Donald J. Trump: “Governor Kathy Hochul is for Canada, a Country that has been ripping off New…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-28 21:22:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Attacks Governor Hochul, Makes Unsubstantiated Claims About Canada and New York

Donald Trump issued a statement sharply criticizing New York Governor Kathy Hochul, claiming, “Governor Kathy Hochul is for Canada, a Country that has been ripping off New York State for years, especially under her Administration, instead of the good ‘ol U.S.A.” Trump further alleged that Hochul would not “respect or acknowledge LAKE AMERICA,” and disparaged Democrats, calling them “Dumocrats” and asserting they are “so bad for our Country.” He concluded by endorsing Bruce Blakeman for governor, promising, “He has my Complete and Total Endorsement, and will never let you down!”

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s statement contains several notable attacks and unsubstantiated assertions:

• Claim about Governor Hochul and Canada: Trump accuses Hochul of favoring Canada over the United States and alleges that Canada has been “ripping off New York State for years, especially under her Administration.” There is no evidence provided in the statement to support the claim that Hochul prioritizes Canadian interests or that Canada has exploited New York during her tenure. Trade and cross-border relations between New York and Canada are complex, but no factual basis is presented for this sweeping accusation.

• Lake America Reference: Trump claims Hochul would not “respect or acknowledge LAKE AMERICA.” There is no public record or reporting that Hochul has made statements to this effect or that a body of water named “Lake America” is at issue in New York-Canada relations. This appears to be an invented or exaggerated talking point.

• Disparagement of Democrats: Trump refers to Democrats as “Dumocrats” and claims they are “so bad for our Country.” This is a personal attack rather than a factual statement and does not address any specific policy or action.

Endorsement of Bruce Blakeman

Trump concludes by urging voters to support Bruce Blakeman for governor, stating Blakeman “will never let you down.” This endorsement is a standard political position and does not contain factual claims requiring verification.

Conclusion

Trump’s latest statement about Governor Hochul is marked by unsubstantiated allegations and personal attacks. His assertions that Hochul favors Canada and that Canada has exploited New York under her administration lack supporting evidence. The reference to “Lake America” is not grounded in any known dispute or policy issue. As with many of Trump’s public statements, these remarks rely on exaggeration and disparagement rather than verifiable facts, underscoring the importance of careful scrutiny and fact-checking in political discourse.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41359

Trump says U.S. has entered deal with Venezuela to control 65 billion barrels of its oil reserves

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-28 18:35:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Claims “Biggest Oil Deal in World History” With Venezuela—Facts Tell a Different Story

President Donald Trump announced on Friday that the United States has entered into an agreement with Venezuela to take control of 65 billion barrels of the country’s oil reserves, calling it “THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY!” in a social media post. Trump stated the deal was negotiated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Venezuela’s interim President Delcy Rodriguez.

Trump’s Bold Claim

Trump’s announcement comes nearly nine months after he directed the U.S. military to capture Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro and bring him to the United States to face federal narcoterrorism and drug trafficking charges. In the aftermath of Maduro’s ouster, Trump floated the idea of U.S. oil companies returning to Venezuela, arguing that the country had previously “stolen” U.S. oil when former President Hugo Chavez nationalized foreign-owned assets, including those of American oil companies.

Fact-Checking the Numbers

While Venezuela does possess one of the world’s largest oil reserves—an estimated 303 billion barrels, or about 17% of the global supply according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration—Trump’s claim that the U.S. will “take control of 65 billion barrels” is not supported by the facts presented in the excerpt. There is no independent confirmation of such an agreement, and the figure Trump cited represents only a fraction of Venezuela’s total reserves.

Moreover, experts note that Venezuela’s oil reserves are well-mapped but largely untapped due to dilapidated infrastructure. The country currently produces only about 1% of the world’s oil, far below its potential output.

Context and Exaggeration

Trump’s announcement appears to be aimed at addressing mounting pressure over high gas prices as the war in Iran continues with no end in sight. The U.S. has already tapped into its strategic petroleum reserves, which have dropped by more than 100 million barrels since the start of 2026.

