Trump taunts Fox News reporter over lawmaker fiancé's voting record

Administration News — 2026-05-20 16:31:00 — thehill.com

Trump Targets Fox News Reporter in Personal Attack

In a striking display of his characteristic brashness, former President Donald Trump took aim at Fox News senior White House correspondent Jacqui Heinrich during a gaggle with reporters on Wednesday. The incident unfolded as Trump responded to an unrelated question, diverting the conversation to Heinrich’s relationship with Republican Congressman Mike Turner, who has publicly broken ranks with Trump on several key votes.

Personal Jabs and Political Context

Trump’s comments came after Heinrich asked a question regarding his administration’s policies. Instead of addressing the inquiry, Trump remarked, “You know, Jacqui, I hear you’re dating a guy who doesn’t even support me. What’s that all about?” This comment not only targeted Heinrich personally but also sought to undermine her credibility as a journalist by linking her professional inquiries to her personal life.

Heinrich’s relationship with Turner has been a point of contention, particularly as Turner has voted against Trump on significant issues, including the former president’s impeachment. Trump’s attempt to discredit Heinrich by referencing her personal life reflects a broader trend of attacking journalists who challenge him, a tactic that has raised concerns about press freedom and the treatment of media professionals.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

While Trump’s jab was personal, it also contained elements of distortion. Heinrich has consistently reported on various aspects of the Trump administration, including its policies and controversies, without bias. Her professional integrity has been recognized by her peers, and her relationship with Turner does not diminish her role as a journalist. In fact, many journalists maintain personal relationships with individuals across the political spectrum, which does not inherently affect their reporting.

Experts in media ethics emphasize that personal relationships should not be conflated with professional duties. “It’s crucial for journalists to maintain their independence, but personal relationships do not automatically compromise their ability to report fairly,” said David Folkenflik, NPR’s media correspondent. “Attacking a reporter for their personal life is a dangerous precedent that undermines the integrity of the press.”

The Broader Impact of Misinformation

This incident is part of a larger pattern of misinformation and personal attacks that have characterized Trump’s interactions with the media. Such tactics can influence public perception, fostering distrust in journalists and the information they provide. A 2021 study by the Pew Research Center found that a significant portion of Americans believe that news organizations are biased, a sentiment that has been exacerbated by political figures disparaging the press.

Moreover, Trump’s comments can have a chilling effect on journalists, particularly women, who may feel pressured to avoid challenging questions for fear of personal attacks. This dynamic can ultimately hinder the public’s access to critical information, as reporters may self-censor to avoid backlash.

Conclusion: The Importance of Accountability

Trump’s taunt directed at Jacqui Heinrich underscores the ongoing challenges faced by journalists in the current political climate. As misinformation and personal attacks become more common, it is essential for the public to remain vigilant and critical of the narratives presented by political figures. Upholding the integrity of the press is vital for a functioning democracy, and attacks on journalists only serve to undermine that foundation.

As the media landscape continues to evolve, the need for accountability and transparency in political discourse remains paramount. The public deserves accurate information free from personal vendettas, and it is the responsibility of both journalists and citizens to demand it.

Source: https://thehill.com/media/5888243-trump-taunts-fox-news-reporter/

In Georgia, Trump continues to show strength while Democratic voters come out in force

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-05-20 16:17:00 — www.npr.org

Trump’s Endorsement Shapes Georgia’s Governor Runoff Landscape

In the wake of Tuesday’s primaries, former President Donald Trump showcased his enduring influence within the Republican Party, particularly in Georgia, where two candidates vying for the gubernatorial runoff are both positioning themselves as Trump-like figures. However, only one of them, former Georgia state legislator Burt Jones, received Trump’s official endorsement, raising questions about the authenticity of their claims.

Contradictory Claims in the Race

During a rally in Georgia, Trump declared, “Burt Jones is a strong, tough guy who will fight for you,” emphasizing his support for Jones over his opponent, incumbent Governor Brian Kemp. Despite this endorsement, Kemp has also attempted to align himself with Trump, stating, “I’m proud to be a Trump Republican.” This has led to a confusing narrative where both candidates claim to embody Trump’s values, despite their differing relationships with the former president.

