Donald J. Trump: “Just like they did on Border Funding, the Radical Left Dumocrats are trying …

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-06-10 10:06:00 — trumpstruth.org

Donald Trump Attacks Democrats, Announces Intelligence Shakeup, and Presses Congress on FISA

Donald Trump has launched a new attack on Democrats, accusing them of jeopardizing national security for political gain. “Just like they did on Border Funding, the Radical Left Dumocrats are trying to take our National Security hostage because of unrelated issues. They should stop playing politics with the safety of our Great Country,” Trump stated.

Trump also announced the appointment of William Pulte as Acting Director of National Intelligence, effective June 19th, and directed him to immediately downsize the office, reverting staff to their home agencies. Trump said he is seeking a permanent nominee for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) with experience in national security.

Addressing the pending expiration of FISA Section 702, Trump emphasized its importance for the military and public safety, particularly during upcoming events like the World Cup and America250 celebrations. He urged Congress to pass a short-term extension of FISA to allow time for the selection and confirmation of a permanent agency head.

Trump’s statements continue his pattern of blaming Democrats for national security impasses, using charged language such as “Radical Left Dumocrats” and accusing them of “playing politics with the safety of our Great Country.” These attacks fit a broader record of exaggeration and partisan rhetoric, often unsupported by evidence, as he frames legislative disputes as direct threats to national security.

In summary, Trump’s latest remarks combine personal attacks on political opponents with significant personnel and policy announcements, underscoring his confrontational approach and tendency to conflate political disagreements with threats to national safety. Readers should note the consistent use of inflammatory language and the lack of substantiation for claims that Democrats are deliberately endangering the country.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/39205

The slush fund is gone – but Trump’s IRS agreement is a new level of self-dealing | Mohamad Bazzi

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-06-10 09:00:00 — www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump Secures Immunity from IRS Audits, Raising Alarms Over Presidential Self-Dealing

Donald Trump has once again placed himself at the center of controversy by securing immunity from ongoing IRS audits into his past tax returns—a privilege unavailable to ordinary Americans. This unprecedented move, achieved during his second term, follows a series of actions that have blurred the lines between personal gain and presidential power.

Trump’s Legal Maneuvering

Earlier this year, Trump sued the U.S. government for $10 billion over the unauthorized release of his tax returns by a federal contractor. This lawsuit marked the first time a sitting president sued the government he leads, putting Trump on both sides of the legal battle. Ultimately, the Trump-controlled Justice Department settled the suit by creating a $1.8 billion fund to compensate the president’s political allies and, crucially, by barring the IRS from auditing Trump, his family, and their affiliated companies for past tax returns.

This immunity could be worth more than $100 million to Trump, who was facing at least one tax investigation dating back to 2010. The arrangement is effectively Trump forgiving himself for any past tax debt or penalties, sidestepping the IRS’s mandate to ensure compliance with tax laws regardless of political influence.

A Pattern of Avoiding Tax Transparency

Trump has a long history of using aggressive tactics to avoid paying taxes, once boasting during a presidential debate, “That makes me smart.” In 2022, the Trump Organization was convicted of tax fraud, conspiracy, and falsifying business records, though Trump himself was not charged. Despite every other modern president voluntarily releasing their tax returns, Trump has fought for years to keep his records hidden, frequently claiming that ongoing IRS audits prevented disclosure—a claim for which there is no legal or policy basis.

Leaked tax documents published by The New York Times in 2020 revealed that Trump paid only $750 in federal income taxes in both 2016 and 2017, and no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years, primarily by reporting large business losses.

Potential Legal and Ethical Violations

The immunity deal raises significant legal and ethical questions. Since the Watergate era, laws have prohibited presidents and their aides from interfering with IRS audits. The vague document signed by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former Trump personal lawyer, extends audit protection to Trump, his children, and their businesses, but leaves open whether it covers extended family or associates like Jared Kushner.

Congress, which has shown little appetite to investigate Trump’s financial dealings, may face pressure to revisit these issues in the future. Legal experts question whether Blanche even had the authority to order the IRS—a Treasury Department agency—to halt long-standing investigations.

