President Zelenskyy and I just had a News Conference with the Fake News. It went very well. Everybody is looking for a solution. Very positive! President DONALD J. TRUMP

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-08 08:33:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Hails News Conference with Zelenskyy, Attacks Media as “Fake News”

President Donald J. Trump, following a joint news conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, characterized the event as highly successful and took aim at the media, labeling them “Fake News.” Trump stated, “President Zelenskyy and I just had a News Conference with the Fake News. It went very well. Everybody is looking for a solution. Very positive!”

Trump’s Continued Attacks on the Media

Trump’s use of the term “Fake News” to describe the press remains a hallmark of his public statements, especially during high-profile international events. By framing the media in this way, Trump seeks to undermine the credibility of journalists and news organizations that cover his administration critically. This pattern has been widely documented and fact-checked, as repeated attacks on the press can erode public trust in independent reporting.

Positive Spin Amid Ongoing Controversy

In his remarks, Trump asserted that the news conference “went very well” and described the overall tone as “very positive.” This characterization stands in contrast to the contentious issues often discussed in such meetings, including U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine and ongoing investigations. Trump’s tendency to put a positive spin on events, regardless of underlying tensions or critical questions from the press, is a recurring theme in his public communications.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

While Trump claimed that “everybody is looking for a solution,” the reality of diplomatic negotiations is often more complex. Fact-checkers have noted that such broad statements can obscure ongoing disagreements or unresolved issues between the parties involved. Trump’s optimistic portrayal may not fully reflect the challenges faced in U.S.-Ukraine relations or the scrutiny surrounding his interactions with foreign leaders.

Conclusion

President Trump’s remarks after the news conference with President Zelenskyy highlight his ongoing strategy of attacking the media and presenting an overly positive narrative. By labeling the press as “Fake News” and insisting on a successful outcome, Trump continues a pattern of statements that have been widely scrutinized and fact-checked for accuracy. Readers should remain aware of these tactics and seek out independent reporting to understand the full context of such high-profile events.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/39894

US judge throws out Trump’s $3.8bn defamation lawsuit against Washington Post | Washington Post

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-07-08 10:18:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit Against Washington Post Dismissed: Judge Finds No Malice in Reporting

A federal judge in Florida has dismissed Donald Trump’s $3.8 billion defamation lawsuit against the Washington Post, marking another legal setback in Trump’s ongoing battles with major media outlets. The lawsuit centered on a 2023 article that reported Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG) had received funding from a bank linked to the pornography industry as it built the Truth Social platform.

Trump’s Claims of Malice Rejected

Trump argued in court that the Washington Post acted with malice, calling the article an “egregious hit piece” and accusing the newspaper of engaging in a “years-long crusade” against him. However, Judge Thomas Patrick Barber, a Trump appointee, ruled that TMTG “failed to present evidence that would allow a jury to find by clear and convincing evidence” that the Post acted with actual malice—the legal standard required for a public figure to win a defamation case.

Pattern of Legal Defeats

This ruling is the latest in a series of defeats for Trump in lawsuits against media organizations. Earlier this year, separate Florida judges dismissed Trump’s actions against the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, and TMTG dropped a defamation claim against the Guardian.

Correction Issued by the Washington Post

The Washington Post published a correction to its original article in May, clarifying that “discovery in the ongoing litigation has established that Trump Media didn’t pay a loan referral fee of $240,000, as was stated in the article and was based on The Post’s reporting at the time of publication.” The Post also corrected its reporting that Trump Media and its merger partner failed to disclose the payment, acknowledging that “no such payment was made.”

Trump Media’s Response

In a statement to the Post, TMTG characterized the correction as a victory, stating: “After three years, The Washington Post finally admitted its harmful story was false. We believe a jury should decide whether these falsehoods were actionable and will evaluate whether to appeal last week’s ruling in due course. We will also continue to hold the media accountable.”