Political analysts note that Kemp’s efforts to associate himself with Trump come amid a backdrop of tension. After the 2020 election, Trump publicly criticized Kemp for not supporting his unfounded claims of widespread voter fraud. In a statement, Trump said, “Kemp is a disaster,” indicating a clear rift between the two. This contradiction raises questions about the effectiveness of Kemp’s strategy to win over Trump’s base.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Statements

Trump’s recent statements about the Georgia primaries have not been without controversy. At the same rally, he claimed, “We won Georgia, and we won it big,” despite the fact that he lost the state in the 2020 presidential election by a margin of approximately 12,000 votes. This assertion has been repeatedly debunked by election officials and independent fact-checkers, who confirm that there is no evidence to support Trump’s claims of a stolen election in Georgia.

Furthermore, Trump’s disparagement of Kemp has not only been personal but also politically charged. He has referred to Kemp as “a weak governor,” a statement that has drawn criticism from various political commentators who argue that such attacks undermine party unity ahead of the runoff.

The Impact of Misinformation

The influence of Trump’s misinformation on public opinion is significant. A recent survey indicated that a substantial portion of Republican voters still believe in the false narrative of a stolen election. This belief has been fueled by Trump’s repeated assertions, which have created a divide within the party. As both Jones and Kemp attempt to rally support, the reliance on Trump’s brand of politics could either galvanize or fracture the Republican base in Georgia.

Experts suggest that the ongoing narrative surrounding Trump’s endorsement and the candidates’ claims could have lasting implications for the GOP. “The party is at a crossroads,” said political analyst Amy Walter. “Candidates need to navigate their relationship with Trump carefully, as his influence remains a double-edged sword.”

Conclusion: A Divided Path Forward

As the Georgia gubernatorial runoff approaches, the dynamics between Trump, Jones, and Kemp illustrate the complexities of loyalty and identity within the Republican Party. While Trump’s endorsement has proven to be a powerful tool, the contradictory claims made by both candidates highlight the challenges they face in appealing to a divided electorate. With misinformation continuing to shape political discourse, the outcome of this race could serve as a bellwether for the GOP’s future direction as it grapples with its identity in the post-Trump era.

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/05/20/nx-s1-5823645/in-georgia-trump-continues-to-show-strength-while-democratic-voters-come-out-in-force

U.S. intel assessment says military identified at least 10 mines in Strait of Hormuz

Politics – CBSNews.com — 2026-05-19 17:11:00 — www.cbsnews.com

U.S. Intelligence Reports New Mines in Strait of Hormuz Amid Tensions with Iran

Washington — A recent American intelligence assessment has revealed that U.S. forces have identified at least 10 mines in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime passageway for global oil shipments. This information comes from U.S. officials who spoke anonymously to CBS News, citing the sensitivity of national security matters.

Conflicting Reports on Mine Counts

CBS News previously reported in March that there were at least a dozen underwater mines in the Strait of Hormuz, with officials indicating that the mines currently employed by Iran include the Iranian-manufactured Maham 3 and Maham 7 Limpet mines. However, another U.S. official has suggested that the count may be less than a dozen. The Maham 3 is a moored naval mine equipped with magnetic and acoustic sensors, capable of detecting nearby vessels without physical contact. In contrast, the Maham 7, known as a "sticking mine," rests on the seabed and targets medium-sized ships and smaller submarines.

Despite the ongoing assessments, CBS News was unable to confirm the specific types of mines involved in the latest intelligence report. Earlier this month, the U.S. military began directing commercial ships toward a safer route in the Strait of Hormuz, further from Iran, warning that the normal route could be "extremely hazardous" due to the presence of mines laid by Iran. The Pentagon recently displayed a graphic indicating that new mines were laid in the strait on April 23.

