Home Blog

WATCH: Sen. Lindsey Graham returns home for South Carolina funeral

WATCH: Sen. Lindsey Graham returns home for South Carolina funeral

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-29 14:12:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Labels Lindsey Graham a “War Lover” During National Cathedral Tribute

During memorial services for Senator Lindsey Graham, President Donald Trump remarked that “Lindsey liked war,” a characterization that stood in contrast to other tributes highlighting Graham’s efforts as a peacemaker.

Trump’s statement came Tuesday at the Washington National Cathedral, where he joined foreign leaders to honor the late senator. While Trump described Graham as “a giant of the United States Senate, a true American original who left us much too soon,” his comment about Graham’s supposed affinity for war diverged from the narrative offered by Graham’s colleagues and friends.

Former Representative Trey Gowdy, speaking at Graham’s funeral in Columbia, South Carolina, directly addressed perceptions of Graham as a warmonger, saying those who believed that “were wrong.” Gowdy emphasized Graham’s final trip abroad was an attempt to broker peace in a conflict that had claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, underscoring the senator’s commitment to diplomacy over conflict.

Trump’s remarks highlight a recurring pattern of using blunt or disparaging language when discussing political allies and adversaries alike. In this instance, his characterization of Graham as someone who “liked war” was at odds with the accounts of those who worked closely with the senator and remembered him for his peacemaking efforts and willingness to take unpopular stands for what he believed was right.

As the state of South Carolina and the nation reflect on Graham’s legacy, Trump’s comments serve as a reminder of the stark differences in how public figures are remembered—and how their records are sometimes distorted or oversimplified in political discourse.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-sen-lindsey-graham-returns-home-for-south-carolina-funeral

Kilmeade says Trump told him Iran war 'not that popular'

Kilmeade says Trump told him Iran war 'not that popular'

Administration News — 2026-07-29 11:27:00 — thehill.com

Trump Reportedly Downplays U.S.-Israeli Conflict in Iran as “Not That Popular”

In a recent conversation recounted by Fox News host Brian Kilmeade, President Trump reportedly described the U.S.-Israeli conflict in Iran as “not that popular.” Kilmeade shared this account during an appearance on fellow Fox News host Lisa Kennedy Montgomery’s podcast, “Kennedy Saves the World,” where he discussed speaking with Trump on the phone during the World Cup and their conversation about the Iran war.

Trump’s Dismissive Stance

According to Kilmeade, Trump conveyed a dismissive attitude toward the ongoing conflict, suggesting that it lacks widespread support or interest. The phrase “not that popular” reflects Trump’s tendency to frame complex foreign policy issues in terms of public opinion, rather than strategic or humanitarian considerations.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Characterization

While Trump’s remark was relayed secondhand by Kilmeade, it highlights a pattern in which Trump has downplayed the significance of international conflicts or minimized their impact based on perceived popularity. This approach has drawn criticism in the past for oversimplifying matters of national security and foreign relations.

Conclusion

President Trump’s reported comment that the U.S.-Israeli conflict in Iran is “not that popular” underscores his characteristic focus on public perception over policy substance. As relayed by Brian Kilmeade, this stance raises questions about the seriousness with which Trump approaches critical international issues, and continues a broader pattern of minimizing or dismissing complex events based on their popularity rather than their importance.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5996977-kilmeade-trump-iran-war-popularity/

Up First briefing: Trump-Netanyahu meeting; Anthony Fauci; Fed rates : NPR

Up First briefing: Trump-Netanyahu meeting; Anthony Fauci; Fed rates : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-07-29 06:00:00 — www.npr.org

President Trump Seeks Swift End to Middle East War Amid Conflicting Priorities with Israel

President Trump is seeking a rapid conclusion to the ongoing war in the Middle East, even as Israel pushes to continue military operations against Iran and Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon. According to reporting from NPR’s Franco Ordoñez, Israel is concerned that any agreement signed by Trump could limit its ability to defend itself, while Trump’s priorities include maintaining Israel’s security, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and addressing rising gas prices.

The relationship between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is described as cooperative but complicated, with both leaders facing uncertainty about how to end the conflict. Trump’s position reflects a desire to end what has become an unpopular war in the United States, even as he balances the demands of a key ally.

