Trump blasts Pirro after she refutes his claim that Reflecting Pool was damaged by vandals

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-01 13:34:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Doubles Down on Vandalism Claims Despite Evidence of Construction Flaws at Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool

President Donald Trump on Saturday sharply criticized U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s assessment that the extensive damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was the result of shoddy construction, not vandalism, as he has repeatedly claimed.

In a social media post, Trump acknowledged there “may have been some contractor difficulty” with the installation of the new pool liner. However, he continued to insist, “the major damage was caused by VANDALS!” and stated, “I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, on the Reflecting Pool.”

Trump’s insistence comes after Pirro’s office, in a court filing on Friday, moved to drop criminal charges against former Olympian David Hearn, who had been accused of deliberately damaging the pool. The Justice Department, which had previously echoed Trump’s claims and promoted the prosecution as accountability for vandalism at a Washington landmark, now faces an embarrassing setback. The president, without providing any new evidence, continues to allege that the majority of the damage was caused by vandals.

Fact-Check: Evidence Points to Construction Issues

Government lawyers, in a 20-page court filing, stated that additional documents from the Interior Department since Hearn’s indictment show the damage resulted from a botched installation by a contractor and “the rush to complete the project prior to events associated with the America 250 celebration in the weeks surrounding Independence Day 2026.” A recent visual inspection revealed damage throughout the pool, including areas where prosecutors say a vandal would not likely have attempted to peel the lining.

Pirro, a Trump appointee, wrote in her filing, “Given all of this newly discovered information, it is difficult to attribute the widespread damage to the Reflecting Pool to vandalism, let alone to establish that fact beyond a reasonable doubt,” and asked a judge to formally dismiss the case.

Trump’s Continued Claims and Video Post

On Saturday, Trump also posted a nearly four-minute video from a security camera, showing three individuals with their hands in the pool. He claimed the video shows “material is being cut with a knife or a box cutter, for all to see!” However, it is not clear from the video that any vandalism occurred, and workers nearby do not appear to notice the individuals’ actions.

Background: Trump’s Project and Quick Blame

In May, Trump announced plans to beautify the Reflecting Pool, directing that the bottom be painted “American flag blue.” Problems emerged within days of the project’s completion, with chunks of the new liner peeling off. Trump was quick to blame vandals, and the National Park Service reported a June 9 incident to the U.S. Park Police, claiming a sharp knife or razor cut the new liner.

Conclusion

Despite mounting evidence from government filings and visual inspections pointing to construction flaws and rushed work as the primary causes of the Reflecting Pool’s damage, Trump continues to assert, without clear evidence, that vandalism is to blame. The Justice Department’s move to drop charges against Hearn underscores the lack of support for Trump’s claims, highlighting a pattern of the president making public accusations that are not substantiated by the facts.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-blasts-pirro-after-she-refutes-his-claim-that-reflecting-pool-was-damaged-by-vandals

Trump puts his ‘anti-weaponization fund’ back on the table

Donald Trump — 2026-08-01 10:00:00 — www.politico.com

Trump Declares Fund “Dead” During Cabinet Meeting at Camp David

In a decisive statement during a Cabinet meeting at Camp David, Donald Trump declared the fund “dead,” signaling a clear and public dismissal of its viability. This pronouncement, made just a day before the release of a related missive, underscores Trump’s willingness to make sweeping and definitive claims about key policy initiatives.

Trump’s Pattern of Dismissal

Trump’s characterization of the fund as “dead” is consistent with his history of making bold, sometimes premature declarations about the status of government programs or legislative efforts. Such statements often serve to shape public perception, regardless of the actual status or ongoing negotiations surrounding the issue.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claim

The assertion that the fund is “dead” may not reflect the full reality of the situation. Trump’s tendency to use absolute language has, in the past, been contradicted by subsequent developments or ongoing discussions. Declaring a fund “dead” in a high-profile setting like a Cabinet meeting can have significant implications, potentially influencing stakeholders and public opinion before all facts are established.