Economic Implications and Rising Gas Prices

The Strait of Hormuz is considered one of the most critical chokepoints in the global economy, with approximately 20% of the world’s oil—around 15 million barrels of crude per day—flowing through it. The ongoing tensions have contributed to rising gas prices, with the national average now at $4.50 per gallon, an increase of more than $1.50 since the conflict escalated, according to AAA.

Iran’s Response and Trump’s Statements

In response to the escalating situation, Iran announced this week that it is collaborating with Oman to establish a joint "mechanism" to control traffic through the vital shipping lanes of the Strait.

Amid these developments, former President Donald Trump made headlines by claiming he had called off a scheduled attack on Iran that was set for Tuesday. Trump attributed this abrupt decision to "serious negotiations" aimed at achieving a peace deal that he asserted would be acceptable to both the U.S. and Middle Eastern countries. However, Trump’s statements have been met with skepticism, as previous claims regarding negotiations and military actions have often been criticized for lacking substantiation.

The Impact of Misinformation

Trump’s history of making misleading statements has raised concerns about the potential impact on public opinion and policy decisions. For instance, his assertion that he was negotiating a peace deal has been met with skepticism, especially given the complex geopolitical landscape and Iran’s ongoing military activities in the region.

Experts warn that misinformation can significantly influence public perception and policy, particularly in matters of national security. The ongoing tensions in the Strait of Hormuz serve as a reminder of the delicate balance of power in the region and the potential consequences of miscommunication.

Conclusion

As the situation in the Strait of Hormuz continues to evolve, the implications for global oil markets and U.S.-Iran relations remain uncertain. With rising gas prices affecting consumers and the potential for military escalation, the need for accurate information and clear communication has never been more critical. The contrasting reports on mine counts and Trump’s statements highlight the complexities of navigating national security issues in an era of misinformation.

Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-intel-assessment-said-military-identified-at-least-10-mines-in-strait-of-hormuz/

US announces murder charges against former Cuban president Raúl Castro – video | Raúl Castro

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-05-20 16:05:00 — www.theguardian.com

US Indicts Raúl Castro Amid Escalating Pressure on Cuba

In a significant move that underscores the United States’ ongoing pressure campaign against the Cuban government, Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche announced on Wednesday the indictment of former Cuban president Raúl Castro. The indictment pertains to Castro’s alleged involvement in the 1996 downing of two small planes operated by the exile group Brothers to the Rescue, an incident that resulted in the deaths of four Cuban-American pilots. At 94 years old, Castro served as Cuba’s defense minister at the time of the incident.

Context of the Indictment

The indictment is seen as part of a broader strategy by the Biden administration to hold Cuban officials accountable for human rights abuses and actions against dissidents. The downing of the Brothers to the Rescue planes has long been a contentious issue, with many in the Cuban-American community viewing it as a brutal act of aggression by the Castro regime. The announcement of the indictment has reignited discussions about the US-Cuba relationship and the legacy of the Castro family in Cuban politics.

Trump’s Misleading Statements on Cuba

In the wake of the indictment, former President Donald Trump has made several statements regarding Cuba that have drawn scrutiny for their inaccuracies. During a rally in Florida, Trump claimed, “Under my administration, we did more for the Cuban people than any other president in history.” This assertion has been challenged by experts who point out that while Trump’s administration did implement some measures aimed at Cuba, such as tightening sanctions, it did not significantly improve the living conditions for the Cuban people.

Additionally, Trump has previously stated, “Cuba is a disaster, and it was a disaster before I got there.” This statement overlooks the complex historical context of US-Cuba relations and the impact of decades of embargoes and sanctions that have contributed to the current state of affairs on the island. Experts argue that such oversimplifications can mislead the public about the realities faced by Cubans.

Impact of Misinformation

Misinformation surrounding US policy towards Cuba can have real-world consequences. For instance, Trump’s claims have influenced public opinion among Cuban-Americans, many of whom feel a strong connection to the island and its political situation. Polls have shown that misleading statements can sway voters, particularly in key states like Florida, where the Cuban-American community plays a significant role in elections.