No false claims or disparagements by Trump are cited in the newsletter excerpt, but his stance and diplomatic approach are clearly outlined. As the situation develops, Trump’s ability to navigate these conflicting priorities will remain a central issue in U.S. foreign policy.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/07/29/g-s1-136076/up-first-newsletter-iran-benjamin-netanyahu-trump-iowa-water-anthony-fauci-fed-rates

Trump asks Supreme Court to overturn $83 million verdict in E. Jean Carroll case

Trump asks Supreme Court to overturn $83 million verdict in E. Jean Carroll case

Politics — 2026-07-28 22:14:00 — www.washingtonpost.com

Trump’s Legal Team Claims Supreme Court Immunity Ruling Shields Him From Liability

Donald Trump’s attorneys have asserted that a 2024 Supreme Court decision granting presidents sweeping immunity for actions taken in office shields him from liability in a current legal case. This position, put forward by Trump’s legal team, marks a significant escalation in his ongoing efforts to avoid prosecution for actions taken during his presidency.

Trump’s lawyers argue that the Supreme Court’s recent ruling means he cannot be held criminally liable for official acts performed while in office. This legal stance is central to Trump’s defense strategy in multiple cases, as he faces charges related to his conduct during his time as president.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Immunity Claim

The Supreme Court’s decision did grant presidents a degree of immunity for official acts, but legal experts note that the ruling does not provide blanket protection for all actions taken while in office. The Court’s opinion specifically distinguished between official and unofficial acts, leaving open the possibility that presidents could be prosecuted for actions outside their constitutional duties.

Despite this nuance, Trump’s attorneys have broadly interpreted the ruling to argue for complete immunity. This expansive reading of the decision is not fully supported by the Court’s language and has been challenged by prosecutors and legal scholars alike.

Implications and Conclusion

Trump’s reliance on the Supreme Court’s immunity decision is a key part of his legal strategy as he seeks to fend off accountability for his actions in office. However, the assertion that the ruling offers total protection is not consistent with the Court’s actual findings. As legal battles continue, the ultimate scope of presidential immunity remains a critical and contested issue.

Trump’s legal team’s sweeping interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision highlights the ongoing debate over the limits of presidential power and accountability. Readers should be aware that while the Court granted some immunity, it did not endorse the absolute protection Trump’s attorneys now claim.

Source article

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/07/28/trump-asks-supreme-court-overturn-83-million-verdict-e-jean-carroll-case/

Donald J. Trump: “Many more people died of Covid under the Biden Administration than under the…

Donald J. Trump: “Many more people died of Covid under the Biden Administration than under the…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-29 06:46:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump’s Covid Claims: Fact-Checking His Latest Attacks and Exaggerations

Donald Trump has once again made a series of sweeping claims about his handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, the role of Dr. Anthony Fauci, and the Biden administration’s response. His statements, which include attacks, exaggerations, and disputed facts, highlight his ongoing effort to shape the narrative around his pandemic record.

Trump’s Claims on Covid Deaths and Operation Warp Speed

Trump asserted, “Many more people died of Covid under the Biden Administration than under the Trump Administration.” He also described “Operation Warp Speed” as a “SPECTACULAR SUCCESS,” claiming it was “one of the most successful things ever done by an American President.”

While it is true that more Americans died after January 2021, this statistic does not account for the fact that Trump left office before vaccines were widely available and before the deadliest waves of the pandemic. Public health experts note that the virus’s trajectory and the emergence of new variants played a significant role in subsequent death tolls. Operation Warp Speed did help accelerate vaccine development, but its rollout faced significant challenges, and the Biden administration oversaw the mass distribution and administration of vaccines.

Attacks on Fauci and Shifting Blame

Trump repeatedly attacked Dr. Anthony Fauci, calling his ideas “CRAZY” and claiming, “I overrode Fauci on this.” He said, “I inherited Fauci, who was there since the 1980’s, but with each passing day, relied less and less on him. He made too many bad calls, like on MASKS. Remember at the beginning he was an anti-masker. He then switched to a super-masker.”

