Donald J. Trump: “Lots of “bluster” from Doug Ford, who is the Premier of the Canadian Provinc…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-24 13:03:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Launches Broadside Against Canadian Leadership, Issues False Claims About U.S.-Canada Relations

President Donald J. Trump has issued a scathing statement targeting Canadian officials and the country’s economic relationship with the United States, making a series of exaggerated and false claims about Canada’s dependence on its southern neighbor.

Trump’s Attacks on Canadian Leaders

In his remarks, Trump disparaged Ontario Premier Doug Ford, calling him “the less charismatic, intelligent, and overall unimpressive brother of the late, great, Rob Ford.” He further described Ford as a “Flunky” to “Governor Carney,” a reference that appears to conflate Mark Carney, the former Bank of Canada governor, with a political office he does not hold. Trump’s language was pointed and personal, referring to Canadian leaders as “clowns” and warning that “the consequences for Canada will be far WORSE” if they do not “fall in line.”

False Claims About Canada’s Economy

Trump asserted, “Without the United States, Canada couldn’t survive — It’s where they get all of their money.” He went on to claim that “Canada’s Unemployment Rate is now at 10%, and rapidly rising,” and that “their businesses are fleeing for the United States, and it’s all because of their failed policies, and inept leadership!”

These statements misrepresent the facts. Canada’s unemployment rate has not reached 10% in recent years; as of early 2024, it has remained well below that figure. The claim that Canadian businesses are fleeing en masse to the United States is not supported by available economic data. While cross-border investment and trade are significant, the Canadian economy is diversified and not solely dependent on the U.S. for its survival.

Exaggerations on Energy and Trade

Trump also stated, “much of the Electricity, Oil, and Gas that Canada gets is transported through the U.S.A.,” and suggested that Canada is “ripping off our Farmers, and other Businesses.” While it is true that the two countries share extensive energy infrastructure and trade, the relationship is mutually beneficial, with both nations exporting and importing energy and agricultural products.

Conclusion: Rhetoric Versus Reality

President Trump’s latest comments about Canada are marked by personal attacks and a series of misleading statements about the economic relationship between the two countries. While the U.S. and Canada have a complex and sometimes contentious partnership, Trump’s depiction of Canada as wholly dependent and economically mismanaged does not align with the facts. Such rhetoric risks undermining the longstanding cooperation that has benefited both nations for decades.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41175

Trump announces new 50% tariff on Canadian cars, trucks and steel | Trump tariffs

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-08-24 13:55:00 — www.theguardian.com

Trump Announces Sweeping 50% Tariff on Canadian Automobiles and Raw Materials, Escalates Rhetoric Against Canada

Donald Trump has announced a new 50% tariff on automobiles and crucial raw materials from Canada, marking a significant escalation in trade tensions between the two countries. The tariffs, set to begin January 1, 2027, will apply to all cars, trucks, automobile parts, and steel imported from Canada.

Trump’s Claims and Attacks on Canada

Trump justified the move by attacking Canada’s trade practices, claiming on social media that Canada has been “ripping off” the United States “for years.” He further disparaged Canada, writing on Truth Social: “On Trade, and in other ways, also, they are among the worst Nations in the World to deal with. They feel entitled, and yet, WE DON’T NEED CANADA, THEY NEED US! They do 95% of their business with the U.S., with us, the exact opposite!”

These statements exaggerate the economic relationship between the two countries. While the U.S. is Canada’s largest trading partner, the claim that Canada does “95% of their business with the U.S.” is not supported by official trade data. According to the office of the U.S. trade representative, total trade between the two nations is roughly $909 billion, but Canada maintains diverse trading relationships beyond the United States.

Canadian Response and Economic Impact

Canadian officials, including Mark Carney, responded by noting that Trump’s announcement was expected and framed it as retaliation for what Canada views as unjustified American tariffs. Carney highlighted the importance of Canadian demand to American workers, stating that Canada is the largest customer for U.S. automobiles—more than the European Union, Japan, Korea, and the United Kingdom combined.

Carney also rejected a recent deal to lower tariffs, arguing that the U.S. “asked too much and they offered too little,” and vowed to match the American tariffs “dollar for dollar.” He emphasized that Canada would be ready to negotiate when the U.S. approaches talks with a “true partnership” mindset.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Statements

Trump’s rhetoric about Canada “ripping off” the U.S. and his assertion that the U.S. does not need Canada are not supported by the facts. The two countries have long been deeply intertwined economically, with millions of jobs on both sides of the border dependent on cross-border trade. The U.S. automotive industry, in particular, relies heavily on Canadian parts and demand.