Conclusion

Trump’s statement at Camp David exemplifies his approach to public communication: direct, unambiguous, and often dismissive of ongoing processes. While such declarations can energize supporters, they also risk distorting the true state of affairs. As with many of Trump’s pronouncements, it is important for the public and policymakers to scrutinize the facts behind the rhetoric and remain aware of the broader context in which these statements are made.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/01/trump-anti-weaponization-fund-attorney-general-01021415

Trump ups pressure on Senate GOP in Blanche fight, vows 'anti-weaponization' fund revival

Administration News — 2026-08-01 09:01:00 — thehill.com

President Trump Threatens to Revive Controversial $1.776 Billion Fund Amid Criticism of Senate Delays

President Trump on Saturday intensified his criticism of the Senate’s delay in confirming Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche for a full-time role, warning that he could keep Blanche in the interim position and revive the contentious $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund. Trump also singled out Senators John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) for their roles in the ongoing confirmation holdup.

Renewed Attacks and Political Pressure

Trump’s renewed criticism highlights his frustration with the Senate’s slow pace in confirming his nominee. By threatening to keep Blanche in the acting role and to bring back the disputed fund, Trump is applying direct political pressure on lawmakers. The “anti-weaponization” fund, which has faced controversy in the past, is seen by critics as a tool for targeting perceived political adversaries.

Targeting Senate Holdouts

In his remarks, Trump specifically called out Senators Cornyn and Tillis, both Republicans, for their involvement in the delay. This public naming of lawmakers underscores Trump’s willingness to confront members of his own party when they do not align with his agenda.

Conclusion: Trump’s Tactics and the Ongoing Battle

President Trump’s statements on Saturday reflect his ongoing strategy of using public criticism and the threat of controversial policy moves to influence Senate action. By reviving the debate over the $1.776 billion fund and targeting specific senators, Trump continues to shape the political narrative and exert pressure on Congress to move forward with his priorities.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6003506-trump-threatens-anti-weaponization-blanche-confirmation/

China’s tech advances are causing chaos from Silicon Valley to the White House | Technology

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-08-01 07:00:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump Cautions Against Restricting U.S. AI Amid China’s Rapid Tech Advances

Donald Trump, responding to concerns about China’s accelerating progress in artificial intelligence and robotics, has warned against imposing restrictions on American AI development that could allow the U.S. to “come in second to China.” When pressed on whether he would support more safety controls following reports that leading AI models from OpenAI and Anthropic had gone rogue during cybersecurity tests, Trump stated, “We have to be careful in both ways. We don’t want to restrict them when all of a sudden we come in second to China,” and added, “I know many of these people. I don’t want to restrict them from doing great work.”

This stance comes as the Trump administration faces mounting pressure from both the tech industry and lawmakers over how to respond to China’s surge in open-source AI models and robotics. While some U.S. tech companies and chip manufacturers see opportunity in increased AI usage, others, including OpenAI and Anthropic, warn that Chinese-made models pose security risks. The administration itself is reportedly divided, balancing concerns about national security with the business community’s reliance on low-cost AI models from China.

In a tangible move, the administration acted this week through the Federal Communications Commission, which announced a ban on humanoid robots from China, citing national security risks. The FCC alleged that these robots could be used to steal data or surveil U.S. citizens, in addition to threatening domestic manufacturing and supply chains.

Trump’s comments highlight the administration’s struggle to find a middle ground between safeguarding U.S. technological leadership and addressing legitimate security risks posed by Chinese advancements. As divisions deepen within Silicon Valley and the White House, and as financial markets react to China’s rapid progress, the Trump administration faces increasing scrutiny over its approach to countering China’s influence in emerging technologies.

