Home Blog

From booze-filled parties to mail ballots: How did American voting actually evolve?

From booze-filled parties to mail ballots: How did American voting actually evolve?

PolitiFact – Rulings and Stories — 2026-06-29 06:52:00 — www.politifact.com

Trump’s Push for “One Day Voting” Contradicts American History and Modern Preferences

President Donald Trump has repeatedly called for a return to “one day voting,” expressing nostalgia for what he describes as the “old fashioned days when you’d actually go out and vote.” In November, Trump stated, “I’d like to see one day voting. I’d like to see not 65 days of voting from all over the place.” At an Arizona rally before the 2020 election, he echoed this sentiment.

However, Trump’s vision of a simpler, single-day voting system is at odds with both historical reality and the evolution of American voting practices. According to experts cited in the excerpt, the idea that Americans once voted only on a single day is a “manufactured concept.” David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research, notes that “it never happened. It never existed. We had mail voting at least since the Civil War. Voting often took place over a period of days, often weeks.”

Throughout American history, voting has adapted to meet the needs of a growing and changing nation. From the earliest days, voting was a public act, often spanning several days and accompanied by community gatherings. The move toward absentee and mail voting began during the Civil War for soldiers and expanded over the decades to accommodate civilians, especially as work and travel made it harder for some to vote in person on a single day.

Trump has not only misrepresented the history of voting in America but has also attacked the expansion of mail-in and early voting, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. He claimed that changes to make voting safer and more accessible “amounted to cheating,” a charge that the excerpt describes as “a ridiculous accusation contrary to the facts.” These changes were made transparently, through executive orders, administrative actions, or legislation, and were used by voters from both major parties.

Despite Trump’s efforts to restrict voting options—such as his push to ban mail voting except in limited circumstances—these initiatives have not succeeded in Congress. The excerpt points out that returning to a single day of voting would create significant risks, including the potential for widespread disruption due to weather, cyberattacks, or equipment failures. Spreading voting over days or weeks allows officials to address problems as they arise, rather than concentrating all risk into a single day.

Public opinion also runs counter to Trump’s position. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that 59% of Americans support early or absentee voting without requiring a reason, with strong support among Democrats and significant support among Republicans.

In summary, Trump’s repeated calls for “one day voting” are based on a false narrative about American history and ignore the practical benefits and broad support for more flexible voting options. His claims about widespread cheating through mail voting are not supported by the facts, and his proposals would roll back decades of progress in making voting more accessible and resilient. As the nation marks the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the evidence shows that convenience and flexibility in voting are deeply embedded in both American history and current public preference.

Source article

Source: https://www.politifact.com/article/2026/jun/29/250th-anniversary-history-voting-mail-election/

Supreme Court, for now, blocks Trump from firing Fed board member Lisa Cook

Supreme Court, for now, blocks Trump from firing Fed board member Lisa Cook

Politics — 2026-06-29 10:32:00 — www.washingtonpost.com

Donald Trump Alleges Mortgage Fraud Against Fed Board Member Lisa Cook

Donald Trump has publicly accused Lisa Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Federal Reserve Board, of committing mortgage fraud. This allegation comes as a setback for Trump, whose claims have not been substantiated by any presented evidence in the excerpt.

### Trump’s Allegation

Trump alleged that Cook was involved in mortgage fraud, a serious accusation that, if true, would have significant implications for her position on the Federal Reserve Board. However, the excerpt provides no details or documentation to support Trump’s claim.

### Fact-Check and Context

There is no indication in the excerpt that Trump’s allegation is supported by any factual evidence or official findings. The claim appears to be an attack on Cook’s character and qualifications, rather than a substantiated accusation. Cook’s historic appointment as the first Black woman on the Fed board has been widely recognized, but Trump’s assertion of mortgage fraud stands uncorroborated in the information provided.

### Conclusion

Trump’s unsubstantiated allegation against Lisa Cook highlights his ongoing pattern of making serious claims without providing supporting evidence. As with previous statements, this accusation warrants careful scrutiny and fact-checking to ensure that public discourse remains grounded in verifiable information. Readers should be aware of the lack of evidence behind Trump’s claim and the importance of relying on documented facts when evaluating such serious allegations.