These statements distort the record. Fauci, as a career public health official, did initially advise against widespread mask use in early 2020, reflecting the public health consensus at the time and concerns about mask shortages for healthcare workers. As evidence mounted about asymptomatic spread, Fauci and others updated their guidance. Trump’s claim that he “overrode” Fauci is misleading; pandemic policy was shaped by many officials, and Trump frequently downplayed the virus’s severity and contradicted his own health experts.

Claims About the Virus’s Origin and Political Attacks

Trump stated, “I said from the beginning that the Virus came from the Wuhan Laboratory in China. Fauci strongly disagreed, always trying to protect China.” He also disparaged Biden and Democratic governors, saying, “The Republican governors did a much better job than the Dumocrats.”

The origins of Covid-19 remain under investigation, with no definitive evidence proving a lab origin. Fauci has said the lab-leak theory should be investigated but has not “always tried to protect China.” Trump’s language is both misleading and inflammatory, and his partisan attacks on Democratic governors are not supported by a clear pattern of outcomes; states’ pandemic experiences varied widely based on multiple factors.

The Bottom Line

Trump’s latest statements about the Covid-19 pandemic are marked by exaggerations, personal attacks, and selective use of facts. His effort to rewrite the history of his administration’s response, while attacking public health officials and political opponents, continues to shape the public debate. As the nation reflects on the pandemic’s toll, it is crucial to separate fact from political spin.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40391

Trump has singled out us Canadians for special treatment in his tariff war – there is no choice but to get nasty | Matt Gurney

Trump has singled out us Canadians for special treatment in his tariff war – there is no choice but to get nasty | Matt Gurney

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-07-29 06:01:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump’s Tariffs and Annexation Rhetoric Shock Canada, Strain Relations

President Trump has escalated tensions with Canada by openly discussing the possibility of annexing the country, claiming that Canada “couldn’t survive without American support.” This provocative stance, paired with a new round of tariffs, marks a sharp departure from the traditionally cordial relationship between the two nations.

Trump’s Tariff Strategy Targets Canada

Earlier this month, the United States, under Trump’s direction, declined to extend its longstanding free trade agreement with Canada and Mexico for another 16-year term. Instead, the deal is now subject to annual renegotiations, creating uncertainty for Canadian exporters. Last week, the White House announced tariffs as high as 50% on select Canadian products—including, for the first time, items previously protected by the trade agreement. The administration described these measures as retaliation for what it called unfair Canadian trade practices.

While the U.S. imposed new tariffs on dozens of other countries, most were in the range of 10%. Canada, however, was singled out for much steeper penalties. The president’s approach appears designed to send a pointed message to Canada while minimizing the impact on American consumers.

Annexation Talk and “Economic Force”

Trump’s rhetoric has gone beyond trade disputes. He has repeatedly floated the idea of annexing Canada as a 51st state, though he has ruled out military action, stating he would instead use “economic force”—with tariffs fitting that definition. While many observers dismiss the annexation talk as typical Trumpian bluster, even the suggestion has jolted Canada’s political class and public, who have long relied on a friendly U.S. for defense and trade.

Political Fallout in Canada

The shockwaves from Trump’s actions have upended Canadian politics. The return of Trump to the White House disrupted an election that Canada’s Liberals were expected to lose. Once Trump began musing about annexation, the Liberals replaced Justin Trudeau with Mark Carney, rallied national sentiment, and won decisively. Carney’s popularity is now closely tied to his perceived ability to stand up to Trump.

The tariffs have also exposed and deepened regional divisions within Canada. The harshest economic impacts have fallen on Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia—provinces that have taken stronger anti-Trump stances—while Alberta and Saskatchewan, which rely on resource exports to the U.S., were largely spared. This selective targeting has fueled speculation that Trump’s administration is seeking to punish provincial leaders it finds irritating.

Trump’s Attacks and Canadian Response

Trump has often complained that dealing with Canadians is “unpleasant and nasty,” and has signaled that he expects relations to become even more contentious. His actions have left Canada with little choice but to resist, as capitulating to U.S. pressure is politically toxic for Canadian leaders.

Despite some concessions by Prime Minister Carney, such as scrapping a planned digital tax that angered U.S. tech companies, Canada is expected to retaliate against the new tariffs. The situation remains fluid, with Trump’s tariffs set to take effect in several weeks and Canada’s response still pending.

