What we know about Trump’s deal giving U.S. access to vast oil reserves in Venezuela

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-29 14:44:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Touts “Biggest Oil Deal in World History” in Venezuela, but Experts and Facts Cast Doubt on Claims

President Donald Trump has declared that the United States has secured “THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY” with Venezuela, promising Americans a stake in the country’s vast oil reserves and lower gas prices. However, a closer examination of the facts and expert analysis reveals significant gaps and exaggerations in Trump’s statements.

Trump’s Claims and the Reality

Trump announced that the agreement would give the U.S. a controlling stake in Venezuelan oil, following the capture and extradition of Nicolás Maduro to face federal drug trafficking charges. He said the deal, negotiated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, would allow the U.S. and a private operator to develop 17 oil fields with a potential of 65 billion barrels over 100 years. Trump also asserted that the deal would help lower gas prices for Americans, a key objective as oil prices remain high due to the ongoing Iran war.

Fact-Checking the Promises

Despite Trump’s assurances, experts warn that the deal is unlikely to deliver immediate relief at the pump. Venezuela’s oil infrastructure is in severe disrepair, and any meaningful increase in production would require years and billions of dollars in investment. Amy Myers Jaffe, director of the Energy, Climate Justice and Sustainability Lab at New York University, stated that the deal “could be helpful in the long run, but it’s not going to do anything to change the price of gasoline at the retail station for Labor Day weekend.” The average price of gas in the U.S. remains significantly higher than last year, and there is no clear plan for who will finance the necessary upgrades.

Unanswered Questions and Skepticism

Key details about the agreement remain undisclosed, including the identity of the private operator and the breakdown of America’s 55% stake in the new company. Experts also question the value of Venezuela’s reserves, noting that figures may have been exaggerated in the past. Industry analysts are skeptical that major U.S. oil companies will rush to invest, given the political instability and damaged infrastructure in Venezuela.

Political Fallout and Criticism

Trump’s move has sparked controversy both in Venezuela and on Capitol Hill. Some Venezuelans view the deal as a betrayal of national sovereignty, while opposition figures and economists have called it “shameful” and “illegitimate.” In the U.S., Trump allies have praised the agreement, but Democratic lawmakers have condemned it as a corrupt maneuver that puts American service members at risk for the benefit of wealthy interests.

Conclusion

While President Trump has promoted the Venezuela oil deal as a historic achievement and a solution to high gas prices, the facts suggest otherwise. The lack of transparency, logistical hurdles, and expert skepticism all point to a reality far more complicated than the president’s bold claims. As the situation develops, Americans are left waiting for real answers—and real results—beyond the headlines.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-we-know-about-trumps-deal-giving-u-s-access-to-vast-oil-reserves-in-venezuela

Untested in court, Trump’s new tariffs on Canada raise legal questions

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-29 10:58:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump’s Use of Obscure Tariff Law Sparks Trade War and Legal Doubts

President Donald Trump has reignited tensions with Canada by invoking Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, a nearly century-old law that had never before been used by any president. Trump imposed a 50% tariff on $20 billion worth of Canadian imports, citing alleged discrimination against U.S. dairy, auto, and alcoholic beverage exports. The move immediately triggered dollar-for-dollar retaliation from Ottawa, further straining relations between the two countries.

Trump’s Position on Tariffs and the Smoot-Hawley Act

Trump, who refers to himself as “Tariff Man,” has defended his aggressive use of tariffs, arguing that the infamous Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the 1930s came too late to save the American economy during the Great Depression. This view stands in stark contrast to the consensus among economists and historians, who blame those tariffs for worsening the global economic crisis.

Legal and Factual Challenges to Trump’s Claims

Legal experts have raised significant questions about Trump’s use of Section 338. The law, part of the broader Smoot-Hawley Act, was designed to allow the president to impose tariffs of up to 50% on imports from countries discriminating against U.S. businesses. However, the Trump administration did not attempt to calculate the actual damage caused by Canadian trade practices, as required by the statute. Instead, tariffs were applied broadly, including to products unrelated to the alleged disputes, such as hockey sticks and cement.