Source article

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/29/supreme-court-now-blocks-trump-firing-federal-reserve-board-appointee/

Donald J. Trump: “I am pleased to announce the nomination of Judge John Cronan to the United S…

Donald J. Trump: “I am pleased to announce the nomination of Judge John Cronan to the United S…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-06-29 20:24:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Praises Judge John Cronan in Sentencing Commission Nomination Announcement

President Donald J. Trump announced the nomination of Judge John Cronan to the United States Sentencing Commission, describing him as a “Highly Respected Judge on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.” In his statement, Trump highlighted Cronan’s background, noting his previous roles as a senior official in the Department of Justice and as a longtime prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, where he served as Chief of the Terrorism and International Narcotics Unit.

Trump further emphasized Cronan’s academic credentials, stating that he graduated from Yale Law School and Georgetown University before clerking for both the Southern District of New York and the Second Circuit. According to Trump, “Judge Cronan’s exemplary career in Law Enforcement will make him a strong asset to the Sentencing Commission.”

Fact-Check: No False Claims or Disparagements in Statement

A review of Trump’s announcement reveals that it is primarily a summary of Judge Cronan’s professional and academic background, as well as an endorsement of his qualifications for the Sentencing Commission. The statement does not contain any false claims, exaggerations, or disparagements directed at individuals or institutions. All information presented about Cronan’s career and education aligns with publicly available records.

Conclusion

Trump’s announcement of Judge John Cronan’s nomination to the United States Sentencing Commission is a straightforward endorsement, focusing on Cronan’s credentials and experience. The statement avoids the falsehoods or attacks that have characterized some of Trump’s previous public remarks, instead offering a factual summary of Cronan’s qualifications. Readers can take away that, in this instance, Trump’s comments are consistent with the record and do not include any misleading or inflammatory statements.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/39625

Reflecting pool algae: the science Trump needs to know – podcast | Science

Reflecting pool algae: the science Trump needs to know – podcast | Science

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-06-29 23:00:00 — www.theguardian.com

President Trump’s Bold Promise to Paint Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool ‘American Flag Blue’ Faces Reality Check

President Trump vowed to have the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool in Washington DC renovated and painted ‘American flag blue’ by July 4. The reflecting pool, a historic site that has struggled with persistent algae blooms for decades, was subsequently stripped, cleaned, coated, and refilled as part of the president’s highly publicized pledge.

Despite these efforts, the algae returned within days, highlighting the ongoing challenge of maintaining the pool’s appearance. The president’s promise to transform the pool with a dramatic new color was met with skepticism from experts and quickly undermined by the stubborn environmental realities that have long plagued the site.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Renovation Claims

Trump’s vow to have the pool painted ‘American flag blue’ by Independence Day drew widespread attention, but the rapid reappearance of algae after the cleaning and coating process demonstrated the limitations of such cosmetic fixes. According to Dr. Linda May, a freshwater ecologist at the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, algae blooms are notoriously difficult to control and require more than surface-level interventions.

The president’s focus on a bold visual transformation, rather than addressing the underlying ecological issues, has been called into question as the pool’s condition quickly reverted to its previous state. This episode underscores the gap between Trump’s public promises and the practical outcomes, especially when dealing with complex environmental challenges.

Conclusion: Promises vs. Reality

President Trump’s pledge to renovate and dramatically repaint the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool was quickly tested by the return of algae, a problem that has resisted simple solutions for years. The episode serves as a reminder that grand statements and cosmetic changes are no substitute for addressing the root causes of persistent issues. As the reflecting pool’s struggles continue, the gap between presidential promises and practical results remains in sharp focus.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/audio/2026/jun/30/reflecting-pool-algae-science-trump-podcast

Professor known for ‘torture memos’ will advise conspiracy probe focused on perceived Trump foes

Professor known for ‘torture memos’ will advise conspiracy probe focused on perceived Trump foes

PBS NewsHour – Politics — 2026-06-29 18:16:00 — www.pbs.org

Donald Trump Continues to Demand Retribution Over Russia Investigation, Despite Lack of Evidence of Criminal Conspiracy

Donald Trump has maintained a persistent stance that top law enforcement and intelligence officials conspired against him, continuing to demand retribution for investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. According to the Associated Press, Trump has sought to punish officials from the FBI and CIA who scrutinized his campaign and presidency, despite multiple investigations finding no criminal misconduct by senior officials.

