Trump says he asked US attorney for California election probe: ‘Do me a favor’

Donald Trump — 2026-06-23 16:49:00 — www.politico.com

Trump’s “Do Me a Favor” Remark: Examining the President’s Statement

President Trump’s words have often drawn scrutiny for their accuracy and intent, and his recent statement is no exception. In the excerpt, the president said, “I said, ‘Do me a favor. Take a look.’”

The Key Statement

The president’s direct quote, “Do me a favor. Take a look,” is notable for its simplicity but carries significant implications depending on its context. This phrase has been at the center of major political controversies, as it has been interpreted as a request that may have influenced official actions.

Fact-Checking the Claim

While the excerpt provides only this brief statement, it is important to highlight that such remarks from the president have previously sparked debate about their meaning and intent. The phrase “do me a favor” has been scrutinized in investigations and fact-checks, especially regarding whether it constituted a request for personal or political benefit.

Context and Implications

The president’s choice of words—asking someone to “take a look” as a personal favor—has been cited in various reports and hearings. Critics argue that such language blurs the line between official duties and personal interests. Fact-checkers have examined the context in which Trump has used similar phrases, often finding that his statements can be misleading or open to interpretation, depending on the circumstances.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statement, “Do me a favor. Take a look,” exemplifies the kind of language that has fueled ongoing scrutiny of his communications. While the excerpt does not provide further context or additional claims, the quote itself highlights the persistent questions about the president’s use of language and the potential for misinterpretation or controversy. Readers should remain attentive to the context and fact-checking of such statements as they continue to shape public discourse.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/23/trump-california-election-probe-do-me-a-favor-00972919

Trump celebrates Goldman loss: 'Finally GONE'

Administration News — 2026-06-24 07:53:00 — thehill.com

Donald Trump Celebrates Dan Goldman’s Primary Loss with Personal Attacks and Unsubstantiated Claims

Donald Trump took to Truth Social late Tuesday to celebrate the defeat of Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) in his House primary race against Brad Lander, the former New York City comptroller. Trump wrote, “Weak and pathetic Congressman Dan Goldman just lost, BIG!” and went on to claim, “I guess people didn’t like him illegally targeting President TRUMP.” He further escalated his rhetoric by adding, “In any event, this jerk is….”

Trump’s comments included both personal attacks and an unsubstantiated accusation regarding Goldman’s actions. By labeling Goldman as “weak and pathetic” and a “jerk,” Trump continued his pattern of disparaging political opponents. His claim that Goldman was “illegally targeting President TRUMP” is not supported by any evidence in the excerpt, reflecting a broader trend in which Trump frequently makes accusations without substantiation.

These statements are consistent with Trump’s history of using social media to attack critics and opponents, often resorting to exaggeration or false claims. The assertion that Goldman’s loss was due to “illegally targeting” Trump is presented without factual backing, serving more as a personal narrative than a verified account of events.

In summary, Trump’s reaction to Goldman’s primary defeat was characterized by personal insults and an unsupported allegation, underscoring his ongoing use of inflammatory rhetoric and unverified claims when addressing political adversaries. Readers should be aware of this pattern as they evaluate Trump’s public statements and their impact on political discourse.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5937775-donald-trump-dan-goldman-loss-new-york-primaries/

The 4 Republican senators who voted for war powers resolution, breaking with Trump

Politics — 2026-06-24 06:21:00 — www.washingtonpost.com

President Trump Lashes Out at Republican Senators Over Iran War Powers Resolution

President Donald Trump sharply criticized four Republican senators who voted to block his ability to resume military action against Iran, highlighting a deepening rift between the White House and the GOP-controlled Senate during his second term.

Trump’s public rebuke of the senators came after the Senate passed a resolution aimed at curbing his authority to unilaterally escalate military conflict with Iran. The president’s reaction underscores his ongoing efforts to assert broad executive power in matters of national security, often clashing with members of his own party who seek greater congressional oversight.

Trump’s Attacks and False Claims

In his response, President Trump lashed out at the Republican senators, framing their votes as a betrayal and suggesting that their actions undermined national security. This characterization distorts the intent of the resolution, which was designed to reinforce Congress’s constitutional role in authorizing acts of war, not to weaken America’s defense posture.

Throughout the debate, Trump repeatedly claimed that restricting his war powers would “show weakness” to adversaries and embolden Iran. However, fact-checkers have noted that the resolution does not prevent the president from defending the United States against imminent threats; rather, it requires congressional approval for sustained military engagement. This distinction is critical, as Trump’s statements exaggerate the resolution’s impact and misrepresent its legal and practical effects.

A Growing Schism Within the GOP

The president’s attacks on his fellow Republicans mark one of the most significant schisms between the Senate and the White House in recent years. By publicly targeting senators from his own party, Trump has intensified internal divisions and raised questions about the future of bipartisan cooperation on foreign policy and national security.