Trump’s claim that Canada does “95% of their business with the U.S.” is a significant exaggeration. While the U.S. is indeed Canada’s largest trading partner, the actual percentage is much lower, and Canada’s economy is not as dependent on the U.S. as Trump suggests.

Conclusion

Trump’s announcement of sweeping new tariffs and his inflammatory statements about Canada represent a sharp departure from decades of close economic partnership. His repeated exaggerations and attacks risk further destabilizing a relationship that supports jobs and industries in both countries. As Canada vows to respond in kind, the future of North American trade remains uncertain, with workers and businesses on both sides of the border facing the consequences of escalating rhetoric and policy.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/24/canada-tariff-increase-trump-auto

WATCH: Bessent announces new sanctions to block Iran’s revenue streams

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-24 11:30:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Claims “Iran Is Completely Collapsing” as U.S. Ramps Up Sanctions

Donald Trump escalated his rhetoric against Iran on social media, declaring that “IRAN IS COMPLETELY COLLAPSING!!!” as the U.S. administration announced a new round of sanctions aimed at blocking all potential sources of revenue for Tehran. The statement comes amid a deepening economic crisis in Iran, with the country’s currency, the rial, plunging to a record low of 2.02 million to the U.S. dollar and inflation soaring.

Trump’s Boast and the Reality on the Ground

Trump’s claim of total collapse exaggerates the situation. While Iran’s economy is under severe strain—marked by double-digit inflation, negative growth, and skyrocketing prices for staples like rice and beef—the country has not ceased to function. The International Monetary Fund forecasts a contraction of more than 5% in Iran’s GDP, and daily life has become increasingly unaffordable for ordinary Iranians. However, Iran retains strategic leverage by disrupting shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil transit route, and has not shown signs of political capitulation.

Administration’s Pressure Campaign

The administration, seeking to break the ongoing impasse, has promised even stronger sanctions, including secondary sanctions on countries that continue to do business with Iran. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized that “it’s no longer acceptable to operate in the gray spaces” of the conflict and warned that any economic engagement with Iran would “expose those responsible to the full reach of American power.”

Fact-Checking the Collapse Narrative

Despite Trump’s assertion, the excerpt provides no evidence that Iran is “completely collapsing.” Instead, it details a battered but still functioning economy, ongoing government operations, and continued regional influence. The administration’s own actions—imposing new sanctions and seeking international cooperation—suggest that Iran remains a significant actor on the world stage, not a state in total collapse.

Conclusion

Trump’s social media post exaggerates the extent of Iran’s economic crisis. While U.S. sanctions have undeniably inflicted serious damage, Iran’s government and economy have not collapsed. The administration’s continued focus on sanctions and diplomatic maneuvering underscores the complexity of the situation and the limits of Trump’s narrative. Readers should approach such sweeping claims with caution and look to the facts on the ground for a more accurate picture.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/watch-bessent-announces-new-round-of-iran-sanctions

Trump Lays It on the Line for Darline Graham Ahead of South Carolina Runoff

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-24 12:59:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Ramps Up Pressure in South Carolina Senate Runoff, Stakes His Political Clout on Darline Graham

In the final days before South Carolina’s high-stakes Republican Senate runoff, President Trump has gone all-in for Senator Darline Graham, making personal calls to top state officials and rallying supporters in Myrtle Beach. Trump’s efforts include urging endorsements from influential figures and deploying his advisers’ super PAC, MAGA Inc., to fund get-out-the-vote text messages—an unusual move for the group this election cycle.

Trump’s credibility is on the line in a state that has recently rebuffed his preferences. Earlier this year, South Carolina’s Republican-led State Senate declined to advance a congressional map backed by Trump that would have eliminated the state’s only majority Black district. In June, voters dismissed Trump’s initial pick for governor, forcing him to make a late-stage second endorsement. With several high-profile losses in other states, Trump’s national endorsement record is under scrutiny, and a defeat for Graham would be a significant setback.

At a Myrtle Beach rally, Trump defended Graham’s lack of foreign policy experience, telling the crowd, “You know, she’s never done it before, but she knows politics well. But she loves our military; she loves things that have to do with greatness for America.” His remarks came after Graham admitted during a televised debate that she was “not that informed on national security,” a moment that drew criticism and skepticism from voters and local officials.

Despite Trump’s push, there is visible resistance among South Carolina’s Republican base to what some describe as “top-down” politics. State Treasurer Curtis Loftis, who backs Graham’s opponent Ralph Norman, dismissed the process as “inside establishment B.S.,” arguing that Graham’s candidacy was foisted on the state by the president and governor.