### Trump’s Claims of Conspiracy

The excerpt reports that Trump has “continued to demand retribution and has sought to punish top officials from that time at the FBI and CIA.” This position comes even after a 2019 report by special counsel Robert Mueller affirmed that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to boost Trump and that the Trump campaign “repeatedly welcomed the assistance.” However, the Mueller report did not find sufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy between Trump’s campaign and Moscow.

### Fact-Checking Trump’s Narrative

Subsequent investigations into the Russia probe identified procedural errors and one instance of an FBI lawyer pleading guilty to doctoring an email. However, none of the reviews found criminal misconduct by any senior law enforcement or intelligence official involved in the investigation. Despite these findings, Trump has continued to push the narrative that he was the target of a criminal conspiracy, a claim not substantiated by the available evidence.

### Ongoing Investigations

The Justice Department is currently investigating claims of a long-running conspiracy to bring down Trump, with law professor John Yoo advising prosecutors. The scope of this investigation remains unclear, and it is not known whether any criminal charges will be brought.

### Conclusion

Donald Trump’s ongoing demands for retribution against officials involved in the Russia investigation stand in contrast to the findings of multiple official inquiries, which have not identified criminal wrongdoing by senior officials. While Trump continues to assert that he was the victim of a conspiracy, the factual record established by the Mueller report and other reviews does not support these claims. This ongoing dispute underscores the deep divisions and persistent mistrust surrounding the investigations into the 2016 election.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/professor-known-for-torture-memos-will-advise-conspiracy-probe-focused-on-perceived-trump-foes

Donald J. Trump: “I am pleased to announce the nomination of Jason Manion to the United States…

Donald J. Trump: “I am pleased to announce the nomination of Jason Manion to the United States…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-06-29 20:26:00 — trumpstruth.org

President Donald J. Trump Announces Nomination of Jason Manion to U.S. Sentencing Commission

President Donald J. Trump publicly announced the nomination of Jason Manion to the United States Sentencing Commission, highlighting Manion’s extensive legal background and experience in public service. In his statement, Trump described Manion as “General Counsel and Senior Advisor to the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud,” and detailed his previous roles, including Counselor to the Attorney General, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio, and Deputy Solicitor General of Ohio. Trump also noted Manion’s academic credentials, stating he is a graduate of Harvard Law School and Thomas Edison State University.

Trump asserted that Manion “will be a voice for Public Safety and Law and Order on the Sentencing Commission,” positioning the nominee as an advocate for stricter enforcement and oversight within the federal sentencing system.

Fact-Check and Analysis

The announcement does not contain any clear false claims, distortions, or attacks on individuals. Trump’s remarks focus on Manion’s professional qualifications and his anticipated role on the Sentencing Commission. The statement frames Manion’s nomination as a move to strengthen public safety and law and order, consistent with Trump’s broader messaging on criminal justice issues.

While Trump’s characterization of Manion as a “voice for Public Safety and Law and Order” is a subjective assessment, it does not constitute a factual misstatement or exaggeration based on the information provided in the excerpt. The announcement refrains from disparagements or unsubstantiated claims about Manion’s background or the work of the Sentencing Commission.

Conclusion

President Trump’s nomination of Jason Manion to the United States Sentencing Commission is presented as a strategic choice to reinforce the administration’s commitment to public safety and legal integrity. The announcement is factual in its description of Manion’s credentials and does not include any of the false statements or attacks that have characterized some of Trump’s previous public communications. Readers are left with a clear understanding of the nominee’s background and the administration’s stated priorities for the Sentencing Commission.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/39628

Trump news at a glance: Trump tried to appeal E Jean Carroll verdict all the way to the supreme court. They passed | Trump administration

Trump news at a glance: Trump tried to appeal E Jean Carroll verdict all the way to the supreme court. They passed | Trump administration

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-06-29 20:03:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump Calls E Jean Carroll Verdict a “Fake Case” After Supreme Court Declines Review

Donald Trump responded to the US supreme court’s decision to leave intact a $5 million civil judgment against him by calling the case “fake,” continuing his pattern of attacking the legitimacy of legal proceedings against him. The court declined to review a New York jury’s 2023 verdict that found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. The justices gave no explanation for their decision, and no public dissents were noted.

