respond.

Trump’s Surprise Announcement

Trump made the announcement Wednesday night in Dallas, leaving senior Republicans on Capitol Hill blindsided and struggling to manage expectations around a trillion-dollar-plus proposal that party leaders admit they cannot deliver. Trump told CBS on Thursday that he does not believe he needs Congress to approve his plan to send out payments, a claim that contradicts the constitutional requirement for congressional approval of federal spending.

A Pattern of Unfulfilled Promises

This is not the first time Trump has floated the idea of direct payments to Americans. According to the excerpt, he has repeatedly promised dividends and checks in recent years—often claiming the money would come from tariffs or tax cuts—but none of these proposals have materialized. Each time, GOP leaders have argued that such ideas lack the votes needed for passage and would require Congress to codify controversial tariffs into law.

Republican Skepticism and Internal Division

Many Republican lawmakers expressed skepticism or outright opposition to the plan. Some questioned the legality of what they see as Trump effectively offering to pay for votes, while fiscal conservatives balked at the estimated $1 trillion-plus cost. GOP campaign arms have notably refrained from promoting the idea, even as Trump’s campaign and White House social media accounts tout it enthusiastically.

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz described the proposal as “an incentive for work”—despite the checks being promised to all Americans, regardless of employment status. Other Republicans, such as Rep. Chip Roy, demanded details on how the plan would be funded, highlighting the lack of a concrete proposal or fiscal plan.

Democratic Criticism and Accusations of Bribery

Democrats quickly condemned Trump’s announcement as a transparent attempt to bribe voters and distract from unpopular policies, including trade wars and military conflict in the Middle East. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called the dividends a “bribe” and pointed to Trump’s weak political standing.

Fact-Check: Trump’s Track Record

The excerpt makes clear that Trump’s record on delivering promised checks is poor. Despite repeated public and private assurances, none of his previous proposals for direct payments to Americans have come to fruition. His claim that Congress is not needed for such a massive spending program is also false, as federal law requires congressional approval for appropriations.

Conclusion

Trump’s last-minute promise of $5,000 checks has exposed deep divisions within the Republican Party and raised serious questions about the legality, feasibility, and motives behind the proposal. With no legislative path forward and a history of unfulfilled promises, the announcement appears to be more political theater than policy—leaving both lawmakers and voters skeptical about whether any such checks will ever arrive.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/10/republicans-split-trump-payouts-midterms-01071816

Trump says he would ‘probably’ be able to make deals with Democrats

Administration News — 2026-09-10 19:12:00 — thehill.com

Trump Vows to Block Democratic Agenda if They Regain Congressional Majorities

President Trump has signaled that he would take an aggressive stance against Democrats if they win back control of Congress, stating he would “probably” be able to make deals with them but also warning he would work to block their initiatives. “I’ll be a block. I’ll end up being a blocker. I’ll block all of their bad stuff for two years,” Trump said.

Trump’s Position: Deal-Maker or Obstructionist?

Trump’s comments highlight a dual approach: expressing openness to bipartisan deals while simultaneously promising to obstruct Democratic policies he deems unfavorable. This stance underscores his willingness to use his position to halt legislative efforts from the opposing party, framing Democratic proposals as “bad stuff” without specifying which policies he would target.

Pattern of Rhetoric and Exaggeration

The president’s remarks fit a broader pattern of using strong, combative language to describe his approach to political opposition. By promising to “block all of their bad stuff,” Trump positions himself as a bulwark against Democratic priorities, but the statement lacks detail on what specific measures he considers harmful or how he would define success in blocking them.

