Home Blog

Whistleblower warns USPS rushing new system that could jeopardize mail-in ballots

Whistleblower warns USPS rushing new system that could jeopardize mail-in ballots

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-09-01 17:55:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump’s Push for Federal Control Over Mail-In Voting Sparks Warnings of “Catastrophic Failure”

President Trump’s executive order to increase federal oversight of mail-in voting has triggered serious concerns from within the U.S. Postal Service, according to a new report cited by Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal. The report, which includes warnings from an anonymous Postal Service official, describes the “risky and haphazard implementation” of Trump’s order and cautions that “potentially millions of American voters may not receive their mail-in ballot this election cycle in a timely manner or at all.”

Trump’s Executive Order and Its Impact

The new rules, stemming from Trump’s executive order, seek to restrict mail-in voting by requiring states and the federal government to verify that everyone casting a ballot is a citizen. However, noncitizen voting is already illegal, and there is little evidence it occurs at scale. The whistle-blower’s concerns are twofold: first, the Postal Service would be tasked with verifying state voter rolls—a responsibility it is not equipped to handle. Efforts to create a digital portal for this verification are reportedly going “very poorly,” with experts noting that such a system could take years to develop and test.

Second, the new rules would change how ballots are processed. Previously, mail ballots were given special handling to ensure timely delivery. Under the new system, they would no longer be routed around processing facilities, increasing the risk that ballots could get stuck in slow or complicated mail streams.

Contradictions and Constitutional Issues

Despite having voted by mail himself, Trump has continued to push for more restrictions and greater federal control over mail-in voting. This approach would inject the federal government into the voting process at every level across the country, raising constitutional concerns. The U.S. Constitution gives states—not the federal government—primary authority over election procedures. Experts warn that making the Postal Service a national clearinghouse for ballots is unprecedented and that the agency is not equipped for such a task.

Potential Impact on Voters

Nearly a third of Americans—about 50 million people—voted by mail in the 2024 general election. The new rules could have a significant impact, especially with midterm elections just weeks away. While voting by mail remains popular, its use has declined since 2020. Many voters appreciate the convenience and flexibility of voting from home, which allows them to research candidates and avoid taking time off work.

Leadership and Skepticism

Trump has played an active role in nominating the current postmaster general and several Republican nominees to the Postal Service board, some of whom have expressed skepticism about mail-in voting and the legitimacy of the 2020 election. These officials, if confirmed, would have substantial influence over the agency, although the Supreme Court has ruled that the president can remove independent agency board members at will.

Conclusion

President Trump’s executive order to tighten federal control over mail-in voting has raised alarms about the potential for widespread disruption in the upcoming election. The lack of evidence for large-scale noncitizen voting, combined with operational and constitutional challenges, underscores the risks of implementing such sweeping changes without adequate preparation. As millions of Americans rely on mail-in ballots, the consequences of these new policies could be far-reaching and deeply consequential for the integrity of the electoral process.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/whistleblower-warns-usps-rushing-new-system-that-could-jeopardize-mail-in-ballots

President Trump nominates Hung Cao as Navy Secretary

President Trump nominates Hung Cao as Navy Secretary

Administration News — 2026-09-01 20:40:00 — thehill.com

President Trump Announces Nomination of Hung Cao for Navy Secretary

President Trump announced on Tuesday that he would be nominating Hung Cao for Navy Secretary following the resignation of the previous officeholder in April. The announcement was made on Truth Social, where Trump stated, “We need Patriots like Hung leading our Navy and Marine Corps, and I can think of no one better than…”

Trump’s Endorsement and Its Implications

By publicly endorsing Hung Cao, Trump emphasized his belief that Cao embodies the qualities needed to lead the Navy and Marine Corps. The president’s statement highlighted his ongoing strategy of selecting individuals he describes as “patriots” for key roles within his administration.

No False Claims or Disparagements in This Statement

In this announcement, Trump did not make any false claims or disparaging remarks about others. The statement focused solely on his support for Hung Cao and the need for strong leadership in the Navy and Marine Corps.

