Home Blog Page 3

The U.S. Is Burning Through Weapons in Iran. Russia and China Are Taking Note.

The U.S. Is Burning Through Weapons in Iran. Russia and China Are Taking Note.

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-08 11:59:00 — www.nytimes.com

Trump Downplays U.S. Munitions Crisis as Iran War Depletes Stockpiles

President Trump has repeatedly downplayed or denied the severity of U.S. weapons shortages, even as his war against Iran has left American and allied forces more vulnerable to threats from Russia, China, and North Korea, according to senior officials and defense experts.

Trump’s Public Stance vs. Private Alarm

Despite warnings from military leaders, including Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, about the risks of further depleting already strained stockpiles, Trump pressed ahead with the Iran campaign, believing it would end quickly. After launching attacks on Iran alongside Israel on February 28, Trump repeatedly promised a swift victory. More than five months later, the conflict continues, with the U.S. unable to force Iran to capitulate or find a way to end the war.

Privately, Trump has expressed anger over news reports highlighting the munitions shortage, ordering a widespread leak investigation and demanding criminal prosecutions. He has told advisers that public discussion of the crisis signals weakness to America’s enemies. In public, Trump continues to downplay the issue, deny its existence, or blame his predecessor, President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

When asked by a reporter about Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s plea for more air-defense missiles, Trump responded, “We want missiles too.” On social media, he insisted that the United States had “massive amounts of ‘munitions,’ especially of certain types.” While it is true that the U.S. maintains a large arsenal of less advanced munitions, experts note that many of these require close-range deployment, putting American aircraft at greater risk. Crucially, the U.S. military has largely exhausted its stocks of certain long-range missiles—such as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles—during the Iran war, leaving the country less prepared for potential conflicts with Russia or China.

Impact on U.S. and Allies

The depletion of air-defense missiles has forced the Pentagon to divert resources from Asia and Europe to the Middle East, eroding American firepower in those regions and delaying deliveries to allied nations. This has led to growing concerns among U.S. military and intelligence officials, as well as among allies who now question America’s ability to provide nonnuclear defense. Some fear that countries like South Korea and Japan may seek their own nuclear deterrents as a result.

The shortage is also having immediate consequences in Ukraine, where Zelensky reported a threefold drop in the number of air-defense missiles provided by Western allies this year. On a recent day, Ukraine failed to intercept any of the 28 missiles fired by Russia, resulting in at least 17 deaths. Experts attribute this shortfall in part to the diversion of munitions to the Iran conflict.

Conclusion

Despite President Trump’s public denials and efforts to shift blame, the facts on the ground reveal a significant and growing munitions crisis that is undermining U.S. and allied security. As experts warn, replenishing depleted stockpiles could take years, leaving a window of vulnerability that adversaries like Russia and China may seek to exploit. The long-term consequences of Trump’s decisions in the Iran war are likely to shape global security for years to come.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/08/us/politics/pentagon-weapons-stockpiles-china-russia.html

Donald J. Trump: "RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/117059577812036128"

Donald J. Trump: "RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/117059577812036128"

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-08 06:10:00 — trumpstruth.org

In a late-night Truth Social post, President Donald Trump reacted angrily to a report by The Washington Post detailing a tense encounter with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at Camp David. Trump, allegedly furious over being misled about depleted U.S. arms due to the Iran conflict, appeared to confirm the incident publicly, despite earlier denials from his aide Karoline Leavitt. Trump insisted the U.S. has ample munitions and warned that those leaking sensitive information would face long-term imprisonment.

Trump’s anger was reportedly triggered by a CNN report stating that 80% of U.S. air-defense interceptors had been used in the Iran war, leaving stockpiles dangerously low. Hegseth, in turn, blamed his deputy, Stephen Feinberg, who fielded a harsh call from Trump and held a Pentagon “crisis” meeting to address the issue.

The administration has faced multiple damaging leaks, including a secret White House meeting about the mishandling of the Jeffrey Epstein case files and concerns over a $400 million jet gifted by Qatar. Key aides, including Susie Wiles and Kash Patel, reportedly launched internal investigations to trace the sources of various leaks.