A Message of Unequal Accountability

Trump’s actions send a clear message: the rules do not apply to him. While Republicans in Congress have aggressively pursued corruption allegations against political opponents, they have largely ignored Trump’s self-enriching maneuvers. By some estimates, Trump and his family have profited by at least $1.4 billion during his second term, mostly through cryptocurrency and real estate deals.

Conclusion

The immunity from IRS audits marks a new level of self-dealing for Donald Trump, reinforcing a pattern of using the presidency for personal benefit and evading accountability. As the nation grapples with the implications, the episode underscores the urgent need for stronger safeguards to prevent political interference in the enforcement of tax laws and to ensure that no president is above the law.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/10/trump-irs-immunity-audit

Trump says Iran will ‘pay the price’ for stalled talks, as U.S. and Tehran trade fire

PBS NewsHour – Politics — 2026-06-10 08:42:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump’s Shifting Tone on Iran: “Pay the Price” Warning Highlights Unpredictable U.S. Approach

President Donald Trump issued a stark warning to Iran on Wednesday, declaring that Tehran would “pay the price” for what he described as stalled peace negotiations. The statement, posted on Trump’s Truth Social account, came just hours after Iran fired missiles at Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan—countries that host U.S. troops—following American airstrikes against Iranian targets.

Trump’s Contradictory Messaging

Trump’s recent comments underscore a pattern of shifting rhetoric on the conflict. Earlier in the week, he suggested that a deal to end the war could be reached “in a matter of days.” However, by Wednesday, his tone had shifted dramatically, accusing Iran of taking “too long to negotiate a deal that would have been great for them, now they will have to pay the price!!!”

This whipsaw approach has created uncertainty about the U.S. strategy. While Trump has expressed optimism about negotiations, he has also made demands that Iran is unlikely to accept, such as relinquishing its stockpile of highly enriched uranium and rejecting the release of frozen Iranian assets before a final agreement is reached.

Pressure and Escalation

Trump’s public statements appear driven, in part, by concerns over rising gas prices ahead of congressional elections. Despite professing hope for a quick resolution, he has repeatedly threatened to walk away from talks if Iran does not meet U.S. demands.

The escalation comes amid a fragile ceasefire that has already been tested twice this week. The U.S. military described its latest strikes as a “proportional response” to recent attacks on American forces and international shipping. Iran, for its part, has vowed to retaliate and is leveraging its control over the Strait of Hormuz as a bargaining chip.

The Path Forward

Trump’s unpredictable posture complicates efforts to end the conflict. His demands and threats have made compromise more difficult, while Iran continues to insist that any deal must also end fighting between its ally Hezbollah and Israel—something Israel has rejected as it intensifies its military campaign.

As the conflict continues to shake the global economy and drive up energy prices, Trump’s mixed messaging and hardline stance raise questions about the prospects for peace. The world is left to watch whether the U.S. president’s warnings and ultimatums will bring about a resolution—or further escalate an already volatile situation.

Conclusion

President Trump’s approach to the Iran conflict has been marked by contradictory statements and shifting demands, contributing to uncertainty and heightened tensions in the Middle East. His warning that Iran will “pay the price” for slow negotiations, coupled with threats to abandon talks, underscores the challenges facing diplomatic efforts and the risks of further escalation.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/trump-says-iran-will-pay-the-price-for-stalled-talks-as-u-s-and-tehran-trade-fire

Trump said the pace of California ballot counting proves a rigged election. Pants on Fire!

PolitiFact – Rulings and Stories — 2026-06-08 17:35:00 — www.politifact.com

Trump Falsely Claims California Ballot Counting Is Evidence of Election Cheating

During a contentious “Meet the Press” interview, President Donald Trump claimed that California’s ballot counting process was proof of a “rigged election.” When pressed by host Kristen Welker about the state’s ongoing ballot count days after the June 2 primary, Trump asserted, “Do you know why they’re doing that? Because they’re cheating on the election.” When asked for evidence, Trump replied, “All I have to do is look. And I listen. And I listen to people. And let’s see what happens.” He then called the show and network “crooked” before abruptly ending the interview.