Conclusion

President Trump’s nomination of Hung Cao for Navy Secretary underscores his approach to filling top military roles with individuals he considers loyal and capable. While this announcement did not include any of Trump’s characteristic false statements or attacks, it continues to reflect his practice of using social media to shape public perception and communicate his choices directly to his supporters.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/policy/defense/6065087-trump-nominates-hung-cao-navy/

Donald J. Trump: “I just informed Governor Greg Abbott, of the GREAT State of Texas (who has m…

Donald J. Trump: “I just informed Governor Greg Abbott, of the GREAT State of Texas (who has m…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-09-01 17:42:00 — www.trumpstruth.org

Trump Announces $50.5 Million for Texas Storm Recovery, Repeats Endorsements for GOP Candidates

Donald Trump announced, “I just informed Governor Greg Abbott, of the GREAT State of Texas (who has my Complete and Total Endorsement for Re-Election!), that I am sending 50.5 Million Dollars to assist recovery efforts from the severe storms, winds, tornadoes, and flooding that hit them hard.” Trump also reiterated his support for Abbott, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, and the entire Republican ticket in Texas, stating, “Texas is a special place, and I will be back soon to support Governor Abbott, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate, and the entire ticket of Republican Candidates, who have my Complete and Total Endorsement.”

Fact-Checking the Funding Claim

Trump’s statement that he is “sending 50.5 Million Dollars to assist recovery efforts” frames the funding as a personal action. In reality, disaster relief funds are allocated through established federal processes, not at the discretion of a single individual. Such funds are typically distributed by agencies like FEMA after requests from state officials and approval through federal channels. While presidents can announce and expedite such aid, the funds are not personally “sent” by Trump, but rather released as part of a coordinated government response.

Political Endorsements and Exaggerations

Trump’s message also serves as a campaign boost for Texas Republicans, repeating that Governor Abbott and others have his “Complete and Total Endorsement.” This language is consistent with Trump’s pattern of using superlatives and absolute terms to describe his political support. While endorsements are a routine part of political communication, the repeated emphasis on “Complete and Total Endorsement” is an exaggeration of his influence and is designed to energize his base.

Conclusion

Trump’s announcement of $50.5 million in disaster relief for Texas highlights his ongoing efforts to position himself as a decisive leader and benefactor. However, the claim that he is personally “sending” the funds misrepresents the established federal process for disaster aid. As with many of his public statements, Trump’s message blends official action with campaign rhetoric, using exaggeration and repetition to reinforce his political brand. Readers should be aware of the distinction between federal disaster response procedures and the personal credit claimed in Trump’s announcement.

Source article

Source: https://www.trumpstruth.org/statuses/41474

US may require parents to prove citizenship to get passports for their children | US immigration

US may require parents to prove citizenship to get passports for their children | US immigration

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-09-01 17:28:00 — www.theguardian.com

President Trump’s Push to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Faces Legal and Constitutional Hurdles

President Trump has made limiting birthright citizenship a central focus of his administration’s immigration agenda. According to State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott, “President Trump has been unequivocal that this administration will protect the meaning and value of American citizenship, full stop, and that includes making sure our passport adjudication process fully reflects that standard.” This statement comes as the State Department proposes new requirements for parents applying for passports for their children, demanding proof of parental citizenship or immigration status.

Crackdown on Birthright Citizenship

Trump’s efforts to restrict birthright citizenship have included executive orders aimed at narrowing who is eligible for automatic citizenship at birth. His initial order would have limited citizenship to children with at least one parent who was a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. However, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled this attempt unconstitutional in a 6-3 decision, finding it violated the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment.

Despite this setback, Trump’s August 6 executive order took aim at so-called “birth tourism,” targeting women who travel to the U.S. to give birth so their children can obtain citizenship. The latest draft guidance from the State Department outlines how the government would enforce this order, including requiring all parents or legal guardians to provide documentation of their citizenship or immigration status when applying for a child’s passport.

Fact-Check and Legal Challenges

The Supreme Court’s ruling directly contradicts Trump’s position, confirming that his initial attempt to restrict birthright citizenship was unlawful. The new directive, if implemented, would further withhold citizenship from children whose parents work for foreign governments in the U.S., are engaged in fraud or commercial transactions to obtain citizenship, or are classified as “alien enemies.”

Currently, parents of U.S.-born children only need to prove parentage and present photo identification when applying for a passport. Under Trump’s proposal, they would have to provide additional documentation, a significant change from existing procedures.