Highlights:

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40658

Trump loyalist Todd Blanche confirmed by Senate as US attorney general | Trump administration

Trump loyalist Todd Blanche confirmed by Senate as US attorney general | Trump administration

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-08-08 07:34:00 — www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump Secures Confirmation of Personal Attorney Todd Blanche as Attorney General

In a significant victory for Donald Trump, the U.S. Senate narrowly confirmed Todd Blanche—Trump’s former personal attorney—as attorney general, placing a close Trump ally at the helm of the nation’s law enforcement. The Republican-led Senate voted 50-49, with Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana casting the deciding vote after two Republicans, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, joined all Democrats in opposing the nomination.

Blanche, who has already been leading the Justice Department in an acting capacity, was at the center of controversy over a proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization fund” and a deal granting tax immunity to the president, his sons, and his businesses. The fund, which critics labeled a “slush fund,” was reportedly intended to reward January 6 protesters, according to Senator Murkowski, who cited this as a reason for her opposition.

The confirmation process highlighted deep divisions over the politicization of the Justice Department under Trump. Scores of career attorneys have left the department during Blanche’s tenure, and judges across the country have rebuked department lawyers for misrepresentations to the court. Blanche has also been instrumental in Trump’s efforts to use the Justice Department to pursue political rivals, including indictments against former FBI director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and the Southern Poverty Law Center—cases widely viewed as lacking in substance.

Blanche’s leadership has also been criticized for mishandling files related to Jeffrey Epstein, with inappropriate redactions and the exposure of victims’ names. During his confirmation hearing, Blanche initially refused to meet with Epstein victims, later relenting but providing few answers.

Blanche’s close relationship with Trump is clear. He left a lucrative partnership to represent Trump in 2023 and has described working for Trump as “the greatest honor of a lifetime.” In April, he stated, “If he chooses to nominate somebody else and asks me to go do something else, I will say, ‘Thank you very much. I love you, sir.’ I don’t have any goals or aspirations beyond that.”

The confirmation drew sharp criticism from Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, who said Republicans have “handed Trump an excuse on a silver platter” to continue his “pervasive, breathtaking corruption” by confirming his personal attorney as attorney general. Schumer argued, “If you want to wipe out corruption, you can’t have the president’s personal attorney as the attorney general. You don’t need a PhD in political science to know that.”

Blanche’s confirmation cements Trump’s influence over the Justice Department, raising concerns about the department’s independence and the potential for further politicization of federal law enforcement. As the new attorney general, Blanche is expected to continue advancing Trump’s agenda, including promises to anti-abortion advocates to make the Dobbs decision permanent in every state.

The Senate’s decision marks a turning point in the relationship between the executive branch and the nation’s top law enforcement agency, with Trump’s personal attorney now in charge and critics warning of the risks of unchecked presidential power.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/08/todd-blanche-attorney-general-confirmed

Colombia’s new president reflects Latin America’s right-wing shift

Colombia’s new president reflects Latin America’s right-wing shift

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-07 17:35:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Endorses Colombia’s New Right-Wing President, Signals Closer U.S. Ties

In June, Donald Trump publicly endorsed Abelardo de la Espriella, then a candidate in Colombia’s presidential race, stating, “de la Espriella fights tirelessly for and loves his great country and people, just like I do for the United States of America.” This endorsement, as reported, marked a clear alignment between Trump and the rightward shift in Colombian politics.

Following de la Espriella’s narrow victory, Trump further demonstrated his support by sending a U.S. delegation—including acting Attorney General Todd Blanche—to the inauguration. This move underscored the Trump administration’s intention to strengthen ties with Colombia’s new leadership.

Observers noted that de la Espriella is among the latest in a wave of right-wing Latin American leaders championed by Trump. Analysts from the Heritage Foundation highlighted that there is “very little daylight between the United States and Colombia under these two leaders,” suggesting that Trump’s administration is actively seeking closer cooperation with conservative governments in the region.

