Trump Aberdeen!
Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-08 19:31:00 — trumpstruth.org
Please provide the EXCERPT from Trump Aberdeen! that you would like me to review and write about.
Home Blog
Trump Aberdeen!
Week in Politics: Blanche confirmed as attorney general; Iran-Oman Strait deal stalls : NPR
Week in Politics: Blanche confirmed as attorney general; Iran-Oman Strait deal stalls : NPR
NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-08-08 06:43:00 — www.npr.org
Trump Dismisses Polls and Doubles Down on Disputed Claims Amid Mounting Criticism
President Trump is once again under scrutiny for his handling of key national and international issues, as he continues to reject unfavorable polling and push forward with controversial executive actions.
Rejecting Polls, Ignoring Public Sentiment
Despite major polls showing that nearly two-thirds of Americans believe the ongoing war should not have been started, Trump has dismissed these results, labeling them as “fake” and insisting his own polls are “just great”—without providing any supporting data. This pattern of rejecting widely reported facts and substituting unsubstantiated claims has drawn criticism, even from some of his own supporters. As NPR’s Ron Elving notes, “against the facts on full display, that’s just too much of a stretch, even for many Trump backers. You don’t build credibility by straining credulity.”
Escalation Threats and Diplomatic Dilemmas
With Iran reportedly gaining control over the Strait of Hormuz and the U.S. seeking an exit from the conflict, Trump has found himself with limited options. According to the report, he has responded by threatening escalation and relying on Oman to negotiate a favorable deal, highlighting the administration’s lack of leverage in the region.
Renewed Attacks on Birthright Citizenship
Trump has also signed two new executive orders aimed at limiting eligibility for birthright citizenship, just weeks after the Supreme Court struck down his previous attempt to eliminate it. These latest orders are described as more targeted, seeking exceptions around earlier court decisions in hopes of achieving a partial victory and salvaging political standing. This ongoing effort to circumvent judicial rulings has raised further questions about Trump’s respect for constitutional boundaries.
Conclusion
President Trump’s continued rejection of unfavorable facts, reliance on unverified claims, and persistent attempts to bypass legal checks underscore a pattern of behavior that has fueled controversy throughout his tenure. As public opinion shifts and legal challenges mount, the credibility gap between Trump’s statements and the documented reality appears to be widening, leaving both supporters and critics questioning the path forward.
What to know about Trump’s new attempt to limit birthright citizenship
What to know about Trump’s new attempt to limit birthright citizenship
PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-08 10:39:00 — www.pbs.org
Trump Exaggerates Scope of “Birth Tourism” as Administration Moves to Restrict Birthright Citizenship
President Donald Trump has once again moved to limit who can become an American citizen, issuing executive orders this week that seek to restrict birthright citizenship and target foreigners who give birth in the United States. The new orders come just months after the Supreme Court struck down a previous attempt to limit birthright citizenship, a decision Trump acknowledged, saying the latest orders were made with “adjustments” to keep the ruling in mind.
Despite the Supreme Court setback, Trump pressed forward, introducing narrower orders that focus on specific categories of people. These include children born to adults with connections to foreign embassies or organizations, as well as anyone considered an “alien enemy” of the United States. The orders also seek to disqualify babies born as a result of “birth tourism” and children of parents tied to groups designated as terrorist organizations.
Exaggerated Claims About “Birth Tourism”
A key claim made by Trump in support of these orders is the scale of “birth tourism.” On Thursday, the president stated, “I’ll tell you right now, hundreds of thousands, OK? Hundreds of thousands,” referring to the number of birth tourism cases. However, this figure is not supported by available data. Experts say Trump’s estimate is a significant exaggeration. According to Colleen Putzel-Kavanaugh, an associate policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, “The hundreds of thousands just seems like an overestimate based on the sort of limited data that we have available.”
Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show that in 2024, nearly 9,600 children were born to foreign mothers with an official address outside the country. Even the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank that advocates for lower immigration, estimated that only 20,000 to 26,000 birth tourists come to the U.S. each year—far short of the “hundreds of thousands” claimed by Trump.