Trump’s Reaction and Claims

Following the supreme court’s announcement, Trump wrote on Truth Social: “Surprisingly, the Supreme Court declined to ‘review’ a Fake Case brought against me.” This statement continues Trump’s repeated public denials of Carroll’s allegations and his efforts to discredit the judicial process. Throughout the legal battle, Trump has maintained that the accusations are false and has accused Carroll of lying.

Legal Background and Fact-Checking

The supreme court’s move comes after a three-judge panel at the second US circuit court of appeals in Manhattan upheld the jury’s verdict in 2024. The appeals court rejected Trump’s arguments that the trial was unfair due to the admission of evidence regarding his alleged past sexual misconduct. Trump’s claim that the case is “fake” is contradicted by the unanimous jury verdict and the repeated affirmation of the judgment by higher courts.

Carroll, a former advice columnist, first made her allegations public in 2019, stating that Trump raped her in the 1990s. Trump has consistently denied the claims and accused Carroll of fabricating the story. Despite his denials and multiple appeals, the courts have upheld the findings against him.

Conclusion

Trump’s response to the supreme court’s decision—labeling the case as “fake”—fits a broader pattern of dismissing unfavorable legal outcomes and attacking the credibility of his accusers and the judicial system. The supreme court’s refusal to hear the case marks the end of Trump’s legal avenues to overturn the verdict, leaving the $5 million judgment in place and affirming the jury’s findings of sexual abuse and defamation.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/29/trump-news-at-a-glance-e-jean-carroll

FDA panel on peptides will include experts who promote the unproven chemicals favored by RFK Jr.

FDA panel on peptides will include experts who promote the unproven chemicals favored by RFK Jr.

PBS NewsHour – Politics — 2026-06-29 18:31:00 — www.pbs.org

President Donald Trump has repeatedly praised Tennessee state senator Bobby Harshbarger’s support of his “Make America Great Again” agenda, highlighting the senator’s alignment with Trump’s political movement. Harshbarger, who is also a pharmacist, has multiple connections to the peptide and compounding pharmacy industry, which is under scrutiny as U.S. health officials prepare to reconsider the safety and effectiveness of several controversial peptide drugs.

Trump’s Praise and Political Connections

Trump’s public support for Harshbarger comes amid ongoing debates about the regulation of peptide drugs—substances that are often promoted for muscle building, injury recovery, and anti-aging, despite little scientific evidence backing these claims. Many of these peptides are sold online or through wellness clinics, frequently labeled as “for research use only” to bypass FDA oversight.

The president’s endorsement of Harshbarger is notable given the senator’s family ties to the compounding pharmacy business and the legal troubles of his father, Robert Harshbarger Jr. Last year, Trump pardoned Robert Harshbarger Jr., who had pleaded guilty over a decade ago to substituting an unapproved drug from China for one used by kidney dialysis patients. He lost his pharmacy license and served four years in prison.

Industry Influence and Regulatory Concerns

The upcoming FDA panel reviewing peptide drugs includes several members with direct financial interests in the industry, a shift from previous panels composed mainly of academic experts. This change has raised questions about potential conflicts of interest and the influence of industry proponents on public health policy.

Conclusion

Trump’s repeated praise for Harshbarger underscores the intersection of political loyalty and regulatory scrutiny in the ongoing debate over peptide drugs. As the FDA prepares to review the safety of these substances, the involvement of politically connected figures and industry insiders will likely remain a focal point for both critics and supporters of the current regulatory approach.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/fda-panel-on-peptides-will-include-experts-who-promote-the-unproven-chemicals-favored-by-rfk-jr

Ohio’s GOP governor said it’s ‘absurd’ to call Haiti safe, experts agree

Ohio’s GOP governor said it’s ‘absurd’ to call Haiti safe, experts agree

PolitiFact – Rulings and Stories — 2026-06-29 17:03:00 — www.politifact.com

Trump’s False Claims About Haitian Immigrants and Safety Contradict U.S. Warnings

After the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians can end, Trump administration officials asserted that it is safe for Haitians to return to their country. This position comes despite the State Department’s highest-level travel warning, which urges, “Do not travel to Haiti due to kidnapping, crime, terrorist activity, civil unrest,” and describes violent crime as “rampant.”