The Trump administration’s engagement is expected to have significant influence on Colombia’s direction, particularly regarding security and anti-narcotics efforts. Human rights advocates, however, have raised concerns about the potential consequences of a hardline approach, citing past increases in extrajudicial killings and disproportionate impacts on rural and minority communities.

Trump’s endorsement and subsequent actions signal a new era of U.S.-Colombia relations, with the administration’s expectations likely to shape policy decisions in Bogotá. As Colombia pivots to the right, the Trump White House’s support for de la Espriella is poised to play a central role in the country’s evolving political landscape.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/colombias-new-president-reflects-latin-americas-right-wing-shift

Blanche on track for narrow Senate confirmation as attorney general

Blanche on track for narrow Senate confirmation as attorney general

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-07 17:45:00 — www.pbs.org

Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a Republican who recently lost his primary after being targeted by President Trump, cited Trump’s influence as a key factor in the razor-thin confirmation process for attorney general nominee Todd Blanche. Cassidy’s remarks on the Senate floor highlighted the stark choice facing the chamber: “The choice is not between perfection and Mr. Blanche. It is between Mr. Blanche and another acting attorney general who may not run the department effectively under President Trump and who indeed may not be as good as Mr. Blanche.”

Trump’s Role in Senate Divisions

Cassidy’s loss in the primary was directly attributed to President Trump’s opposition, underscoring the former president’s ongoing sway over Republican politics. The Senate’s efforts to confirm Blanche came down to a single vote, with Cassidy’s support proving decisive. The absence of Senator Mitch McConnell, another key Republican, was noted as “benefiting the president,” further illustrating how Trump’s influence continues to shape outcomes in the Senate.

Concerns Over Presidential Power

The Senate also passed the toughest sanctions bill on Russia to date, a move described as the most powerful statement yet in support of Ukraine. However, the report noted that “there is some concern because this gives a lot of power to President Trump from some,” indicating unease among lawmakers about expanding executive authority under Trump’s leadership. Despite these concerns, the urgency of countering Russia’s actions took precedence as the bill advanced to the House.

Conclusion

The day’s events at the Capitol showcased the persistent divisions within the Republican Party, many of which are fueled by President Trump’s ongoing interventions and influence. As the Senate navigates high-stakes decisions on nominees and foreign policy, Trump’s presence continues to loom large—shaping votes, driving party dynamics, and raising questions about the balance of power in Washington.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/blanche-on-track-for-narrow-senate-confirmation-as-attorney-general

Max Miller Continues to Resist Pressure to Drop Out as Deadline Looms

Max Miller Continues to Resist Pressure to Drop Out as Deadline Looms

NYT > U.S. > Politics — 2026-08-07 18:19:00 — www.nytimes.com

Representative Max Miller, a Republican from Ohio facing serious allegations of physical abuse from his ex-wife and young daughter, has chosen to resist mounting pressure from party leaders to withdraw from his re-election campaign. According to the excerpt, Miller told President Trump in a phone call earlier this week that he intended to “do as the president had done amid his own scandals: fight through it.” Trump, for his part, urged Miller to consider his odds but stopped short of directly requesting that Miller withdraw from the race.

## Trump’s Approach: Fight Through Scandal

Miller’s decision to remain in the race, despite public calls for his resignation and the threat of losing a reliably Republican seat, appears to be influenced by Trump’s own approach to political crises. The excerpt reports that Miller explicitly referenced Trump’s strategy of weathering scandals rather than stepping aside, signaling that Trump’s posture has become a model for embattled allies within the party.

## Trump Stops Short of Calling for Withdrawal

While Trump advised Miller to weigh his chances, he did not join other Republican leaders in demanding Miller’s exit from the race. This stands in contrast to the actions of Ohio Senator Jon Husted and the head of the Center for Christian Virtue, both of whom publicly called for Miller to step aside. Trump’s reluctance to press for Miller’s withdrawal underscores his tendency to avoid direct intervention in the political fates of loyalists, even amid serious allegations.

## The Broader Impact

The excerpt highlights that Republican officials fear the accusations against Miller could jeopardize a safe seat in a critical election cycle. Despite these concerns, Trump’s response—counseling caution but not demanding action—reflects a pattern seen throughout his political career: encouraging embattled allies to fight on, rather than bow to public or party pressure.

