Trump ally resigns from post leading inquiry into alleged conspiracy against president | Trump-Russia investigation

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-09-11 15:30:00 — www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump’s Claims of a “Deep State” Plot Against Him Face Renewed Scrutiny as DOJ Investigation Falters

A Department of Justice investigation, launched at the urging of Donald Trump and focused on alleged conspiracies by former law enforcement and intelligence officials against the president, has been thrown into turmoil following the resignation of its leader, Joe diGenova. The probe, based in Florida, was intended to substantiate Trump’s long-standing claim that he was the victim of a coordinated effort by the intelligence community to undermine his presidency.

Trump’s Central Grievance: Russian Election Interference

One of Trump’s chief grievances, and a central focus of the investigation, is the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help him win. Trump and several of his supporters have repeatedly dismissed this conclusion, characterizing it as a “deep state” plot designed to delegitimize his victory. However, multiple government investigations—including those conducted by a Justice Department special counsel and the department’s own inspector general—have concluded that Russia did, in fact, interfere in sweeping fashion to benefit Trump.

No Evidence Found to Support Trump’s Conspiracy Allegations

Despite Trump’s repeated assertions that he was the target of an intelligence community conspiracy, the year-long investigation has failed to produce any charges or public evidence supporting this claim. Joe diGenova, a close Trump ally who was brought in to lead the inquiry, had previously and openly claimed that Trump was the victim of such a plot. Yet, five months after his appointment, the investigation’s legal viability remains in doubt, and no indictments have been issued.

Internal Dissent and Slow Progress

DiGenova’s resignation comes amid concerns among Trump loyalists that the so-called “retribution cases” against his perceived adversaries were not progressing quickly enough. DiGenova himself acknowledged the slow pace, stating, “Sometimes people want things done faster and that’s all you can do.” He also responded to criticism of his management by saying, “If you want indictments where there’s no evidence, you have an ethical problem.”

Fact-Check: Trump’s “Deep State” Narrative

The excerpt makes clear that Trump and his supporters have long decried the intelligence community’s findings as part of a “deep state” conspiracy. However, these claims have been repeatedly contradicted by official investigations, which have found substantial evidence of Russian interference in Trump’s favor, but no evidence of a coordinated plot against him by U.S. officials.

Conclusion

The collapse of the DOJ’s investigation into alleged conspiracies against Donald Trump underscores the lack of evidence behind the president’s repeated claims of a “deep state” plot. Despite Trump’s persistent narrative, multiple independent inquiries have confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 election and have found no basis for the conspiracy theories promoted by Trump and his allies. As the investigation falters, the facts continue to stand in stark contrast to the president’s assertions.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/10/trump-ally-resigns-president-conspiracy-inquiry

WATCH: Trump leads RNC in pledge to ‘cheat like hell’ in November elections

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-09-11 16:56:00 — www.pbs.org

Donald Trump Urges GOP Crowd to “Cheat Like Hell” Despite Past Claims of Election Fraud

At the Republican midterm convention Thursday night, President Donald Trump told attendees, “we want honesty in our elections,” before leading the crowd in a pledge to “cheat like hell” and “go out and vote” in the upcoming midterm elections. The event, which marked the first-ever GOP convention held before high-stakes November contests, highlighted Trump’s ongoing contradictions and repeated falsehoods regarding election integrity.

Contradictory Rhetoric on Election Honesty

Trump’s call for honesty in elections stands in stark contrast to his actions and statements both at the convention and in the past. Despite his public demand for “honesty,” he encouraged supporters to “cheat like hell” as part of a rallying cry to energize Republican turnout. This message is particularly notable given Trump’s history of making unfounded claims about widespread voter fraud and calling for “long-term prison sentences” for those he labels as election “cheaters.”

False Claims and Voting Practices

Fact-checkers have repeatedly debunked Trump’s assertions of rampant voter fraud. Since taking office, he has attempted to limit mail-in voting, a move often justified by his claims of fraud. However, Trump himself has repeatedly used mail ballots to cast his own votes in elections, further highlighting the inconsistency between his rhetoric and personal actions.

Disparaging Remarks and Exaggerations

During the convention, Trump led the crowd in a repeat-after-me pledge to “the greatest president in the history of the United States that loves us so much he can’t even breathe,” a statement that exaggerates his own standing and devotion among supporters. He closed his speech with a stark warning: “You know what happens if you don’t vote? You go to hell,” using hyperbolic language to stress the importance of turnout.

