News Wrap: 2 men rescued from Nepal tunnel 9 days after catastrophic flood

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-09-04 17:45:00 — www.pbs.org

President Trump Downplays U.S. Military Deaths in Iran Conflict

President Donald Trump sought to minimize the severity of the ongoing conflict between the United States and Iran, telling reporters, “A lot of people don’t call it a war. I call it a military conflict because it’s small potatoes for us. It’s not a big thing.” This statement comes despite the fact that at least 18 U.S. service members have died and hundreds more have been wounded since the U.S. and Israel first launched military strikes on Iran more than six months ago.

Minimizing the Cost of Conflict

Trump’s remarks were made in response to questions about Vice President J.D. Vance’s recent comments, in which Vance said he “wouldn’t call it a war.” Trump largely agreed, characterizing the U.S. involvement as “intermittent strikes” and downplaying the scale and impact of the military operations.

Fact-Checking the Reality

The president’s attempt to reframe the conflict as “small potatoes” stands in stark contrast to the significant human cost already incurred. The death of 18 American service members and the wounding of hundreds more underscore the seriousness of the ongoing hostilities. By dismissing the conflict as “not a big thing,” Trump misrepresents the scale of U.S. military engagement and the sacrifices made by American personnel.

Conclusion

President Trump’s comments reflect a pattern of minimizing or distorting the realities of U.S. military actions abroad. As the conflict continues and the toll rises, it is crucial for the public to have an accurate understanding of the costs and consequences involved. The president’s statements risk obscuring the true impact of the war in Iran on American service members and their families.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/news-wrap-2-men-rescued-from-nepal-tunnel-9-days-after-catastrophic-flood

Part 1: Donald Trump is the Counter Revolution:

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-09-06 21:35:00 — www.trumpstruth.org

In a recent post on Truth Social, Donald J. Trump criticized musician Bruce Springsteen for speaking negatively about him while abroad. Trump expressed his longstanding dislike for Springsteen’s music and political views, labeling him as “not a talented guy” and “a pushy, obnoxious JERK.” He also disparaged Springsteen’s physical appearance, referring to him as a “dried out ‘prune’ of a rocker” with “atrophied” skin. Trump suggested that Springsteen should “KEEP HIS MOUTH SHUT” until returning to the United States, implying potential consequences upon his return. (truthsocial.com)

This post exemplifies Trump’s pattern of attacking individuals who criticize him, often resorting to personal insults and derogatory language. Such behavior raises concerns about the tone and nature of political discourse, especially when it involves public figures engaging in personal attacks.

Source article

Source: https://www.trumpstruth.org/statuses/41594

Trump to speak at both nights of RNC midterm convention

Administration News — 2026-09-06 19:23:00 — thehill.com

President Trump to Deliver Key Addresses at Republican National Committee’s Inaugural Midterm Convention

President Trump is set to play a central role at the Republican National Committee’s inaugural midterm convention in Dallas, according to The Hill’s broadcast partner NewsNation. Trump is scheduled to give the keynote address on the first night of the event and will also deliver closing remarks on the second night.

Trump’s Prominent Convention Role

The announcement confirms that President Trump will not only open the convention but also close it, underscoring his continued influence within the Republican Party. His dual appearances are expected to set the tone for the event and signal the party’s alignment with his leadership and messaging.

No False Claims or Attacks Reported in Excerpt

While Trump’s upcoming speeches are likely to draw significant attention and scrutiny, the excerpt does not include any specific false claims, distortions, or attacks made by Trump in relation to this event. The focus remains on his scheduled participation and the official confirmation of his speaking roles.

Conclusion

President Trump’s selection as both keynote and closing speaker at the Republican National Committee’s Dallas convention highlights his ongoing prominence in party affairs. As the event approaches, observers will be watching closely for the content and tone of his remarks, which are expected to shape the party’s messaging heading into the midterm elections.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6074352-trump-rnc-midterm-convention-two-speeches/

Donald J. Trump: “Many people suggested changing the name of New Mexico, one of the great vote…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-09-06 18:36:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Suggests Renaming New Mexico, Calls State “One of the Great Vote Cheating States of All Time”

In a recent statement, President Donald J. Trump claimed, “Many people suggested changing the name of New Mexico, one of the great vote cheating states of all time, to NEW AMERICA. So much more prestigious and beautiful for the people of that potentially incredible State. Wow, I Love It!!!”

