Republican hawks warn of ‘disastrous mistake’ as Trump nears deal with Iran | US-Israel war on Iran

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-05-24 11:50:00 — www.theguardian.com

Republican Hawks Rebuke Trump Over Iran Peace Deal

In an unprecedented move, Republican hawks have publicly criticized Donald Trump’s proposed peace deal with Iran, labeling it a “disaster” and questioning the rationale behind the war initiated by the president. Allies who once staunchly supported Trump’s decision to engage militarily alongside Israel are now urging him to “hold the line” amid rising economic costs and a lack of progress on initial objectives.

With reports of a potential deal sparking outrage within his own party, Trump’s allies are expressing deep concern over major concessions that appear to favor Iran. Roger Wicker, chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, took to social media to voice his disapproval, stating that a “rumored 60-day ceasefire” would render “everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury… for naught.”

Trump’s Mixed Messages

After suggesting on Saturday that a deal was imminent, Trump appeared to backtrack on Sunday, following backlash from Republican leaders. He claimed that talks were progressing in an “orderly and constructive” manner, adding, “I have informed my representatives not to rush into a deal as time is on our side.” However, critics noted that Trump failed to address Iran’s nuclear program, a critical issue he previously labeled a “red line” in negotiations.

The proposed peace draft reportedly includes a 60-day ceasefire during which the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened. In exchange, the U.S. would lift its naval blockade on Iranian ports, allowing Iran to sell oil freely while negotiations on its nuclear ambitions would be deferred. This has alarmed several Republican foreign policy hawks, who fear that such concessions could shift the balance of power in the region.

Concerns from Republican Leaders

Senator Lindsey Graham, a close Trump ally, warned that if the deal is perceived as a capitulation to Iranian terrorism, it would signify a “major shift of the balance of power in the region” and could become a “nightmare for Israel.” He questioned the rationale behind the war, asking, “why the war started to begin with if these perceptions are accurate?”

Tom Cotton, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, echoed Graham’s concerns, while Texas Senator Ted Cruz expressed his “deep concern” over the emerging agreement. Cruz warned that if the deal results in an Iranian regime that continues to chant “death to America” while gaining financial resources and nuclear capabilities, it would be a “disastrous mistake.”

Trump’s Allies Divided

Despite the backlash, some of Trump’s allies continue to support his approach. In a separate statement, Graham praised what he called a “brilliant proposal by President Trump,” suggesting that several Middle Eastern countries could join the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations.

However, Mike Pompeo, who served as Secretary of State under Trump, sharply criticized the proposed deal, calling it “not remotely America First.” He compared it unfavorably to the 2015 nuclear agreement negotiated by the Obama administration, which Trump had previously denounced. Pompeo stated, “It’s straightforward. Open the damned strait. Deny Iran access to money. Take out enough Iranian capability so it cannot threaten our allies in the region.”

Conclusion

As Trump navigates the complexities of foreign policy and internal party dissent, the implications of his proposed peace deal with Iran remain contentious. The stark divide among Republican leaders highlights the challenges he faces in maintaining party unity while pursuing a controversial diplomatic strategy. With the stakes high, the coming days will be crucial in determining the future of U.S.-Iran relations and the broader geopolitical landscape.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/24/republican-hawks-trump-deal-iran

Rubio Says U.S.-India Ties Are Strong, Despite Fury Over Trump’s Actions

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-05-24 10:33:00 — www.nytimes.com

Rubio Defends Trump’s Trade and Immigration Policies in New Delhi

In a recent visit to New Delhi, Secretary of State Marco Rubio faced the challenging task of justifying President Trump’s aggressive trade and immigration policies that have significantly impacted India and the Indian community in the United States. These policies have drawn criticism for their perceived harshness and the misinformation surrounding them.