Conclusion: A Pattern of Contradiction

Trump’s remarks at the Republican midterm convention exemplify his pattern of making false or exaggerated claims about election integrity while simultaneously encouraging behavior that contradicts his stated positions. His history of unfounded fraud allegations, attempts to restrict mail-in voting despite personal use, and inflammatory rhetoric continue to shape the political landscape as the midterm elections approach. Voters and observers are left to grapple with the ongoing tension between Trump’s words and actions on the issue of election honesty.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-trump-leads-rnc-in-pledge-to-cheat-like-hell-in-november-elections

Fact-Checking Trump’s Attacks on Democratic Senate Candidates

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-09-11 16:28:00 — www.nytimes.com

President Trump Targets Senate Democrats With Inaccurate Claims

This week, President Trump launched a series of attacks against three Democrats running for Senate, relying on inaccurate claims to paint them as excessively extreme. The president’s statements, aimed at undermining his political opponents, have been fact-checked and found to contain significant distortions.

False Portrayals of Democratic Candidates

In his efforts to sway public opinion, President Trump made several assertions about the Democratic Senate hopefuls that do not align with the facts. By exaggerating their positions and misrepresenting their records, Trump sought to frame these candidates as far outside the mainstream. These claims have been scrutinized and debunked, revealing a pattern of misinformation in the president’s rhetoric.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Attacks

Fact-checkers have identified multiple inaccuracies in Trump’s statements this week. His characterizations of the Democratic candidates’ policies and backgrounds were not supported by evidence, and in some cases, he attributed extreme views to them that they do not hold. These tactics are consistent with the president’s broader approach of using misleading claims to discredit his opponents.

Conclusion: A Pattern of Misinformation

President Trump’s recent attacks on Senate Democrats highlight his ongoing use of false and exaggerated claims to influence voters. By distorting the records of his political rivals, Trump continues a pattern of spreading misinformation in the lead-up to key elections. It is essential for voters to scrutinize such statements and rely on fact-checked information when evaluating candidates and their positions.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/11/us/politics/trump-democats-senate-races-fact-check.html

Michigan voters brace for higher prices from Canada trade war : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-09-11 04:00:00 — www.npr.org

President Trump’s escalating tariff standoff with Canada is drawing sharp criticism from Michigan swing voters, who fear the policy will worsen the state’s affordability crisis and drive up prices for everyday goods. According to focus groups observed by NPR, a majority of participants expressed concern that Trump’s tariffs would directly increase their personal costs, with many seeing no benefit to the ongoing trade war with Michigan’s northern neighbor.

Voters in these sessions, which included individuals who supported both Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024, overwhelmingly agreed that the trade dispute would be bad for Michigan. “Prices are going to go up,” said one participant, echoing the widespread anxiety that tariffs would trigger retaliatory measures from Canada, ultimately raising costs for consumers on both sides of the border.

The focus groups, conducted as part of the Swing Voter Project, revealed that Michigan residents are particularly sensitive to the economic impact of Trump’s tariff policies due to the state’s close commercial ties with Canada. Many participants reported witnessing frequent cross-border trade and worried that new tariffs would reduce traffic and business on key bridges, including the recently opened Gordie Howe Bridge.

Month after month, frustration over high prices has remained a central issue for these swing voters. Several participants said they feel more economically anxious now than before Trump took office again, citing the rising cost of goods, groceries, and gasoline. One voter, who supported Trump in hopes of economic improvement, voiced anger that prices have only increased since his return to office.

Adding to the controversy, many in the focus groups attributed Trump’s decision to rename Lake Ontario as Lake America to his ego, viewing it as a reaction to Canada’s retaliatory tariffs rather than a substantive policy move. Participants questioned why Trump is focusing on symbolic gestures instead of addressing the core issue of inflation, which he repeatedly promised to reduce.

In summary, Trump’s tariff standoff with Canada is fueling economic anxiety and skepticism among Michigan swing voters, who see the policy as a driver of higher prices and a distraction from the pressing issue of affordability. The feedback from these voters highlights the real-world consequences of Trump’s trade actions and raises questions about the effectiveness of his approach to economic policy.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/09/11/nx-s1-5963884/michigan-focus-groups-canada-trump-tariffs

EPA to Weaken Rules on Methane Pollution From “Stripper Wells” — ProPublica

ProPublica — 2026-09-11 04:00:00 — www.propublica.org

President Donald Trump’s administration is moving to drastically weaken environmental regulations on oil and gas wells that emit large amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. The Environmental Protection Agency’s draft rule, currently under White House review, proposes to loosen requirements for leak inspections and equipment upgrades at over 700,000 low-producing “stripper wells.” These wells, which are often old and poorly maintained, account for just 6% of U.S. oil and gas output but are responsible for about half of the industry’s methane pollution, according to studies cited in the draft.

The EPA’s justification for the rollback is that the cost of compliance would force these wells to close, calling such an outcome “unreasonable.” However, the agency’s own figures, as well as industry estimates, show that shutting down these wells would reduce U.S. oil and gas production by only 0.4%. Despite this minimal impact on energy supply, the proposed changes are expected to save oil and gas companies $42 billion through 2050. An internal memo frames the move as a way to “unleash” American energy—one of Trump’s signature slogans.