Ongoing Legal Battles

Lawyers representing babies who could be deprived of citizenship under Trump’s orders have filed class-action lawsuits, asking federal judges to block the latest directive from taking effect. The legal and constitutional challenges to Trump’s efforts underscore the ongoing controversy and uncertainty surrounding his push to redefine birthright citizenship.

Conclusion

President Trump’s campaign to limit birthright citizenship continues to face significant legal obstacles, with the Supreme Court already ruling against his broader efforts. His administration’s latest proposal represents a narrower, yet still controversial, attempt to change long-standing U.S. policy. As legal challenges proceed, the debate over the meaning and value of American citizenship remains at the forefront of the national conversation.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/01/parents-citizenship-passports-children

U.S. Strikes Iran Over Strait of Hormuz Mines, Trump Says

U.S. Strikes Iran Over Strait of Hormuz Mines, Trump Says

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-09-01 15:08:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Threatens Harsher Military Action Against Iran Amid Escalating Conflict

In the wake of renewed hostilities between the United States and Iran, President Trump has taken a hardline stance, publicly warning Iran of severe consequences if it retaliates against recent U.S. military strikes. In a social media post, Trump described the U.S. attacks as “large and powerful, and in retaliation for the Iranians’ failed attempt at adding sea mines to the Strait.” He further threatened, “If the failed Nation of Iran retaliates for this very justified attack, they will be hit again at a much harder and higher level.”

The latest exchange of strikes follows a brief period of calm, which ended after Trump pulled back from further escalation due to concerns over dwindling U.S. munition stockpiles. The president then unveiled a campaign aimed at crippling Iran’s economy, including enforcing a naval blockade and ramping up sanctions. However, the effectiveness of these measures remains in question, as enforcing sanctions on Iran is notoriously difficult and could provoke confrontations with powerful rivals, including China.

Iranian officials report that the U.S. strikes caused significant damage across several sites on Iran’s southern shores, including military and civilian targets. Local authorities in Hormozgan Province stated that a wedding ceremony and a residential home were struck, resulting in casualties. The U.S. Central Command has not commented on these specific claims.

The Trump administration’s aggressive posture has contributed to rising tensions in the region, with oil prices surging and fears of a broader conflict mounting. Despite the administration’s efforts to pressure Iran economically and militarily, the underlying issues fueling the conflict remain unresolved. A recent “memorandum of understanding” between Tehran and Washington quickly collapsed, and Iran continues to exert leverage by targeting ships in the Strait of Hormuz and demanding concessions to reopen the vital shipping corridor.

Trump’s public statements and the administration’s actions underscore a strategy of maximum pressure, but the risk of escalation and unintended consequences remains high. As both sides trade threats and strikes, the prospects for a durable solution appear increasingly remote.

In summary, President Trump’s rhetoric and policies have intensified the U.S.-Iran conflict, with his threats of harsher retaliation raising the stakes for both nations and the broader region. The situation remains volatile, and the world watches closely as events unfold.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/01/us/politics/us-launches-air-strikes-iran.html

Congress averts a government shutdown ahead of midterms : NPR

Congress averts a government shutdown ahead of midterms : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-09-01 13:06:00 — www.npr.org

President Trump is expected to sign a bipartisan measure that will extend federal government funding through December 11, temporarily averting a shutdown as midterm elections approach. The House passed the stopgap bill 370-48, following the Senate’s earlier approval, after negotiations on a longer-term funding solution broke down.

The White House encouraged lawmakers to support the continuing resolution, which maintains current spending levels with a few exceptions. This move comes after a year marked by two record-long government shutdowns, including a 43-day standoff over health insurance subsidies and a 76-day closure at the Department of Homeland Security amid contentious debates over immigration enforcement.

Trump’s immigration crackdown was a central issue during these shutdowns, elevating the national debate but ultimately leaving Democrats unable to secure concrete policy concessions. As Congress punts the funding fight until after the elections, Trump’s expected approval of the measure signals a temporary pause in the ongoing partisan battles over federal spending and immigration policy.