Furthermore, experts note that Canada’s dairy protections do not specifically target U.S. farmers, but apply to all trading partners. Notably, the U.S. had previously agreed to Canada’s dairy quota system in a trade pact negotiated by Trump himself. Legal scholars called it “incongruous, to say the least, for the United States to denounce as discriminatory the very terms it agreed to.”

Obsolescence and Legal Uncertainty

Many trade lawyers argue that Section 338 has been rendered obsolete by more recent trade laws, which both limit and clarify presidential tariff authority. These newer laws require investigations and procedural steps that Trump’s administration bypassed. As a result, there is considerable doubt whether the tariffs could survive a legal challenge.

Conclusion

Trump’s unprecedented use of Section 338 has not only escalated a trade war with Canada but also raised serious legal and factual questions about the legitimacy and effectiveness of his approach. By invoking a long-dormant law and disregarding both established procedures and previous agreements, Trump’s actions have drawn criticism from legal experts and economists alike, highlighting a pattern of exaggeration and distortion in his trade policy justifications. The ongoing dispute underscores the broader risks and uncertainties created by Trump’s confrontational and unconventional trade tactics.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/untested-in-court-trumps-new-tariffs-on-canada-raise-legal-questions

Trump Says U.S. Struck Deal for Control of More Than 65 Billion Barrels of Venezuela’s Oil

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-29 11:53:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Claims U.S. Has Secured Majority Control of Venezuela’s Oil Reserves in Unprecedented Deal

President Trump announced late Friday that the United States had struck a deal to take majority control of a massive portion of Venezuela’s oil reserves, describing the move as a bold effort to assert U.S. dominance over energy in the Western Hemisphere. Trump stated in a social media post that the agreement would give the United States control of more than 65 billion barrels of proven oil reserves—an amount he said is nearly equal to the total proven reserves in the United States, the world’s largest oil producer.

Trump’s Boast and the Unusual Nature of the Deal

According to Trump, the agreement marks a sweeping shift in U.S. foreign energy policy, involving a partnership with a private company connected to Venezuelan businessman Alejandro Betancourt López. The State Department, speaking through a U.S. official, confirmed the partnership but provided few details. The deal is highly unusual, representing a rare foray by the U.S. into another country’s oil fields through private-sector collaboration rather than direct government control.

Sparse Details and Unanswered Questions

While Trump touted the scale of the deal, the specifics remain unclear. The text of the agreement was not immediately available, and neither Betancourt nor the State Department responded to requests for comment about the businessman’s role. Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez called the agreement “historic,” claiming it would develop 17 oil fields, attract over $100 billion in investment, and generate an estimated $209 billion for Venezuela’s struggling government. However, these figures and projections have not been independently verified.

Context: U.S. Policy Shift and Venezuelan Upheaval

The Trump administration’s approach to Venezuela has been marked by dramatic intervention. Earlier this year, the administration deposed and captured Nicolás Maduro, transforming Venezuela from an adversary into what now resembles a client state. Trump and his advisers have openly stated that oil is central to their campaign to expand U.S. influence in the Americas, a stance that departs from previous U.S. leaders who avoided linking military or foreign policy objectives directly to resource acquisition.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s assertion that the U.S. would control over 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil reserves is striking, given that Venezuela is believed to have the world’s largest oil reserves. However, the lack of transparency around the agreement and the absence of the actual contract text make it difficult to assess the accuracy of his claim. Historically, U.S. oil exploration in Venezuela has been conducted by the state-owned Petróleos de Venezuela or through joint ventures, not by direct U.S. government control.