Conclusion: A Clear Message of Opposition

Trump’s statements make clear that, should Democrats regain congressional majorities, he intends to act as a significant obstacle to their legislative agenda. His rhetoric continues a trend of framing political opposition in stark, adversarial terms, leaving little doubt about his approach to divided government. Readers should note the lack of specifics in his claims and the ongoing pattern of exaggeration in his public statements.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6083451-trump-potential-democratic-majority-probably-deals/

Lawsuit claims DHS is systematically intimidating ICE observers : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-09-10 16:07:00 — www.npr.org

A new federal lawsuit is challenging policies and actions from the Trump administration that observers say targeted and intimidated those monitoring immigration enforcement operations. The suit, filed by Minneapolis resident Michael Khalili and the nonprofit Common Cause, alleges that directives issued under President Trump—including National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7)—linked impeding immigration enforcement and extreme views on migration to domestic terrorism. This memo served as the basis for federal investigations and surveillance of activists in Minnesota, which ultimately led to criminal charges against 15 people for conspiracy to impede ICE.

The lawsuit draws on public statements and internal memos from the Trump administration that equate observers who record federal officers with “violent rioters” and “domestic terrorists,” arguing that these communications established a national policy of retaliation against peaceful observers. The complaint also points out that the Trump administration repealed guardrails that could have prevented federal officers from using facial recognition and license plate readers against observers, and dismantled the Department of Homeland Security’s Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.

The legal action highlights a pattern of intimidation, including threats of force or arrest, collection of personal information, use of force, pursuit of criminal charges, and civil penalties such as revoking Global Entry or TSA PreCheck status. The suit contends that these actions violate the First Amendment and privacy rights of those observing immigration enforcement, and seeks a national injunction to prevent further retaliation.

The case underscores the far-reaching impact of Trump-era policies on civil liberties, particularly for those seeking to hold the government accountable. As the lawsuit moves forward, it raises critical questions about the balance between national security directives and the constitutional rights of citizens to observe and document government actions.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/09/10/nx-s1-5961220/dhs-ice-observers-surveillance-lawsuit

James Talarico accuses Ken Paxton of ‘ignoring’ Epstein survivors | US midterm elections 2026

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-09-10 13:49:00 — www.theguardian.com

Democrats Blast Trump’s $5,000 “Dividend” Promise as False, Highlight Pattern of Broken Pledges

Donald Trump’s latest campaign promise—a $5,000 “dividend” to every American adult if Republicans win control of Congress—has come under sharp criticism from Democratic leaders, who point to a long record of similar unfulfilled pledges. Speaking at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas, Trump made the sweeping offer, but Democrats quickly dismissed it as another empty promise.

Beto O’Rourke, former congressman and presidential candidate, called the dividend announcement “a gimmick, it’s a bribe. It’s another promise that the president will be unable to fulfill … It adds to the stink of desperation that is emanating from that convention centre.” O’Rourke’s comments reflect widespread skepticism about Trump’s ability or willingness to deliver on such a large-scale financial commitment.

At a press conference, Democratic congressman Robert Garcia was even more direct, labeling Trump “a known liar” and “the biggest liar to ever serve in government, period.” Garcia cited Trump’s repeated failures to deliver on previous “dividends,” including those supposedly tied to tariffs, the cryptocurrency Dogecoin, and even Air Force One. “There’s no one in the country that thinks somehow this new dividend is actually going to happen,” Garcia said, emphasizing that Americans want real solutions to rising costs, not more false promises.

This pattern of exaggerated or unfulfilled claims has become a hallmark of Trump’s political messaging. Democrats argue that instead of addressing core issues like healthcare and inflation, Trump continues to make grandiose statements that do not materialize, misleading the public and distracting from substantive policy debates.

As the midterm elections approach, Trump’s record of broken promises and misleading statements is once again in the spotlight. Democratic leaders are urging voters to look past what they describe as “spectacle really laced with fear” and focus on the real economic challenges facing American families.

In summary, Trump’s $5,000 dividend pledge is being widely criticized as another in a series of false promises, reinforcing concerns about his credibility and commitment to addressing the nation’s most pressing problems.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/10/james-talarico-ken-paxton-epstein-survivors

WATCH: What Trump told reporters near Ground Zero in 2001

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-09-10 13:12:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump’s Claims About 9/11 Response Face Scrutiny from Fact-Checkers

In the days following the September 11 attacks, Donald Trump told reporters near Ground Zero that he was there to check on his construction crew. In archival footage from September 13, 2001, Trump described the devastation: “It’s just terrible. I can’t get anywhere. Something I’ve never seen before. And dangerous. We have a lot of buildings still in a form of collapse, so it’s very dangerous and it’s tough.”

