Donald J. Trump: “United States aircraft just struck Iranian missile and drone storage locatio…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-06-27 18:13:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Threatens Iran with Annihilation After U.S. Strikes: A Closer Look at His Rhetoric

United States aircraft just struck Iranian missile and drone storage locations, and coastal radar sites, for violating the Cease Fire Agreement, AGAIN! It is very possible that they will never learn! There may come a point when we are no longer able to be reasonable, and will be forced to militarily complete the job that we very successfully started. If that happens, the Islamic Republic of Iran will no longer exist! President DJT.

Trump’s Escalatory Language

President Donald Trump issued a stark warning following U.S. military strikes on Iranian targets, stating, “If that happens, the Islamic Republic of Iran will no longer exist!” This statement, attributed directly to Trump, signals a dramatic escalation in rhetoric and raises serious questions about the administration’s approach to conflict with Iran.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s assertion that the United States may be “forced to militarily complete the job that we very successfully started” exaggerates the effectiveness and finality of previous U.S. military actions in the region. While the U.S. has conducted targeted strikes and claimed tactical successes, the broader conflict with Iran and its proxies remains unresolved. The suggestion that military action could lead to the complete destruction of the Islamic Republic of Iran is not supported by the complex realities of international conflict and regional dynamics.

Attacks and Exaggerations

Trump’s language, including “It is very possible that they will never learn!” and the threat of Iran’s total destruction, reflects a pattern of using hyperbolic and confrontational statements. Such rhetoric not only heightens tensions but also distorts the nuanced and ongoing nature of U.S.-Iran relations. The claim that the U.S. “very successfully started” the job further overstates the impact of previous actions, ignoring the persistent challenges and risks of escalation.

Conclusion: The Impact of Trump’s Words

President Trump’s statements following the latest U.S. strikes on Iranian targets exemplify his tendency to use extreme language and make sweeping claims. By threatening the very existence of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Trump moves beyond measured diplomacy and into dangerous territory. This approach risks further destabilizing the region and undermines efforts to achieve a sustainable resolution. As with previous instances, Trump’s record of exaggeration and aggressive rhetoric continues to shape the discourse around U.S. foreign policy—often with significant consequences.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/39580

Trump says he will nominate Lance Schroyer as next ICE director | Trump administration

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-06-27 16:01:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump Nominates Lance Schroyer for ICE Director, Makes Sweeping Claims About Immigration Enforcement

Donald Trump announced Saturday that he will nominate Lance Schroyer as the next director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), highlighting Schroyer’s law enforcement background in Oklahoma and military service. In a Truth Social post, Trump claimed Schroyer “has over 29 YEARS of Law Enforcement experience in Oklahoma — A State where I WON all 77 Counties in 2016, 2020, and 2024! Lance is a former Oklahoma State Trooper, and United States Marine.” Trump described Schroyer as “a PATRIOT with real operational experience, and proven leader with DECADES of experience locking up the worst of the worst” and praised his “firsthand experience getting Illegal Aliens OFF our streets.”

Exaggerated Claims on Enforcement

Trump asserted that Schroyer “has what it takes to DETAIN AND DEPORT Illegal Alien Criminals, including murders, rapists, and drug traffickers at a rate never seen before!” He further claimed, “our Administration has the HIGHEST Daily Arrest Rate by ICE and CBP than ANY other President, by far.” These statements continue Trump’s pattern of making sweeping, unverified claims about immigration enforcement and his administration’s record.

Context and Controversy

Since early 2017, ICE has operated without a Senate-confirmed director. Trump has made immigration crackdowns a central focus, but rights groups argue that these policies violate civil liberties and create unsafe environments for ethnic minorities. ICE’s aggressive tactics have sparked controversy, particularly after ICE agents fatally shot two U.S. citizens in Minnesota in January, leading to nationwide protests.

Senate Confirmation and Policy Impact

Both Trump and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin called on the Senate to quickly confirm Schroyer. Mullin emphasized Schroyer’s operational experience under the 287g program, which delegates federal immigration enforcement powers to local officers. Mullin also noted that “it has been 11 years” since the Senate last confirmed an ICE director.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Statements

Trump’s repeated claims about record-breaking arrest rates and the effectiveness of his administration’s enforcement efforts have often been challenged by independent fact-checkers. While ICE and CBP arrest statistics have fluctuated over the years, there is no publicly available evidence supporting Trump’s assertion that his administration achieved the “highest daily arrest rate” compared to all previous presidents.