Conclusion

President Trump’s reaction to the Senate’s Iran war powers resolution demonstrates his willingness to disparage members of his own party and to make misleading claims about congressional oversight of military action. As the debate over executive authority continues, Trump’s statements and actions remain a focal point in the ongoing struggle between the legislative and executive branches over the conduct of U.S. foreign policy.

Source article

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/24/4-republican-senators-who-voted-war-powers-resolution-breaking-with-trump/

Trump Is Making Big Claims About the Iran Talks. Iran Keeps Contradicting Him.

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-06-24 01:48:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Draws Red Line on Iran Nuclear Inspections Amid Disputed Claims

President Trump has made clear that any nuclear accord with Iran hinges on the ability of international inspectors to access Iranian nuclear sites. On Tuesday, Trump stated that if there were no inspections, “there was no accord,” underscoring his administration’s hardline stance as negotiations continue to face significant obstacles.

Disputed Progress on Inspections

The issue of inspections has been a central point of contention in recent talks held in Switzerland. While two officials familiar with the negotiations confirmed that granting the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) broad powers for short-notice inspections was under discussion, Iranian officials have publicly denied any imminent agreement. Tehran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, pushed back on claims that inspectors would soon be allowed into key nuclear facilities, insisting there were no such plans for sites at Isfahan, Natanz, and Fordo.

Fact-Checking the Claims

Despite some U.S. officials suggesting progress, the reality on the ground remains far more complicated. The Iranians have agreed in principle to the concept of inspections but have withheld commitment to specific dates or details, tying their cooperation to broader negotiations over access to billions in frozen funds. This directly contradicts any assertion that inspections are about to begin, highlighting the ongoing gap between public statements and diplomatic realities.

Trump’s Position and the Path Forward

Trump’s declaration that inspections are a non-negotiable condition for any deal places additional pressure on the diplomatic process. His response came after conflicting reports from both sides, reflecting the deep mistrust and complex politics at play. As Secretary of State Marco Rubio noted, the situation remains fluid, with Iran’s internal politics adding another layer of uncertainty.

Conclusion

President Trump’s insistence on inspections as a prerequisite for any nuclear agreement with Iran sets a clear, public red line. However, the facts emerging from the negotiations show that no imminent inspection plan has been agreed upon, and Iranian officials continue to resist outside access to their nuclear facilities. As talks continue, Trump’s stance will likely remain a central issue, shaping the prospects for any future accord.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/23/us/politics/trump-iran-talks-contradictions.html

Donald J. Trump: “Many Communists running in badly failing Blue States. The votes seem to have…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-06-23 22:52:00 — trumpstruth.org

Donald Trump Labels Blue States as “Communist,” Predicts Further Decline

Donald Trump recently claimed, “Many Communists running in badly failing Blue States. The votes seem to have them doing quite well against each other. The bad news is that history has conclusively shown that the downtrodden States that they will soon be running will ONLY GET WORSE. MAGA!” This statement, attributed directly to Trump, continues his pattern of attacking Democratic-led states and making sweeping, disparaging claims about their leadership and future.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s assertion that there are “many Communists running” in Democratic-controlled states is not supported by evidence. While some candidates in blue states may advocate for progressive policies, labeling them as “Communists” is a distortion. The term “Communist” refers to a specific political ideology that is not represented by mainstream Democratic candidates.

Additionally, Trump’s claim that these states are “badly failing” and “downtrodden” is contradicted by various economic and social indicators. Many Democratic-led states, such as California, New York, and Massachusetts, rank highly in GDP, education, and healthcare outcomes. While these states face challenges, the blanket assertion that they are “failing” is misleading.

Historical Context and Exaggeration

Trump further claims that “history has conclusively shown” that states under Democratic leadership “will ONLY GET WORSE.” This is an exaggeration not supported by historical data. States’ economic and social outcomes fluctuate due to a range of factors, including national trends and local policies, and there is no conclusive evidence that Democratic leadership leads to inevitable decline.

Conclusion

Trump’s recent comments continue his pattern of using inflammatory language and exaggerations to attack political opponents. By labeling Democratic candidates as “Communists” and predicting doom for blue states, he distorts the facts and misleads the public. Voters should be aware of these tactics and seek out accurate information when evaluating claims about state performance and political leadership.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/39504

Mamdani-backed candidates sweep Democratic primaries in New York City | New York

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-06-23 21:40:00 — www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump’s Influence on GOP Primaries Remains Strong

Donald Trump’s grip on the Republican Party was once again on display as several candidates he endorsed secured victories in key primary races across the country. In the upstate New York 21st congressional district, Anthony Constantino, who was endorsed by the president, won the Republican primary, positioning himself as the favorite to win in November in a heavily Republican seat. This district was previously held by Elise Stefanik, a prominent supporter of Trump’s agenda.