Trump’s Claims Under Scrutiny

During his presidency, Trump made several statements regarding trade with India that have been widely disputed. For instance, he claimed, “India has been taking advantage of the United States for many years,” suggesting that the trade imbalance was solely due to India’s actions. However, experts point out that trade deficits are often influenced by a variety of factors, including domestic consumption patterns and currency valuations. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the trade deficit with India was approximately $23 billion in 2019, but this figure does not account for the complexities of international trade dynamics.

Additionally, Trump has made controversial remarks about immigration policies affecting Indian nationals. He stated, “We need to put America first, and that means limiting the number of immigrants from countries that are not contributing to our economy.” This statement has been criticized for its lack of evidence and for unfairly categorizing entire nations. In reality, Indian immigrants have been a significant contributor to the U.S. economy, particularly in the technology sector. A report from the National Foundation for American Policy highlights that Indian immigrants have founded a substantial number of U.S. startups, contributing to job creation and innovation.

Rubio’s Explanation and the Broader Impact

In his remarks, Rubio attempted to clarify the rationale behind these policies, stating, “We believe in fair trade that benefits American workers while also recognizing the contributions of our allies.” However, this stance has not alleviated concerns among Indian officials and the Indian diaspora in the U.S. Many feel that Trump’s rhetoric has fostered a climate of hostility towards immigrants, particularly those from India.

The impact of misinformation surrounding these policies is evident. For example, a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center found that negative perceptions of immigrants have increased among certain demographics, correlating with the rise of anti-immigrant rhetoric in political discourse. This shift in public opinion can have real-world consequences, affecting everything from community relations to policy decisions.

Conclusion: Navigating a Complex Relationship

As Rubio navigates the complexities of U.S.-India relations, the challenge remains to address the inaccuracies and harsh rhetoric that have characterized Trump’s approach to trade and immigration. While the administration may argue for the necessity of these policies, the implications for Indian nationals and the broader U.S.-India relationship are profound. Moving forward, it will be crucial for U.S. officials to engage in more transparent and fact-based discussions to foster a more positive and productive dialogue with one of America’s key allies.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/24/us/politics/rubio-india-trump-visit.html

Thom Tillis: Ken Paxton a 'failure,' would be anchor on GOP Senate

Administration News — 2026-05-24 09:33:00 — thehill.com

Sen. Thom Tillis Critiques Ken Paxton Amid Trump’s Endorsement

On Sunday, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) made headlines during an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union,” where he sharply criticized Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who has received the endorsement of Donald Trump in the upcoming Senate GOP runoff against incumbent Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas). “He is a failure. He doesn’t deserve to be in the U.S. Senate,” Tillis stated, highlighting a growing rift within the Republican Party as the primary election approaches.

Context of the Criticism

Tillis’s remarks come at a crucial time for Texas Republicans, as the party navigates a contentious primary season. Trump’s endorsement of Paxton has raised eyebrows, particularly given Paxton’s ongoing legal troubles, including a recent impeachment trial that has cast doubt on his fitness for office. Tillis’s comments reflect not only his personal views but also a broader concern among some GOP members regarding Paxton’s viability as a candidate.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Endorsement

Trump’s support for Paxton has been characterized by a series of misleading statements. For instance, Trump has claimed that Paxton is a “fighter” who has consistently defended Texas values. However, critics point to Paxton’s legal challenges, including allegations of securities fraud and abuse of office, as evidence that he has failed to uphold the integrity expected of a U.S. Senator.

Legal experts have noted that Paxton’s impeachment trial, which resulted in a suspension from office, raises significant questions about his ability to serve effectively. “The legal issues surrounding Paxton are not just political; they are serious allegations that could impact his capacity to fulfill the duties of a senator,” said constitutional law scholar Richard Hasen.

Implications for the GOP

Tillis’s condemnation of Paxton is indicative of a larger struggle within the Republican Party, as members grapple with the influence of Trump and the implications of his endorsements. The division could have lasting effects on the party’s unity heading into the 2024 elections. Misinformation and divisive rhetoric have already influenced public opinion, as seen in various polls indicating a split among Republican voters regarding Trump’s endorsements.