## Conclusion

Miller’s invocation of Trump’s example demonstrates the lasting influence of Trump’s combative approach to scandal management within the Republican Party. By stopping short of calling for Miller’s withdrawal, Trump once again signals his preference for resilience over resignation, even as party leaders warn of the potential electoral costs. This episode serves as another example of how Trump’s personal political strategy continues to shape the actions and attitudes of Republican officeholders facing controversy.

Source article

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/07/us/politics/max-miller-gop.html

ICE will only release body camera video when in agency’s ‘best interests,’ policy says

ICE will only release body camera video when in agency’s ‘best interests,’ policy says

PBS News Hour – Politics — 2026-08-07 18:35:00 — www.pbs.org

Trump Rescinds Body Camera Mandate for Federal Agents Amid ICE Accountability Concerns

President Donald Trump’s administration has come under scrutiny after rescinding a Biden-era order that required federal law enforcement agencies to use body cameras. This move, made after Trump returned to office in 2025, has drawn criticism from experts and former officials who argue that the lack of transparency undermines public trust and accountability—especially as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers have faced increased pressure following fatal shootings during Trump’s immigration crackdown.

ICE Delays and Policy Gaps

ICE began testing body cameras in 2021 under President Joe Biden, distributing 1,400 devices and promising further expansion as funding allowed. However, after Trump took office again, his administration not only rescinded the federal body camera requirement but also delayed purchasing additional cameras—even after Congress provided a historic $75 billion funding boost to the agency in 2025. ICE only began significant camera purchases in July, following several high-profile shootings and mounting pressure from lawmakers.

Critics, including Jason Houser, ICE chief of staff under Biden, have accused the Trump administration of “slow-rolling” the deployment of body cameras. Houser argued that the administration should have equipped officers with cameras when it ramped up mass arrests and traffic stops, rather than waiting for public outcry after fatal incidents. He described the delayed rollout as “clearly a political response” that fails to address the underlying issues of officer training and operational readiness.

Selective Transparency Raises Red Flags

ICE’s new body camera policy, issued in February 2025, gives the agency broad discretion over what footage is released to the public. The policy states that video of shootings or incidents causing death or serious injury will only be released if it is deemed “in the best interests of the agency.” This allows ICE’s director to release footage that casts the agency in a positive light while withholding or delaying video that could be damaging. Experts say this approach is unusually explicit in its intent to control the agency’s public image.

Katherine Hawkins, a senior legal analyst at the Project On Government Oversight, warned that the policy makes body camera footage “virtually useless” for public accountability, as there is no clear mechanism for the public to access recordings. Even when footage is released, ICE will redact officers’ faces, names, and badge numbers, further limiting transparency.

Conclusion: Political Motives and Public Trust

The Trump administration’s decision to rescind the federal body camera mandate and delay ICE’s camera rollout has raised serious questions about its commitment to transparency and accountability in law enforcement. By giving ICE broad control over what footage is made public, the administration risks eroding public trust—especially as the agency continues to conduct high-stakes operations under Trump’s aggressive immigration policies. As experts and former officials have noted, meaningful reform requires not just technology, but a genuine commitment to openness and oversight.

Source article

Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/ice-will-only-release-body-camera-video-when-in-agencys-best-interests-policy-says

Appeals court says Congress must ok White House ballroom : NPR

Appeals court says Congress must ok White House ballroom : NPR

NPR Topics: Politics — 2026-08-07 13:10:00 — www.npr.org

Trump Attacks Court Ruling Halting White House Ballroom, Claims National Security at Risk

President Trump lashed out at a federal appeals court decision ordering his administration to halt construction of a massive White House ballroom, calling the ruling “horrendous, politically motivated and unlawful.” Within hours of the decision, Trump announced on Truth Social that his administration would appeal immediately, emphasizing that the two judges who ruled against him were appointed by Democratic presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

Trump continued to defend the ballroom project as essential for national security, arguing that the court’s decision “severely jeopardizes the lives and welfare of the people who work, and will be working, at the White House — including all future Presidents of the United States, and their families, as well as the lives of all those visiting, such as Heads of State and other Dignitaries, and all Americans who wish to visit the historic, beautiful Executive Mansion.” He described the project as a “single, integrated” security upgrade, including bomb shelters, top-secret military facilities, and advanced protective features.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claims

The appeals court made clear that construction of the ballroom cannot proceed without explicit approval from Congress, stating, “Whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help.” The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which brought the lawsuit, celebrated the ruling, reiterating that only Congress has the authority to approve such a project.