Conclusion

President Trump’s aggressive tariff policies and annexation rhetoric represent a dramatic shift in U.S.-Canada relations. His willingness to use economic leverage and public threats has not only strained diplomatic ties but also reshaped Canada’s domestic politics. As both countries brace for the next phase of this confrontation, Trump’s approach has made resistance the only viable option for Canadian leaders—ensuring that tensions will remain high for the foreseeable future.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jul/29/donald-trump-canada-tariff-war-white-house-mark-carney-us-president

U.S. looks to boost anti-China spending worldwide by hundreds of millions of dollars, documents say

U.S. looks to boost anti-China spending worldwide by hundreds of millions of dollars, documents say

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-28 17:44:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Administration Reverses Course, Plans Major Spending to Counter China After Previous Cuts

The Trump administration is preparing to dramatically increase funding for programs aimed at countering China’s global influence, just a year after halting many of those same initiatives during a period of aggressive budget and personnel reductions.

According to documents obtained by the Associated Press, the administration notified Congress that it intends to spend $175.8 million to replace outdated undersea telecommunications cables in the Caribbean and Central America. The move is designed to prevent China from gaining a strategic foothold in the region’s digital infrastructure.

This renewed focus comes after the Trump administration had previously slashed funding for such efforts, including dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development and eliminating hundreds of diplomatic posts worldwide. Many projects specifically aimed at blunting Chinese influence were paused or canceled during these cuts.

Despite these earlier reductions, the administration now expresses deep concern about China’s activities in the Americas, including Chinese ownership of key ports, infrastructure projects under the Belt and Road initiative, and investments in the telecommunications sector. The administration’s position is that China’s economic activities pose risks to U.S. national security and prosperity.

The State Department is also considering nearly half a billion dollars more in spending for anti-China programs across the Western Hemisphere, Africa, and Asia. Many of these initiatives are intended to “reclaim diplomatic leverage” in areas where the U.S. had previously withdrawn support.

Trump’s approach to China has been marked by inconsistency. As the article notes, “Trump has oscillated between anger and elation with Xi,” seeking to cultivate the Chinese leader as an ally even as China pursues goals at odds with U.S. interests. The administration’s posture has ranged from public displays of cooperation to reluctance to pressure China, particularly after Trump claimed Chinese interference in U.S. elections.

The administration’s shifting stance and the abrupt reversal of previous cuts highlight ongoing contradictions in its China policy. While the new spending is intended to blunt Chinese influence, it follows a period in which the Trump administration’s own actions undermined U.S. efforts abroad.

The ultimate impact of these new programs remains uncertain and will not be known for months or years. However, the administration’s record of abrupt policy changes and contradictory positions raises questions about the effectiveness and consistency of its strategy to counter China’s global ambitions.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/u-s-looks-to-boost-anti-china-spending-worldwide-by-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-documents-say

Fauci and His Senate Nemesis Rand Paul to Face Off in Hearing

Fauci and His Senate Nemesis Rand Paul to Face Off in Hearing

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-07-29 06:12:00 — www.nytimes.com

President Trump Announces New Restrictions on Gain-of-Function Virus Research

On Tuesday, President Trump announced new restrictions on gain-of-function research, a type of scientific work that involves altering the genetic makeup of viruses to better understand how they evolve and how pandemics might be prevented. This move comes amid ongoing controversy and debate over the origins of the coronavirus pandemic and the role of U.S.-funded research in China.

Background of the Controversy

The announcement follows renewed scrutiny of gain-of-function research, which has been at the center of political and scientific debate. Senator Rand Paul has insisted that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, previously led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, funded dangerous research on viruses in China that allegedly spun out of control. Dr. Fauci has repeatedly denied these claims, stating that the research was tightly controlled and did not contribute to the pandemic.

Fact-Checking the Claims

The government places strict controls on gain-of-function research, and there is no direct evidence in the excerpt that supports the allegation that U.S. funding led to the creation of the coronavirus in a Chinese laboratory. Many scientists, along with Dr. Fauci, maintain that the virus most likely originated naturally, jumping from animals to humans.