Conclusion

President Trump’s announcement signals a major shift in U.S. foreign energy policy and raises significant questions about the legality, transparency, and long-term consequences of such a move. While Trump has framed the deal as a triumph for U.S. energy dominance, the absence of clear details and independent verification leaves his claims open to scrutiny. As more information emerges, the true scope and impact of this unprecedented agreement will become clearer, but for now, Trump’s statements remain largely unsubstantiated by publicly available evidence.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/28/business/trump-venezuela-oil-deal.html

Week in Politics: Trump renames Lake Ontario 'Lake America'; Fed chair signals hikes

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-08-29 06:40:00 — www.npr.org

President Trump Orders Renaming of Lake Ontario to “Lake America” in Move Aimed at Provoking Canada

In a controversial move, President Trump signed an executive order to change the name of Lake Ontario to “Lake America,” a decision widely interpreted as an attempt to provoke Canadian leaders. The executive order, which directly targets one of North America’s most prominent shared bodies of water, has already sparked diplomatic tensions and raised questions about the administration’s approach to international relations.

Fact-Checking the Executive Order

The claim that President Trump signed an executive order to rename Lake Ontario is not supported by any historical precedent or legal authority. Lake Ontario, one of the five Great Lakes, is jointly managed by the United States and Canada, and any unilateral attempt to rename it would lack international recognition and legal standing. The executive order appears to be a symbolic gesture rather than a substantive policy change, and its primary effect seems to be provoking a reaction from Canadian officials.

Pattern of Provocative and False Statements

This latest action fits a broader pattern of President Trump making provocative statements and taking actions designed to elicit strong responses from foreign leaders. By targeting the name of a shared natural resource, Trump continues a record of using executive authority for headline-grabbing moves that often lack practical impact or factual basis.

Conclusion

President Trump’s executive order to rename Lake Ontario as “Lake America” exemplifies his ongoing use of symbolic gestures to provoke international controversy. The move has no legal effect and is not recognized by Canada, highlighting a pattern of statements and actions from the administration that are more about political theater than substantive policy. As with previous claims and executive actions, this episode underscores the importance of fact-checking and critical scrutiny of presidential statements and decisions.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/08/29/nx-s1-5945108/week-in-politics-trump-renames-lake-ontario-lake-america-fed-chair-signals-hikes

Trump announces new US oil agreement with Venezuela | Donald Trump

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-08-28 18:34:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump Claims “Majority” U.S. Control Over Venezuelan Oil—Key Details Missing, Fact-Checks Raise Questions

Donald Trump announced Friday a new U.S. oil agreement with Venezuela’s interim president Delcy Rodríguez, asserting that the United States will have “majority” control of 65 billion barrels of proven oil reserves. Trump made the announcement on his social-media platform, stating the deal was brokered “through a partnership with private business” by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Trump’s Claims: “Majority Control” and “No Cost”

According to Trump, the administration has “secured majority U.S. control of more than 65 BILLION BARRELS of proven Oil Reserves in Venezuela, at no cost to the American Taxpayer.” He further claimed the agreement would more than double American oil reserves.

Despite these sweeping statements, Trump’s announcement provided few specifics on the structure of the agreement, which oil fields or companies are involved, or how the U.S. would exercise majority control over the reserves. Venezuela is estimated to have 303 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, the largest in the world.

Fact-Check: Exaggerations and Omissions

Trump’s assertion that the U.S. now controls 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil, “at no cost to the American taxpayer,” lacks supporting details. No information was provided about the terms of the deal, the mechanism of control, or how such a transfer of reserves would occur without financial or political cost. The claim that this would “more than double” U.S. oil reserves is also questionable, given that the U.S. currently has about 35 billion barrels in proven reserves—Trump’s figure would indeed be a dramatic increase, but the feasibility and legality of such control remain unaddressed.

Political Context and Reactions

Trump is facing pressure ahead of November’s midterm elections due to rising gasoline prices. The administration has been seeking ways to secure cheaper oil supplies and replenish the U.S. strategic petroleum reserve. Reports from the Wall Street Journal and Axios indicated that the administration was in advanced talks for the U.S. to take a direct stake in over a dozen Venezuelan oilfields, potentially involving up to 90 billion barrels of reserves.