Conclusion

While Trump and his media company continue to claim they are the victims of false and malicious reporting, the courts have repeatedly found no evidence of actual malice or actionable defamation. The Washington Post’s correction addresses factual errors in its reporting, but the judge’s ruling underscores the high bar for public figures to prevail in defamation cases. As Trump’s legal challenges against the press continue to falter, the pattern highlights the difficulty of proving intentional falsehoods in high-profile media coverage.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/jul/08/trump-washington-post-defamation-lawsuit

WATCH LIVE: Trump holds news conference at NATO summit in Turkey

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-08 08:23:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Renews Attacks on NATO Allies, Demands Control of Greenland and Support for Iran Campaign

At a high-stakes NATO summit in Ankara, President Donald Trump reignited tensions with European allies by insisting that the United States should control Greenland and sharply criticizing NATO members for failing to support his military campaign against Iran.

Trump’s Renewed Push for Greenland

Trump again pressed his controversial claim that the U.S. should control Greenland, a semiautonomous Danish territory, stating, “We need it for protection of the world, not just the United States.” He dismissed Denmark’s interest in Greenland, asserting it is “very important” for the U.S. but not for Denmark. This stance was directly rebuffed by Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who emphasized that “Greenland is of course not for sale” and underscored Denmark’s commitment to defending its territory as part of NATO.

Criticism and Threats Toward NATO Partners

Arriving at the summit, Trump blasted several European countries for refusing to participate in his Iran campaign, singling out Spain as “a terrible partner in NATO” and renewing threats to cut off trade. He has repeatedly demanded increased defense spending from NATO members, arguing that the U.S. bears an unfair share of the burden. Despite recent increases in defense budgets by several allies, Trump dismissed these efforts and continued to demand “loyalty,” branding NATO a “paper tiger” after some countries declined to provide open access to their bases for U.S. operations against Iran.

Dismissal of Iran Negotiations

Trump also declared the interim agreement with Iran effectively dead, saying, “For me, I think it’s over,” and described further talks as “just a waste of time dealing with them.” This hardline stance comes after U.S. strikes on Iran in response to attacks on merchant ships, actions that were praised by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte as “absolutely necessary.”

Impact on NATO Unity

Trump’s repeated disparagements and demands have, in the past, pushed European countries to close ranks. However, his renewed interest in Greenland and continued criticism of allies threaten to undermine the unity of the alliance at a time when it faces significant external threats from Russia and ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Iran.

Conclusion

President Trump’s combative approach at the Ankara summit highlights his ongoing willingness to challenge NATO norms, disparage allies, and pursue controversial territorial claims. His statements and demands risk deepening rifts within the alliance, raising questions about the future cohesion and effectiveness of NATO as it confronts mounting security challenges.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/watch-live-trump-holds-news-conference-at-nato-summit-in-turkey

Trump calls to cut off all US trade with Spain

Administration News — 2026-07-08 06:44:00 — thehill.com

President Trump Calls for End to U.S. Trade with Spain, Labels Country a “Wasted Cause”

During remarks at the NATO summit early Wednesday, President Trump sharply criticized Spain, urging the United States to cut off all trade with the European country. Trump justified his stance by accusing Spain of failing to contribute adequately to defense spending. He declared, “Spain is a wasted cause. We don’t want to do any trade business with Spain anymore.”

Trump’s comments represent a significant escalation in his rhetoric toward a key NATO ally. By labeling Spain as a “wasted cause” and advocating for a complete halt to trade, Trump not only disparaged the country but also threatened to disrupt longstanding economic and diplomatic ties. His remarks were made in the context of ongoing debates within NATO about member nations’ defense budgets, an issue Trump has repeatedly highlighted during his presidency.

Fact-checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s assertion that Spain is not contributing to NATO defense spending is a common theme in his public statements about U.S. allies. However, such claims often overlook the complexities of NATO funding and the various ways member countries support the alliance. While some NATO members, including Spain, have faced criticism for not meeting the alliance’s target of spending 2% of GDP on defense, they continue to participate in joint operations and contribute in other meaningful ways.

Trump’s call to end trade with Spain is an extreme response that goes far beyond standard diplomatic pressure. The president’s statement risks undermining the U.S.-Spain relationship and could have significant economic repercussions for both countries.