Trump’s aggressive involvement—calling Governor Henry McMaster and even reaching out to former critic Mark Sanford to seek endorsements for Graham—underscores the importance he places on this race. However, Sanford ultimately endorsed Norman, citing concerns about the nation’s financial direction.

As the runoff approaches, Trump’s heavy-handed approach is being tested in a state known for its independent-minded voters. The outcome will not only determine the Republican nominee but also serve as a referendum on Trump’s influence within the party and his ability to sway local races.

Conclusion

President Trump’s deep involvement in the South Carolina Senate runoff highlights both his determination to shape the Republican field and the limits of his political capital in a state with a tradition of resisting outside pressure. As voters head to the polls, the results will reveal whether Trump’s endorsement remains a decisive force—or if local skepticism prevails.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/24/us/politics/trump-graham-south-carolina-endorsement.html

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to unveil new economic sanctions on Iran : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-08-24 07:26:00 — www.npr.org

President Trump has labeled the upcoming round of economic sanctions on Iran as an “economic D-Day” and vowed to target other countries that provide an economic lifeline to Tehran. This escalation comes as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent prepares to announce what he described as the “single greatest financial offensive ever” against Iran.

Sanctions Strategy and Global Impact

Trump’s rhetoric signals a shift in U.S. strategy, with a focus not only on businesses but also on governments that facilitate financial flows to Iran. The administration has already imposed extensive sanctions on Iran, some dating back nearly 50 years, and recently tightened penalties for entities helping Iran evade restrictions. A months-long U.S. naval blockade has further isolated Iran by cutting off most goods from the outside world.

In anticipation of the new measures, Iran’s currency, the Rial, has plunged to a record low. Trump’s pledge to go after countries aiding Iran appears aimed especially at China, which has historically purchased about 90 percent of Iran’s oil.

Skepticism Over Effectiveness

Despite Trump’s aggressive stance, some analysts question whether additional sanctions will have any real impact. Alan Eyre, a former U.S. diplomat involved in Iran nuclear negotiations, told NPR that the U.S. has already exhausted all meaningful sanction options, saying, “there are no new sanctions that are effective.”

Escalating Tensions and Humanitarian Concerns

Iran’s leadership has threatened “seismic” retaliation against any new U.S. economic warfare, warning Gulf states that participation in the sanctions could make them targets. Since the U.S. and Israel launched their war on Iran nearly six months ago, Iran has attacked U.S. bases and Gulf countries, resulting in injuries and fatalities. Iran has also threatened to further disrupt oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could worsen already historic disruptions to global energy supplies.

Meanwhile, ordinary Iranians continue to bear the brunt of the economic fallout. With inflation nearing 90 percent and the currency in freefall, many Iranians are forced to buy food on credit and struggle to afford basic necessities, including lifesaving medicines. The worsening economic situation has fueled public protests, which have been met with violent crackdowns.

Conclusion

President Trump’s declaration of an “economic D-Day” against Iran marks a dramatic escalation in U.S. policy, but experts question whether further sanctions can achieve their intended goals. As the administration doubles down on its hardline approach, the primary impact may be felt by ordinary Iranians already suffering under decades of economic pressure and conflict. The effectiveness and humanitarian consequences of this strategy remain deeply contested.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/08/24/g-s1-139743/treasury-secretary-scott-bessent-to-unveil-new-economic-sanctions-on-iran

Donald J. Trump: “Canada has been ripping off the United States of America for years. Their ri…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-24 08:38:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Escalates Rhetoric Against Canada, Announces Steep Tariff Hike and Makes Disputed Claims

President Donald J. Trump has sharply escalated his criticism of Canada, accusing the country of unfair trade practices and announcing sweeping new tariffs set to take effect in 2027. In a statement, Trump declared, “Canada has been ripping off the United States of America for years. Their ridiculously high tariffs on our Farmers and farm products has made life impossible for these great American Patriots, and has long created a 60 Billion Dollar Deficit between our two Countries. Not sustainable, and NOT ANYMORE!”

Tariff Threats and Sweeping Accusations

Trump stated that, starting January 1, 2027, tariffs on all cars, trucks, automotive parts, and steel imported from Canada will rise to 50%. He further claimed, “Build in the U.S. and there are ZERO TARIFFS. Canada will be treated like a State no longer!” Trump went on to disparage Canada’s trade practices, saying, “they are among the worst Nations in the World to deal with. They feel entitled, and yet, WE DON’T NEED CANADA, THEY NEED US! They do 95% of their business with the U.S., with us, the exact opposite!”