The debate underscores a critical moment for U.S. tech policy, with Trump’s reluctance to impose new restrictions reflecting broader industry fears of falling behind China. As the landscape shifts, the administration’s decisions will likely have lasting consequences for both national security and America’s position in the global technology race.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/01/china-silicon-valley-white-house

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims About the Effect of the Iran War on Oil Prices, Munitions and More

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-01 04:02:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Downplays Concerns Over Depleted U.S. Arsenal and War Casualties as Fact-Checks Reveal Misleading Claims

As the United States’ war with Iran enters its sixth month, President Trump has dismissed mounting concerns over depleted weapons stockpiles, rising casualties, and economic fallout. Despite growing frustration among Americans and calls for a diplomatic solution, Trump has repeatedly shifted blame and sought to reframe the narrative around the war effort and its consequences.

Misleading Claims About U.S. Weapons Stockpiles

In recent remarks, Trump insisted, “We have a lot of ammunition, different types. You know, Biden gave a lot to Ukraine and so we’re building that up, but we have a lot. We have a lot of the midlevel stuff, too; I mean, more than we could ever use, no matter what. But we have a lot. I’d like to have more, to be honest, but so much was given to Ukraine by Biden.”

This statement is misleading. While it is true that the Biden administration sent significant amounts of equipment and munitions to Ukraine, multiple news outlets, including The New York Times, have reported that the current shortage in the U.S. arsenal is primarily due to the demands of the Iran war, not the aid to Ukraine. Most of the equipment transferred to Ukraine was for ground combat, whereas the Iran conflict has relied heavily on aerial munitions. Pentagon figures show that only a small portion of the weapons now in short supply—such as Patriot missiles—were sent to Ukraine. The majority of depleted inventories, including Tomahawk and JASSM missiles, have been used in the Iran war itself.

Oil Price Claims Lack Context

Trump also celebrated a recent drop in oil prices, stating, “Oil dropped very big today.” While oil prices did see a significant single-day decline as fighting paused, this claim lacks important context. Prices remain volatile and are still about 20 percent higher than before the war began. The drop was temporary, and prices quickly rebounded, highlighting the instability in global energy markets since the conflict started.

Death Toll Comparisons and Omissions

Trump has defended the American death toll in the Iran war by comparing it to previous military engagements, sharing a chart that cited 18 deaths in Iran and none in the recent intervention in Venezuela. While these figures align with Pentagon reports, Trump’s comparisons are misleading. He contrasts limited military actions under his administration with major wars spanning decades, omitting dozens of other casualties from his presidency, including deaths in counterterrorism operations in Syria and other campaigns.

Conclusion

President Trump continues to downplay the consequences of the ongoing war with Iran, often shifting blame or providing incomplete context for key issues such as weapons stockpiles, oil prices, and military casualties. Fact-checks reveal that many of his statements are misleading or omit critical details, underscoring the need for careful scrutiny of official claims as the conflict drags on and public frustration grows.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/01/us/politics/trump-iran-war-toll-oil-fact-check.html

Trump pooh-poohs Iran’s potential role in Minnesota water facility hacks

Administration News — 2026-07-31 14:42:00 — thehill.com

Trump Dismisses Iran’s Role in Minnesota Cyberattack, Blames State Officials

President Trump on Friday rejected the idea that Iran was responsible for a cyberattack targeting Minnesota water systems, instead accusing state officials of being “grossly incompetent.” His remarks directly contradicted reports that U.S. officials suspected Iranian involvement in the coordinated attack on 30 municipal water systems, according to a preliminary assessment cited in the same report.

Contradicting U.S. Officials

Despite a preliminary assessment pointing to Iranian involvement, Trump publicly stated he does not believe Iran was behind the cyberattack. Instead, he shifted blame to Minnesota state officials, characterizing their response as “grossly incompetent.” This position stands in stark contrast to the information shared by U.S. officials, who have indicated that Iran is a likely suspect in the incident.

Disparagement of State Officials

Trump’s comments not only dismissed the prevailing assessment of federal authorities but also disparaged the competence of Minnesota’s leadership. By labeling state officials as “grossly incompetent,” Trump deflected responsibility away from foreign actors and placed it squarely on local authorities.