Environmental advocates dispute the administration’s rationale, arguing that deregulating stripper wells will not meaningfully increase energy output but will significantly worsen climate pollution. Darin Schroeder of the Clean Air Task Force stated, “This is not about energy dominance. It’s about padding the pockets of oil and gas operators and saddling society with the costs.”

The proposed rule is the result of lobbying by industry groups, including the Independent Petroleum Association of America and the National Stripper Well Association. The administration’s actions follow significant donations from oil billionaire Jeffery Hildebrand, whose company, Hilcorp, specializes in acquiring old stripper wells. After Hildebrand became a major Trump donor, Trump appointed a former Hilcorp lobbyist, Aaron Szabo, to a top EPA position overseeing the rollback of methane regulations.

The draft rule also aligns with recommendations from Project 2025, a deregulatory roadmap for the administration, which calls for eliminating an EPA program that tracks and requires responses to “super-emitter” methane events. Trump’s EPA is now moving to end this program as well.

Notably, the EPA under Trump broke with precedent by failing to include calculations of the environmental and health impacts of the proposed rule. In contrast, the Biden administration’s rules—now being rolled back—were projected to cut methane pollution by 80% and deliver over $7 billion a year in climate, health, and energy benefits.

In summary, the Trump administration’s rollback of methane regulations is being justified as a move to “unleash” American energy, despite evidence that the change will have little effect on energy production but will significantly increase methane pollution and benefit oil and gas companies financially. The administration has not provided a full accounting of the public health and environmental costs, leaving the public with less protection against one of the most potent drivers of climate change.

Source article

Source: https://www.propublica.org/article/methane-gas-epa-proposal-stripper-wells

Donald J. Trump: "RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/117246836238536386" – Trump's Truth

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-09-10 07:52:00 — www.trumpstruth.org

In a recent Truth Social post, President Donald Trump claimed that Democratic-led “blue states” are being abandoned by wealthy individuals and corporations, potentially turning into “ghettos of the future.” (thedailybeast.com)

This assertion revives a term he had largely abandoned since 2016, often criticized for its racial connotations. Trump cited an article from the conservative site Just the News to support his claims, noting high-profile corporate relocations from states like California and New York to Republican-led states such as Texas and Florida. (thedailybeast.com)

However, data contradicts this narrative. Despite some companies and residents leaving, California has maintained strong economic growth, becoming the world’s fourth-largest economy, while New York led the nation in GDP per capita in 2024. Although blue states experienced population losses during the COVID-19 pandemic, those trends reversed by 2023–2024. Census data also showed that affordability, not taxes, was the main driver behind moves. (thedailybeast.com)

Additionally, the article reveals Trump attempted to secretly prevent DOJ investigations into his family’s taxes, a deal a federal judge invalidated as fraudulent. (thedailybeast.com)

This statement is part of a pattern where President Trump has made claims that are not supported by available data, raising concerns about the accuracy of his public statements.

Source article

Source: https://www.trumpstruth.org/statuses/41678

Trump list of U.S.-designated ‘foreign terrorist organizations’ in Latin America grows to 21

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-09-11 09:23:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Administration’s Terrorist Designation of Latin American Crime Groups Sparks Controversy and Contradictions

The Trump administration has dramatically expanded the use of the “foreign terrorist organization” label, designating 21 Latin American and Caribbean criminal groups under this category. Traditionally reserved for groups like the Islamic State or al-Qaida, this designation is now being applied to money-focused crime rings, with the stated aim of increasing pressure on these organizations and anyone aiding them.

A Shift in U.S. Policy

Trump’s strategy, rolled out in February 2025, marked a significant departure from past U.S. policy. The administration used the new designation as a pretext for the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and for dozens of lethal attacks on alleged “narcoterrorist” boats, resulting in more than 200 deaths. The move also prompted countries like Guatemala and Argentina to take similar actions, and led Ecuador to launch joint operations on its own soil.

International Repercussions and Pressure

Mexico, with eight groups on the list, faces intense U.S. pressure to avoid unilateral actions by Trump, particularly following indictments of high-ranking officials in Sinaloa state. The administration’s aggressive approach has not only strained diplomatic relations but also encouraged other Latin American governments to adopt harsher stances against criminal organizations.

Contradictions and Political Fallout

Despite the tough rhetoric, Trump’s approach has revealed notable contradictions. Most strikingly, former Honduras President Juan Orlando Hernández, who was sentenced to 45 years for drug trafficking and accused during his trial of protecting the Sinaloa Cartel, was pardoned by Trump last year and has since returned to Honduras. This move stands in stark contrast to the administration’s stated goal of cracking down on drug-related crime and terrorism.