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

Several of Trump’s assertions are at odds with established economic data and trade records:

• Trade Deficit Exaggeration: Trump’s claim of a “60 Billion Dollar Deficit” with Canada is not supported by official U.S. government statistics. According to the Office of the United States Trade Representative, the U.S. typically runs a modest trade surplus in services with Canada, and the overall goods and services trade deficit is far lower than Trump’s figure.
• Tariff Misstatements: Trump’s assertion that Canadian tariffs on U.S. farm products are “ridiculously high” and have “made life impossible” for American farmers is misleading. While some Canadian tariffs exist, both nations have relatively low average tariff rates, and U.S. agricultural exports to Canada remain robust.
• Business Dependency Claim: The statement that Canada does “95% of their business with the U.S.” is a significant exaggeration. While the U.S. is Canada’s largest trading partner, the actual figure is much lower, and Canada maintains diverse trade relationships globally.
• Disparagement of Canada: Trump’s characterization of Canada as “among the worst Nations in the World to deal with” and his assertion that “they feel entitled” represent a sharp break from diplomatic norms and are not grounded in objective trade analysis.

Conclusion: Rhetoric vs. Reality

President Trump’s latest remarks and proposed tariff increases mark a dramatic escalation in his ongoing criticism of Canada. However, his statements are riddled with exaggerations and factual inaccuracies regarding trade balances, tariffs, and the nature of U.S.-Canada economic relations. As the debate over trade policy continues, Trump’s rhetoric highlights the importance of fact-based analysis and the risks of inflaming tensions with longstanding allies through misleading claims.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41154

Can Democrats Win Back the Senate? Why Their Chances Are Improving.

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-24 04:03:00 — www.nytimes.com

As the Senate map shifts, President Trump’s approach to the economic fallout from his policies is drawing sharp criticism and putting Republicans on the defensive in key battleground states. Amid rising costs of fuel, food, and health services—driven in part by Trump’s war with Iran—voters are expressing deep unease about his handling of the economy.

Trump’s Response to Economic Concerns

In May, as the average gas price soared to $4.56 a gallon, Trump dismissed the financial strain on Americans, asserting that the economic costs of the conflict with Iran were justified by national security interests. He told reporters, “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation.” Later, in a cabinet meeting, he declared, “I don’t care about the midterms,” signaling indifference to the political consequences of his administration’s actions.

This posture of nonchalance comes as inflation continues to outpace wage growth, leaving many voters feeling pessimistic about the economy. In states like Alaska and Ohio, where gas prices and other economic pressures are hitting especially hard, Democrats see new opportunities to compete in traditionally Republican territory.

Motivating the Republican Base

Trump has also voiced concern about Republican turnout in election cycles when he is not on the ballot. At a recent rally in South Carolina, he urged supporters, “Pretend, please, that I’m on the ballot,” in an attempt to energize his base and offset his approval rating, which has dipped below 40 percent.

Implications for the Senate Battle

The combination of Trump’s dismissive comments about Americans’ financial struggles and his efforts to rally the Republican base underscores the challenges facing his party. With Democrats energized and out-raising their GOP opponents in several key races, the once solid Republican advantage in the Senate is now in jeopardy.

Conclusion

President Trump’s public statements—minimizing the economic pain felt by voters and expressing indifference to the political stakes—are fueling Democratic hopes and Republican anxieties as the fight for Senate control intensifies. As economic discontent grows, Trump’s record and rhetoric are likely to remain at the center of the debate in the months ahead.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/24/us/politics/democrats-republicans-midterms-senate-majority.html

Trump's 'economic D-Day' on Iran puts China in the crosshairs

Administration News — 2026-08-24 05:00:00 — thehill.com

Trump’s Economic Offensive Against Iran Puts China in the Crosshairs

President Trump’s announcement of a major economic warfare campaign against Iran has not only escalated tensions with the Islamic republic but also placed China, Iran’s largest trading partner and primary purchaser of its oil exports, directly in the spotlight. Trump’s threats to target any country, business, or banking institution supporting Iran come at a time when diplomatic efforts have unraveled.

Trump’s Threats Extend Beyond Iran

According to the excerpt, Trump has made clear his intention to go after any entity that continues to do business with Iran. This sweeping threat includes China, which has maintained robust trade relations with Iran, particularly in the oil sector. By expanding the scope of economic pressure, Trump is signaling a willingness to confront not just Iran but also major global players who defy U.S. sanctions.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims and Posture

Trump’s position, as reported, is to threaten punitive action against countries and businesses supporting Iran. The excerpt does not provide specific false claims or disparagements, but it does highlight Trump’s aggressive posture and the unraveling of diplomatic efforts. The president’s stance marks a significant escalation from previous policies, and his threats are directly attributable to him.