The announcement has sparked anger among members of Venezuela’s opposition, who criticized Trump’s approach as a “land grab” and accused the U.S. of acting in a “rapacious, mafioso” manner, in stark contrast to historic American foreign policy initiatives like the Marshall Plan.

Conclusion: Big Promises, Big Questions

Trump’s bold claims about securing majority U.S. control over Venezuelan oil reserves—at no cost and with little detail—raise significant questions about the accuracy and transparency of the announcement. With no clear explanation of how such control would be implemented or what the agreement entails, Trump’s statements appear to exaggerate the immediate impact and benefits of the deal. As the situation develops, both the American and Venezuelan public await concrete details to assess whether this is a diplomatic breakthrough or another example of political grandstanding.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/28/trump-venezuela-oil-agreement

News Wrap: Friday marks 6 months since Iran war started

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-28 17:50:00 — www.pbs.org

President Trump Claimed Iran Conflict Would Last Weeks—Six Months Later, Devastation Remains

President Trump said the U.S. and Israel’s military strikes on Iran would last “a matter of weeks.” Now, six months after the conflict began, the scars of war are still visible across Iran, with cities like Minab mourning the loss of more than 100 children killed in a school bombing on the war’s first day. Buildings remain in ruins, and families continue to grieve, highlighting the ongoing human cost of a conflict that has far outlasted Trump’s initial prediction.

At a separate event, President Trump honored the Artemis II lunar mission crew with the Congressional Space Medal of Honor, praising them as “four intrepid space heroes whose sense of daring and adventure led them further from Earth than anyone has ever traveled before.” The ceremony also included Trump’s signing of an executive order to create the United States Space Academy, which he compared to a West Point for the military space branch.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration faces legal challenges after a federal judge ruled that Pentagon measures against A.I. company Anthropic were “illegal and baseless.” The judge found that Anthropic was denied due process when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth labeled the company a national security risk after it refused to allow military use of its A.I. models for surveillance or autonomous weapons. The administration is expected to contest the ruling.

Trump’s statements and actions continue to draw scrutiny, particularly as the consequences of his policies and predictions unfold in real time. The ongoing conflict in Iran, which he said would be brief, remains unresolved, leaving a trail of destruction and grief that stands in stark contrast to his earlier assurances.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/news-wrap-friday-marks-6-months-since-iran-war-started

Trump says U.S. has entered deal with Venezuela to take control of 65 billion barrels of oil reserves : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-08-28 21:07:00 — www.npr.org

Trump Touts “Biggest Oil Deal in World History” With Venezuela, But Experts Warn of Overblown Claims

President Donald Trump announced Friday that his administration has reached what he called “THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY” with Venezuela, claiming it will give the United States access to vast amounts of the country’s untapped oil reserves at cost. Trump made the declaration in a social media post, stating the agreement was negotiated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Venezuela’s acting President Delcy Rodríguez.

Trump’s Sweeping Claims

Trump’s post described the deal as a historic breakthrough, emphasizing its scale and potential benefit to the U.S. “The United States of America has just entered into an Agreement with the Country of Venezuela on, THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY!” he wrote.

He has also insisted that his administration has brought stability to Venezuela, arguing that the country “stole U.S. oil” when former President Hugo Chávez nationalized foreign-owned assets decades ago.

The Details and the Reality

According to Venezuelan officials, the agreement involves developing 17 oil fields with a proven potential of 65 billion barrels, potentially drawing $100 billion in investment and generating over $209 billion in taxes for Venezuela. The deal would allow the United States to partner with a private operator to create a new company controlling the reserves, with the U.S. holding a 55% effective output stake and rights to buy oil at cost. The company would become the world’s second-largest corporate holder of proven reserves after Saudi Aramco, according to a U.S. official.