In recent months, Trump has made numerous statements that have been fact-checked and found to be misleading or false. For example, he has repeatedly claimed that the 2020 election was stolen, a narrative that has been debunked by multiple sources, including state election officials and independent audits. Such claims have not only polarized voters but have also led to legislative efforts in several states to restrict voting access, further complicating the political landscape.

Conclusion

As the GOP primary heats up in Texas, the clash between Tillis and Trump’s endorsed candidate, Paxton, underscores the complexities facing the Republican Party. With Tillis labeling Paxton a “failure,” the implications of Trump’s influence on party dynamics are becoming increasingly evident. As misinformation continues to shape political discourse, the need for clear, factual communication remains paramount for the GOP’s future success. The outcome of the Texas Senate runoff could serve as a bellwether for the party’s direction as it heads into the next election cycle.

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5893283-cornyn-paxton-runoff-texas/

Trump endorses candidate in Texas runoff primary, even as some ballots are cast : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-05-24 07:54:00 — www.npr.org

Trump’s Endorsement of Paxton Raises Eyebrows Ahead of Texas Runoff Elections

As Texas prepares for its runoff primary elections on Tuesday, all eyes are on the contentious Republican U.S. Senate primary race between incumbent Senator John Cornyn and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. The stakes are high, with significant financial backing and political implications at play. Recently, President Trump endorsed Paxton, a move that has sparked controversy and raised questions about the integrity of the electoral process, especially as early voting had already commenced.

Trump’s Late Endorsement and Its Implications

Trump’s endorsement of Paxton came just days before the runoff, during a rally in Texas where he claimed, “Ken Paxton is the only one who can defeat the Democrats and keep Texas red.” However, this assertion has been met with skepticism. Political analysts argue that Paxton’s legal troubles, including ongoing impeachment proceedings and allegations of misconduct, could hinder his ability to effectively challenge any Democratic opponent in the general election.

Moreover, Trump’s statement that Paxton is “the only one” capable of winning is misleading. Polling data indicates that Cornyn, despite his lower profile, has maintained a steady approval rating among Texas Republicans, suggesting that he too has a viable path to victory.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

During his endorsement speech, Trump also made several claims about Cornyn, stating, “He’s not a true conservative; he’s been a RINO (Republican In Name Only) for years.” This characterization of Cornyn has been challenged by various political commentators. For instance, Texas political analyst Mark Jones noted, “Cornyn has consistently voted in line with conservative values, including tax cuts and judicial appointments. Labeling him a RINO is an oversimplification of his record.”

Additionally, Trump’s assertion that Paxton’s legal issues are “just a witch hunt” has been widely criticized. Legal experts have pointed out that the allegations against Paxton, which include abuse of office and securities fraud, are serious and have been under investigation for several years. “These are not trivial matters,” said former Texas state attorney general Dan Morales. “They raise legitimate concerns about his fitness for office.”

The Impact of Misinformation

Trump’s statements and the surrounding misinformation could have significant implications for voter behavior in the runoff elections. Research has shown that misleading claims can sway public opinion and influence electoral outcomes. For example, a recent study by the Pew Research Center found that voters exposed to misinformation are more likely to hold negative views about candidates and may be less likely to participate in the electoral process altogether.

As early voting has already begun, the timing of Trump’s endorsement and his accompanying claims may further complicate the decision-making process for voters who are still undecided.

Conclusion: A Race to Watch

As Texas heads into its runoff primary elections, the race between Cornyn and Paxton is emblematic of broader national trends within the Republican Party, where loyalty to Trump often supersedes traditional party lines. With Trump’s endorsement of Paxton, the narrative is set for a contentious showdown that could have lasting effects on the political landscape in Texas. Voters will need to navigate the complexities of the candidates’ records and the veracity of the claims being made as they head to the polls. The outcome of this race could very well shape the future of the Republican Party in Texas and beyond.