The decision to sign the stopgap bill highlights the administration’s willingness to avoid a politically damaging shutdown ahead of the elections, even as deeper disagreements remain unresolved. The months-long standoffs underscore the challenges of reaching bipartisan consensus on major issues, with Trump’s policies continuing to shape the contours of the debate.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/09/01/nx-s1-5951536/house-government-funding-vote-midterms

Donald J. Trump: “I am pleased to announce that Pastor Darrell Scott, a longtime friend, respe…

Donald J. Trump: “I am pleased to announce that Pastor Darrell Scott, a longtime friend, respe…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-09-01 11:22:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Announces Pastor Darrell Scott as Advisor on Tobacco Health Issues, Claims Action Delivers on Campaign Promise

President Donald J. Trump announced, “I am pleased to announce that Pastor Darrell Scott, a longtime friend, respected Faith Leader, and tireless Advocate for America’s Underserved Communities, will be serving my Administration and me as an Advisor for tobacco health issues on the Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD) in the CDC.” Trump’s statement frames the appointment as a significant step in addressing tobacco-related disease, particularly in communities he describes as “overlooked and underserved.”

Claims of Delivering on a Campaign Promise

Trump asserts that this move is “delivering on a Campaign promise,” suggesting that the appointment of Pastor Scott fulfills a specific pledge made during his campaign. However, there is no widely documented campaign promise from Trump specifically regarding the appointment of faith leaders or Pastor Scott to federal health advisory roles, nor a detailed plan for addressing tobacco health issues through such appointments. This claim appears to exaggerate the direct connection between the appointment and any explicit campaign commitment.

Emphasis on Underserved Communities

Trump’s statement highlights the toll of tobacco-related disease on “American Families, including Communities that have too often been overlooked and underserved.” While it is accurate that tobacco use disproportionately affects certain underserved populations, the announcement does not specify any new policy measures or targeted interventions that would directly address these disparities beyond the advisory appointment itself.

Praise for Pastor Scott

Trump describes Pastor Scott as “a GREAT LEADER with a tremendous heart for the people of our Country,” offering strong personal endorsement. While this is a subjective characterization rather than a factual claim, it underscores Trump’s tendency to use superlative language when discussing allies and appointees.

Conclusion

President Trump’s announcement of Pastor Darrell Scott’s appointment to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on tobacco health issues is presented as a fulfillment of a campaign promise and a step toward protecting underserved communities. However, the statement exaggerates the direct connection to any specific campaign pledge and lacks detail on substantive policy changes. The announcement continues Trump’s pattern of using broad, positive language to frame administrative decisions, while leaving questions about the concrete impact of such appointments on public health policy.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41444

How the Pentagon Is Getting Into the Venezuelan Oil Business Under Trump

How the Pentagon Is Getting Into the Venezuelan Oil Business Under Trump

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-09-01 11:12:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Announces Controversial Pentagon-Backed Oil Deal with Venezuela, Faces Scrutiny Over U.S. Military Involvement

President Trump announced Friday that the Pentagon, through its Office of Strategic Capital, has reached a deal with Venezuela to secure billions of barrels of oil reserves “through a partnership with private business.” Trump stated that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio negotiated the agreement with the Venezuelan government, which centers on a partnership with North American Blue Energy Partners, a company led by the polarizing international businessman Alejandro Betancourt López.

Deal Details and Government Stake

Under the terms described by Trump, the Pentagon would have the option to take up to a 35 percent stake in the parent company of Betancourt’s firm. This stake would be acquired through “penny warrants,” a financial instrument that allows the government to buy shares at a nominal price, often just one cent. The arrangement also guarantees the U.S. government preferential access to much of the oil produced by the company.

The White House claimed the deal would come “all at zero cost to the United States,” suggesting that the federal government’s involvement could help the company attract private investment and shield it from legal or political risks in Venezuela.

Criticism and Contradictions

The announcement has drawn sharp criticism from Democratic lawmakers. Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the move “a blatant abuse of power and taxpayer dollars,” demanding a full accounting of the legal authority and financial terms behind the deal.

There is also confusion and contradiction within the administration. While the Pentagon’s chief spokesman, Sean Parnell, claimed the office “does not take equity stakes in private companies,” the White House’s statement and reporting by The Wall Street Journal indicate the government could hold a 35 percent passive equity stake and receive warrants.

Potential Conflicts and Oversight Concerns

The Office of Strategic Capital, which was originally created to boost U.S. weapons manufacturing and reduce reliance on Chinese supply chains, has shifted its approach under Trump. The office, now led by David Lorch, has expanded its loan authority from $1 billion to $200 billion, largely due to Trump’s domestic policy legislation.