Baseless Claims of Election Fraud

Trump’s assertion that New Mexico is “one of the great vote cheating states of all time” continues his pattern of making unsubstantiated allegations about widespread election fraud. There is no credible evidence to support the claim that New Mexico has engaged in large-scale vote cheating. State and federal officials, as well as independent observers, have repeatedly found no basis for such accusations in New Mexico’s election history.

Exaggerated Proposals and Disparagement

By suggesting that New Mexico should be renamed “NEW AMERICA,” Trump not only exaggerates the supposed problems with the state’s elections but also disparages its identity. His statement frames the state as fundamentally flawed, despite the lack of factual support for his claims. This follows a broader trend in Trump’s rhetoric, where he frequently attacks the legitimacy of election processes and the integrity of states that did not support him.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Record

Fact-checkers have consistently debunked Trump’s repeated claims of widespread voter fraud in various states, including New Mexico. The state has implemented robust election security measures, and its results have been certified without credible evidence of fraud. Trump’s latest remarks represent another instance of his ongoing effort to undermine confidence in the electoral system with false and exaggerated statements.

Conclusion

Trump’s recent comments about New Mexico are part of a familiar pattern: making unsupported allegations of election fraud and disparaging states that do not align with his political interests. Despite his claims, there is no evidence to justify renaming New Mexico or labeling it as a hub of vote cheating. These statements serve to sow doubt and division rather than inform or improve the electoral process. Readers should be aware of the facts and recognize the lack of substantiation behind such rhetoric.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41579

Trump administration makes another appeal to Supreme Court to allow mail ballot restrictions

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-09-06 10:15:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Administration Pushes Supreme Court to Reinstate Mail Ballot Restrictions Amid False Claims of Fraud

The Trump administration has renewed its push for the Supreme Court to allow new restrictions on mail ballots ahead of the upcoming midterm elections, citing President Donald Trump’s executive order. This marks the third time the administration has asked the high court to intervene, even as states begin mailing ballots and face tight deadlines to implement any changes.

Trump’s Ongoing Effort to Limit Mail Voting

President Trump has consistently sought to limit mail voting, despite frequently using mail ballots himself. He has repeatedly and falsely blamed mail-in voting for his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden, spreading baseless claims of widespread fraud. These assertions have been widely debunked, yet Trump continues to promote the narrative that mail balloting undermines election integrity.

Legal Battle Over New Restrictions

The administration’s latest filing argues that the injunction against Trump’s executive order is causing “confusion and chaos” as states prepare for the election. Solicitor General John Sauer, representing the administration, claims that allowing the injunction to remain makes compliance with the new rules voluntary instead of mandatory, which he says could disrupt the election process.

However, voting rights groups and Democratic-led states argue that the proposed changes are unconstitutional and impossible to implement on such short notice without disenfranchising voters who rely on mail ballots. The ACLU has called the Postal Service rule “unconstitutional and unlawful,” warning that enforcing it so close to the election would “rob eligible voters of their essential right to make their voices heard in our democracy.”

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Trump’s claims about mail ballot fraud have been repeatedly proven false. Despite his efforts, he has not succeeded in altering the longstanding procedures for mail voting. Nearly one-third of U.S. voters cast mail ballots, and there is no credible evidence supporting Trump’s assertions that this method leads to widespread fraud.

Conclusion

As the Supreme Court considers the Trump administration’s request, the stakes remain high for this year’s elections. Trump’s persistent false claims about mail voting continue to fuel legal battles and public confusion, but so far, the courts have not endorsed his efforts to restrict access to mail ballots. The outcome of this legal fight will have significant implications for voter access and the integrity of the electoral process.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-administration-makes-another-appeal-to-supreme-court-to-allow-mail-ballot-restrictions

For Trump’s Former Fixer, a Tortured Path From ‘Rat’ to Reconciliation

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-09-06 18:14:00 — www.nytimes.com

Donald Trump Promotes False Claim About Michael Cohen Recanting Testimony

In a recent radio conversation, Donald Trump asserted that Michael Cohen, his former personal lawyer, had recanted his previous testimony against him—a claim that is demonstrably false. Trump told Cohen, “You took it back. I wouldn’t even be talking to you right now if you didn’t, to be honest.” This statement directly contradicts the public record and Cohen’s own consistent assertions.