Conclusion

President Trump’s remarks at the NATO summit, in which he called Spain a “wasted cause” and urged the U.S. to cease all trade with the country, highlight his willingness to use harsh rhetoric and sweeping proposals against allies he perceives as not meeting their obligations. These statements continue a pattern of exaggeration and disparagement that has characterized Trump’s approach to international relations. As the debate over NATO spending persists, Trump’s comments are likely to fuel further controversy and diplomatic tension.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5958540-donald-trump-us-spain-trade/

TFunding for prevention of teen pregnancy cut by Trump’s HHS : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-07-08 06:00:00 — www.npr.org

The Trump Administration’s Crackdown on Teen Pregnancy Prevention Grants: Fact-Checking the Claims

The Trump administration took a hardline stance on federally funded teen pregnancy prevention programs, issuing a directive that program materials must “reflect the immutable biological reality of sex, not radical gender ideology, and may not promote anti-American ideologies such as discriminatory equity ideology.” The administration required organizations to comply with five executive orders or risk losing their grants, stating, “Programs with such unauthorized content are not eligible for federal funding.”

Sweeping Cuts Despite Compliance

Organizations scrambled to revise their curricula to meet these new requirements. Healthy Futures of Texas, for example, adapted 11 different programs and was repeatedly told its materials were in compliance. Yet, in late June, the Department of Health and Human Services abruptly canceled all but a dozen Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program grants across the country, totaling $66 million, citing “misalignment with agency priority, specifically normalizing sexual activity for minors.”

False and Disparaging Claims

President Trump’s budget request claimed, “There is no evidence that these specific programs have contributed to this historic decline in teen pregnancy, which is now at an all-time low. Moreover, TPP issues grants to problematic organizations like abortion clinics that waste American taxpayer dollars on abortion services and promote radical leftist ideology.” However, the excerpt notes that the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program was established after rigorous evaluation, including randomized controlled trials—considered the gold standard for public policy effectiveness. The programs funded were shown to reduce teen pregnancy and increase healthy behaviors.

Contradictory Actions

Despite the administration’s repeated attacks on these programs and the claim that they were ineffective and ideologically problematic, Trump also signed $101 million in funding for the program into law earlier in the year. This contradiction was highlighted by Senate and House Democrats, who demanded that the funding be reinstated.

Conclusion

The Trump administration’s actions and statements regarding teen pregnancy prevention funding were marked by sweeping claims that contradicted established evidence and the administration’s own actions. While the administration disparaged the effectiveness and intent of these programs, independent evaluations and the program’s legislative history show that they were based on proven methods and rigorous research. The abrupt funding cuts have left many organizations scrambling and threaten to reverse progress in reducing teen pregnancy rates, especially in vulnerable communities.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/07/08/nx-s1-5885054/teen-pregnancy-prevention-trump-hhs

Donald J. Trump: “” – Trump’s Truth

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-07-08 00:04:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Urges Congress to Prioritize SAVE AMERICA Act, Emphasizes Military Strength

In a statement embedded in a tweet by Senator Mike Lee, Donald J. Trump called on Congress to prioritize the SAVE AMERICA ACT, tying its passage to the strength of the U.S. military and ongoing budget negotiations. Trump’s message, highlighted in the tweet, underscores his push for legislative action, stating the importance of both defense funding and the SAVE AMERICA ACT, alongside references to “Reconciliation 3.0.”

Trump’s Position on Legislative Priorities

Trump’s statement emphasizes the strength of the U.S. military, using it as a central argument for why Congress should act on the SAVE AMERICA ACT. By linking military funding with the legislative agenda, Trump positions the act as a matter of national strength and urgency. This approach is consistent with his broader rhetorical strategy of framing policy debates around themes of national security and American power.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

While Trump asserts the importance of the SAVE AMERICA ACT and the strength of the U.S. military, the excerpt does not provide specific factual claims or attacks on individuals that require further fact-checking. Instead, it reflects Trump’s ongoing pattern of using strong, patriotic language to advocate for his preferred policies and legislative outcomes.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s latest statement, as shared in Senator Mike Lee’s tweet, continues his practice of linking legislative priorities to themes of military strength and national security. While the excerpt does not contain specific false claims or disparagements, it provides a clear example of Trump’s rhetorical style and his efforts to shape Congressional action through public statements. Readers should remain attentive to the broader context and factual basis of such claims as legislative debates continue.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/39892

A Look Back at Trump’s Broadsides Against NATO Allies

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-07-08 01:07:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump’s Longstanding Attacks on NATO: False Claims, Threats, and Insults

Donald Trump has made NATO a frequent target, repeatedly criticizing the alliance and its members with a series of false claims, threats, and disparaging remarks. As NATO leaders gathered in Ankara, Turkey, Trump again berated allies for not supporting the U.S. in its war against Iran, stating, “Italy turned us down, and Germany turned us down, and France turned us down,” and adding, “And in a way, I was testing people.”