However, experts cited in the report caution that a significant drop in U.S. gas prices should not be expected soon. They point out that boosting Venezuelan oil production will take years and require billions in infrastructure investment. Venezuela’s oil sector has suffered from decades of neglect, and even with mapped reserves, the country currently produces only about 1% of the world’s oil.

Industry Skepticism

Despite Trump’s push, major American oil companies remain wary. After the ouster of Nicolás Maduro, Trump called on oil executives to return to Venezuela, but they expressed caution. Darren Woods, CEO of ExxonMobil, described the country as “un-investable” at the time due to political instability and damaged infrastructure.

Conclusion

While President Trump has framed the Venezuela oil agreement as a historic achievement that will benefit both nations and lower U.S. gas prices, the facts presented in the report suggest a more complex reality. Experts warn that any tangible impact on oil prices is years away, and the challenges of restoring Venezuela’s oil industry are significant. Trump’s characterization of the deal as the “biggest oil deal in world history” appears exaggerated when weighed against the logistical and economic hurdles ahead.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/08/28/nx-s1-5948229/trump-says-u-s-has-entered-deal-with-venezuela-to-take-control-of-65-billion-barrels-of-oil-reserves

Donald J. Trump: “Governor Kathy Hochul is for Canada, a Country that has been ripping off New…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-28 21:22:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Attacks Governor Hochul, Makes Unsubstantiated Claims About Canada and New York

Donald Trump issued a statement sharply criticizing New York Governor Kathy Hochul, claiming, “Governor Kathy Hochul is for Canada, a Country that has been ripping off New York State for years, especially under her Administration, instead of the good ‘ol U.S.A.” Trump further alleged that Hochul would not “respect or acknowledge LAKE AMERICA,” and disparaged Democrats, calling them “Dumocrats” and asserting they are “so bad for our Country.” He concluded by endorsing Bruce Blakeman for governor, promising, “He has my Complete and Total Endorsement, and will never let you down!”

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s statement contains several notable attacks and unsubstantiated assertions:

• Claim about Governor Hochul and Canada: Trump accuses Hochul of favoring Canada over the United States and alleges that Canada has been “ripping off New York State for years, especially under her Administration.” There is no evidence provided in the statement to support the claim that Hochul prioritizes Canadian interests or that Canada has exploited New York during her tenure. Trade and cross-border relations between New York and Canada are complex, but no factual basis is presented for this sweeping accusation.

• Lake America Reference: Trump claims Hochul would not “respect or acknowledge LAKE AMERICA.” There is no public record or reporting that Hochul has made statements to this effect or that a body of water named “Lake America” is at issue in New York-Canada relations. This appears to be an invented or exaggerated talking point.

• Disparagement of Democrats: Trump refers to Democrats as “Dumocrats” and claims they are “so bad for our Country.” This is a personal attack rather than a factual statement and does not address any specific policy or action.

Endorsement of Bruce Blakeman

Trump concludes by urging voters to support Bruce Blakeman for governor, stating Blakeman “will never let you down.” This endorsement is a standard political position and does not contain factual claims requiring verification.

Conclusion

Trump’s latest statement about Governor Hochul is marked by unsubstantiated allegations and personal attacks. His assertions that Hochul favors Canada and that Canada has exploited New York under her administration lack supporting evidence. The reference to “Lake America” is not grounded in any known dispute or policy issue. As with many of Trump’s public statements, these remarks rely on exaggeration and disparagement rather than verifiable facts, underscoring the importance of careful scrutiny and fact-checking in political discourse.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41359

Trump says U.S. has entered deal with Venezuela to control 65 billion barrels of its oil reserves

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-28 18:35:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Claims “Biggest Oil Deal in World History” With Venezuela—Facts Tell a Different Story

President Donald Trump announced on Friday that the United States has entered into an agreement with Venezuela to take control of 65 billion barrels of the country’s oil reserves, calling it “THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY!” in a social media post. Trump stated the deal was negotiated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Venezuela’s interim President Delcy Rodriguez.