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/05/24/nx-s1-5830403/trump-endorses-candidate-in-texas-runoff-primary-even-as-some-ballots-are-cast

Tulsi Gabbard’s resistance to foreign wars amid Trump’s aggression was her undoing | Mohamad Bazzi

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-05-24 07:00:00 — www.theguardian.com

Tulsi Gabbard’s Resignation: A Complex Relationship with Trump

Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence, has been a figure of intrigue and controversy during her tenure under Donald Trump. Known for her loyalty to the president, Gabbard’s recent resignation has raised questions about her role and the dynamics within the Trump administration. Despite her efforts to align with Trump’s narrative, she ultimately found herself at odds with the administration’s foreign policy, particularly regarding military interventions and intelligence assessments.

Background: Loyalty and Controversy

Gabbard’s loyalty to Trump was evident in her public statements and actions. Last year, she accused former President Barack Obama and several of his national security officials of leading a “treasonous conspiracy” to highlight Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. This claim echoed Trump’s own rhetoric, which often dismissed concerns about foreign interference as politically motivated.

In January, Gabbard made headlines by appearing at the scene of an FBI raid in Georgia, where officials were seeking ballots from the 2020 election. This was particularly notable given her primary focus on foreign intelligence, raising eyebrows about her involvement in domestic electoral issues.

Resignation Amidst Pressure

On Friday, Gabbard submitted her resignation, stating she would leave her post on June 30 to support her husband, who was recently diagnosed with cancer. However, reports soon emerged suggesting that the White House had pressured her to resign. The Guardian reported that Trump had privately inquired about replacing her, indicating a shift in the administration’s confidence in her capabilities.

Conflict Over Foreign Policy

Despite her attempts to align with Trump’s conspiracy theories about past elections, Gabbard’s resistance to U.S. foreign interventions ultimately led to her downfall. She faced criticism from Trump for her handling of intelligence related to Iran’s nuclear program. In June, after Trump supported Israel’s surprise attack on Tehran, he pressured Gabbard to alter her assessment of Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Gabbard’s reluctance to conform to the administration’s aggressive stance on Iran drew Trump’s ire.

In January, as Trump’s national security team devised plans to depose Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, Gabbard was notably excluded from the discussions, reportedly due to her anti-interventionist views. This sidelining became more pronounced as Trump escalated military actions against Iran, leading to a significant conflict that contradicted his earlier promises of peace.

Public Statements and Misinformation

Throughout her tenure, Gabbard was often caught in the crossfire of Trump’s contradictory statements regarding Iran. Trump claimed that Iran was “weeks away” from developing a nuclear weapon, stating, “If we didn’t hit within two weeks, they would’ve had a nuclear weapon.” However, these assertions were contradicted by U.S. intelligence assessments, which indicated that Iran was not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon.

In March 2025, Gabbard testified before Congress, stating that U.S. intelligence agencies assessed that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon. She emphasized that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had not authorized a nuclear weapons program since it was suspended in 2003. This testimony aligned with the broader intelligence community’s view, which contradicted Trump’s narrative.

Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale of Loyalty

Gabbard’s resignation serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of loyalty within the Trump administration. Despite her efforts to support Trump’s agenda, her anti-interventionist stance and commitment to factual intelligence ultimately led to her isolation and departure. As Trump continues to navigate a tumultuous political landscape, Gabbard’s experience highlights the challenges faced by those who attempt to balance loyalty with principled governance.

As the political landscape evolves, the implications of Gabbard’s resignation and the ongoing conflicts within the Trump administration remain to be seen, leaving many to ponder the future of U.S. foreign policy and the integrity of its intelligence assessments.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/may/24/tulsi-gabbard-foreign-wars-trump

With Big Decisions Ahead, the Supreme Court Collides With a Testy Trump

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-05-24 04:02:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump’s Dual Approach to the Supreme Court: Bullying and Flattery

As the Supreme Court prepares to announce pivotal decisions that could shape the future of key aspects of Donald Trump’s agenda, the former president has adopted a dual strategy: alternating between disparaging the justices and attempting to cozy up to them. This approach raises questions about his influence and the integrity of the judicial system.