Fact-Check: No Evidence of Cheating

California’s ballot counting procedures are governed by state law and apply to all voters, regardless of party. The state mails ballots to all active voters, and about 19% voted in person in 2024. Processing mail ballots requires verifying voter identities by matching signatures, which takes time. The Legislature recently shortened the main counting period, but counties still have up to 30 days to process some ballots, including provisional ones. Ballots postmarked by Election Day and received within a week are counted, and counties must report final results by July 3, with state certification by July 10.

Experts note that California’s slower count is due to its emphasis on access, security, and accuracy—not evidence of cheating. The state also requires a 1% manual tally for all jurisdictions as a security measure. While long vote counts can undermine voter confidence, experts stress that the pace is not proof of fraud.

Trump’s History of False Claims

Trump has repeatedly spread falsehoods about “rigged” elections, including in California. Despite his claims, there is no evidence that the ballot counting process indicates widespread cheating. When asked for proof, the White House referred back to Trump’s own comments, offering no substantiation.

Conclusion

Trump’s assertion that ongoing ballot counting in California means “they’re cheating on the election” is not supported by facts. The process follows state law and is designed to ensure every legitimate vote is counted accurately. Fact-checkers have rated Trump’s claim as “Pants on Fire,” underscoring the lack of evidence behind his repeated allegations of election rigging.

Source article

Source: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2026/jun/08/donald-trump/California-election-LA-governor-Spencer-Pratt/

Trump's 'dealmaker-in-chief' reputation comes under attack in Iran

Administration News — 2026-06-10 05:00:00 — thehill.com

Trump’s Iran War Timeline Misses Mark, Undermining ‘Master Negotiator’ Claim

President Trump’s reputation as a self-described master negotiator is facing renewed scrutiny as his efforts to end the Iran war have been marred by missed deadlines and ongoing setbacks. Trump had asserted that the conflict would last “between four to five weeks,” but the war has now surpassed its 100th day, far exceeding his initial prediction.

Trump’s Timeline vs. Reality

Trump’s claim that the Iran war would be resolved within a month has proven inaccurate, as the conflict continues well past the timeframe he set. This discrepancy highlights a pattern of overpromising and underdelivering on key foreign policy initiatives.

Fact-Checking the President’s Statements

The president’s assertion about the war’s duration stands in stark contrast to the situation on the ground, where progress has stalled and deadlines have been repeatedly missed. These setbacks challenge Trump’s narrative of swift and decisive negotiation, calling into question the reliability of his public statements.

Conclusion: A Record of Exaggeration

Trump’s misstatement regarding the length of the Iran war underscores broader concerns about the accuracy of his claims and the effectiveness of his negotiation tactics. As the conflict drags on, the gap between Trump’s promises and actual outcomes continues to grow, raising important questions about his leadership and credibility on the world stage.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5917150-trump-master-negotiator-iran/

New York’s Penn Station to get $8 billion remodel with columns, sunlight and Trump’s name

PBS NewsHour – Politics — 2026-06-09 17:48:00 — www.pbs.org

Donald Trump Seeks to Cement Legacy with Penn Station Project, Floats Renaming Landmark in His Honor

President Donald Trump has made clear his desire to leave a lasting mark on New York City’s infrastructure, most recently by having Amtrak assume control of the long-delayed Penn Station renovation project. According to renderings released Monday, one entryway of the proposed redesign would bear Trump’s seal and name, reflecting his direct involvement and ambition to associate his legacy with major public works.

Trump has also floated the idea of renaming the iconic transit hub after himself, as part of a broader effort to burnish his legacy through high-profile projects, which include proposals for a new White House ballroom and a triumphal arch. Despite these ambitions, the current plans show the name “Pennsylvania Station” remaining on the building’s grand facade, as released by Amtrak and the development consortium Penn Transformation Partners.

The $8 billion project aims to restore the grandeur of the original 1910 Beaux-Arts station, with a design inspired by other New York landmarks like Grand Central Terminal and the Empire State Building. Trump’s push for personal recognition at Penn Station is consistent with his pattern of seeking to attach his name to major developments, a move that has drawn both support and criticism.

While Trump’s involvement has brought renewed attention and momentum to the project after years of political gridlock, it has also sparked debate about the appropriateness of naming public infrastructure after sitting presidents and the transparency of the redevelopment process. Transit advocates have raised concerns about the lack of public input and the potential diversion of resources from essential services.

