Donald J. Trump: “It was my Great Honor to welcome Highly Respected and very popular Pennsylva…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-04 12:30:00 — trumpstruth.org

Donald Trump Endorses Stacy Garrity for Pennsylvania Governor: A Closer Look at His Statements

Donald Trump has publicly endorsed Pennsylvania State Treasurer Stacy Garrity for governor, stating, “It was my Great Honor to welcome Highly Respected and very popular Pennsylvania State Treasurer, Stacy Garrity, into the Oval Office. Stacy is running to be the next Governor of the GREAT Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. She has my Complete and Total Endorsement. She will do a fantastic job!”

Trump’s Endorsement and Claims

Trump’s statement highlights his support for Garrity, describing her as “highly respected” and “very popular.” He also asserts that she will do a “fantastic job” as governor. These claims are presented as fact, but the excerpt does not provide evidence or context to support the assertions about Garrity’s popularity or qualifications beyond Trump’s endorsement.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Language

While Trump’s endorsement is clear, his characterization of Garrity as “highly respected and very popular” is subjective and not substantiated within the statement. Such language is typical of Trump’s public endorsements, where he often uses superlatives and broad praise without specific supporting details. The claim of “Complete and Total Endorsement” is a frequent phrase in Trump’s political communications, intended to signal strong support but not tied to any measurable criteria.

No Disparagements or False Claims in This Statement

In this particular excerpt, Trump does not make any direct attacks or disparaging remarks about opponents or other individuals. The focus remains on praising Garrity and expressing confidence in her candidacy.

Conclusion

Trump’s endorsement of Stacy Garrity for Pennsylvania governor is marked by his characteristic use of emphatic and positive language. While he offers strong praise, the claims about Garrity’s respect and popularity are not backed by evidence in the statement itself. Readers should note the distinction between Trump’s promotional language and independently verifiable facts when evaluating such endorsements.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40540

Up First briefing: Michigan primaries; Spokane fires; Todd Blanche : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-08-04 06:29:00 — www.npr.org

Trump Administration Opens Protected Pacific Marine Areas to Commercial Fishing, Sparking Backlash

The Trump administration has moved to open large sections of the Pacific Ocean—previously safeguarded as U.S. marine national monuments and sanctuaries—to commercial fishing. This decision, which reverses protections for some of the most pristine and biodiverse marine areas in the country, has drawn both support and sharp criticism.

Industry Support and Cultural Opposition

Hawaii’s fishing fleet has welcomed the move, citing increased competition and rising diesel costs as reasons why expanded access to these waters is needed. Industry representatives argue that opening the Pacific Marine Monument waters could provide much-needed opportunities for local fishermen.

However, many Native Hawaiian cultural groups are strongly opposed, viewing the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands as sacred. Conservationists have also raised alarms, warning that these marine areas require the highest level of protection—especially as climate change threatens their vibrant ecosystems.

Environmental Concerns

Conservation experts caution that opening these protected waters to commercial fishing could jeopardize thriving coral reefs, shark populations, and seabird colonies. They emphasize that, amid the growing impacts of climate change, preserving these unique ecosystems is more important than ever.

Conclusion

The Trump administration’s decision to allow commercial fishing in previously protected Pacific marine areas has ignited a debate between economic interests and environmental and cultural preservation. As the policy takes effect, its impact on both local communities and the fragile marine environment will be closely watched.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/08/04/g-s1-137277/up-first-newsetter-michigan-primaries-todd-blanche-spokane-wildfires-chuck-edwards

Trump keeps making threats. Washington and the world have stopped flinching.

Politics — 2026-08-04 04:00:00 — www.washingtonpost.com

Global Shockwaves as President Trump Unveils Tariff Hikes in Rose Garden

In April 2025, President Donald Trump dramatically escalated global trade tensions by appearing in the White House Rose Garden with a poster board detailing sweeping tariff hikes. The move triggered immediate, worldwide repercussions: financial markets lost trillions of dollars in value, diplomats from around the globe rushed to Washington, and more than 75 governments scrambled to negotiate with the United States—many abandoning their own carefully prepared countermeasures in a frantic effort to cut deals.