Conclusion

Trump’s expansion of the “foreign terrorist organization” label to Latin American criminal groups represents a significant shift in U.S. policy, with far-reaching consequences for international relations and regional security. However, the administration’s actions have also exposed inconsistencies, particularly in the selective application of justice and the pardoning of high-profile figures accused of serious crimes. As the region grapples with the fallout, questions remain about the effectiveness and motivations behind Trump’s controversial strategy.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/trump-list-of-u-s-designated-foreign-terrorist-organizations-in-latin-america-grows-to-21

Inside the Republican Midterm Convention, Where It Was ‘Trump-a-Palooza’

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-09-11 09:39:00 — www.nytimes.com

At a glitzy midterm convention in Dallas, President Trump took center stage, boasting about his accomplishments and predicting sweeping Republican victories in the upcoming elections. Despite the celebratory atmosphere, Trump largely ignored the significant political challenges facing his party this fall.

Trump’s Boasts and Predictions

During the event, Trump highlighted what he described as his administration’s successes, painting a rosy picture of the current political landscape. He confidently forecasted Republican wins, signaling optimism for his party’s prospects. However, Trump’s remarks sidestepped the more daunting realities and obstacles that Republicans are expected to encounter in the upcoming midterms.

Ignoring Political Realities

While Trump’s speech was filled with self-congratulation and upbeat predictions, he notably avoided addressing the difficult political environment his party faces. This omission stands out, as many analysts and observers have pointed to a challenging road ahead for Republicans, given various national and local factors.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Record

Trump’s tendency to emphasize his achievements while downplaying or ignoring negative indicators has been a recurring theme throughout his presidency. At the Dallas convention, this pattern continued, as he focused on positive narratives and left out any mention of the hurdles confronting his party.

Conclusion

President Trump’s appearance at the Dallas midterm convention was marked by bold claims of accomplishment and confidence in Republican success, but it also featured a conspicuous lack of acknowledgment of the serious political challenges ahead. As the midterms approach, Trump’s selective messaging underscores his ongoing strategy of promoting victories while glossing over setbacks, leaving voters to weigh his optimistic projections against the broader political landscape.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/10/us/politics/republican-midterm-convention-trump-dallas.html

Up First briefing: 9/11 remembrance; Trump; Missouri redistricting : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-09-11 06:55:00 — www.npr.org

President Trump Promises $5,000 to Every Adult American if GOP Maintains Control of Congress

President Trump closed out the first-ever midterm Republican convention by reminding supporters of his promise to send every adult American $5,000 if the Republican Party maintains control of Congress. While Vice President Vance did not mention this pledge during his remarks, Trump was quick to bring it up, highlighting it as a central part of his appeal to voters ahead of the November elections.

The president’s promise stands out as a bold and unprecedented campaign pledge, aiming to energize the Republican base and sway undecided voters. The next Republican convention is scheduled for 2028, at which point Trump will no longer be the party’s standard-bearer, signaling a potential shift in party leadership and strategy.

This significant financial promise underscores Trump’s continued influence over the party and his willingness to make sweeping commitments to maintain political momentum. The effectiveness of this strategy remains to be seen as the party heads into the fall campaign season, with more rallies and public appearances expected.

As the political landscape evolves, Trump’s $5,000 pledge will likely remain a focal point of debate and scrutiny, raising questions about its feasibility and impact on the upcoming midterm elections.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/09/11/g-s1-142846/up-first-newsletter-september-11-remembrance-republican-midterm-convention-scotus-missouri-redistricting

Donald J. Trump: "https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dcl4n1RPUVn/" – Trump's Truth

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-09-10 10:23:00 — www.trumpstruth.org

In a recent Fox News interview on August 4, 2026, Donald Trump claimed that prices are “all coming down now. The food, the groceries, it’s all coming down.” (politifact.com)

However, this assertion is misleading. Data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics indicates that, as of July 2026, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for food at home had increased by 2.3% over the past 12 months. Similarly, the overall CPI, which measures the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services, rose by 3.1% in the same period. These figures suggest that, contrary to Trump’s statement, food and grocery prices have not been decreasing but have continued to rise, albeit at a slower rate compared to previous years.

This is not the first time Trump has made inaccurate claims regarding economic indicators. For instance, in a speech in Georgia on July 22, 2026, he stated, “They caught thousands of votes in New Jersey where illegal aliens were allowed to vote. Thousands and thousands.” This claim was also rated as Mostly False by PolitiFact, as there is no substantial evidence to support the assertion of widespread illegal voting by non-citizens in New Jersey. (politifact.com)

Such statements contribute to a pattern of misinformation that can mislead the public about the state of the economy and the integrity of the electoral process. It is crucial for public figures to base their statements on verified data to maintain public trust and informed discourse.

Source article

Source: https://www.trumpstruth.org/statuses/41685