Legal and Constitutional Challenges Ahead
Trump’s executive orders are expected to face legal challenges, especially given the Supreme Court’s previous decision upholding the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, with limited exceptions. The new orders attempt to expand those exceptions, but advocates and legal experts argue that the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent will likely prevent these changes from taking effect.
Conclusion
President Trump’s renewed push to restrict birthright citizenship is marked by exaggerated claims about the prevalence of “birth tourism” and a continued effort to narrow the definition of who can become an American. As legal challenges loom, the administration’s latest actions highlight an ongoing drive to reshape U.S. immigration policy, even in the face of constitutional and judicial barriers.
The U.S. Is Burning Through Weapons in Iran. Russia and China Are Taking Note.
The U.S. Is Burning Through Weapons in Iran. Russia and China Are Taking Note.
NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-08 11:59:00 — www.nytimes.com
Trump Downplays U.S. Munitions Crisis as Iran War Depletes Stockpiles
President Trump has repeatedly downplayed or denied the severity of U.S. weapons shortages, even as his war against Iran has left American and allied forces more vulnerable to threats from Russia, China, and North Korea, according to senior officials and defense experts.
Trump’s Public Stance vs. Private Alarm
Despite warnings from military leaders, including Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, about the risks of further depleting already strained stockpiles, Trump pressed ahead with the Iran campaign, believing it would end quickly. After launching attacks on Iran alongside Israel on February 28, Trump repeatedly promised a swift victory. More than five months later, the conflict continues, with the U.S. unable to force Iran to capitulate or find a way to end the war.
Privately, Trump has expressed anger over news reports highlighting the munitions shortage, ordering a widespread leak investigation and demanding criminal prosecutions. He has told advisers that public discussion of the crisis signals weakness to America’s enemies. In public, Trump continues to downplay the issue, deny its existence, or blame his predecessor, President Joseph R. Biden Jr.
Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims
When asked by a reporter about Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s plea for more air-defense missiles, Trump responded, “We want missiles too.” On social media, he insisted that the United States had “massive amounts of ‘munitions,’ especially of certain types.” While it is true that the U.S. maintains a large arsenal of less advanced munitions, experts note that many of these require close-range deployment, putting American aircraft at greater risk. Crucially, the U.S. military has largely exhausted its stocks of certain long-range missiles—such as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles—during the Iran war, leaving the country less prepared for potential conflicts with Russia or China.
Impact on U.S. and Allies
The depletion of air-defense missiles has forced the Pentagon to divert resources from Asia and Europe to the Middle East, eroding American firepower in those regions and delaying deliveries to allied nations. This has led to growing concerns among U.S. military and intelligence officials, as well as among allies who now question America’s ability to provide nonnuclear defense. Some fear that countries like South Korea and Japan may seek their own nuclear deterrents as a result.
The shortage is also having immediate consequences in Ukraine, where Zelensky reported a threefold drop in the number of air-defense missiles provided by Western allies this year. On a recent day, Ukraine failed to intercept any of the 28 missiles fired by Russia, resulting in at least 17 deaths. Experts attribute this shortfall in part to the diversion of munitions to the Iran conflict.
Conclusion
Despite President Trump’s public denials and efforts to shift blame, the facts on the ground reveal a significant and growing munitions crisis that is undermining U.S. and allied security. As experts warn, replenishing depleted stockpiles could take years, leaving a window of vulnerability that adversaries like Russia and China may seek to exploit. The long-term consequences of Trump’s decisions in the Iran war are likely to shape global security for years to come.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/08/us/politics/pentagon-weapons-stockpiles-china-russia.html
Donald J. Trump: "RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/117059577812036128"
Donald J. Trump: "RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/117059577812036128"
Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-08 06:10:00 — trumpstruth.org
In a late-night Truth Social post, President Donald Trump reacted angrily to a report by The Washington Post detailing a tense encounter with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at Camp David. Trump, allegedly furious over being misled about depleted U.S. arms due to the Iran conflict, appeared to confirm the incident publicly, despite earlier denials from his aide Karoline Leavitt. Trump insisted the U.S. has ample munitions and warned that those leaking sensitive information would face long-term imprisonment.