Trump’s Tariff Announcement Sparks Market Turmoil

Trump’s public display of the tariff increases sent a clear message to both allies and rivals. The announcement was met with alarm, as evidenced by the scale of the market reaction and the diplomatic scramble that followed. The excerpt highlights the direct impact of Trump’s actions: “Markets shed trillions of dollars, envoys rushed to Washington, more than 75 governments scrambled to negotiate, some scrapping carefully prepped countermeasures in a rush to cut deals.”

Fact-Checking the Fallout

The excerpt does not cite specific false claims or disparagements by Trump in his Rose Garden appearance, but it does attribute the global economic and diplomatic upheaval directly to his decision to brandish the tariff hikes. The scale of the fallout underscores the significant influence of Trump’s trade policies and the unpredictable consequences of his public pronouncements.

Conclusion: A Presidency Defined by Disruption

President Trump’s 2025 Rose Garden announcement on tariffs stands as a stark example of how his actions can send shockwaves through the global economy and diplomatic community. The episode illustrates the far-reaching consequences of presidential decisions and the volatility that can result from abrupt policy shifts. As the world continues to respond to Trump’s trade agenda, the lasting impact of his approach to international negotiations remains a defining feature of his presidency.

Source article

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/08/04/trump-keeps-making-threats-washington-world-have-stopped-flinching/

News Wrap: Michigan reports 2 deaths related to cyclosporiasis outbreak

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-03 17:45:00 — www.pbs.org

More than two dozen states, most led by Democrats, have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its latest round of tariffs. The administration recently imposed double-digit levies on 60 trading partners, justifying the move by claiming these countries had not done enough to prevent imports produced by forced labor. These new tariffs took effect as previous ones expired.

In their legal challenge, the states argue that the president overstepped his authority by enacting these tariffs and is attempting to reinstate duties that the Supreme Court had already struck down earlier this year. The states are seeking intervention from the U.S. Court of International Trade to halt the tariffs and to secure refunds for duties already paid.

The Trump administration’s position, as reported, is that the tariffs are necessary to address forced labor in global supply chains. However, critics—including the coalition of states—contend that this justification is both legally and factually questionable, given the Supreme Court’s prior ruling and the lack of clear evidence that the targeted countries are uniquely responsible for forced labor imports.

This legal battle highlights ongoing disputes over the scope of presidential authority on trade and the administration’s willingness to push the limits of executive power, even in the face of judicial rebuke. As the case proceeds, the outcome will have significant implications for U.S. trade policy and the balance of power between the executive branch and the courts.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/news-wrap-michigan-reports-2-deaths-related-to-cyclosporiasis-outbreak

Trump, Graham Dominate Senate Race: 5 Takeaways from South Carolina Debate.

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-03 22:41:00 — www.nytimes.com

President Trump’s Endorsement of Darline Graham Puts His Influence to the Test in South Carolina

President Trump’s decision to endorse Darline Graham, a political newcomer, in the special Republican primary to succeed her late brother, Senator Lindsey Graham, has become a defining issue in the race and a clear test of Trump’s ongoing power over the South Carolina GOP.

Trump’s Support Shapes the Race

Trump’s backing of Ms. Graham, who was recently appointed to serve the remainder of her brother’s term, stands out as a significant move over several well-known Republican politicians in the state. According to the debate coverage, Trump was reportedly impressed by Ms. Graham’s composure following her brother’s sudden death. Throughout the debate, Ms. Graham repeatedly highlighted Trump’s endorsement and made it clear that she would align herself closely with his agenda if elected.

“I completely support the president’s agenda,” Ms. Graham stated during the debate, leaving no ambiguity about her intention to be a reliable Trump vote in the Senate. Unlike some of her opponents, she did not distance herself from Trump’s policies, even when given the opportunity.