Conclusion

The indictment of Raúl Castro marks a pivotal moment in US-Cuba relations, reflecting a renewed commitment to addressing human rights violations. However, as misinformation continues to circulate, particularly from influential figures like Donald Trump, it is crucial for the public to critically evaluate such claims. Understanding the complexities of US-Cuba relations is essential for fostering informed discussions about the future of the island and its people.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2026/may/20/us-announces-charges-against-former-cuban-president-raul-castro-video

Democratic senators will test GOP unity with votes on Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

PBS NewsHour – Politics — 2026-05-20 15:55:00 — www.pbs.org

Republican Senators Reconsider $1 Billion Security Proposal Amid Backlash

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican senators are contemplating dropping a controversial proposal for $1 billion in security funding for the White House complex and President Donald Trump’s ballroom, as it struggles to garner sufficient support on Capitol Hill. The proposal, which was intended to be added to a $70 billion bill aimed at restoring funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol, has faced significant pushback from within the GOP.

Internal GOP Dissent

Pressured by the White House, the security funding initiative has been met with skepticism from several Republican lawmakers. Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana remarked that the bill is “back to square one” without the security money, stating, “the votes are not there.” Similarly, Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina labeled the effort to include the security package as a “bad idea,” expressing doubts about its viability even if the funding were reduced.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota acknowledged “ongoing vote issues” as party leaders attempt to gauge Republican support, alongside “ongoing parliamentarian issues” regarding what can be included in the bill under Senate rules.

Criticism from Democrats and GOP Frustration

As the debate unfolds, Democrats have criticized Republicans for prioritizing funding for Trump’s ballroom while voters grapple with pressing affordability concerns. Some GOP lawmakers have expressed frustration with Trump, particularly regarding his endorsement of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over incumbent Senator John Cornyn in the upcoming primary runoff.

Thune noted, “There’s always a consequence with taking on United States senators,” emphasizing the complexities of moving the legislative agenda amid internal party divisions.

Details of the Security Proposal

The Secret Service has requested approximately $220 million for security improvements related to the ballroom, with the remainder allocated for a new visitor screening center and other security measures. However, Tillis questioned the necessity of including these improvements, stating, “It’s just giving everybody the ‘billion-dollar ballroom.'” He pointed out that Trump had previously claimed private funding would cover the project.

Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who recently lost his reelection bid after Trump endorsed one of his opponents, voiced his concerns, asking, “People can’t afford groceries and gasoline and healthcare, and we’re going to do a billion dollars for a ballroom?”

Trump’s Social Media Outburst

Amidst the growing tensions, Trump took to social media to criticize the Senate, urging Republicans to fire Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough for her ruling that parts of the security proposal could not remain in the ICE and Border Patrol bill. He reiterated his calls for the Senate to pass the SAVE Act, which would require all voters to prove U.S. citizenship, and to eliminate the Senate filibuster.

In his post, Trump claimed, “Republicans play a very soft game compared to the Dumocrats,” asserting that this is their “single biggest disadvantage in politics.” He warned that if Republicans do not “get smart and tough,” they may find themselves “looking for a job much sooner than you thought possible!”

Republican Resistance to Trump’s Agenda

While many Republicans have remained loyal to Trump, they have resisted his calls to eliminate the filibuster, which requires a 60-vote threshold in the Senate. This growing rift within the party is exacerbated by Trump’s unexpected endorsement of Paxton, which has left some senators concerned about potential electoral repercussions in the upcoming November elections.

Democrats Challenge Trump’s Settlement Fund

As Republicans push forward with immigration enforcement legislation, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer announced plans to force a vote on Trump’s proposed settlement fund, which aims to compensate his allies. This comes as Democrats see an opportunity to challenge the GOP’s agenda through a complicated budget process requiring numerous amendment votes.

Thune expressed his disapproval of the new fund, which was announced as part of a settlement related to Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns. Cassidy described it as a “slush fund,” while Tillis warned of the “real risk” that some rioters from the January 6 attack, who were later pardoned by Trump, could receive compensation through this fund.