Trump’s insistence on this narrative appears to be a strategic move, making clear that any reconciliation with Cohen was contingent on Cohen disavowing his sworn statements. The excerpt shows Trump “focused on promoting the fiction that Mr. Cohen had recanted his testimony,” despite no evidence supporting this claim.

Cohen, who has described the personal and professional devastation he experienced after breaking with Trump, has not withdrawn or altered his testimony. Instead, the record shows that Cohen has repeatedly stood by his statements, even as he has faced intense public scrutiny and legal consequences.

Trump’s repeated promotion of this falsehood is part of a broader pattern of misstatements and distortions aimed at undermining the credibility of those who testify against him. By insisting that Cohen “took it back,” Trump not only misrepresents the facts but also attempts to rewrite the narrative for his own benefit.

This episode highlights Trump’s ongoing efforts to blur the line between fact and fiction, particularly when it comes to legal challenges and public accountability. As the legal and political battles continue, Trump’s willingness to promote demonstrably false claims remains a central feature of his public posture.

In summary, Trump’s statement about Cohen recanting his testimony is not supported by any factual evidence and stands as another example of his pattern of making false claims to serve his interests. Readers should be aware of the persistent use of such tactics as the former president seeks to shape public perception and defend himself against mounting legal scrutiny.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/06/us/politics/michael-cohen-donald-trump-interview.html

Trump says White House helipad work is done after August project restart

Administration News — 2026-09-06 16:15:00 — thehill.com

President Trump Announces Completion of White House Helipad, Cites Eisenhower as First President to Use Helicopter

President Trump on Sunday announced that the White House helipad, which was redone at his request last month, has been completed. In his announcement, Trump posted a photo of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on the White House lawn before departing in an Air Force H-13J helicopter in July 1957, noting that Eisenhower was the first U.S. president to fly in a helicopter from the White House grounds.

Highlighting the recent renovation, Trump’s statement draws a direct line between his administration’s updates to the White House infrastructure and a historical moment in presidential transportation. By referencing Eisenhower’s use of the helicopter, Trump positioned the helipad’s completion as part of a longstanding tradition of modernizing presidential travel.

While the announcement focused on the helipad’s completion and its historical context, it did not include any false claims or disparagements. The statement remains factual in its description of Eisenhower’s pioneering helicopter flight and the recent work on the helipad.

In summary, President Trump’s announcement underscores his administration’s attention to White House facilities and connects the present with a notable moment in presidential history. The completion of the helipad at Trump’s request marks another chapter in the evolution of presidential transportation.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6074141-trump-completes-white-house-helipad/

Witkoff and Kushner call Kyiv talks ‘substantive’ after Moscow Putin meeting : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-09-06 04:51:00 — www.npr.org

President Trump Signals New Proposals in Ukraine Talks, Faces Stalemate Over Russian Demands

President Trump had suggested that his envoys, Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, were bringing new proposals to Ukraine in a fresh round of U.S.-brokered diplomacy. However, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has shown little willingness to consider the territorial concessions that Moscow insists are non-negotiable—a sticking point that has stalled previous negotiations.

The Trump administration’s diplomatic push comes after Kushner and Witkoff held lengthy, closed-door talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, which produced no announced breakthrough toward ending the war. Following those discussions, Kushner described the meetings in Kyiv with Zelenskyy as “substantive,” while Witkoff said he was “very encouraged.” Details of the proposals or any progress remain unclear, with both sides tight-lipped about specifics.

Zelenskyy reiterated before meeting the U.S. envoys that any agreement must include security guarantees and a “dignified post-war peace.” The persistent impasse over Russia’s territorial demands continues to block meaningful progress, despite President Trump’s claims of new diplomatic efforts.