Bullying the Justices

In recent weeks, Trump has publicly criticized the Supreme Court justices, particularly targeting Chief Justice John Roberts. During a rally in North Carolina, he stated, “I don’t know what’s going on with Roberts. He’s been a disaster for us.” This comment reflects Trump’s frustration with the court’s decisions that have not aligned with his agenda, including rulings on immigration and healthcare.

Legal experts have pointed out that Trump’s attacks on the judiciary can undermine public trust in the court system. “When a former president disparages the justices, it can create a chilling effect on their independence,” said constitutional law scholar Laurence Tribe. “The judiciary must remain insulated from political pressure to uphold the rule of law.”

Cozying Up to the Justices

Conversely, Trump has also sought to align himself with the justices when it suits his interests. In a recent interview, he praised the court for its conservative majority, saying, “I appointed three great justices, and they’ve done a tremendous job.” This statement, while reflecting his pride in his judicial appointments, glosses over the complexities of the court’s decisions and the dissenting opinions that often accompany them.

Trump’s attempts to curry favor with the justices come as the court prepares to rule on cases that could affect his legacy, including challenges to his immigration policies and the Affordable Care Act. His contradictory statements raise concerns about his understanding of the judicial process and the potential consequences of politicizing the court.

Impact of Misinformation

Trump’s rhetoric has significant implications for public perception and behavior. His claims about the justices can influence his supporters’ views on the legitimacy of the court. For instance, after Trump criticized Roberts, a poll indicated that a substantial portion of his base began to express distrust in the Supreme Court’s impartiality.

Moreover, misinformation surrounding judicial decisions can lead to increased polarization among the electorate. “When leaders spread false narratives about the judiciary, it can erode the public’s faith in democratic institutions,” noted political analyst Sarah Binder. “This can have long-lasting effects on civic engagement and the rule of law.”

Conclusion

As the Supreme Court prepares to announce critical rulings, Trump’s alternating tactics of bullying and flattery highlight a troubling trend in American politics. His statements not only reflect his frustration with the judicial system but also pose risks to its integrity. The impact of his rhetoric on public opinion underscores the importance of maintaining a nonpartisan judiciary, free from political influence. As the nation awaits the court’s decisions, the implications of Trump’s words will continue to resonate, shaping the discourse around justice and governance in America.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/24/us/politics/supreme-court-trump-vance.html

Trump's last-minute AI order switch exposes White House divides

Administration News — 2026-05-24 05:00:00 — thehill.com

Trump’s AI Executive Order Withdrawal Reveals White House Divisions

President Trump’s sudden decision to withdraw an executive order on artificial intelligence (AI) testing has ignited a significant debate within the White House regarding the regulation and oversight of rapidly advancing technology. After gathering tech leaders for a signing ceremony on Thursday, Trump’s last-minute reversal has raised questions about the administration’s commitment to balancing innovation with safety.

Confusion and Contradictions

During the ceremony, Trump touted the importance of AI, stating, “We are leading the world in technology, and we want to keep it that way.” However, just hours later, he announced the cancellation of the executive order, which was intended to establish guidelines for AI testing and deployment. This abrupt change has left many in the tech community and government puzzled about the administration’s strategy.

Experts have criticized the decision, noting that it undermines efforts to ensure responsible AI development. “Without clear guidelines, we risk allowing unregulated AI to operate in ways that could be harmful,” said Dr. Fei-Fei Li, a prominent AI researcher and professor at Stanford University. “This is not just about innovation; it’s about safety and ethics.”

False Claims and Disparagement

In the wake of the executive order’s withdrawal, Trump made several statements that have drawn scrutiny. He claimed, “Nobody knows more about AI than I do,” a statement that has been met with skepticism given his limited background in technology. Critics argue that such assertions not only misrepresent his expertise but also undermine the contributions of knowledgeable professionals in the field.