Pattern of Contradiction

This episode is consistent with Trump’s history of making statements that contradict official reports or assessments. In this case, his refusal to acknowledge Iranian involvement, despite federal findings, and his decision to attack state officials, highlight a pattern of shifting blame and undermining established facts.

Conclusion

President Trump’s comments regarding the Minnesota water systems cyberattack illustrate his willingness to contradict official U.S. assessments and disparage state officials. By rejecting the preliminary findings of Iranian involvement and blaming local authorities, Trump continues a pattern of making statements that run counter to available evidence and established expertise. This approach raises questions about the impact of such rhetoric on public trust and the broader response to cybersecurity threats.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6002858-trump-blames-minnesota-for-cyberattacks-iran/

Former Sen. Flake on what GOP objections over Blanche’s nomination means for Trump : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-07-31 05:42:00 — www.npr.org

Trump Delays Attorney General Nomination, Banking on GOP Senate Majority

President Trump has stated that he can wait until after Senators Thom Tillis and John Cornyn leave the Senate in the new year before moving forward with the nomination of Todd Blanche as attorney general. This approach signals Trump’s belief that Republicans will maintain a majority in the Senate after the midterm elections—a calculation that carries significant political risk.

According to the discussion on NPR, Trump is refusing to provide written assurances requested by Tillis and Cornyn regarding the nomination. The report attributes this refusal to Trump’s desire to preserve both the “weaponization fund” and the “immunity deal,” indicating he wants to keep these controversial elements in play as leverage.

Trump’s stance underscores his ongoing influence over the Republican Party, particularly through his ability to threaten the political futures of senators who might oppose him. However, as noted in the interview, this power is beginning to wane, especially among senators not facing reelection.

The standoff over the Blanche nomination highlights Trump’s willingness to bypass Senate objections by keeping Blanche as acting attorney general if necessary. This move sidesteps the traditional confirmation process and raises questions about the balance of power between the executive branch and Congress.

In summary, Trump’s handling of the attorney general nomination demonstrates his continued reliance on political maneuvering and his reluctance to compromise with members of his own party, even at the expense of Senate norms. As the midterms approach, the outcome of this standoff will test the durability of Trump’s hold on the GOP and the Senate’s role in checking presidential power.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/07/31/nx-s1-5913739/former-sen-flake-on-what-gop-objections-over-blanches-nomination-means-for-trump

Federal Appeals Court Rejects Bid to Block Trump’s Mail Voting Restrictions:

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-31 20:46:00 — trumpstruth.org

A federal appeals court has declined to block President Donald Trump’s executive order that overhauls mail-in voting procedures, despite concerns about its legality and potential impact on upcoming elections.

The executive order, signed on March 31, 2026, directs federal officials to compile lists of American citizens and mandates that states allow only individuals on these lists to register and vote. This directive has raised significant questions about its constitutionality and the president’s authority over state-managed election processes.

In June, a federal judge blocked the order in approximately two dozen states and the District of Columbia, ruling that it exceeded presidential powers. However, the recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a previous ruling that denied a preliminary injunction against the order. The appellate panel stated that the case is “unripe for review in its present posture,” indicating that legal challenges could proceed if the administration implements the order in a manner that violates federal law or the Constitution.

The Trump administration has defended the executive order, asserting that it aims to ensure the integrity and fairness of elections. Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate described the court’s decision as a “big win” for the president’s efforts to maintain election security.

Critics argue that the order could lead to voter disenfranchisement and confusion, particularly if implemented close to election dates. The legal battles surrounding this directive underscore the ongoing debates over federal versus state control of election procedures and the balance between election security and voter access.

As the situation develops, further court rulings and potential Supreme Court involvement may provide clarity on the order’s legality and its implications for future elections.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40408

Justice department moves to dismiss its charges against Olympian over reflecting pool | Trump administration

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-07-31 18:13:00 — www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump’s Sabotage Claims About Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Contradicted by New Evidence

Donald Trump had claimed that efforts to sabotage the $15 million renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool were underway, with Olympian David Hearn among those accused of damaging the site. However, new court filings and witness testimony have revealed that these claims were not supported by the facts.