Trump’s Position and Policy Response

President Trump’s announcement of new restrictions on gain-of-function research signals a policy response to the ongoing debate and public concern. While the excerpt does not include a direct quote from Trump, it clearly attributes the decision to him and highlights his administration’s stance on tightening oversight of this controversial area of scientific study.

Conclusion

President Trump’s move to impose new restrictions on gain-of-function research underscores the political and scientific tensions surrounding the origins of the coronavirus pandemic. As the debate continues, the administration’s actions reflect a cautious approach to research that has been the subject of misinformation and heated public discussion. The facts remain that there is no conclusive evidence linking U.S.-funded research to the pandemic’s origins, and the government continues to enforce strict controls on such work.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/29/us/politics/fauci-testifies-rand-paul.html

Donald J. Trump: “Senator Ron Johnson is working hard with Senate Republican Leadership to ado…

Donald J. Trump: “Senator Ron Johnson is working hard with Senate Republican Leadership to ado…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-28 20:09:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Urges Senate to Pass Budget Resolution, Makes Claims About SAVE AMERICA ACT

President Donald J. Trump has called on the Senate to adopt a Budget Resolution before the August recess, emphasizing its importance as the “first step towards getting as much of THE SAVE AMERICA ACT as possible in a Budget Bill, funding our Troops, and helping our Farmers.” Trump asserted, “This Resolution can be adopted at a simple Majority threshold,” and pressed the Senate to “GET IT DONE!”

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s statement highlights several key points: the urgency of passing a Budget Resolution, the connection to the SAVE AMERICA ACT, and the assertion that the resolution can pass with a simple majority. While it is true that budget resolutions in the Senate can be adopted with a simple majority, the broader claims about the SAVE AMERICA ACT and its impact on troops and farmers warrant closer scrutiny.

The SAVE AMERICA ACT and Budget Procedure

The SAVE AMERICA ACT, as referenced by Trump, is positioned as a legislative priority. However, the specifics of what the act entails and how much of it could be included in a budget bill remain unclear from the statement alone. Budget resolutions set the framework for federal spending but do not themselves allocate funds or enact policy changes. Any substantive provisions from the SAVE AMERICA ACT would require subsequent legislation or reconciliation instructions.

Funding Troops and Farmers

Trump links the passage of the Budget Resolution to funding for troops and farmers. While budget resolutions can set overall spending levels for defense and agriculture, actual funding decisions are made through appropriations bills. The implication that passing the resolution directly funds these priorities is an exaggeration of the process.

Conclusion

President Trump’s call for swift Senate action on a Budget Resolution underscores his legislative priorities and his push for the SAVE AMERICA ACT. However, his statements conflate the procedural role of a budget resolution with the actual enactment of funding and policy. Readers should be aware that while a budget resolution is an important step, it does not itself guarantee funding for specific programs or the passage of broader legislative packages.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40390

Lindsey Graham remembered for impact on South Carolina and the world

Lindsey Graham remembered for impact on South Carolina and the world

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-28 17:50:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Remembers Lindsey Graham at Memorial, Highlights Close Relationship

At the memorial service for Senator Lindsey Graham, President Donald Trump delivered remarks praising Graham’s career and character, calling him “a force to be reckoned with all over the world.” Trump described Graham’s rise from rural South Carolina to the heights of American politics, emphasizing his steadfast convictions and magnetic personality.

During his eulogy, Trump also referenced the evolution of his relationship with Graham, recalling a humorous incident from the 2016 presidential campaign when he gave out Graham’s personal cell phone number during a heated moment on the trail. Trump noted that, despite this, the two became close friends, with Graham continuing to call him over the years.

The service, attended by international dignitaries and U.S. officials, underscored Graham’s influence on both domestic and foreign policy, as well as his close alliance with Trump in the Senate. The president’s remarks reflected the personal and political bond that developed between the two men, highlighting Graham’s adaptability and commitment to advancing his agenda for South Carolina and the nation.

While Trump’s comments at the memorial were largely complimentary and lighthearted, they also served to remind attendees of the complex and sometimes contentious history between the two figures, particularly during the 2016 campaign. Ultimately, Trump’s speech focused on Graham’s legacy and their enduring friendship, offering a glimpse into the personal dynamics that shaped recent years in Washington.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/lindsey-graham-remembered-for-impact-on-south-carolina-and-the-world