Trump’s involvement extended beyond New York. In South Carolina, he initially endorsed Lieutenant Governor Pamela Evette for the Republican nomination for governor but later decided to endorse both Evette and state attorney general Alan Wilson, telling voters they “can’t go wrong.” This move highlights Trump’s ongoing efforts to shape the direction of the Republican Party and maintain loyalty among its ranks.

Additionally, Trump has endorsed incumbents running in three Republican-strong districts, further cementing his role as a kingmaker within the party. His endorsements continue to carry significant weight, often determining the outcome of closely contested primaries.

Conclusion

The latest round of primaries underscores Donald Trump’s enduring influence over the Republican Party. His endorsements remain a decisive factor in primary races, reflecting his continued dominance and the party’s alignment with his political brand. As the general election approaches, Trump’s sway over GOP candidates and voters is likely to remain a central feature of the political landscape.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/23/new-york-primary-results-house

Maryland Democrats pick their U.S. House nominees as Moore wins primary for governor

PBS NewsHour – Politics — 2026-06-23 19:37:00 — www.pbs.org

President Donald Trump Falsely Claims Maryland Governor Sent Illegal Ballots to Help Democrats

President Donald Trump has once again come under fire for spreading misinformation about the integrity of elections—this time targeting Maryland’s primary process. In the lead-up to Tuesday’s consequential primaries, Trump seized on a ballot distribution error and falsely claimed that Governor Wes Moore “illegally sent the ballots to ensure victory for Democrats.”

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claim

The facts show that the ballot issue in Maryland was the result of a vendor error, not any illegal action by Governor Moore or state officials. The State Board of Elections had to resend mail-in ballots to some voters after a technical mistake caused some to receive a ballot for the wrong party. There is no evidence that Moore or any state official acted unlawfully or with partisan intent.

Maryland’s state administrator of elections publicly rebuked Trump for spreading misinformation, emphasizing that the incident was a logistical error that was quickly addressed to protect voters’ rights.

A Pattern of Election Misinformation

Trump’s false claim about Maryland’s ballots fits a broader pattern of baseless allegations about election fraud and manipulation. These statements have been repeatedly fact-checked and debunked by election officials and independent observers across the country.

Conclusion

As Maryland’s primary results shape the state’s political future, Trump’s latest falsehood underscores the ongoing challenge of combating misinformation in American elections. State officials and election administrators continue to urge voters to rely on verified information and to participate in the democratic process with confidence in its integrity.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/maryland-democrats-pick-their-u-s-house-nominees-as-moore-wins-primary-for-governor

Trump’s Pick for Top I.R.S. Lawyer Works at Firm That Represents Him

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-06-23 20:36:00 — www.nytimes.com

President Trump Nominates Lawyer from His Own Tax Firm to Lead IRS Legal Team Amid Audit Controversy

President Trump has nominated James R. Gadwood, a tax lawyer from Miller & Chevalier—a firm that has represented his own holding company, DJT Holdings LLC—to serve as the chief counsel of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This move comes at a time when the Trump administration has already faced intense scrutiny for its unprecedented decision to grant the president, his family, and their affiliates protection from IRS tax audits.

Trump’s Direct Involvement and Audit Immunity

According to the White House, Trump personally selected Gadwood for the top IRS legal job. The president and his holding company have been subject to repeated IRS audits, as the agency’s longstanding policy has been to audit the president’s tax returns annually. However, a central issue in Gadwood’s confirmation process is the Trump administration’s decision to halt these audits. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche ordered this protection as part of a settlement to a lawsuit Trump filed against the IRS earlier this year.

The administration has maintained its stance on this sweeping tax immunity, even after abandoning a proposed $1.8 billion fund meant to compensate individuals who claimed to be victims of federal overreach. That fund was initially part of the deal to end Trump’s lawsuit, which argued that the IRS should have prevented the leak of his tax returns during his first term.

Legal and Ethical Questions Raised

Blanche’s directive to end audits of Trump and his family has raised significant legal questions for the IRS, including whether agency employees could face criminal penalties for complying with the order. One unresolved tax dispute with the IRS could have cost Trump more than $100 million.

It remains unclear how Gadwood would handle the audit immunity issue if confirmed. The current acting chief counsel, Kenneth Kies, who also previously represented Trump on tax matters, has recused himself from any issues involving the president.

Pattern of Personal Involvement in IRS Leadership

Trump has shown a consistent interest in the IRS chief counsel position. In his first term, he urged Senate leaders to prioritize the confirmation of his nominee, Michael Desmond, who later became chairman of the tax practice at Miller & Chevalier—the same firm now employing Gadwood. Trump’s first nominee for the top IRS legal job in his second term, Donald L. Korb, was withdrawn after criticism from hard-right activists.