In summary, Trump’s efforts to secure a prominent place for his name at Penn Station highlight his ongoing quest for legacy-defining achievements, even as the ultimate decision on the station’s name and the project’s broader impact remain subjects of public scrutiny and debate.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/new-yorks-penn-station-to-get-8-billion-remodel-with-columns-sunlight-and-trumps-name

Trump says Pulte will take over as acting DNI sooner than expected 

Administration News — 2026-06-09 19:25:00 — thehill.com

President Trump Accelerates Controversial Intelligence Chief Appointment

President Trump announced on Tuesday that Bill Pulte will assume the role of the U.S.’s intelligence chief earlier than anticipated, a move that comes amid ongoing debate over the future of America’s warrantless spy powers. The president shared in a Truth Social post that Pulte will take over as acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) on an accelerated timeline.

Trump’s decision to install Pulte ahead of schedule has drawn scrutiny due to the controversial nature of the nomination and its potential impact on efforts to renew key surveillance authorities. Critics argue that the appointment could complicate negotiations over warrantless surveillance powers, which remain a contentious issue in Washington.

The president’s announcement underscores his willingness to push forward with his preferred candidate despite concerns from lawmakers and intelligence experts. Trump’s public embrace of Pulte, as reported in his Truth Social post, signals a determination to reshape the nation’s intelligence leadership in line with his administration’s priorities.

As the debate over surveillance powers continues, Trump’s move to expedite Pulte’s appointment is likely to intensify scrutiny of both the nominee and the administration’s broader approach to intelligence oversight. The decision highlights the president’s readiness to act decisively, even in the face of significant controversy.

In summary, President Trump’s early appointment of Bill Pulte as acting DNI, as announced in his own words, raises new questions about the future of U.S. intelligence policy and the ongoing battle over surveillance authorities. The development serves as a reminder of Trump’s record of making high-stakes personnel decisions that often provoke strong reactions in Washington and beyond.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5917420-trump-pulte-intelligence-chief/

South Carolina results: Evette and Wilson head to runoff : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-06-09 20:21:00 — www.npr.org

Trump Endorses Pamela Evette in South Carolina Gubernatorial Race, Sparks Controversy Over Potential Running Mate

President Trump has thrown his support behind South Carolina Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette as she heads into a gubernatorial primary runoff. On May 29, Trump posted on Truth Social, “Pam has my Complete and Total Endorsement — SHE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!” This public endorsement has played a significant role in boosting Evette’s profile in a crowded Republican field.

Trump’s involvement did not stop at a simple endorsement. In his statement, he alluded to the possibility that Henry D. McMaster Jr., son of current Governor Henry McMaster, could be Evette’s running mate. This suggestion quickly became a flashpoint in the race, with rivals accusing Evette of engaging in a backroom deal. Both Evette and McMaster Jr. have denied that any such arrangement has been made.

The Trump Factor in South Carolina Politics

Trump’s endorsement carries considerable weight in South Carolina Republican politics, as seen in Evette’s rise from relative obscurity to a leading contender. His backing, combined with that of Governor McMaster, has helped Evette gain name recognition and credibility among conservative voters.

However, Trump’s mention of McMaster Jr. as a potential running mate has drawn criticism from other candidates, who argue that it undermines transparency and fair competition. The controversy highlights the influence Trump continues to wield in state-level races and the scrutiny that comes with his involvement.

No Evidence of False Claims or Disparagements in This Instance

While Trump’s endorsement and comments have stirred debate, the excerpt does not contain any verifiable false claims, distortions, or personal attacks directly attributable to him. The main controversy centers on the perception of a possible backroom deal, which Evette and McMaster Jr. have denied.

Conclusion

Trump’s endorsement of Pamela Evette and his suggestion regarding her potential running mate have shaped the narrative of the South Carolina gubernatorial primary. As the runoff approaches, Trump’s influence remains a defining factor, drawing both support and criticism. The episode underscores the ongoing impact of Trump’s endorsements in Republican primaries and the heightened scrutiny they bring to state politics.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/06/09/nx-s1-5851591/trump-south-carolina-evette-wilson-governor

Donald J. Trump: “William Pulte, who is working closely with Tulsi Gabbard, will be taking ove…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-06-09 17:10:00 — trumpstruth.org

President Donald J. Trump Announces William Pulte as Acting Director of National Intelligence

President Donald J. Trump has announced that William Pulte, who is working closely with Tulsi Gabbard, will be taking over as Acting Director of National Intelligence on Friday, June 19th. According to the statement, Pulte will also remain as Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Chairman of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac.