As the political landscape continues to shift, two police officers who defended the Capitol during the January 6 assault have filed a lawsuit to block payouts from the fund. The acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, who previously served as Trump’s personal attorney, did not dismiss the possibility that rioters who assaulted police could be eligible for compensation during his testimony in a Senate hearing.

Conclusion

The ongoing debate over the $1 billion security proposal highlights the fractures within the Republican Party as lawmakers grapple with the implications of Trump’s influence on their legislative agenda. As internal dissent grows and Democrats prepare to challenge Trump’s initiatives, the outcome of this funding proposal could have significant ramifications for both parties as they head into the critical midterm elections.

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/democratic-senators-will-test-gop-unity-with-votes-on-trumps-anti-weaponization-fund

Robert Woodson, Leader of the Black Conservative Movement, Dies at 89

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-05-20 16:07:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump’s Misstatements on Self-Reliance and Community Activism

In a recent speech, former President Donald Trump made a series of statements regarding community activism and approaches to combat racism, poverty, and crime. His remarks, however, were marked by inaccuracies and misrepresentations that have sparked controversy and debate. Central to his comments was the assertion that self-reliance, rather than affirmative action or government assistance, is the most effective means to address these societal issues.

Context of the Statements

Trump delivered his remarks at a rally in North Carolina, where he often emphasizes themes of personal responsibility and self-sufficiency. While advocating for self-reliance, he dismissed the effectiveness of affirmative action, claiming, “It’s not about handouts; it’s about hard work.” This statement, while appealing to some, overlooks the complexities of systemic racism and economic inequality that many community activists argue require more than individual effort to overcome.

Disparaging Remarks and Misleading Claims

In his speech, Trump also made disparaging comments about certain community leaders, suggesting that they were “not doing anything” to help their communities. He stated, “They just want to keep people dependent on government.” This broad-brush characterization not only undermines the efforts of countless activists who advocate for self-reliance through various programs but also misrepresents the role of government assistance in providing a safety net for those in need.

Experts in community activism have pointed out that while self-reliance is an important value, it cannot be the sole solution to deeply rooted issues like racism and poverty. For instance, Dr. Angela Glover Blackwell, founder of PolicyLink, emphasizes that “self-reliance must be supported by systemic changes that address the barriers people face.” Her perspective highlights the necessity of both individual initiative and structural support in creating equitable opportunities.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s assertion that affirmative action is ineffective is contradicted by numerous studies indicating that such policies have helped increase access to education and employment for marginalized groups. Research from the American Economic Association shows that affirmative action has played a significant role in diversifying workplaces and educational institutions, leading to broader societal benefits.

Moreover, Trump’s comments about community leaders fail to recognize the diverse strategies employed by activists across the country. Many community organizations focus on empowering individuals through education, job training, and mentorship, which align with the values of self-reliance he espouses. For example, the Urban League has long advocated for economic empowerment through education and job placement, demonstrating that community efforts are multifaceted and not solely reliant on government assistance.

Impacts of Misinformation

The spread of misinformation regarding community activism and the effectiveness of government programs can have significant consequences. Public opinion can be swayed by misleading narratives, leading to reduced support for policies that aim to address systemic inequalities. For instance, a 2021 survey by the Pew Research Center found that misconceptions about the effectiveness of affirmative action contribute to a growing divide in public attitudes toward race and equity issues.

As Trump continues to make sweeping claims about self-reliance and community leadership, the potential for misunderstanding and misrepresentation remains high. His rhetoric not only risks alienating those who work tirelessly to uplift their communities but also undermines the broader conversation about how best to address the challenges of racism and poverty.