At the time, Trump said he had about 100 workers helping to dig out rubble at the World Trade Center, with another 100 to 150 “coming.” Years later, as president, Trump repeated this story at a 9/11 tribute event, stating, “I was building a big building in New York and I took the whole crew down there right after this happened and they had no hesitation. Everybody went down with me. We went down as a big group of people. It wasn’t too much we could do, I’ll be honest. It was raw. Nobody’s seen anything like it ever.”

However, these claims have been repeatedly scrutinized. PolitiFact fact-checked Trump’s statements and was unable to verify that he brought hundreds of workers to assist with “digging out” at Ground Zero. The NewsHour footage from 2001 does not show any Trump construction crew present at the site.

Despite the lack of evidence, Trump has continued to share this story over the years, positioning himself as a hands-on participant in the recovery efforts. When asked about rebuilding, Trump said, “You can do anything nowadays with the right money and the right talent,” expressing confidence that New York would recover, though “maybe not the same form, but in some form.”

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s repeated claims about sending large crews to help at Ground Zero after 9/11 have not been substantiated by available evidence or independent fact-checks. While Trump has consistently portrayed himself as actively involved in the aftermath, archival footage and reporting do not support the scale of his involvement as described. This pattern highlights the importance of verifying public figures’ statements, especially regarding significant national events.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-what-trump-told-reporters-near-ground-zero-in-2001

‘We are going in the wrong direction’: Republican convention dogged by the cost of living

Politics — 2026-09-09 18:25:00 — www.politico.com

Trump Predicts Oil Prices Will Drop—But Only After the Midterms, as GOP Faces Backlash Over Economic Policies

As Republicans gather in Dallas, President Donald Trump’s economic policies are under fire from within his own party, with many GOP lawmakers and strategists alarmed by the impact of his trade war with Canada and military actions against Iran. Trump told reporters Wednesday that oil prices are set to drop amid the ongoing U.S. conflict with Iran—but not until after the midterms, a timeline that is much later than anxious Republicans would hope.

Mounting Economic Pressure

Republicans at the convention are grappling with a surge in oil prices, which hit $100 per barrel, and a deepening trade war with Canada that threatens key industries in the Midwest. Trump’s decision to import more foreign beef ahead of the midterms has also angered ranchers and farmers from Texas to Iowa. Senior Republicans are privately dismayed at the “pileup of Trump economic moves that have rattled voters and key industries in their states.”

Republicans Struggle to Shift Blame

While Trump’s White House and RNC spokespeople continue to blame Democrats for the affordability crisis, many Republicans acknowledge that Trump’s actions—especially the ongoing conflict with Iran—are driving up gas prices and everyday costs. Senator Rick Scott admitted, “We have higher gas prices now as a result of the president trying to keep us safe as a result of what Iran wants to do,” and described the situation as a “short-term problem” that Trump will address by “destroying the regime.”

Voters Hold Trump Responsible

Despite efforts to paint a rosier picture, a recent POLITICO poll shows that a 34% plurality of Americans hold Trump fully responsible for the state of the current U.S. economy, compared to just 17% who blame former President Joe Biden. Some Republicans are hoping Trump will use his convention keynote address to refocus the party’s economic messaging, but skepticism remains high. One GOP county chair bluntly predicted, “Maybe the president delivers a coherent speech that is clear, that is direct, that is policy oriented, that is forward-looking… Will he do that? Absolutely not.”

Conclusion

President Trump’s own statements and policies are at the center of Republican anxiety over rising costs and economic instability. As the party scrambles to reassure voters ahead of the midterms, Trump’s prediction that relief at the pump won’t come until after the election only adds to the pressure—and the political risk—for Republicans in battleground states.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/09/republicans-economy-trump-dallas-midterm-convention-01069724