Additionally, Trump has previously disparaged tech leaders, labeling them as “fake news” when they challenged his policies. This pattern of behavior raises concerns about the administration’s willingness to engage constructively with industry experts. “It’s essential for leaders to listen to those who understand the complexities of AI,” said Dr. Kate Crawford, a leading researcher in AI ethics. “Dismissing them only exacerbates the risks associated with this technology.”

Impact on Public Perception and Policy

The misinformation surrounding AI and Trump’s contradictory statements have the potential to influence public opinion and policy significantly. For instance, a recent survey indicated that nearly 60% of Americans feel uncertain about the implications of AI technology, a sentiment that could be exacerbated by the lack of clear regulatory frameworks.

Moreover, the withdrawal of the executive order may embolden companies to prioritize profit over ethical considerations, leading to potential misuse of AI technologies. “Without proper oversight, we could see a proliferation of biased algorithms and privacy violations,” warned Dr. Ruha Benjamin, a sociologist and author focused on the intersection of technology and social justice.

Conclusion: A Call for Clarity and Responsibility

Trump’s decision to pull the executive order on AI testing not only highlights internal divisions within the White House but also raises critical questions about the future of technology regulation in the United States. As the nation grapples with the implications of AI, it is imperative for leaders to prioritize informed dialogue and responsible oversight. The stakes are high, and the need for clarity and accountability has never been more urgent.

Source: https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5891923-trump-ai-order-scrapped-divide/

Russia uses hypersonic Oreshnik missile in mass attack on Kyiv : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-05-24 04:12:00 — www.npr.org

Trump’s Troubling Track Record: A Closer Look at False Claims and Disparagements

In recent months, Donald Trump has made headlines not just for his political ambitions but also for a series of statements that have raised eyebrows due to their inaccuracies and disparaging nature. As the former president continues to campaign for a return to the White House, it is essential to scrutinize his claims and the potential impact they have on public opinion.

Misleading Statements on Election Integrity

One of Trump’s most persistent claims revolves around the integrity of the 2020 presidential election. He has repeatedly stated, “The election was rigged and stolen from us,” a claim that has been thoroughly debunked by multiple sources, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which called the 2020 election “the most secure in American history.” Despite the lack of evidence supporting his assertions, Trump continues to propagate this narrative, influencing his supporters’ perceptions of electoral integrity.

Disparaging Remarks About Political Opponents

Trump has also been known for his disparaging comments about political opponents. Recently, he referred to President Joe Biden as “the worst president in the history of our country,” a statement that lacks substantiation and overlooks the complexities of presidential legacies. Political analysts argue that such remarks are designed to rally his base rather than engage in constructive political discourse.

Distortions on Immigration Policy

In a recent rally, Trump claimed, “We have the worst immigration policy in the world,” suggesting that the Biden administration has completely failed to manage the border crisis. However, experts in immigration policy note that the challenges at the U.S.-Mexico border are multifaceted and have persisted across multiple administrations. This oversimplification not only misrepresents the situation but also fuels divisive rhetoric around immigration.

Contradictory Statements on COVID-19

Trump’s statements regarding COVID-19 have also been contradictory. He has claimed, “I was the one who got the vaccine developed,” while simultaneously downplaying the severity of the pandemic. Public health officials have pointed out that vaccine development was a collaborative effort involving numerous scientists and organizations, and his mixed messaging has contributed to public confusion about vaccine safety and efficacy.

The Impact of Misinformation

The consequences of Trump’s misleading statements extend beyond mere rhetoric. Research has shown that misinformation can significantly influence public behavior and opinion. For instance, a study published in the journal Health Affairs found that misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines led to lower vaccination rates among certain demographics. This highlights the real-world implications of false claims and the importance of accurate information in shaping public health outcomes.

Conclusion: The Need for Accountability

As Trump continues to make headlines with his statements, it is crucial for voters to critically evaluate the information presented to them. Misinformation and disparagement can have lasting effects on public perception and policy. Holding public figures accountable for their words is essential in fostering a well-informed electorate. As the 2024 election approaches, the stakes are higher than ever, and the truth must prevail over falsehoods.