Conclusion

Trump’s nomination of Lance Schroyer as ICE director is accompanied by characteristic boasts about immigration enforcement and his administration’s record. As the Senate considers Schroyer’s confirmation, Trump’s statements highlight ongoing debates about the accuracy of his claims and the broader impact of his immigration policies.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/27/trump-nomination-ice-director-lance-schroyer

Trump says he is nominating former Oklahoma state trooper Lance Schroyer as ICE director

PBS NewsHour – Politics — 2026-06-27 16:22:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Nominates Lance Schroyer as ICE Director, Praises “Decades of Experience”

President Donald Trump announced Saturday that he is nominating Lance Schroyer, a former Oklahoma state trooper and U.S. Marine, to serve as the next director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Trump made the announcement on his Truth Social platform, describing Schroyer as a “PATRIOT with real operational experience” and a “proven leader with DECADES of experience locking up the worst of the worst.”

Trump’s Position on Immigration Enforcement

Trump’s nomination of Schroyer comes as he continues to emphasize aggressive immigration enforcement. The president has returned to the White House on a promise of mass deportations, with ICE playing a central role in executing that vision. Under Trump’s direction, the agency recently received a one-time $75 billion funding boost, enabling the hiring of 12,000 new officers and expanding detention capacity.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

In his statement, Trump highlighted Schroyer’s extensive law enforcement background, but did not provide specific evidence regarding Schroyer’s record of “locking up the worst of the worst.” While Schroyer’s 29-year career as a trooper and his work with federal and state partners are noted by others, Trump’s characterization is a broad assertion rather than a verifiable fact within the provided excerpt.

Context: Public Reaction and ICE’s Role

Schroyer’s nomination arrives at a time when public sentiment has turned against Trump’s immigration crackdown. Recent surges of federal immigration officers into American cities have led to heightened tensions, protests, and fatal clashes, including the shootings of two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis earlier this year.

Conclusion

Trump’s selection of Schroyer underscores his administration’s ongoing commitment to strict immigration enforcement and mass deportations. While Trump touts Schroyer’s experience and leadership, the broader context reveals a deeply polarized public and a controversial expansion of ICE’s authority and resources. As the nomination moves forward, Schroyer’s leadership will be closely watched amid ongoing debate over the direction of U.S. immigration policy.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-he-is-nominating-former-oklahoma-state-trooper-lance-schroyer-as-ice-director

Trump Taps Former Oklahoma Trooper as New ICE Director

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-06-27 16:10:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Pushes Senate to Confirm ICE Nominee, Makes Claims About Immigration Enforcement

President Trump announced Saturday his nomination of Lance Schroyer, a former Oklahoma state trooper, to lead Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), urging the Senate to move quickly on the confirmation. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said Schroyer would be the first Senate-confirmed leader of ICE since 2017.

Trump wrote, “Lance has firsthand experience getting Illegal Aliens OFF our streets and, just like ME and our Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin, he LOVES the men and women of ICE.” This statement reflects Trump’s continued focus on aggressive immigration enforcement and his use of charged language to describe undocumented immigrants.

Scrutiny Over Experience and Agency Direction

Schroyer, who is currently a senior adviser to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, has not previously worked at ICE and has limited experience managing national immigration policy. Despite this, Trump emphasized Schroyer’s law enforcement background and alignment with his administration’s priorities.

ICE has been at the center of Trump’s efforts to increase deportations nationwide, a push that has drawn significant scrutiny, especially after immigration agents killed two Americans in Minneapolis earlier this year. The agency has operated without a Senate-confirmed director since 2017.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s assertion that Schroyer has “firsthand experience getting Illegal Aliens OFF our streets” is misleading. While Schroyer has a long law enforcement career, there is no public record of him leading large-scale immigration enforcement operations or managing ICE activities prior to his advisory role under Mullin. The claim exaggerates Schroyer’s direct experience with federal immigration enforcement.

Additionally, Trump’s language—referring to undocumented immigrants as “Illegal Aliens”—is widely criticized as dehumanizing and not used in official government communications.