Despite Trump’s assertion of a historic oil deal, the reality is that Venezuela’s production capacity remains severely limited, and the logistics of transferring control of such a vast quantity of oil are not addressed in his statement. The claim of “the biggest oil deal in world history” is therefore a significant exaggeration based on the available facts.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statements about a massive U.S.-Venezuela oil agreement are not substantiated by the facts provided in the excerpt. While Venezuela’s oil reserves are indeed vast, the claim that the U.S. has secured control over 65 billion barrels—and that this constitutes the largest oil deal in history—does not align with expert assessments or current production realities. As with many of Trump’s past statements, the announcement is marked by exaggeration and lacks supporting evidence. Readers should approach such claims with caution and seek out independent verification.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-u-s-has-entered-deal-with-venezuela-to-control-65-billion-barrels-of-its-oil-reserves

Trump says US has a deal to take huge stake in Venezuela’s oil reserves

Donald Trump — 2026-08-28 18:51:00 — www.politico.com

Trump Claims Oil Plan Will Replenish Reserves and Lower Gas Prices

President Trump asserted that his administration’s plan “would help replenish U.S. oil reserves and drive down gas prices,” according to the . This statement comes as part of the administration’s ongoing efforts to address energy policy and the economic impact of fluctuating oil prices.

Examining Trump’s Claims

Trump’s claim that the plan would both replenish the nation’s oil reserves and lower gas prices is significant, as it addresses two major concerns for American consumers and the energy sector. However, fact-checks and expert analysis have often found that presidential actions alone do not immediately or directly lower gas prices, which are influenced by a complex mix of global supply, demand, and market speculation.

Record of Exaggerated Statements

The president has a history of making bold promises about the effects of his energy policies. In this instance, his assertion that the plan would drive down gas prices may overstate the direct impact of federal actions on consumer costs at the pump. While replenishing oil reserves can strengthen national energy security, the relationship between government oil purchases and retail gas prices is not always straightforward or immediate.

Conclusion

President Trump’s statement that the administration’s plan “would help replenish U.S. oil reserves and drive down gas prices” highlights his tendency to make sweeping claims about policy outcomes. While the intent to bolster reserves is clear, the promise of lower gas prices as a direct result is less certain, reflecting a pattern of exaggeration in the president’s public statements on economic issues. Readers should scrutinize such claims and consider the broader context and complexities of the energy market.

Source article

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/28/trump-says-us-has-a-deal-to-take-huge-stake-in-venezuelas-oil-reserves-01055442

Trump says he secured ‘majority US control’ of large slice of Venezuela’s oil reserves

Administration News — 2026-08-28 18:43:00 — thehill.com

Trump Claims “Majority U.S. Control” Over Venezuela’s Oil in Unsubstantiated Social Media Post

President Trump announced Friday evening that there will be “majority U.S. control” of a large portion of Venezuela’s oil reserves. In a post on Truth Social, Trump declared, “BREAKING NEWS: The United States of America has just entered into an Agreement with the Country of Venezuela on, THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY!”

Trump’s Unverified Announcement

Trump’s statement suggests that the United States has secured an unprecedented agreement with Venezuela, granting the U.S. majority control over the country’s vast oil reserves. He characterized the deal as “the biggest oil deal in world history,” implying a major shift in global energy markets and U.S. foreign policy.

Lack of Evidence and Context

No supporting evidence or official confirmation of such an agreement has been provided in the excerpt. Trump’s post does not detail the terms of the alleged deal, nor does it reference any statements from Venezuelan officials or U.S. government agencies. The claim stands in stark contrast to the current diplomatic and economic realities between the two countries, which have been marked by sanctions and strained relations.

Pattern of Exaggerated Claims

Trump’s assertion fits a broader pattern of making dramatic, often unsubstantiated claims about international agreements and U.S. achievements. The language used—calling it “THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY”—is characteristic of his tendency to exaggerate the scale and impact of his administration’s actions without providing verifiable details.

Conclusion

President Trump’s announcement of “majority U.S. control” over Venezuela’s oil reserves and the “biggest oil deal in world history” remains unsubstantiated based on the information provided. The lack of corroborating evidence and official confirmation raises questions about the accuracy of his claim. This episode highlights the importance of critically evaluating statements made by public officials, especially when they concern significant international developments.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6058643-trump-says-he-secured-majority-u-s-control-of-large-slice-of-venezuelas-oil-reserve/

Donald J. Trump: “BREAKING NEWS: The United States of America has just entered into an Agreeme…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-28 17:47:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Claims “Biggest Oil Deal in World History” With Venezuela: Fact-Checking the Announcement

President Donald J. Trump has declared, “The United States of America has just entered into an Agreement with the Country of Venezuela on, THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY!” According to Trump, this deal—negotiated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, with Venezuela’s Delcy Rodriguez—gives the U.S. majority control of over 65 billion barrels of proven oil reserves in Venezuela, “at no cost to the American Taxpayer.” Trump further asserts that the agreement “MORE THAN DOUBLES American Oil Reserves, greatly increases our Oil Supply, and will substantially lower Gas Prices for all Americans, long into the future.”