Impact on International Relations

The president’s approach risks further straining U.S. relations with China and complicates efforts to resolve tensions with Iran through diplomacy. By targeting China, Trump is potentially igniting a broader economic conflict that could have far-reaching consequences for global markets and stability.

Conclusion

President Trump’s threats to penalize any country or business supporting Iran, including China, represent a dramatic escalation in his administration’s economic campaign. As diplomatic channels falter, Trump’s aggressive posture places both Iran and its key trading partners in the crosshairs, raising the stakes for international relations and economic stability. Readers should closely watch how these threats unfold and their impact on global affairs.

Source article

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6044341-trump-iran-economic-warfare-china/

[No Title] – Post from August 24, 2026

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-24 00:28:00 — trumpstruth.org

In a recent post on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump claimed that his cognitive test results demonstrated “extreme intelligence.” This assertion has been fact-checked and rated as false by PolitiFact. (politifact.com)

Trump’s statement about his cognitive test results is part of a broader pattern of false or misleading claims. For instance, he has previously stated that the U.S. has received promises of investments totaling $18 trillion to $22 trillion since January, a claim that has also been debunked. (politifact.com)

Additionally, Trump has made inaccurate statements regarding international affairs. In a Fox News interview, he claimed that in Venezuela, “We’re making hundreds of billions of dollars (in oil revenue), and so are they,” which was fact-checked and found to be false. (politifact.com)

These instances highlight a consistent pattern of false statements from Trump, underscoring the importance of fact-checking and verifying information from public figures.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/41150

U.S. and Canada fall deeper into a trade war with new tariffs as talks collapse and blame is spread

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-22 10:30:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump’s Tariffs on Canada Mark Sharp Break from Decades of Cooperation, Spark Economic and Political Fallout

President Donald Trump’s decision to impose steep tariffs on Canadian goods has pushed the United States and Canada into a deepening trade war, upending a historically close alliance and raising prices for consumers on both sides of the border.

Trump’s administration has made tariffs a central part of its economic agenda, with new import taxes now hitting about 5% of Canada’s annual exports to the U.S.—from hockey sticks to tongue depressors. The move comes after failed negotiations in Washington, with both sides blaming each other for the collapse. Canada has announced retaliatory penalties set to begin September 8.

Trump’s trade team, led by chief negotiator Jamieson Greer, has justified the tariffs as necessary countermeasures after what they describe as a year of Canadian retaliation. “We’ve said enough, and so we’ve taken countermeasures. Our interest is in protecting American workers and protecting American supply chains,” Greer said.

The Trump administration claims it offered to cut tariffs on sensitive Canadian exports like steel, autos, and lumber, but insists Canada rejected a favorable deal. Trump’s posture has been to push for more concessions, with his administration stating that Canada “always had the best deal, and they still would have an even better deal, but they didn’t want that.”

However, Canadian officials, led by Prime Minister Carney, argue that U.S. demands were excessive and would have undermined Canada’s ability to negotiate trade deals with other countries and protect its own industries and cultural sovereignty. Carney called the U.S. approach “unacceptable,” accusing Washington of using “economic integration as a weapon.”

Trump’s approach represents a dramatic departure from the traditionally cooperative relationship between the two countries. Notably, he has made inflammatory remarks about turning Canada into America’s 51st state, further straining diplomatic ties.

The tariffs are expected to have significant economic and political consequences. With nearly three-quarters of Canada’s exports going to the U.S., and American voters already frustrated by high prices, the fallout could be felt widely. Business leaders warn that the escalating trade war risks raising costs for families and disrupting vital supply chains.

Trump’s legal justification for the new tariffs relies on Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, a rarely used provision from the Depression era. The Supreme Court recently struck down much of Trump’s earlier tariff program, ruling that he had overstepped his authority. The administration’s turn to this obscure law—part of the infamous Smoot-Hawley tariff framework blamed for deepening the Great Depression—marks an unprecedented step in U.S.-Canada trade relations.

As talks to renew the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement stall, the rift between the U.S. and Canada raises doubts about the future of North American trade. Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy and combative rhetoric have left a legacy of mistrust, with both countries now facing the political and economic costs of a fractured partnership.

Conclusion

President Trump’s tariff escalation against Canada signals a sharp break from decades of cooperation, driven by a hardline trade agenda and combative tactics. The fallout threatens not only economic stability but also the trust that has long defined U.S.-Canada relations, leaving both nations searching for a way forward amid rising tensions and uncertainty.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/u-s-imposes-50-tariffs-on-20-billion-worth-of-canadian-products-canada-says-it-will-retaliate