Military Spending: Accusations and Threats

Trump has consistently accused NATO members of being “delinquent” in their military spending, portraying them as freeloaders benefiting from what he calls Washington’s “one-way” protection. In 2018, he referred to Americans as “the schmucks that are paying for the whole thing.” When Spain was the only NATO member not to commit to a large increase in military spending, Trump labeled the country a “laggard” and floated the idea of punishing Spain with higher tariffs, saying, “I’m very unhappy with Spain. I was thinking of giving them trade punishment through tariffs because of what they did.” He escalated his rhetoric further by threatening to end all trade with Spain after Madrid refused U.S. military access for the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran—though none of these threats materialized.

Undermining Collective Defense

Trump has repeatedly questioned NATO’s core principle of collective defense, as outlined in Article 5 of the alliance’s founding charter. He told reporters, “If they don’t pay, I’m not going to defend them.” At a 2024 campaign rally, he went further, recounting his response to a hypothetical scenario in which Russia attacked a NATO member that had not “paid up”: “No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You’ve got to pay. You got to pay your bills.”

Casting Doubt on Defending Allies

Trump has also cast doubt on whether the U.S. would defend smaller NATO members, using Montenegro as an example. In 2018, he described Montenegro as “a tiny country with very strong people,” and suggested that defending it could lead to global conflict: “They may get aggressive, and congratulations, you’re in World War III.”

Dismissing NATO Contributions

Trump has minimized the contributions of NATO allies, particularly regarding military operations. In a Fox Business interview, he claimed, “We have never really asked anything of them. You know, they’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that. And they did. They stayed a little back, little off the front lines.” This remark drew strong criticism from Britain, which lost 457 service members during the Afghanistan war—the only time NATO’s collective security agreement was invoked.

Conclusion

Trump’s record on NATO is marked by a pattern of false statements, exaggerations, and open hostility toward allies. His rhetoric has repeatedly undermined the alliance’s unity and questioned the U.S. commitment to mutual defense, raising concerns among America’s closest partners and drawing sharp rebukes from leaders abroad. As NATO continues to play a critical role in global security, Trump’s statements and threats remain a significant point of contention within the alliance.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/08/world/europe/trump-nato-criticism.html

News Wrap: Judge rejects Trump’s attempt to collect Georgia election worker info

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-07-07 17:45:00 — www.pbs.org

President Trump Repeats Baseless Claims of Voter Fraud in Georgia

President Trump has repeatedly claimed, without evidence, that voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia—a heavily Democratic area—was responsible for his loss in the state during the 2020 election. These assertions have been a central part of his ongoing efforts to challenge the election results.

Federal Judge Rejects Trump Administration’s Subpoena

A federal judge, who was appointed by Trump, rejected the Trump administration’s attempt to collect the names and contact information of every Fulton County election worker from the 2020 election. In his ruling, the judge stated that the need for the subpoenaed information was low and that the disclosure would be highly burdensome, making the request unreasonable.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

The excerpt makes clear that President Trump’s repeated claims of widespread voter fraud in Fulton County are not supported by evidence. Despite these assertions, no credible proof has emerged to substantiate the allegations, and the courts have consistently found no basis for such claims.

Conclusion

President Trump’s continued promotion of unfounded claims about voter fraud in Georgia has been directly contradicted by judicial rulings and the lack of supporting evidence. The federal judge’s decision to deny the administration’s sweeping subpoena further underscores the absence of justification for these allegations. As the legal process unfolds, the facts remain clear: the claims of voter fraud in Fulton County have not been substantiated.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/news-wrap-judge-rejects-trumps-attempt-to-collect-georgia-election-worker-info

U.S. Strikes Iran and Reimposes Sanctions After Tanker Attacks

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-07-07 22:07:00 — www.nytimes.com

President Trump Downplays Iran Conflict as U.S. Launches Airstrikes and Revokes Oil Waiver

President Trump has downplayed the escalating conflict with Iran, describing recent military actions as “not even a war,” but rather “a military operation” and “a denuclearization.” This statement came as the United States carried out airstrikes against more than 80 Iranian targets on Tuesday, following attacks on three commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz that the Pentagon attributed to Iran.