Conclusion

Trump’s nomination of Lance Schroyer to lead ICE highlights his administration’s ongoing hardline stance on immigration. However, his claims about Schroyer’s experience overstate the nominee’s direct involvement in immigration enforcement. As the Senate considers Schroyer’s confirmation, questions remain about his qualifications and the future direction of ICE under Trump’s leadership.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/27/us/politics/trump-oklahoma-ice-director.html

Trump unveils America 250 'Patriot Passport' with his likeness

Administration News — 2026-06-27 13:00:00 — thehill.com

President Trump Unveils “Patriot Passport” Featuring His Image for America’s 250th Anniversary

President Trump on Friday shared a new rendering of a limited-edition “Patriot Passport” to mark America’s 250th anniversary. The sample image, posted on the president’s social media, shows Trump standing with his fists on the Resolute Desk, with the text of the Declaration of Independence in the background.

The design, which prominently features Trump’s likeness and patriotic symbols, is being promoted as a commemorative item for the upcoming anniversary. The second page of the passport includes additional imagery, though details were not fully disclosed in the excerpt.

This move is the latest example of Trump leveraging his image and association with historic American symbols for promotional purposes. The “Patriot Passport” aligns with his ongoing efforts to position himself as a central figure in American history and patriotism.

While the excerpt does not include any false claims or disparagements, it highlights Trump’s continued use of national milestones and iconic imagery to engage his supporters and maintain a strong personal brand.

Conclusion

President Trump’s unveiling of the “Patriot Passport” underscores his strategy of intertwining his public persona with major national celebrations. As America approaches its 250th anniversary, Trump’s actions reflect his intent to remain a prominent figure in the country’s political and cultural landscape.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5943983-trump-patriot-passport-250th/

Week in Politics: Trump and bipartisan housing bill, John Bolton; Democratic socialists : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-06-27 06:40:00 — www.npr.org

Trump Blocks Bipartisan Housing Bill, Pushes Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud

President Trump abruptly canceled a planned signing of major bipartisan housing legislation this week, refusing to move forward until the Senate passes the SAVE Act, a bill that would tighten voting ID requirements. Trump’s decision, announced with the stage already set in Statuary Hall at the U.S. Capitol, has left lawmakers and observers questioning his priorities as Americans face mounting concerns over the cost of living and affordable housing.

Housing Bill Held Hostage to Voting Law Demands

The housing bill, which had garnered broad support from both parties in the House and Senate, was expected to provide relief to millions struggling with housing costs. Instead, Trump made its passage contingent on unrelated changes to voting laws, specifically demanding stricter voter ID requirements. According to NPR’s Ron Elving, this move has not advanced Trump’s voting bill in the Senate, nor has it united his party around the issue. Instead, it has shifted attention away from a popular legislative win and back to Trump’s ongoing campaign to alter voting procedures.

False Claims of Widespread Voter Fraud

Trump used the cancellation as an opportunity to again raise the specter of voter fraud, a topic he has repeatedly invoked without evidence. As Elving notes, Trump “had to change the subject, talk once more about voter fraud, once again, without offering any proof of actual voter fraud affecting actual election outcomes.” This pattern of making unsubstantiated claims about election integrity has been a hallmark of Trump’s rhetoric, despite repeated fact-checks and the lack of evidence showing widespread fraud.

Exaggerated Threats and Attacks on Political Opponents

At a Faith & Freedom Coalition conference, Trump escalated his rhetoric, calling the recent electoral gains by Democratic socialists in New York “the greatest threat to our country since its founding, in my opinion, 250 years ago.” He further exaggerated the scale of the development, saying, “People don’t look at that. Oh, three people were elected. No, no. It’s many more than three people.” This kind of hyperbolic language is a common feature of Trump’s public statements, often used to stoke fear and energize his base.