The IRS has experienced instability during Trump’s second term, with multiple temporary leaders and the firing of Trump’s own pick for IRS commissioner after just two months. The agency is currently led by Frank Bisignano, who also heads the Social Security Administration.

Conclusion

President Trump’s nomination of a lawyer from his own tax firm to lead the IRS legal team, combined with his administration’s move to halt audits of his own taxes, has intensified concerns about conflicts of interest and the integrity of the nation’s tax enforcement system. The outcome of Gadwood’s confirmation process will likely have lasting implications for the IRS and public trust in the administration of tax law.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/23/us/politics/trump-top-irs-lawyer.html

Alan Wilson, boosted by Trump’s late co-endorsement, wins South Carolina governor runoff

Politics — 2026-06-23 18:29:00 — www.politico.com

Trump’s Last-Minute Dual Endorsement in South Carolina: A Strategic Move to Protect His Record

Donald Trump took to Truth Social last Friday to announce, “I can’t hurt one of them by only Endorsing the other, so, therefore, I am going to Endorse, for Governor of South Carolina, both Pam Evette and Alan Wilson! It’s a Wealth of Riches – With either one you can’t go wrong.” This unusual dual endorsement came after Trump’s original pick, Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, appeared to be trailing in the polls despite his support.

Shifting Endorsements to Avoid Losses

Trump’s decision to endorse both candidates was a clear attempt to avoid another high-profile setback to his endorsement record. Recent losses in Georgia’s and Iowa’s gubernatorial primaries had already dealt blows to his reputation as a kingmaker within the Republican Party. By backing both Evette and Attorney General Alan Wilson, Trump positioned himself to claim victory regardless of the outcome.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Position

The excerpt does not contain any outright false claims or disparagements by Trump but does highlight his strategic maneuvering. Rather than standing by his initial endorsement, Trump shifted his position in response to polling data, suggesting a willingness to hedge his bets to maintain his image of political influence. His statement, “With either one you can’t go wrong,” glosses over the reality that his original endorsement was not sufficient to boost Evette’s campaign, prompting the need for a last-minute adjustment.

Conclusion: Image Management Over Principle

Trump’s dual endorsement in the South Carolina governor’s race underscores his focus on protecting his personal brand and endorsement record, rather than steadfastly supporting a single candidate. This episode illustrates how Trump adapts his public positions to avoid the appearance of failure, prioritizing optics and political capital over consistency. As the general election approaches, Trump’s actions in South Carolina serve as a reminder of his ongoing efforts to shape the narrative around his influence within the Republican Party.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/23/wilson-wins-south-carolina-governor-primary-00973028

WATCH: Trump says nuclear inspectors will be able to enter Iran at ‘appropriate time’

PBS NewsHour – Politics — 2026-06-23 14:33:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Claims Iran Agreed to Nuclear Inspections, Downplays Urgency Amid GOP Criticism

President Donald Trump asserted Tuesday that Iran had agreed to United Nations inspections of its nuclear sites, but emphasized there was “no rush” for inspectors to be on the ground. Speaking to reporters in Pennsylvania, Trump said that if Iran had not agreed to inspections, he would have called off talks, stating, “I’d cancel the meetings right now.” When pressed on the timing of inspections, Trump responded, “There’s no rush. They’ll be on the ground at the appropriate time.”

Trump’s comments come as his interim deal with Iran faces criticism from Republicans in Congress, including Sen. Ted Cruz, who argue the agreement offers Iran significant benefits without immediate returns for the United States. Addressing these concerns, Trump dismissed the criticism, saying, “I think anybody that’s been critical has to be educated — even if they’re friends of mine.”

Fact-Checking Trump’s Statements

Trump’s insistence that Iran agreed to inspections, paired with his claim of “no rush,” raises questions about the immediacy and enforceability of the deal’s terms. Critics, including some within his own party, have highlighted that the agreement may grant Iran advantages while delaying substantive oversight.

Additionally, Trump’s suggestion that critics “have to be educated” serves as a disparagement of fellow Republicans who have voiced legitimate policy concerns. This pattern of dismissing dissenting views is consistent with Trump’s approach to criticism throughout his presidency.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statements regarding the Iran deal reflect a tendency to downplay the urgency of oversight while overstating the agreement’s immediate impact. His response to critics underscores his willingness to publicly belittle those who question his policies, even among his allies. As the debate over the Iran deal continues, Trump’s record of exaggerations and dismissive rhetoric remains a central issue in evaluating his approach to international negotiations and domestic dissent.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-trump-says-nuclear-inspectors-will-be-able-to-enter-iran-at-appropriate-time