Conclusion

Trump’s recent statements on self-reliance and community activism reflect a narrow understanding of complex social issues. While promoting individual responsibility is important, it is equally crucial to acknowledge the systemic barriers that many face. As misinformation continues to circulate, it is vital for the public to engage with accurate information and diverse perspectives to foster a more informed dialogue about the paths to equity and justice in America.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/20/us/politics/robert-woodson-dead.html

Trump IRS settlement: Why $1.8 billion ‘anti-weaponization’ fund lacks legal precedent

PolitiFact – Rulings and Stories — 2026-05-20 15:10:00 — www.politifact.com

The Trump administration announced it is settling a presidential lawsuit over leaked tax data by creating a $1.776 billion fund aimed at compensating individuals who claim to have been victims of judicial “weaponization” under President Joe Biden. This move has drawn immediate backlash from Democratic critics. Representative Seth Moulton labeled the fund as “blatant corruption” and a “cash grab,” while Senator Elizabeth Warren described it as “an insane level of corruption — even for Trump.” Senator Ron Wyden warned that if Trump proceeds with this plan, it could represent “the most brazen theft of taxpayer dollars by any president in history.”

Democrats have raised concerns that the fund could potentially be used to compensate individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot, many of whom were pardoned by Trump during his second term. Trump administration officials did not dismiss this possibility. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated on May 19 that he could not guarantee that compensation would be denied to those involved in the riot, Trump campaign donors, or Republican lawmakers whose phone records were seized during investigations led by Special Counsel Jack Smith.

Trump defended the fund on May 18, stating, “This is reimbursing people that were horribly treated, horribly treated. It’s anti-weaponization. They’ve been weaponized. They’ve been, in some cases, imprisoned wrongly. They paid legal fees that they didn’t have. They’ve gone bankrupt. Their lives have been destroyed.” He also mentioned, “There’s been numerous other occasions over the years where things like this have been done.”

The Justice Department cited the 2011 settlement in the case of Keepseagle v. Vilsack as a legal precedent for the new fund, which involved Native American farmers alleging discrimination in federal assistance. However, experts have pointed out significant differences between the two funds, including the lack of specific compensation standards and judicial oversight in the new fund.

The Keepseagle settlement had clear eligibility requirements and was subject to ongoing judicial approval, while the new fund’s criteria are vague, requiring claimants to assert they were victims of “lawfare” or “weaponization” without clear definitions. Legal experts have expressed concerns that the new fund could be used to benefit political allies of the Trump administration rather than those genuinely harmed.

In summary, Trump’s remarks about the fund’s purpose and the comparisons to past settlements have been met with skepticism, and the differences between the new fund and established precedents raise questions about its legitimacy and intended use.

Source: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2026/may/20/donald-trump/legal-settlement-fund-weaponization-justice-jan-6/

How Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, toppled by Trump, charted his own way

PBS NewsHour – Politics — 2026-05-20 05:38:00 — www.pbs.org

There aren’t many lawmakers like Thomas Massie left in Congress. The renegade Republican who rose to prominence as an idiosyncratic and stubborn outlier in his party, popular in the Kentucky district that repeatedly sent him to the House, lost his primary bid for reelection Tuesday after a vicious and costly attack by President Donald Trump. The stunning outcome caps a career like few others and shows the extent of the president’s ability to badger, badmouth and eventually boot out his political adversaries — and that no lawmaker is apparently safe. Massie’s defeat comes after the Trump-led ouster of Sen. Bill Cassidy in Louisiana over the weekend and the president’s endorsement Tuesday of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in his challenge to Sen. John Cornyn, which sent chills through the Senate.

Trump had reserved his fiercest attacks for Massie, a quirky conservative who had become among the most powerful rank-and-file Republicans in the House because of his willingness to vote as he pleased, rather than as the party demanded. And now he’s been toppled like so many other Republicans who crossed the president.

“If the legislative branch always votes with the president, we do have a king,” Massie told cheering supporters Tuesday night. Massie was undaunted after losing to Ed Gallrein, a former Navy SEAL handpicked by Trump. “If the legislative branch always votes with the president, we do have a king,” Massie told cheering supporters Tuesday night. But if lawmakers follow the Constitution, he said, “we have a republic.”

Massie also teased that his political career may not be over quite yet during the closing moments of his concession speech, as a raucous crowd broke into chants of “2028!” and “President!” “You’ve made a compelling argument,” he replied. “We’ll talk about it later.” Trump said of Massie’s defeat: “He deserves to lose.”