Trump’s anger was reportedly triggered by a CNN report stating that 80% of U.S. air-defense interceptors had been used in the Iran war, leaving stockpiles dangerously low. Hegseth, in turn, blamed his deputy, Stephen Feinberg, who fielded a harsh call from Trump and held a Pentagon “crisis” meeting to address the issue.
The administration has faced multiple damaging leaks, including a secret White House meeting about the mishandling of the Jeffrey Epstein case files and concerns over a $400 million jet gifted by Qatar. Key aides, including Susie Wiles and Kash Patel, reportedly launched internal investigations to trace the sources of various leaks.
Highlights:
- Donald Trump Makes Midnight Post Over White House Leaks, Published on Thursday, August 06
Trump loyalist Todd Blanche confirmed by Senate as US attorney general | Trump administration
Trump loyalist Todd Blanche confirmed by Senate as US attorney general | Trump administration
US politics | The Guardian — 2026-08-08 07:34:00 — www.theguardian.com
Donald Trump Secures Confirmation of Personal Attorney Todd Blanche as Attorney General
In a significant victory for Donald Trump, the U.S. Senate narrowly confirmed Todd Blanche—Trump’s former personal attorney—as attorney general, placing a close Trump ally at the helm of the nation’s law enforcement. The Republican-led Senate voted 50-49, with Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana casting the deciding vote after two Republicans, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, joined all Democrats in opposing the nomination.
Blanche, who has already been leading the Justice Department in an acting capacity, was at the center of controversy over a proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization fund” and a deal granting tax immunity to the president, his sons, and his businesses. The fund, which critics labeled a “slush fund,” was reportedly intended to reward January 6 protesters, according to Senator Murkowski, who cited this as a reason for her opposition.
The confirmation process highlighted deep divisions over the politicization of the Justice Department under Trump. Scores of career attorneys have left the department during Blanche’s tenure, and judges across the country have rebuked department lawyers for misrepresentations to the court. Blanche has also been instrumental in Trump’s efforts to use the Justice Department to pursue political rivals, including indictments against former FBI director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and the Southern Poverty Law Center—cases widely viewed as lacking in substance.
Blanche’s leadership has also been criticized for mishandling files related to Jeffrey Epstein, with inappropriate redactions and the exposure of victims’ names. During his confirmation hearing, Blanche initially refused to meet with Epstein victims, later relenting but providing few answers.
Blanche’s close relationship with Trump is clear. He left a lucrative partnership to represent Trump in 2023 and has described working for Trump as “the greatest honor of a lifetime.” In April, he stated, “If he chooses to nominate somebody else and asks me to go do something else, I will say, ‘Thank you very much. I love you, sir.’ I don’t have any goals or aspirations beyond that.”
The confirmation drew sharp criticism from Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, who said Republicans have “handed Trump an excuse on a silver platter” to continue his “pervasive, breathtaking corruption” by confirming his personal attorney as attorney general. Schumer argued, “If you want to wipe out corruption, you can’t have the president’s personal attorney as the attorney general. You don’t need a PhD in political science to know that.”
Blanche’s confirmation cements Trump’s influence over the Justice Department, raising concerns about the department’s independence and the potential for further politicization of federal law enforcement. As the new attorney general, Blanche is expected to continue advancing Trump’s agenda, including promises to anti-abortion advocates to make the Dobbs decision permanent in every state.
The Senate’s decision marks a turning point in the relationship between the executive branch and the nation’s top law enforcement agency, with Trump’s personal attorney now in charge and critics warning of the risks of unchecked presidential power.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/08/todd-blanche-attorney-general-confirmed
Colombia’s new president reflects Latin America’s right-wing shift
Colombia’s new president reflects Latin America’s right-wing shift
PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-07 17:35:00 — www.pbs.org
Trump Endorses Colombia’s New Right-Wing President, Signals Closer U.S. Ties
In June, Donald Trump publicly endorsed Abelardo de la Espriella, then a candidate in Colombia’s presidential race, stating, “de la Espriella fights tirelessly for and loves his great country and people, just like I do for the United States of America.” This endorsement, as reported, marked a clear alignment between Trump and the rightward shift in Colombian politics.