Policy Alignment and the Filibuster

Ms. Graham also broke with her late brother on a key procedural issue, saying she would support eliminating the Senate filibuster to pass the SAVE America Act, a voting restrictions bill that is a top priority for Trump. She justified her position by echoing Trump’s argument that Democrats would eventually remove the filibuster anyway: “This is where I differ from my brother — getting rid of the filibuster to get this done, because eventually, the Democrats are going to get rid of it anyway.”

Trump’s Influence Remains Central

The debate underscored how Trump’s endorsement and agenda remain central to Republican politics in South Carolina. Candidates and their supporters referenced Trump’s positions and support as a key credential, with Representative Russell Fry, a strong Trump ally, stating, “I supported Lindsey Graham because he stood with President Trump.”

Conclusion

President Trump’s endorsement of Darline Graham has transformed the special primary into a referendum on his influence within the state’s Republican Party. Ms. Graham’s unwavering alignment with Trump’s agenda and willingness to break with her brother’s legacy on key issues highlight the former president’s continued dominance in shaping the direction of the GOP in South Carolina. As the primary approaches, the outcome will serve as a clear indicator of Trump’s enduring sway among Republican voters in the state.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/03/us/politics/graham-south-carolina-senate-debate.html

Why Trump is lashing out at Chevron amid profit windfall

Politics — 2026-08-03 14:03:00 — www.washingtonpost.com

Trump Attacks Chevron CEO, Demands Lower Gas Prices Amid Soaring Profits

President Donald Trump on Monday morning accused Chevron CEO Mike Wirth of ingratitude and demanded that the executive lower gas prices as voter frustration with high fuel costs continues to mount. In a social media post, Trump attacked Chevron for not giving his administration what he considers adequate credit for the oil major’s financial success, following the company’s report of one of its highest quarterly profits in years.

Trump’s Public Attack on Chevron

Trump’s criticism comes at a time when drivers across the country are struggling with gas prices averaging more than $4 for a gallon of regular. By targeting Chevron’s CEO, Trump sought to shift blame for high gas prices onto the company, suggesting that Chevron’s profits come at the direct expense of American consumers.

The president’s demand for lower prices and his accusation of ingratitude against Wirth highlight a pattern of public confrontations with business leaders, especially when corporate profits are high and consumer costs are rising. Trump’s insistence that Chevron should credit his administration for its financial success is consistent with his tendency to seek recognition for positive economic news, while deflecting responsibility for negative developments.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s assertion that Chevron has not given his administration enough credit for its financial performance lacks context. Oil company profits are influenced by a range of global factors, including supply and demand, geopolitical events, and market speculation—many of which are outside the direct control of any single administration. The president’s implication that Chevron’s profits are solely or primarily due to his policies is an exaggeration not supported by independent economic analysis.

Additionally, Trump’s demand that Chevron lower prices overlooks the complex factors that determine gas prices at the pump. While oil company profits can play a role, prices are also shaped by crude oil markets, refining capacity, distribution costs, and taxes.

Conclusion: Trump’s Pattern of Public Confrontation

President Trump’s attack on Chevron’s CEO and his demand for lower gas prices reflect a broader pattern of using public statements to pressure business leaders and shape public perception. By claiming credit for corporate profits while blaming companies for high consumer costs, Trump continues to employ a strategy that mixes self-promotion with public confrontation. As gas prices remain a key concern for voters, Trump’s rhetoric underscores the ongoing debate over responsibility and accountability in the nation’s energy markets.

Source article

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/08/03/why-trump-is-lashing-out-chevron-amid-profit-windfall/

Trump’s Continued Claims of Vandalism at Reflecting Pool Disputed by U.S. Attorney Memo

FactCheck.org — 2026-08-03 17:40:00 — www.factcheck.org

Trump Doubles Down on Vandalism Claims at Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Despite DOJ Findings

President Donald Trump continues to assert that the extensive damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was the work of vandals, even as a Department of Justice motion filed on July 31 directly contradicts his claims. The DOJ motion, based on new evidence, attributes the damage to a contractor’s “botched” installation of the pool coating, not to vandalism as initially represented by the Department of Interior.