Massie rose from the House Republican backbench, charting his own path and showing again and again he was willing to buck his party and the president. He voted against Trump’s big tax cuts bill last year, worried the several trillion-dollar costs would add to the nation’s deficits. He rejected Trump’s military forays against Iran and Venezuela, opposed to U.S. intervention overseas, and he routinely voted against U.S. foreign aid, including to Israel, drawing millions of dollars against him from pro-Israel interest groups.

And perhaps most remarkably, Massie, in partnership with Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California, persisted in a long-shot effort to force the Justice Department’s release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. It was his work on the Epstein files, perhaps more than any of his repeated votes against spending bills and other party priorities, that elevated Massie’s profile. Trump lashed out at the “lowlife” Massie as the congressman pushed the issue last year, prolonging a political headache for the White House.

First elected in 2012, at the tail end of the GOP tea party wave before Trump’s Make America Great Again movement burst onto the scene, Massie stood out from the start. An engineer by training, Massie designed several patents — some on display in his office — as well as a debt calculator that blinks in flashing red numerals as the nation’s deficits pile up. He often wears a miniature version of the debt calculator as a lapel pin. He married his high school sweetheart, Rhonda, and joined her at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. They raised their four children living largely off the grid in a solar-power home he designed himself, making him something of a legend among a generation of do-it-yourselfers. He raised cattle, drove an early Tesla and drank raw milk.

Inspired by fellow Kentuckian Rand Paul after having put up lawn signs for the senator’s election, the libertarian-leaning Massie ran for office himself. Once he won his own House seat, Massie declined to join the newly forming Freedom Caucus, his own far-right views not fully aligning with the conservative coalition.

Trump set his sights on Massie in 2020 during his first presidential term, when the congressman dared to object to a $2.2 trillion aid package to combat the coronavirus pandemic. At the time, Massie refused to allow the COVID-19 package to be approved without a formal roll call, forcing hundreds of lawmakers back to the Capitol. Trump called him a “third rate Grandstander.” Trump did not let up his criticisms, even after Massie’s wife died in 2024. Massie announced in 2025 that he had remarried, after proposing to Carolyn Grace Moffa, a former Paul staffer, on the steps of the Library of Congress. He said they planned to live on the farm. The president suggested that Massie got remarried too quickly, writing on social media that “his wife will soon find out that she’s stuck with a LOSER!”

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/how-kentucky-rep-thomas-massie-toppled-by-trump-charted-his-own-way

‘Relics of the past’: The old guard of Georgia’s GOP has fallen

Politics — 2026-05-20 00:26:00 — www.politico.com

The MAGA takeover of the Georgia GOP is nearly complete. The old-guard of the Republican Party in Georgia has fallen after withstanding MAGA’s furor since 2020, replaced by a new breed of candidates — up and down the ballot — closely aligned with President Donald Trump.

On Tuesday, the Trump allies marched on: Trump-backed Lt. Gov. Burt Jones clinched a spot in the gubernatorial runoff on Tuesday alongside billionaire Rick Jackson, who told supporters he’d govern like the president “with a southern tone.” In the GOP Senate primary, Rep. Mike Collins, a staunch MAGA ally, advanced to a runoff. And House candidates Jim Kingston, Houston Gaines and Clay Fuller won their races by wide margins, boosted by the president’s endorsement.

Meanwhile, longtime Trump antagonists — especially those who denied the 2020 election was “stolen” — lost their primary battles: Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, Attorney General Chris Carr and Gabriel Sterling, a former top Raffensperger aide.

The results offered the clearest sign yet that Georgia Republican voters increasingly want their political future tied to Trump-style politics and messaging — a shift in one of the nation’s premier battlegrounds that could shape elections in 2026 and beyond.

“It’s key to success in a Republican primary in Georgia today to either have the president’s endorsement or be able to make the case to voters that you’re certainly a Trump-aligned candidate,” said Georgia Republican Party chair Josh McKoon, a loyal Trump ally.

Candidates like Raffensperger may now be “relics of the past,” said Chip Lake, a longtime Republican strategist who helped Jones’ campaign. “That doesn’t mean they’re bad human beings, it just means that their style of politics is not consistent today with where the base of the party is.”