Conclusion: A Record of Distraction and Distortion

President Trump’s actions this week highlight a familiar pattern: prioritizing personal political goals over broadly supported policy solutions, and promoting false or exaggerated claims to justify those priorities. By blocking a bipartisan housing bill and again raising unproven allegations of voter fraud, Trump has demonstrated a willingness to use distortion and distraction, even at the expense of addressing urgent national needs. As the country grapples with real challenges, the facts show that Trump’s focus remains fixed on his own agenda, often at odds with the evidence and the public interest.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/06/27/nx-s1-5867378/week-in-politics-trump-and-bipartisan-housing-bill-john-bolton-democratic-socialists

WATCH: Trump receives report from Religious Liberty Commission in the Oval Office

PBS NewsHour – Politics — 2026-06-26 16:04:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Touts Commission Report Challenging Church-State Separation, Claims to Have “Saved Religion”

A new draft report from a commission created by President Donald Trump is calling for a fundamental shift in the relationship between religion and government, urging the nation to move away from the traditional concept of separating church and state. The Religious Liberty Commission, established by Trump and composed almost entirely of conservative Christians, released its 224-page draft Friday, advocating for a stronger role for religion in government, schools, and public life.

Trump’s Boast and Claims of Persecution

Speaking at a Faith & Freedom Coalition gathering in Washington, Trump promoted the commission’s findings, declaring, “We saved religion, it was going down.” He also accused the administration of his predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden, of carrying out a “reign of persecution” against religious Americans.

Commission Recommendations Reflect Trump’s Agenda

The commission’s report aligns closely with Trump’s longstanding goals. It recommends eliminating the Johnson Amendment, which prohibits political activity by tax-exempt religious organizations—a move Trump has repeatedly pushed for. The report also calls for compensating military service members discharged for refusing COVID-19 vaccines, expanding religious expression in public spaces, increasing access to public funds for faith-based agencies, and broadening exemptions for those with religious objections to policies on vaccines, pronouns, and classroom lessons.

Downplaying Church-State Separation

While the commission stops short of calling the separation of church and state a “lie”—as its chairman, Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, did earlier this year—it argues that the concept is often misapplied. The report insists it does not advocate for theocracy or the total elimination of any separation, but rather for a “tension” between First Amendment clauses that protect religious freedom and prohibit government establishment of religion.

Fact-Check: Trump’s Exaggerations and Distortions

Trump’s claim that his administration “saved religion” is a significant exaggeration. The report itself is part of a broader push by conservative states to bring more religion into public life, including classrooms, but there is no evidence that religion in America was “going down” in a way that required saving by the Trump administration. Furthermore, Trump’s assertion of a “reign of persecution” under Biden is not substantiated by the commission’s own findings, which critics say amount to advocacy rather than evidence-based investigation.

Criticism and Lack of Diversity

The commission has faced criticism for its lack of ideological diversity and for failing to address issues such as anti-Muslim efforts and the rise of antisemitism on the right. A coalition of groups has filed a lawsuit challenging the commission’s composition, arguing that it does not meet federal requirements for balanced viewpoints.

Conclusion

Trump’s promotion of the Religious Liberty Commission’s report underscores his administration’s efforts to reshape the boundaries between religion and government. However, his sweeping claims about saving religion and persecution under his successor are not supported by the facts presented in the commission’s own draft. As the report enters a public comment period, debate over the future of church-state separation in America is likely to intensify.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-trump-receives-report-from-religious-liberty-commission-in-the-oval-office

Maher challenges Vance on Trump election fraud claims: ‘That s— has to stop’

Administration News — 2026-06-27 08:15:00 — thehill.com

Trump’s Persistent Election Fraud Claims Draw Renewed Scrutiny

President Trump’s repeated false claims of election fraud remain at the center of national debate, as highlighted in a recent exchange on a prominent talk show. During a discussion with Vice President Vance, comedian Bill Maher directly challenged the ongoing narrative, pointing to Trump’s pattern of insisting that any electoral loss must be the result of cheating rather than a legitimate defeat.

False Claims Under Scrutiny

The excerpt underscores that, under Trump, the Republican Party has promoted a binary view of election outcomes: “Either we win, or they cheated.” This position, attributed to Trump, has been widely fact-checked and debunked by multiple sources, yet it continues to shape the party’s rhetoric and response to election results.

Impact on Democratic Norms

Maher’s comments reflect growing concern that Trump’s refusal to accept electoral defeat undermines a core democratic tradition—conceding when the vote does not go in one’s favor. The insistence on widespread fraud, without substantiated evidence, has fueled mistrust in the electoral process and contributed to ongoing political polarization.