On August 1, Trump posted on Truth Social, “I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, on the Reflecting Pool. I don’t know what she was thinking? To me, it was a pure case of VANDALISM. … There may have been some contractor difficulty, but the major damage was caused by VANDALS!” That same day, Trump shared what he claimed was video evidence showing the material being cut with a knife or box cutter, insisting this proved vandalism.

For weeks, Trump has maintained that vandals cut a “300-foot slit” in the pool’s new liner, later escalating the claim to “thugs” cutting a gash “300 yards long.” However, the administration has not provided evidence to support such extensive vandalism. Images and videos from reporters only show people breaking off already-peeling coating or holding pieces after the damage had become a news event.

Expert assessments and the DOJ’s own investigation found plausible explanations for the peeling related to rushed and faulty installation, not deliberate destruction. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s motion to dismiss a felony charge against a former Olympic canoeist cited newly released documents and visual inspections pointing to contractor error, including overspray and delamination, as the root cause.

Despite these findings, Trump has continued to push the narrative of vandalism, disregarding the detailed evidence and conclusions presented by the DOJ and independent experts.

Conclusion

President Trump’s persistent claims about vandalism at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool stand in stark contrast to the Department of Justice’s findings, which point to contractor error as the primary cause of the damage. No substantial evidence has been provided to support Trump’s assertions of widespread vandalism, highlighting a continued pattern of false and exaggerated statements.

Source article

Source: https://www.factcheck.org/2026/08/trumps-continued-claims-of-vandalism-at-reflecting-pool-disputed-by-u-s-attorney-memo/

Donald J. Trump: “RT @realDonaldTrumpIt is my Great Honor to endorse MAGA Warrior, Rick Bratti…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-03 18:18:00 — trumpstruth.org

Donald Trump Endorses Rick Brattin with Sweeping Claims About Policy and Record

Donald Trump has issued a full-throated endorsement of Rick Brattin, who is running to represent Missouri’s 5th Congressional District. In his statement, Trump praised Brattin as a “MAGA Warrior” and claimed he would “work tirelessly to Grow our Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Promote MADE IN THE U.S.A., Unleash American Energy DOMINANCE, Keep our Border SECURE, Stop Migrant Crime, Strengthen our Incredible Military/Veterans, Safeguard our Elections, and Defend our always under siege Second Amendment, which I have flawlessly fought to protect for many years.”

Sweeping Promises and Exaggerations

Trump’s endorsement is filled with sweeping promises about Brattin’s future performance in Congress. He asserts that Brattin “will never let you down” and that “everywhere Rick Brattin has gone, he has been respected.” These broad statements lack specific evidence and serve to exaggerate Brattin’s record and reputation.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s assertion that he has “flawlessly fought to protect” the Second Amendment for many years is a notable exaggeration. While Trump has positioned himself as a defender of gun rights, his record includes both support for and retreat from certain gun control measures, such as bump stock bans and discussions of background checks. The claim of a “flawless” record does not align with the complexities and shifts in his administration’s policies.

Additionally, Trump’s repeated use of phrases like “Unleash American Energy DOMINANCE” and “Keep our Border SECURE, Stop Migrant Crime” reflect common talking points that have often been challenged by fact-checkers. For example, claims of “American energy dominance” and “border security” under his administration have been disputed by independent analyses showing mixed results and ongoing challenges in both areas.

Conclusion

Trump’s endorsement of Rick Brattin is characterized by sweeping rhetoric and exaggerated claims about both Brattin’s record and Trump’s own policy achievements. While endorsements are often hyperbolic, readers should be aware of the factual record behind such statements. As the campaign in Missouri’s 5th Congressional District unfolds, voters will have the opportunity to scrutinize these claims and assess the real impact of the policies and records being promoted.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40511

Blanche wins support from GOP holdouts after vowing to scrap ‘anti-weaponization fund’

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-03 17:55:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Defends Possibility of Payouts to January 6 Rioters, Sends Mixed Messages on DOJ Fund

President Donald Trump is once again at the center of controversy over a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund that could have provided settlements to Trump allies, including January 6 rioters. Despite a new written order from Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche rescinding the fund, Trump continues to defend the idea of compensating those involved in the Capitol attack and has left the door open to reviving the fund in the future.