Examining the Claims

“Biggest Oil Deal in World History”

Trump’s announcement brands the agreement as the largest ever, but the excerpt provides no evidence or context to support this superlative. While Venezuela is known to have some of the world’s largest proven oil reserves, the claim that this is the “biggest” deal in history is an exaggeration without comparative data or independent verification.

“Majority U.S. Control of More Than 65 Billion Barrels”

The statement that the U.S. now controls a majority of Venezuela’s oil—more than 65 billion barrels—raises significant questions. No details are provided about the terms, enforcement, or international recognition of such control. Historically, Venezuela’s oil industry has been state-controlled, and any transfer of majority control would be unprecedented and highly controversial.

“At No Cost to the American Taxpayer”

Trump asserts that the deal was secured “at no cost to the American Taxpayer.” Major international resource agreements typically involve complex financial arrangements, investments, or concessions. The claim of zero cost is highly dubious without supporting documentation or explanation.

“MORE THAN DOUBLES American Oil Reserves”

Trump claims the transaction “more than doubles American Oil Reserves.” According to publicly available data, U.S. proven oil reserves are estimated at around 35–44 billion barrels. Adding 65 billion barrels would indeed more than double this figure, but only if the U.S. truly gained control of these reserves—a claim not substantiated in the excerpt.

“Will Substantially Lower Gas Prices for All Americans”

The assertion that this deal “will substantially lower Gas Prices for all Americans, long into the future” is speculative. Oil prices are determined by global markets, and the impact of any single deal—especially one lacking transparency—cannot be guaranteed to deliver such sweeping benefits.

Conclusion

President Trump’s announcement of “THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY” with Venezuela is filled with sweeping claims and superlatives. The excerpt offers no independent verification, supporting evidence, or details about the mechanics of the agreement. Assertions of majority U.S. control, zero taxpayer cost, and guaranteed lower gas prices all stretch credulity based on the information provided. As with many of Trump’s previous statements, these claims warrant careful scrutiny and independent fact-checking before being accepted as fact. Readers should remain cautious and seek additional information as more details emerge.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41356

Democrats prep for a midterm challenge: The risk Trump interferes : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-08-28 04:00:00 — www.npr.org

Trump Pushes Election Fraud Claims, Seeks Sweeping Changes to Voting Laws Despite Lack of Evidence

President Trump is once again at the center of a heated debate over the integrity of U.S. elections, as he calls for sweeping changes to voting laws and continues to cast doubt on the legitimacy of upcoming midterm elections. In a recent speech from the White House, Trump urged Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, a legislative package that would require proof of citizenship for voter registration and mandate photo identification at the polls. Trump argued, “How easy is that to do, unless you want to cheat? The only reason you wouldn’t do it is you want to cheat because your policies are so bad, and your candidates are so pathetic that you can’t get away or can’t get elected any other way.”

False Claims and Disparagements

Trump’s remarks are part of a broader pattern in which he repeatedly suggests that widespread voter fraud threatens U.S. elections. However, studies and investigations have consistently found that voter fraud is vanishingly rare. Critics, including members of a Senate Democratic task force, argue that Trump’s statements are designed to sow doubt about the electoral process and pave the way for future challenges to election results he may not favor.

Justin Vail, a leader at Protect Democracy, described Trump’s approach as a three-step playbook: “First, he deceives Americans, manufacturing false claims about voter fraud and the security of our elections. Second, he seeks to disrupt the normal state and local management of elections… And if that’s all not enough, Trump is prepared to outright deny election results that he doesn’t like.”

Aggressive Federal Actions and Legal Defeats

Trump has also issued executive orders aimed at restricting mail-in voting and directed the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of adult U.S. citizens for use in mail-in ballot delivery. These efforts have resulted in a wave of federal lawsuits—31 cases seeking state voter data, all of which have been dismissed by district courts that cited privacy laws and the Constitution’s delegation of election administration to the states.