Following de la Espriella’s narrow victory, Trump further demonstrated his support by sending a U.S. delegation—including acting Attorney General Todd Blanche—to the inauguration. This move underscored the Trump administration’s intention to strengthen ties with Colombia’s new leadership.
Observers noted that de la Espriella is among the latest in a wave of right-wing Latin American leaders championed by Trump. Analysts from the Heritage Foundation highlighted that there is “very little daylight between the United States and Colombia under these two leaders,” suggesting that Trump’s administration is actively seeking closer cooperation with conservative governments in the region.
The Trump administration’s engagement is expected to have significant influence on Colombia’s direction, particularly regarding security and anti-narcotics efforts. Human rights advocates, however, have raised concerns about the potential consequences of a hardline approach, citing past increases in extrajudicial killings and disproportionate impacts on rural and minority communities.
Trump’s endorsement and subsequent actions signal a new era of U.S.-Colombia relations, with the administration’s expectations likely to shape policy decisions in Bogotá. As Colombia pivots to the right, the Trump White House’s support for de la Espriella is poised to play a central role in the country’s evolving political landscape.
Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/colombias-new-president-reflects-latin-americas-right-wing-shift
Blanche on track for narrow Senate confirmation as attorney general
Blanche on track for narrow Senate confirmation as attorney general
PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-07 17:45:00 — www.pbs.org
Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a Republican who recently lost his primary after being targeted by President Trump, cited Trump’s influence as a key factor in the razor-thin confirmation process for attorney general nominee Todd Blanche. Cassidy’s remarks on the Senate floor highlighted the stark choice facing the chamber: “The choice is not between perfection and Mr. Blanche. It is between Mr. Blanche and another acting attorney general who may not run the department effectively under President Trump and who indeed may not be as good as Mr. Blanche.”
Trump’s Role in Senate Divisions
Cassidy’s loss in the primary was directly attributed to President Trump’s opposition, underscoring the former president’s ongoing sway over Republican politics. The Senate’s efforts to confirm Blanche came down to a single vote, with Cassidy’s support proving decisive. The absence of Senator Mitch McConnell, another key Republican, was noted as “benefiting the president,” further illustrating how Trump’s influence continues to shape outcomes in the Senate.
Concerns Over Presidential Power
The Senate also passed the toughest sanctions bill on Russia to date, a move described as the most powerful statement yet in support of Ukraine. However, the report noted that “there is some concern because this gives a lot of power to President Trump from some,” indicating unease among lawmakers about expanding executive authority under Trump’s leadership. Despite these concerns, the urgency of countering Russia’s actions took precedence as the bill advanced to the House.
Conclusion
The day’s events at the Capitol showcased the persistent divisions within the Republican Party, many of which are fueled by President Trump’s ongoing interventions and influence. As the Senate navigates high-stakes decisions on nominees and foreign policy, Trump’s presence continues to loom large—shaping votes, driving party dynamics, and raising questions about the balance of power in Washington.
Max Miller Continues to Resist Pressure to Drop Out as Deadline Looms
Max Miller Continues to Resist Pressure to Drop Out as Deadline Looms
NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-07 18:19:00 — www.nytimes.com
Representative Max Miller, a Republican from Ohio facing serious allegations of physical abuse from his ex-wife and young daughter, has chosen to resist mounting pressure from party leaders to withdraw from his re-election campaign. According to the excerpt, Miller told President Trump in a phone call earlier this week that he intended to “do as the president had done amid his own scandals: fight through it.” Trump, for his part, urged Miller to consider his odds but stopped short of directly requesting that Miller withdraw from the race.
## Trump’s Approach: Fight Through Scandal
Miller’s decision to remain in the race, despite public calls for his resignation and the threat of losing a reliably Republican seat, appears to be influenced by Trump’s own approach to political crises. The excerpt reports that Miller explicitly referenced Trump’s strategy of weathering scandals rather than stepping aside, signaling that Trump’s posture has become a model for embattled allies within the party.