Conclusion

President Trump’s stance, as reported in the discussion with Vice President Vance, exemplifies a broader trend of rejecting unfavorable outcomes by alleging fraud. This approach has been repeatedly challenged and fact-checked, yet it persists as a defining feature of Trump’s political strategy. The continued promotion of these false claims raises serious questions about the future of electoral integrity and the willingness of political leaders to uphold democratic norms.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5943740-bill-maher-jd-vance-donald-trump-election-fraud-claims/

Donald J. Trump: “RT @realDonaldTrumpThe Crowd was incredible last night, packed to the brim —…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-06-27 05:05:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Claims Massive Crowd and “Truly Successful America” in Recent Speech

President Donald J. Trump declared, “The crowd was incredible last night, packed to the brim — At least 45,000 people were there, with a huge Television and online audience.” He went on to praise the event’s airplane flyovers and music, and asserted, “Everybody stayed right until the end of my Speech because they loved hearing about a truly successful America.”

Crowd Size Claims

Trump’s assertion that “at least 45,000 people were there” continues a pattern of exaggerating crowd sizes at his events. Independent estimates and local officials have often reported lower attendance figures at past rallies, and no independent verification of the 45,000 figure has been provided for this event. Claims of “packed to the brim” crowds have been a hallmark of Trump’s public appearances, but fact-checks have frequently found these numbers to be inflated.

Portrayal of Unanimous Enthusiasm

Trump also claimed, “Everybody stayed right until the end of my Speech because they loved hearing about a truly successful America.” This sweeping statement suggests unanimous approval and engagement, which is difficult to substantiate. Reports from previous events have shown that some attendees do leave early, and not all audience members are uniformly supportive.

Looking Ahead to July 4th

Trump promised an even larger area for his next appearance, stating, “I wish we were able to have an even larger area, which we will be able to do on July 4th when I’ll be speaking again.” This forward-looking claim continues his pattern of projecting ever-growing support and anticipation for his events.

Conclusion

President Trump’s recent statements highlight his ongoing tendency to exaggerate crowd sizes and portray overwhelming support. While his supporters remain enthusiastic, independent verification of his claims is often lacking. As Trump looks ahead to his July 4th event, his rhetoric underscores the importance of fact-checking and critical scrutiny of public statements.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/39562

Watergate Today as a Blip of a Story? Vance Might Not Be Entirely Wrong.

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-06-27 04:02:00 — www.nytimes.com

Donald Trump Pushes Boundaries of Presidential Power, Embraces Aggressive Tactics Against Critics

Donald Trump has openly distinguished himself from Richard Nixon by highlighting his refusal to resign in the face of impeachment, stating that unlike Nixon, he fought impeachment proceedings—twice. Since his re-election, Trump has been upfront about pursuing business interests while in office and about using the power of government to punish his enemies.

This approach signals a dramatic shift in the norms of presidential conduct. Trump’s willingness to leverage his office for personal and political gain, and to retaliate against perceived opponents, marks a departure from the constraints that were put in place after the Watergate scandal to prevent abuse of presidential power. These measures were designed to protect the independence of the Justice Department and other federal agencies.

Trump’s record stands in stark contrast to the bipartisan consensus that ultimately led to Nixon’s resignation. While Nixon left office after Republicans joined Democrats in approving articles of impeachment, Trump has maintained a mutually appreciative relationship with Nixon’s legacy but has emphasized his own combative stance against oversight and accountability.

Observers note that Trump’s actions have been met with little challenge from Congress and increasing approval from the Supreme Court, which has granted broad immunity from prosecution for official actions. This environment has allowed Trump to push the bounds of presidential authority further than any of his predecessors.

The current political climate, as reflected in the comments of Vice President JD Vance and others, suggests that the standards for presidential accountability have eroded. Trump’s ability to “curate his own reality” and to rewrite the narrative around his actions would have been inconceivable in the era of Watergate. As a result, experts warn that a president could now engage in the kinds of abuses that ended Nixon’s career and still remain in office.

In summary, Donald Trump’s open pursuit of personal business interests while president and his use of government power to punish adversaries exemplify a new, unbound model of executive leadership—one that raises serious questions about the future of democratic accountability in the United States.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/27/us/politics/watergate-vance-trump-nixon.html