Despite these legal setbacks, the administration has continued to pursue restrictions, recently securing a temporary win in the Supreme Court related to mail-in balloting, though litigation is ongoing.

Escalating Rhetoric and Unprecedented Proposals

Trump has not ruled out even more drastic measures. In an August post on Truth Social, he asserted, “Remember, the States are merely an ‘agent’ for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do.” When asked by PBS News if he would send federal agents or servicemembers to polling locations—a move that would be illegal—Trump replied, “I’d do anything necessary to make sure we have honest elections.”

Most recently, when prompted in an interview about declaring a national emergency around elections, Trump responded that “stranger things have happened,” further fueling concerns among election law experts and lawmakers.

Conclusion

President Trump’s ongoing campaign to reshape election laws and cast doubt on the legitimacy of U.S. elections is marked by repeated false claims about voter fraud and disparagement of opponents. While his administration’s legal efforts have largely failed in court, his rhetoric and actions continue to raise alarms among lawmakers and democracy advocates, who warn that these tactics threaten the foundations of American democracy. As the midterms approach, the battle over voting rights and election integrity is set to intensify, with Trump’s statements and actions at the center of the controversy.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/08/28/nx-s1-5940881/democrats-congress-midterm-elections-trump

Trump announces creation of U.S. Space Academy

Politics — 2026-08-28 13:00:00 — www.washingtonpost.com

Trump’s Role in Creating the Space Force Highlighted in New School Announcement

A recent report from The 7LIVE underscores former President Donald Trump’s central role in establishing the Space Force, the sixth and newest branch of the U.S. military. According to the article, “the school will serve the Space Force, the sixth and newest branch of the military President Donald Trump created during his first term, as well as NASA and the growing civilian spaceflight industry.”

This statement directly attributes the creation of the Space Force to Trump’s first term, reinforcing his repeated claims of founding the branch as a signature achievement. The Space Force was officially established in December 2019, and Trump has frequently touted its creation as a major accomplishment in his administration’s approach to national security and space policy.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s assertion that he created the Space Force is accurate in the sense that the branch was indeed established during his presidency, following his advocacy and the passage of the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act. However, it is important to note that the groundwork for a dedicated space military branch had been discussed for years prior, with bipartisan support and input from military and civilian leaders. Still, Trump’s administration was responsible for formalizing and launching the Space Force as an independent branch.

Broader Implications

The announcement of a new school to serve the Space Force, NASA, and the civilian spaceflight industry highlights the ongoing impact of Trump’s decision. While Trump’s rhetoric often exaggerates the novelty of the idea, the establishment of the Space Force remains a significant development in U.S. military history.

Conclusion

The 7LIVE’s coverage affirms Trump’s direct involvement in the creation of the Space Force, a point he has repeatedly emphasized. While the idea had been circulating in defense circles for years, Trump’s administration brought it to fruition, leaving a lasting mark on the nation’s military and space policy. As the Space Force continues to evolve, the legacy of its creation during Trump’s first term remains a key part of his presidential record.

Source article

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/08/28/trump-announces-creation-us-space-academy/

Congressman Mike Lawler of New York was fantastic on FoxBusiness today. Important that we keep him in Congress. A total winner!!! President DJT

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-28 08:00:00 — trumpstruth.org

Donald Trump Praises Congressman Mike Lawler as a “Total Winner” in Public Endorsement

In a recent statement, Donald Trump publicly praised Congressman Mike Lawler of New York, calling him “fantastic on FoxBusiness today” and emphasizing the importance of keeping Lawler in Congress. Trump described Lawler as “a total winner,” signaling strong support for the congressman’s continued service.

Trump’s Endorsement and Exaggeration

Trump’s endorsement of Lawler highlights his ongoing influence within the Republican Party and his willingness to publicly back candidates he views as loyal or effective. By labeling Lawler as “fantastic” and “a total winner,” Trump uses his characteristic hyperbolic language, which has been a hallmark of his public statements. While such praise is common in Trump’s rhetoric, it often lacks specific evidence or context to substantiate the claims.