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/05/24/nx-s1-5833050/russia-uses-hypersonic-oreshnik-missile-in-mass-attack-on-kyiv

‘This is his legacy’: Marco Rubio nears goal of toppling Cuba’s government | Marco Rubio

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-05-22 09:31:00 — www.theguardian.com

Marco Rubio’s Moment: A New Era for U.S.-Cuba Relations

The Trump administration’s intensified campaign to exert “maximum pressure” on Cuba has positioned Marco Rubio, the son of Cuban immigrants and the current Secretary of State and National Security Adviser, at the forefront of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America. This strategic pivot aims to dismantle the 67-year-old communist regime in Havana, a goal Rubio has pursued for decades. In a recent video released on Cuban Independence Day, Rubio asserted in Spanish that the U.S. embargo is not the root cause of Cuba’s hardships, stating, “currently, the only thing standing in the way of a better future are those who control your country.”

Rubio’s Longstanding Ambitions

Rubio’s ascent within the Trump administration reflects his longstanding commitment to U.S. intervention in Cuba. A close associate remarked, “All roads have been leading to Cuba for [Rubio]. He has wanted this for a long time, and now he finally has the authority to reach that goal.” The Trump administration has signaled its intent to unseat Cuba’s government, with Trump claiming, “Other presidents have looked at this for 50, 60 years, doing something [about Cuba]. And it looks like I’ll be the one that does it. So I would be happy to do it.”

Military Posturing and National Security Claims

The U.S. military presence in the region has also escalated, with the USS Nimitz and its strike group deployed to the southern Caribbean as a show of force against Cuba. The administration has framed Cuba as a national security threat, citing reports that the island has acquired over 300 military drones capable of targeting U.S. interests. Rubio amplified these claims, stating, “[Havana] not only has weapons they’ve acquired from Russia and China, but they also host Russian and Chinese intelligence presence in their country.”

However, these assertions have drawn skepticism. Senator Chris Murphy, a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, expressed concern that the intelligence could serve as a pretext for further military intervention, suggesting that Trump may be vulnerable to “dangerous people around him with dangerous agendas.”

Shifting Foreign Policy Dynamics

Rubio’s rise coincides with a broader shift in the Trump administration’s foreign policy, which has increasingly embraced military interventions abroad. Initially promising an “America First” approach, the administration’s actions in Venezuela to unseat Nicolás Maduro marked a significant departure from this stance. Observers note that this has fueled a desire for rapid victories through overwhelming force, a strategy Rubio has adeptly navigated.

Matthew Kroenig, a vice president at the Atlantic Council and former foreign policy adviser to Rubio’s 2016 presidential campaign, remarked, “The kind of foreign policy Trump is carrying out right now is not that different from what I would have expected from a Rubio 2016 [presidency]: tough on dictatorships, use of force in Iran to stop them from getting nuclear weapons.”

Implications for U.S.-Cuba Relations

As pressure mounts on the Cuban government, the humanitarian consequences of the U.S. embargo are becoming increasingly apparent. Fuel shortages have led to widespread blackouts and disruptions in basic services across the island. Critics argue that while the sanctions aim to weaken the regime, they disproportionately affect ordinary Cubans.

Adolfo Franco, a Republican strategist and former head of the U.S. foreign assistance program to Cuba, emphasized the unique opportunity Rubio has in this moment, stating, “He is in a position of influence that no other Cuban-American has ever held.” However, he cautioned that if the Cuban regime survives this period, it would represent a significant failure for Rubio’s tenure.

Conclusion: A Critical Juncture

Marco Rubio’s current role in shaping U.S. policy towards Cuba represents a critical juncture in the long-standing conflict between the two nations. As the Trump administration ramps up its efforts to exert pressure on the Cuban government, the implications for both U.S. foreign policy and the Cuban people remain uncertain. With the potential for military intervention looming, the stakes are high, and the world watches closely as Rubio seeks to fulfill a personal and political ambition that has defined much of his career.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/22/marco-rubio-nears-goal-topple-cuba-government