Trump’s Position and Falsehoods

Ending TPS for Haitians aligns with Trump’s campaign promise. In 2024, Trump spread the falsehood that Haitians living in Springfield, Ohio, were stealing and eating people’s pets—a claim that has been widely debunked and labeled as a lie by fact-checkers.

Contradicting U.S. Government Warnings

Despite the State Department’s Level 4 warning, Trump administration officials have continued to insist that Haitians can safely return. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin told CNN that the advisory is for “American citizens traveling to Haiti, not Haitians going back home.” Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, claimed, “For Haitians? Absolutely,” when asked if Haiti is safe, and compared crime in Haiti to “pockets” of higher crime in U.S. cities.

These claims have been rejected by experts and officials familiar with conditions in Haiti. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, who has experience working in Haiti, called the assertion that it is safe to return “absurd.”

Reality in Haiti

Experts describe Haiti as deeply unsafe, with ongoing gang violence, political instability, and a collapse of basic services. Over 6 million people need humanitarian aid, and armed groups control much of the capital. The United Nations reports that more than 2,300 people have been killed by gang violence this year alone, and 1.5 million Haitians have fled their homes in recent years.

For Haitians with TPS, returning would mean facing additional risks, including being targeted for kidnapping and extortion because they are perceived as having money.

Conclusion

Trump’s false claims about Haitians and the safety of returning to Haiti are contradicted by both U.S. government warnings and on-the-ground realities. The spread of misinformation—such as the debunked claim about Haitians eating pets—further stigmatizes vulnerable communities and ignores the severe dangers they face if forced to return. As the administration continues to push for the end of TPS, the facts make clear that Haiti remains unsafe for returnees.

Source article

Source: https://www.politifact.com/article/2026/jun/29/Supreme-Court-TPS-Haitians-safe-Markwayne-Mullin/

Michigan threatens to pull troops from D.C. if used for Trump task force : NPR

Michigan threatens to pull troops from D.C. if used for Trump task force : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-06-29 18:34:00 — www.npr.org

Trump’s Crime Claims Spark National Guard Dispute Amid Declining D.C. Crime Rates

President Trump’s ongoing deployment of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., continues to draw controversy, with state leaders and legal experts challenging the basis and scope of the operation. Trump said he sent hundreds of troops to the capital in August 2025 to address what he described as rampant crime, despite the fact that crime rates were declining at the time.

Disputed Justification for Troop Deployment

Trump’s stated rationale for the deployment—a response to “rampant crime”—directly contradicts the reality of falling crime rates in Washington, D.C. This disconnect has been highlighted by experts as a significant departure from established governing norms. Over time, the number of troops in the city has grown to more than 4,800, with participation from nearly two dozen states.

Democratic Governors Push Back

The controversy escalated as Democratic-led states, including Michigan, North Carolina, Kentucky, and Minnesota, sent National Guard members to D.C. specifically to support America 250 celebrations, not for law enforcement activities. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer made clear in a letter obtained by NPR that her state’s troops are only to be used for the America 250 mission and not for Trump’s joint task force, known as the D.C. Safe and Beautiful Mission. She warned that Michigan would withdraw its troops if this condition is not met.

Other Democratic governors echoed this stance, emphasizing their opposition to the Trump administration’s broader use of the National Guard in D.C. and supporting litigation challenging the deployment.

Confusion and Legal Concerns

Recent reports and authenticated video footage show Michigan National Guard members patrolling areas far from official America 250 events, raising questions about mission creep. Legal experts warn that distinguishing between the America 250 celebration and the broader joint task force is difficult, as the task force conducts high-visibility patrols across the city.

Despite assurances from the joint task force that being listed as part of the federal operation “does not change their specific mission,” Democratic governors insist their troops should not be counted in the joint task force numbers.

Conclusion

Trump’s justification for deploying National Guard troops to D.C.—citing rampant crime—has been undermined by factual crime data showing a decline. The resulting confusion and legal disputes underscore the ongoing tension between federal directives and state authority, as well as the broader debate over the use of military force in domestic law enforcement. This episode highlights persistent concerns about transparency and accountability in the Trump administration’s approach to public safety and federal-state relations.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/06/29/nx-s1-5875427/michigan-governor-national-guard-dc