Trump’s Bold Claim

Trump’s announcement comes nearly nine months after he directed the U.S. military to capture Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro and bring him to the United States to face federal narcoterrorism and drug trafficking charges. In the aftermath of Maduro’s ouster, Trump floated the idea of U.S. oil companies returning to Venezuela, arguing that the country had previously “stolen” U.S. oil when former President Hugo Chavez nationalized foreign-owned assets, including those of American oil companies.

Fact-Checking the Numbers

While Venezuela does possess one of the world’s largest oil reserves—an estimated 303 billion barrels, or about 17% of the global supply according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration—Trump’s claim that the U.S. will “take control of 65 billion barrels” is not supported by the facts presented in the excerpt. There is no independent confirmation of such an agreement, and the figure Trump cited represents only a fraction of Venezuela’s total reserves.

Moreover, experts note that Venezuela’s oil reserves are well-mapped but largely untapped due to dilapidated infrastructure. The country currently produces only about 1% of the world’s oil, far below its potential output.

Context and Exaggeration

Trump’s announcement appears to be aimed at addressing mounting pressure over high gas prices as the war in Iran continues with no end in sight. The U.S. has already tapped into its strategic petroleum reserves, which have dropped by more than 100 million barrels since the start of 2026.

Despite Trump’s assertion of a historic oil deal, the reality is that Venezuela’s production capacity remains severely limited, and the logistics of transferring control of such a vast quantity of oil are not addressed in his statement. The claim of “the biggest oil deal in world history” is therefore a significant exaggeration based on the available facts.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statements about a massive U.S.-Venezuela oil agreement are not substantiated by the facts provided in the excerpt. While Venezuela’s oil reserves are indeed vast, the claim that the U.S. has secured control over 65 billion barrels—and that this constitutes the largest oil deal in history—does not align with expert assessments or current production realities. As with many of Trump’s past statements, the announcement is marked by exaggeration and lacks supporting evidence. Readers should approach such claims with caution and seek out independent verification.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-u-s-has-entered-deal-with-venezuela-to-control-65-billion-barrels-of-its-oil-reserves

Trump says US has a deal to take huge stake in Venezuela’s oil reserves

Donald Trump — 2026-08-28 18:51:00 — www.politico.com

Trump Claims Oil Plan Will Replenish Reserves and Lower Gas Prices

President Trump asserted that his administration’s plan “would help replenish U.S. oil reserves and drive down gas prices,” according to the . This statement comes as part of the administration’s ongoing efforts to address energy policy and the economic impact of fluctuating oil prices.

Examining Trump’s Claims

Trump’s claim that the plan would both replenish the nation’s oil reserves and lower gas prices is significant, as it addresses two major concerns for American consumers and the energy sector. However, fact-checks and expert analysis have often found that presidential actions alone do not immediately or directly lower gas prices, which are influenced by a complex mix of global supply, demand, and market speculation.

Record of Exaggerated Statements

The president has a history of making bold promises about the effects of his energy policies. In this instance, his assertion that the plan would drive down gas prices may overstate the direct impact of federal actions on consumer costs at the pump. While replenishing oil reserves can strengthen national energy security, the relationship between government oil purchases and retail gas prices is not always straightforward or immediate.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statement that the administration’s plan “would help replenish U.S. oil reserves and drive down gas prices” highlights his tendency to make sweeping claims about policy outcomes. While the intent to bolster reserves is clear, the promise of lower gas prices as a direct result is less certain, reflecting a pattern of exaggeration in the president’s public statements on economic issues. Readers should scrutinize such claims and consider the broader context and complexities of the energy market.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/28/trump-says-us-has-a-deal-to-take-huge-stake-in-venezuelas-oil-reserves-01055442