## Trump Stops Short of Calling for Withdrawal
While Trump advised Miller to weigh his chances, he did not join other Republican leaders in demanding Miller’s exit from the race. This stands in contrast to the actions of Ohio Senator Jon Husted and the head of the Center for Christian Virtue, both of whom publicly called for Miller to step aside. Trump’s reluctance to press for Miller’s withdrawal underscores his tendency to avoid direct intervention in the political fates of loyalists, even amid serious allegations.
## The Broader Impact
The excerpt highlights that Republican officials fear the accusations against Miller could jeopardize a safe seat in a critical election cycle. Despite these concerns, Trump’s response—counseling caution but not demanding action—reflects a pattern seen throughout his political career: encouraging embattled allies to fight on, rather than bow to public or party pressure.
## Conclusion
Miller’s invocation of Trump’s example demonstrates the lasting influence of Trump’s combative approach to scandal management within the Republican Party. By stopping short of calling for Miller’s withdrawal, Trump once again signals his preference for resilience over resignation, even as party leaders warn of the potential electoral costs. This episode serves as another example of how Trump’s personal political strategy continues to shape the actions and attitudes of Republican officeholders facing controversy.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/07/us/politics/max-miller-gop.html
ICE will only release body camera video when in agency’s ‘best interests,’ policy says
ICE will only release body camera video when in agency’s ‘best interests,’ policy says
PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-07 18:35:00 — www.pbs.org
Trump Rescinds Body Camera Mandate for Federal Agents Amid ICE Accountability Concerns
President Donald Trump’s administration has come under scrutiny after rescinding a Biden-era order that required federal law enforcement agencies to use body cameras. This move, made after Trump returned to office in 2025, has drawn criticism from experts and former officials who argue that the lack of transparency undermines public trust and accountability—especially as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers have faced increased pressure following fatal shootings during Trump’s immigration crackdown.
ICE Delays and Policy Gaps
ICE began testing body cameras in 2021 under President Joe Biden, distributing 1,400 devices and promising further expansion as funding allowed. However, after Trump took office again, his administration not only rescinded the federal body camera requirement but also delayed purchasing additional cameras—even after Congress provided a historic $75 billion funding boost to the agency in 2025. ICE only began significant camera purchases in July, following several high-profile shootings and mounting pressure from lawmakers.
Critics, including Jason Houser, ICE chief of staff under Biden, have accused the Trump administration of “slow-rolling” the deployment of body cameras. Houser argued that the administration should have equipped officers with cameras when it ramped up mass arrests and traffic stops, rather than waiting for public outcry after fatal incidents. He described the delayed rollout as “clearly a political response” that fails to address the underlying issues of officer training and operational readiness.
Selective Transparency Raises Red Flags
ICE’s new body camera policy, issued in February 2025, gives the agency broad discretion over what footage is released to the public. The policy states that video of shootings or incidents causing death or serious injury will only be released if it is deemed “in the best interests of the agency.” This allows ICE’s director to release footage that casts the agency in a positive light while withholding or delaying video that could be damaging. Experts say this approach is unusually explicit in its intent to control the agency’s public image.
Katherine Hawkins, a senior legal analyst at the Project On Government Oversight, warned that the policy makes body camera footage “virtually useless” for public accountability, as there is no clear mechanism for the public to access recordings. Even when footage is released, ICE will redact officers’ faces, names, and badge numbers, further limiting transparency.
Conclusion: Political Motives and Public Trust
The Trump administration’s decision to rescind the federal body camera mandate and delay ICE’s camera rollout has raised serious questions about its commitment to transparency and accountability in law enforcement. By giving ICE broad control over what footage is made public, the administration risks eroding public trust—especially as the agency continues to conduct high-stakes operations under Trump’s aggressive immigration policies. As experts and former officials have noted, meaningful reform requires not just technology, but a genuine commitment to openness and oversight.