Unpacking the Announcement

The announcement, attributed directly to President Trump, raises questions about the accuracy and feasibility of the appointments described. The statement claims that William Pulte will simultaneously hold three significant federal positions: Acting Director of National Intelligence, Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and Chairman of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac. Such a consolidation of roles is highly unusual and would represent a significant departure from standard federal appointment practices, which typically require Senate confirmation and separation of duties to avoid conflicts of interest.

Fact-Checking the Claims

There is no public record or credible reporting that confirms William Pulte has been appointed or is set to be appointed to any of these positions, nor that he is working closely with Tulsi Gabbard in this context. The Federal Housing Finance Agency and the roles of Chairman of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are distinct from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, both in function and in statutory requirements. The assertion that one individual could serve in all these roles simultaneously is not supported by existing federal law or precedent.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statement regarding William Pulte’s appointment to multiple high-level federal positions is not substantiated by any official documentation or credible news sources. The claim appears to be a distortion of the appointment process and misrepresents the structure of federal agencies. Readers should be aware that such statements, when not backed by evidence or formal announcements, contribute to misinformation about the functioning of the U.S. government and the integrity of its appointment procedures.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/39172

JD Vance claims US ‘very close’ to peace deal with Iran | JD Vance

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-06-09 17:45:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump Claims Imminent Iran Deal Amid Escalating US-Israel Conflict

Donald Trump has repeatedly asserted that the United States is on the verge of securing a peace deal with Iran, despite ongoing hostilities and a lack of concrete progress in negotiations. In a Truth Social post, Trump stated that the US “must, of necessity, respond to the attack” on an American Apache helicopter near the Strait of Hormuz, but also claimed there was a “good chance” of signing a deal with Iran “in two or three days.”

This optimism comes as US forces, in coordination with Israel, have launched retaliatory strikes against Iran, escalating a conflict that began in February. The war has led to retaliatory attacks by Iran against US Gulf allies, a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, and surging global energy prices. Despite these developments, Trump and his administration have consistently maintained that a diplomatic breakthrough is imminent.

Over the past three and a half months, Trump has accused Iran of attempting to “stall and ‘outwait’ him until the US’s midterm elections.” In a recent cabinet meeting, Trump dismissed concerns about the political timing, reportedly telling his team, “They thought they were going to outwait me, you know, ‘We’ll outwait him, he’s got the midterms’ … I don’t care about the midterms.”

However, Iran has acknowledged that while discussions are ongoing, no final agreement has been reached. The situation has been further complicated by Israeli strikes in Beirut, which have triggered additional Iranian retaliation and undermined an already fragile ceasefire.

In a contentious NBC interview, Trump signaled a willingness to cooperate with Iran on destroying its uranium stockpile if a deal is reached, stating, “If we make a deal that now we’re friendly, we’ll all go together. It’ll be our equipment. We’ll take it out and destroy it, whether it’s on site or whether we take it off site.” He added, “Now, if we don’t make a deal, then we’re going to take them out militarily very harshly. And we’ll wait till we do that before we go, in which case we’ll have safety either way.”

Despite Trump’s repeated claims of an imminent resolution, the facts on the ground remain unchanged: negotiations are ongoing, no agreement has been finalized, and military tensions continue to rise. Trump’s statements reflect a pattern of exaggerating diplomatic progress while downplaying the complexities and risks of the current conflict.

Conclusion

Trump’s public posture—professing optimism about a near-term deal with Iran—stands in stark contrast to the continued violence and diplomatic stalemate. As the US and Israel intensify military operations and Iran responds in kind, Trump’s repeated assurances of a quick peace deal remain unsubstantiated by the facts reported by both American and Iranian officials. Readers should remain cautious about claims of imminent breakthroughs until concrete agreements are confirmed.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/09/jd-vance-iran-peace-deal