Trump’s Position on the Fund

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump characterized January 6 defendants as victims, stating, “These people were attacked. And this would be a reimbursement, going to pay them. A lot of people like it. If they don’t approve Todd, I will put it back on the table. A lot of people like it. A lot of big supporters of Trump like it.” This statement directly contradicts bipartisan concerns that the fund could result in large payouts to individuals convicted of violent acts during the insurrection.

Contradictory Statements

Trump’s messaging on the issue has been inconsistent. While he has publicly defended the fund and suggested it could return if his nominee is not approved, he also told a reporter that there were no other avenues he knew of for such payouts. This pattern of mixed messaging has been a hallmark of Trump’s approach to contentious issues, leaving both supporters and critics uncertain about his true intentions.

Democratic Criticism and Legal Concerns

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have dismissed the recent deal to rescind the fund as meaningless. Senator Adam Schiff argued that the agreement “doesn’t prevent payouts to violent insurrectionists in the future. It doesn’t prevent the administration from bringing the slush fund back from the dead next week or using an existing DOJ settlement fund for the same purpose.” Schiff also noted that the deal leaves in place a controversial tax immunity provision for Trump and his family.

Background and Implications

The fund originated as part of a settlement in a lawsuit Trump filed against the IRS over leaked tax returns. It faced immediate bipartisan criticism and was blocked by a federal judge. Acting Attorney General Blanche initially claimed the fund was dead but only recently put that in writing under pressure from Senate Republicans.

Despite the written order, the language does not explicitly prevent future payouts to January 6 defendants or the revival of the fund. Trump’s continued defense of the fund and his willingness to reconsider it highlight ongoing concerns about accountability and the potential for government resources to be used for the benefit of individuals involved in the Capitol riot.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statements and shifting positions on the “anti-weaponization” fund underscore the ongoing debate over accountability for the January 6 attack and the use of government settlements. While the fund has been formally rescinded for now, Trump’s comments suggest the issue is far from settled, raising questions about future actions and the message being sent to those who participated in the insurrection.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/blanche-wins-support-from-gop-holdouts-after-vowing-to-scrap-anti-weaponization-fund

Pirro’s future in question amid break with Trump on Reflecting Pool

Administration News — 2026-08-03 18:05:00 — thehill.com

President Trump Lashes Out at Jeanine Pirro Over Reflecting Pool Case

President Trump’s public clash with U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro over the handling of the Reflecting Pool case has sparked questions about the future of their long-standing relationship. On Monday evening, Pirro visited the White House after Trump criticized her on camera just hours earlier in the Oval Office.

Trump’s on-camera outburst marks a significant escalation in tensions between the president and Pirro, who have been allies for decades. The president’s decision to lash out at Pirro, a figure with whom he has typically enjoyed a friendly rapport, signals a notable shift in his approach to the Reflecting Pool case and those involved in its prosecution.

The president’s willingness to publicly attack Pirro raises concerns about his handling of the case and his treatment of officials who have previously been in his inner circle. This incident is the latest in a pattern of Trump targeting individuals who do not align with his preferred outcomes, even when those individuals have a history of loyalty.

As questions mount about Pirro’s standing with the president, the fallout from Trump’s remarks underscores the unpredictable nature of his relationships and the potential impact on ongoing legal matters. The episode highlights the president’s readiness to publicly criticize allies, adding another layer of complexity to the already contentious Reflecting Pool case.

In summary, President Trump’s on-camera criticism of Jeanine Pirro over the Reflecting Pool case not only puts their relationship in the spotlight but also raises broader questions about his approach to legal challenges and his treatment of longtime associates.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6006753-trump-jeanine-pirro-us-attorney-reflecting-pool/