The office’s recent deals have raised concerns about conflicts of interest, including a $620 million loan to Vulcan Elements, a company with financial ties to Donald Trump Jr. This has prompted further scrutiny from Democratic senators.

Unusual Government Role and Long-Term Impact

The deal would also give the State Department the right of first refusal to buy the remaining 80 percent of the company’s oil output, an unusual role for the agency. Any decision to purchase oil for U.S. stockpiles would require Congressional authorization and is typically managed by the Energy Department.

Despite the sweeping terms, experts note that it could take years for new projects in Venezuela to produce meaningful amounts of oil.

Conclusion

President Trump’s announcement of the Pentagon-backed oil deal with Venezuela marks a significant and controversial shift in U.S. government involvement in foreign energy markets. The deal’s structure, potential conflicts of interest, and internal contradictions have sparked intense debate and calls for greater transparency and oversight. As the administration moves forward, the long-term implications for U.S. energy policy and military involvement in commercial ventures remain to be seen.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/31/us/politics/pentagon-venezuela-oil.html

Trump calls on Congress to pass film and TV tax incentive

Trump calls on Congress to pass film and TV tax incentive

Administration News — 2026-09-01 09:05:00 — thehill.com

President Trump Calls for Immediate Tax Incentives to Boost U.S. Film Industry

President Trump on Monday evening urged Congress to “immediately” approve federal tax incentives for movie and TV production. Posting on Truth Social, Trump stated that he had met earlier in the day with actor Jon Voight, and that their discussion centered on the movement of film industry jobs out of the United States to other countries.

Trump’s push for tax incentives highlights his position that federal action is needed to keep entertainment industry jobs within the U.S. He framed the issue as urgent, calling for swift congressional approval to address the ongoing trend of productions relocating overseas.

While Trump’s statement underscores his concern about job losses in the film sector, the excerpt does not include any specific false claims or disparagements. Instead, it presents his expressed position and advocacy for legislative action to support domestic film and TV production.

This latest call from Trump illustrates his continued use of social media to press for policy changes and to publicly align himself with prominent figures in the entertainment industry. As the debate over tax incentives and job retention continues, Trump’s stance is likely to remain a focal point in discussions about the future of American film and television production.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6063166-trump-proposes-federal-film-tax-incentives/

Whistleblower warns about USPS plan for Trump mail voting order : NPR

Whistleblower warns about USPS plan for Trump mail voting order : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-09-01 05:00:00 — www.npr.org

President Trump Defends USPS Voting Restrictions Despite Rare Evidence of Illegal Voting

President Trump has defended his directives for the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) and other federal agencies as necessary to prevent illegal voting by non-U.S. citizens, even though numerous studies and audits indicate that such illegal voting is extremely rare. This stance comes amid ongoing legal battles and significant controversy over the USPS’s rushed implementation of new, largely untested technology intended to comply with Trump’s executive order restricting mail-in voting.

Whistleblower Warnings and Legal Challenges

A newly released whistleblower report warns that the USPS could “derail” the midterm election if it continues to push forward with this untested technology. The report, submitted by a federal government official with direct knowledge of the project, claims that USPS leadership has ignored best practices in their haste to meet the president’s September 1 deadline. The whistleblower highlights a “zero-percent failure policy” for verifying mail-in ballots, which could result in massive delays and prevent states from mailing thousands of ballots.

Currently, key parts of the USPS plan remain blocked by a court order, with a federal judge in Boston recently issuing a temporary restraining order after finding the plan likely illegal. The judge noted that USPS lacks the authority to control voting by mail. The Trump administration has appealed this ruling, and further court decisions are expected as election officials and voters navigate the resulting uncertainty.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Despite President Trump’s repeated claims that his directives are needed to combat illegal voting by non-citizens, the excerpt notes that “many studies and audits show [illegal voting] is extremely rare.” This directly contradicts the justification Trump has provided for his controversial actions regarding mail-in ballots and the USPS.

Conclusion

President Trump’s push to restrict mail-in voting through the USPS is facing strong opposition from both legal authorities and internal whistleblowers, who warn that the rushed and untested system could disrupt the upcoming midterm elections. While Trump continues to defend his actions as necessary to prevent illegal voting, available evidence does not support his claims, raising further questions about the true impact and intent of his directives.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/09/01/nx-s1-5950869/trump-mail-in-voting-usps