Trump’s comments, made during a meeting with NATO leaders in Ankara, Turkey, sought to minimize the severity of the situation. Despite his characterization, the U.S. response was significant, targeting Iranian air defense systems, command and control networks, coastal radar sites, anti-ship missile capabilities, and over 60 Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps boats. The strikes were approved and ordered by Trump while he attended the NATO summit, according to a U.S. official.

The U.S. also revoked a waiver that had allowed Iran to sell oil on the global market, further tightening economic pressure. The waiver had been intended as an incentive for Iran to adhere to a preliminary peace accord, but its removal came just 60 days into what Trump had prematurely celebrated as a peace agreement.

Trump’s approach to the conflict has been marked by a tendency to downplay its gravity, even as the region faces renewed instability and the risk of broader violence. His administration’s actions—both militarily and economically—have complicated ongoing negotiations with Iran, which are now paused following the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

As the situation develops, Trump’s public minimization of the conflict stands in contrast to the scale of the U.S. military response and the potential for further escalation in the region. The president’s statements and decisions continue to shape the fragile dynamics between Washington and Tehran, with global energy supplies and regional security hanging in the balance.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/07/us/politics/us-strikes-iran-tanker-attacks.html

Trump renews call for US to take over Greenland as he arrives for Nato summit | Nato

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-07-07 16:49:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump Threatens NATO Withdrawal, Revives Greenland Bid, and Attacks European Allies

Donald Trump has reignited his controversial proposal for the United States to acquire Greenland, while also threatening to withdraw all American troops from Europe in response to what he describes as repeated pushback from the continent. Speaking at the NATO summit in Ankara, Trump linked his wavering commitment to defending Europe to political decisions by European leaders on immigration and energy, suggesting these issues have fundamentally changed the region.

Trump criticized former UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, claiming that Starmer’s decision to keep the UK out of the war against Iran contributed to his political downfall. Trump asserted, “I was very disappointed with Nato. We weren’t treated well because we did something in Iran. We don’t need anybody’s help, but before I asked they said they wouldn’t be there.” He further claimed, “In the case of the United Kingdom, the prime minister, I guess he’s no longer there, maybe because of this, it was a very unpopular thing he did. He said: ‘No, we’ll help after the war is over.’ I said: ‘We don’t need that kind of help.’” In reality, Starmer’s stance was popular with the British public, contradicting Trump’s assertion.

Reviving a previous dispute, Trump argued that Denmark’s refusal to sell Greenland had “hurt” his relationship with NATO, stating, “Denmark doesn’t spend money to really help Greenland, but it’s an important part for the US, and it’s surrounded by China ships and Russian ships … [It] should be controlled by the US, not by Denmark. And when they wouldn’t go along with it, and with all the money we spend to help them with Russia…” This claim ignores the fact that Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, and its future is determined by its own people and Denmark, not the US.

Trump also threatened to remove all US soldiers from Europe, warning, “We don’t have to spend any money; we could remove all of our soldiers out of Europe because, as you probably noticed, Europe’s a very different place than it was 20 years ago … they better be careful with immigration and energy. If they’re not careful with those two things, you’re not going to have a Europe any more.”

Renewing his longstanding criticism of NATO allies, Trump accused European members of not spending enough on defense and being overly reliant on the US. “Why are we spending hundreds of billions of dollars and they’re not there for us? We’ve always been there for them,” he said. However, NATO’s mutual defense clause has only been triggered once—after the September 11 attacks—when allies joined US troops in Afghanistan, underscoring the alliance’s record of support for the US.

Conclusion

Trump’s statements at the NATO summit reflect a pattern of exaggerations, misstatements, and confrontational rhetoric toward America’s European allies. His revived interest in acquiring Greenland, threats to withdraw US troops, and repeated claims about NATO burden-sharing continue to strain transatlantic relations and misrepresent the facts on the ground. As European nations move forward with new defense collaborations, Trump’s posture raises ongoing questions about the future of the alliance and America’s role within it.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/07/trump-renews-call-us-take-over-greenland-nato