But hugging Trump that tightly in the primary has proved lethal for some Republicans in the general election, and Democrats in Georgia hope 2026 will echo the GOP’s 2022 election losses.

The Republican Party in Georgia, like in other states, has been drifting more and more toward a full-throated populist approach during the Trump era. But the old guard led by outgoing Gov. Brian Kemp (R) as well as Raffensperger and Carr managed to hold on through the 2022 midterm primaries against a number of Trump-backed challengers, delaying the hard MAGA takeover that occurred in many other states earlier on. The sharp shift this cycle comes as the GOP pushes for more resources and attention in the key swing state.

Now, some GOP strategists increasingly view aligning with Trump not just as an ideological litmus test, but as a practical necessity — especially as Trump’s political operation sits on roughly $300 million in campaign funds.

“It is good for the state of Georgia to choose these MAGA-aligned candidates in that the president has a huge war chest, and that war chest can be utilized for candidates that he likes,” said one Georgia-based Republican strategist granted anonymity to speak candidly about the state’s dynamics.

Across the state’s marquee Senate and governor’s primaries, the winning GOP candidates all embraced Trump’s brand. The expensive and rancorous primary for the governor’s mansion quickly evolved into a contest over who best carried the MAGA mantle — Jones, who has the president’s explicit support, or Jackson, who tried to convince voters that he, too, was closely aligned with Trump.

Trump has stayed out of the Senate primary so far, but the candidates still raced to align with his movement. Collins, a hardline immigration hawk and loyal Trump ally on Capitol Hill who appeared at a rally with Trump earlier this year, said that he is “unapologetically Pro-God, Pro-Trump, Pro-2nd Amendment, Pro-Strong Military” after advancing to the runoff.

Even former football coach Derek Dooley — Kemp’s handpicked candidate who will face off against Collins in the June runoff — leaned into his status as an outsider (à la Trump) and adopted a “Georgia First” pitch.

“We haven’t made any attempts to alienate Trump whatsoever. Derek supports the agenda. He’s made it clear through the debate and multiple interviews that he supports the president,” said a senior Dooley adviser, who was granted anonymity to speak openly about the race, prior to Election Day.

It’s a notable gamble for a party that was punished during the 2022 midterms for nominating hardline MAGA candidates across the country — including former football star Herschel Walker for Georgia Senate — who later lost in key races. This midterms cycle appears to be trending much harder toward Democrats, given Trump’s low approval ratings, voters’ concerns with the economy and the unpopular war in Iran.

Democrats are more than eager to tie Republicans to the president. Devon Cruz, a spokesperson for the Georgia Democratic Party, said in a statement that the Senate runoff will leave Collins and Dooley “terminally inseparable” from Trump.

Still, Tuesday’s results underscored how Trump’s dominance is increasingly shaping which Republicans can win statewide primaries in key races. And it’s not just in Georgia.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has long been a thorn in the president’s side, lost his seat to a Trump-endorsed challenger in a bitter retributive campaign. Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy was ousted by the president’s favored candidate. Trump vanquished a majority of the Indiana Republicans who bucked him on redistricting. And he finally backed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for the Senate race after deeming Sen. John Cornyn to be an insufficient ally.

“The party has completely changed in 50 states,” Lake, the Republican strategist, said. “It looks nothing like it did a decade ago, and it looks absolutely nothing like it did 15 years ago.”

“We’re a party that’s a lot different, that’s got a sharper focus, that’s willing to fight more,” he added.

Raffensperger, who had become the biggest icon of standing up to the president, acknowledged to reporters following his loss that conspiracies about the 2020 election – despite no evidence to support any claims of fraud – helped tank his chances with Republican voters.

But he stopped short of blaming Trump’s grip on the party on his failure to advance in the runoff: “I just think terms are up, and so it’s a changing of the guard and turning over a new leaf,” he told reporters after his election loss. “We’ll have new people with new plans, new hopes, new visions, and we’re going to see where it goes.”

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/20/georgia-maga-trump-gop-00929251