Fact-Checking the Praise

The statement does not provide details about Lawler’s performance or specific achievements during his FoxBusiness appearance. Instead, Trump’s comments rely on broad, unqualified praise. This pattern of exaggeration is consistent with Trump’s record of making sweeping statements without offering supporting facts.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s recent endorsement of Congressman Mike Lawler underscores his ongoing role in shaping Republican politics through public statements and endorsements. While Trump characterizes Lawler as “fantastic” and “a total winner,” the lack of specific evidence or context for these claims reflects a broader pattern in Trump’s communication style—one that often prioritizes hyperbole over substantiated fact. Readers should be aware of this tendency when evaluating such endorsements.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41306

Fed chair addresses inflation and says central bank’s job is ‘to deliver stable prices’ | Federal Reserve

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-08-28 10:48:00 — www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump Pressures Federal Reserve to Cut Interest Rates Despite Inflation Risks

Donald Trump has continued to insist that the Federal Reserve should lower interest rates, putting him at odds with the central bank’s current approach to fighting inflation. This stance comes as Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh emphasized the Fed’s responsibility to deliver stable prices and signaled that interest rates may rise in the coming months.

Trump’s repeated calls for rate cuts persist even as economists warn that such a move could further exacerbate inflation, which remains above the Fed’s 2% target. After US inflation hit a three-year high of 4.2% in May, it cooled to 3.4% in July—still 1% higher than the previous year’s figures. Warsh described progress on inflation as “modest,” noting that recent improvements in price readings do not reflect meaningful changes in underlying trends.

Trump’s aggressive push for lower rates stands in contrast to the Fed’s cautious approach, as the central bank navigates economic pressures stemming from higher oil prices and global instability. The Fed’s decision-making has become more contentious, with a notable split among board members at the last meeting over whether to raise rates further.

Despite these economic challenges, Trump’s position remains clear: he wants the Fed to cut rates, a move that experts say could undermine efforts to control inflation and stabilize the economy. As the debate continues, the White House’s pressure on the Fed highlights the ongoing tension between political demands and economic realities.

In summary, Trump’s insistence on lower interest rates, despite warnings from economists and the Fed’s own assessments, underscores a significant divide over how best to manage the nation’s economic future.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/aug/28/kevin-warsh-federal-reserve-inflation

Palestine Action Activists Accused of Vandalism at Trump Turnberry Face Terrorism Accusation

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-28 08:11:00 — www.nytimes.com

Donald Trump Labels Pro-Palestinian Protesters as “Terrorists” After Vandalism at Scottish Golf Resort

In the wake of vandalism at his Trump Turnberry golf resort in Scotland, President Trump described the pro-Palestinian activists involved as “the terrorists who attacked the beautiful Turnberry,” asserting that “they did serious damage, and will hopefully be treated harshly.” This statement came after seven members of the protest group Palestine Action broke into the resort in March 2025, damaging turf, sprinklers, and spraying the clubhouse with red paint, along with the message “Gaza is not 4 sale.”

Trump’s public characterization of the activists as terrorists aligns with the approach taken by both British and U.S. authorities. Following the incident, British prosecutors charged the activists with malicious damage to property and argued that the acts were “aggravated by reason of having a terrorist connection,” potentially exposing the accused to harsher sentences. Days later, the U.K. government officially banned Palestine Action as a terrorist organization, a move that sparked heated debate over free speech and the right to protest.

The Trump administration subsequently mirrored the U.K.’s decision, designating Palestine Action as a terrorist organization as part of what it called “Action Against Violent Far-Left Terrorist Networks.” The administration stated that this decision “complements the U.K.’s proscription.”

Critics, including human rights organizations such as Amnesty International, have condemned the use of terrorism laws in this context as disproportionate. Felix Jakens, director of communications at Amnesty International, argued that it was “completely disproportionate to equate painting on a golf course with terrorism,” warning that a terrorism sentence “stays with you for life” and expressing shock at the severity of potential punishments for nonviolent protest.

Legal experts note that British terrorism laws, originally intended for violent crimes, are now being applied to acts of property damage by political protesters, raising difficult questions about where to draw the line between protest and terrorism.

Trump’s labeling of the activists as terrorists and his call for harsh treatment reflect his broader pattern of using inflammatory language and supporting aggressive legal action against protest groups, even when their actions are nonviolent. This approach has intensified debate in both the U.K. and the U.S. over the balance between security and civil liberties.

As the legal proceedings continue, the case stands as a high-profile example of how Trump’s rhetoric and policy positions can influence and escalate the response to political protest, both domestically and abroad.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/28/world/europe/palestine-action-trump-golf-course.html