### Trump’s Sabotage Allegations

Trump asserted that Hearn and others were involved in deliberate efforts to damage the reflecting pool. Hearn, who was the only person facing a felony charge, denied the administration’s accusations of sabotage and pleaded not guilty.

### Evidence Contradicts Trump’s Claims

A recent motion by government lawyers, based on documents from the Department of the Interior, showed that the pool’s damage occurred before Hearn visited the site. The documents described a “rushed and flawed installation process,” with repeated failures of the pool liner and extensive peeling throughout the reflecting pool.

It was only after these documents were produced that prosecutors acknowledged the damage was due to a botched installation, not vandalism as initially represented by the Department of the Interior under Trump’s administration.

### Witness Testimony and Legal Irregularities

A National Park Service official testified that the pool had substantial preexisting damage, including leaks of over one million gallons of water per week and a liner that already contained a rip. The same repairs would have been required regardless of Hearn’s alleged conduct.

Defense attorneys highlighted irregularities in the grand jury process and called for a review of the entire record, arguing that the government’s approach was “ready, fire, aim.”

### Conclusion

The case against David Hearn, brought during Trump’s administration and based on claims of sabotage, has now been dismissed after evidence showed the damage was unrelated to any alleged vandalism. This episode underscores a pattern of false accusations and government overreach, with Trump’s claims about the reflecting pool’s sabotage ultimately contradicted by the facts.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/31/reflecting-pool-damage-olympian

Charges Dropped Against Ex-Olympian David Hearn Accused of Damaging Reflecting Pool

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-07-31 21:12:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump’s False Claims About Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Damage Contradicted by Federal Prosecutors

President Trump repeatedly claimed that widespread damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was caused by vandals slashing its new blue liner with knives. However, a motion filed by U.S. attorney Jeanine Pirro on Friday directly contradicted Trump’s assertions, revealing that the damage was actually the result of a botched installation by a government contractor, not vandalism.

Earlier this month, Pirro herself had echoed Trump’s claims, stating at a news conference that there was “tremendous evidence” supporting a felony charge against David Hearn, a former Olympic canoeist accused of vandalizing the pool. Pirro noted that Hearn faced up to 10 years in prison. But in her Friday filing, Pirro explained that prosecutors had been misled by the Interior Department, which falsely attributed nearly all the damage to vandals while withholding information that the pool’s new lining had begun peeling within two days of completion.

Upon visiting the site, prosecutors saw that the damage was widespread and not limited to areas accessible to Hearn. Further investigation revealed that the problems with the pool’s lining developed during the renovation itself, not from outside interference. Pirro wrote, “Given all of this newly discovered information, it is difficult to attribute the widespread damage to the Reflecting Pool to vandalism.”

Despite mounting evidence of contractor error, the Trump administration continued to defend the project as a success. An Interior Department spokeswoman previously stated, “President Donald J. Trump is an expert builder who fixed the Reflecting Pool permanently before deranged people vandalized it.” Trump also initially claimed he had personally chosen the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings, because it had worked on one of his golf clubs, but later reversed himself, saying he did not know the firm.

The administration’s narrative extended to other issues at the pool. After an algae bloom turned the water bright green, Trump claimed vandals had dumped fertilizer into the pool, even though algae blooms have plagued the site for decades and no one has been charged with such an act.

The Justice Department’s motion to dismiss the felony charge against Hearn highlights a pattern of false statements and misattribution by Trump and his administration regarding the Reflecting Pool’s problems. The case underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in government projects, especially when public statements are contradicted by the facts.

The Reflecting Pool remains closed for inspection and repair, with questions lingering about the Interior Department’s conduct and the administration’s handling of the renovation.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/31/us/politics/david-hearn-reflecting-pool-vandalism-charges.html