As the conflict grinds on, both Ukrainian and Russian forces have intensified air attacks, and concerns are mounting among NATO members about Russian sabotage and cyberattacks in Europe. The situation remains tense, with little indication that the Trump administration’s latest diplomatic overtures will resolve the deadlock over Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

In summary, while President Trump has positioned his administration as actively seeking a resolution to the Ukraine conflict, the fundamental disagreements over territorial concessions remain unresolved, casting doubt on the prospects for a breakthrough.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/09/06/nx-s1-5959657/us-envoys-witkoff-kushner-talks-in-kyiv-putin-moscow

The Mar-a-Lago Club is considered, by everyone, to be the Best in the World. It also serves as our unparalleled Southern White House, free of charge. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! President DONALD J. TRUMP

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-09-06 14:43:00 — trumpstruth.org

Donald Trump Declares Mar-a-Lago “the Best in the World,” Claims It Serves as “Unparalleled Southern White House”

In a statement, President Donald J. Trump asserted, “The Mar-a-Lago Club is considered, by everyone, to be the Best in the World. It also serves as our unparalleled Southern White House, free of charge. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

Trump’s Bold Claims About Mar-a-Lago

President Trump’s remarks position Mar-a-Lago as not only a world-class club but also as a central hub for presidential activity, dubbing it the “Southern White House.” His claim that the club is “considered, by everyone, to be the Best in the World” is a sweeping generalization not supported by objective evidence or universal consensus. While Mar-a-Lago is indeed a prominent and historic property, there is no independent verification that it holds such a distinction globally or that “everyone” shares this view.

Fact-Checking the “Free of Charge” Assertion

Trump also stated that Mar-a-Lago serves as the “unparalleled Southern White House, free of charge.” This assertion has been scrutinized in the past, as the costs associated with presidential visits—including security, staffing, and logistics—are typically borne by taxpayers, even if the venue itself does not charge the government for use. The claim that it is “free of charge” overlooks these significant public expenses.

Conclusion: Exaggerations and Unverified Claims

President Trump’s statements about Mar-a-Lago reflect a pattern of exaggeration and self-promotion. While the club is a notable property and has hosted presidential activities, the claims that it is universally regarded as the best in the world and that it operates as a cost-free “Southern White House” are not substantiated by independent facts. Readers should approach such assertions with a critical eye, recognizing the distinction between promotional language and verifiable reality.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41568

Trump again asks supreme court to restrict mail-in voting as midterms loom | US voting rights

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-09-06 11:23:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump Administration Pushes Supreme Court to Reinstate Mail-In Voting Restrictions Amid Baseless Fraud Claims

The Trump administration has renewed its appeal to the US Supreme Court to allow new restrictions on mail-in voting, following a federal judge’s decision to block enforcement of Donald Trump’s executive order just ahead of the November midterm elections.

Executive Order and Legal Battle

Donald Trump signed an executive order in March that would prohibit the US Postal Service (USPS) from delivering ballots to any voters not on a federal list of citizens deemed eligible to vote by the Department of Homeland Security. This move would sharply limit ballot delivery, restricting it only to voters on approved lists. The administration has described these restrictions as “commonsense measures” aimed at protecting voting security and has called the court order blocking them “unreasoned and unlawful.”

Fact-Checked Claims and Contradictions

Trump has repeatedly sought to restrict voting by mail, despite having used the method himself in the past. He has falsely blamed mail-in balloting for his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden, promoting baseless claims of widespread fraud. These allegations have been widely debunked, but Trump continues to use them to justify efforts to limit mail-in voting.

Impact and Opposition

Democratic states and voting rights groups argue that Trump’s ordered changes are unconstitutional. State election officials warn there is not enough time to overhaul their systems to comply with the new federal directives. Nearly one-third of US voters cast their ballots by mail, making the outcome of this legal dispute critical for the upcoming elections and control of Congress.

Conclusion

Trump’s ongoing campaign to restrict mail-in voting is rooted in false claims about election fraud and contradicts his own history of using mail ballots. As the legal battle continues, the stakes remain high for voters and the integrity of the electoral process. The administration’s push for restrictive measures, despite a lack of evidence supporting their necessity, highlights the persistent spread of misinformation around voting security.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/06/trump-administration-supreme-court-mail-in-voting