Trump’s administration has repeatedly framed the ballroom as a national security necessity, even citing recent threats and incidents to bolster its case. However, the legal challenge centers on the administration’s failure to follow the legally mandated review process, including obtaining congressional approval. The Washington Post reported that the cost of the project could reach at least $600 million, far higher than the original $200 million estimate.

Conclusion

Trump’s response to the court ruling highlights his pattern of attacking judicial decisions and framing opposition as politically motivated, while continuing to push forward with controversial projects without following established legal procedures. The ongoing legal battle underscores the importance of checks and balances in government decision-making, especially when it comes to projects with significant financial, historical, and security implications.

Source article

Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/08/07/nx-s1-5925123/white-house-ballroom-appeals-court-congress

Donald J. Trump: “THE PROTECT COLLEGE SPORTS ACT is a great Bill, and the Senate will hopefull…

Donald J. Trump: “THE PROTECT COLLEGE SPORTS ACT is a great Bill, and the Senate will hopefull…

Trump's Truth – Latest Posts — 2026-08-07 15:52:00 — trumpstruth.org

Trump Pushes for College Sports Bill With Dubious Claims and Attacks Critics

President Donald J. Trump has thrown his support behind the Protect College Sports Act, urging the Senate to remain in Washington, D.C., until the bill passes. In a statement, Trump claimed, “Without this Bill, millions of young Athletes will be hurt, programs will be canceled, Women’s and Olympic Sports will go away, the fans will be robbed, and Universities will go broke.” He further asserted, “Nobody has done more to protect Women Athletes than me,” and insisted the bill “CLEARLY protects the Laws in 27 States protecting Women’s Sports, and banning Men from Women’s Sports.” Trump also dismissed critics, declaring, “Anyone who tells you differently is LYING!”

Exaggerated Consequences and Unsubstantiated Claims

Trump’s statement is filled with sweeping predictions about the future of college sports if the bill does not pass. The claim that “millions of young Athletes will be hurt” and that “Universities will go broke” lacks supporting evidence. While the legislation addresses issues related to gender participation in sports, there is no clear data indicating that failure to pass the bill would lead to the collapse of women’s and Olympic sports or widespread financial ruin for universities.

Questionable Record on Women’s Sports

Trump’s assertion that “Nobody has done more to protect Women Athletes than me” is not supported by his record. While he has repeatedly spoken out on the issue of transgender participation in women’s sports, independent fact-checkers have found no evidence of significant policy achievements or initiatives during his presidency that directly advanced protections for women athletes beyond public statements.

Attacks on Opponents

In his statement, Trump labels anyone who disagrees with his position as “LYING,” a tactic he has frequently used to discredit critics. This approach sidesteps substantive debate and frames opposition as dishonest, rather than engaging with the complexities of the issue or the range of expert opinions on the impact of the bill.

Conclusion: Rhetoric Over Reality

President Trump’s push for the Protect College Sports Act relies heavily on exaggerated threats and self-praise, rather than verifiable facts. His statement distorts the potential consequences of the bill’s failure and overstates his own contributions to women’s sports. As the Senate considers this legislation, it is crucial for lawmakers and the public to separate rhetoric from reality and base decisions on evidence, not hyperbole.

Source article

Source: https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/40638

Trump renews bid to fire Fed governor Lisa Cook despite supreme court ruling | Federal Reserve

Trump renews bid to fire Fed governor Lisa Cook despite supreme court ruling | Federal Reserve

US politics | The Guardian — 2026-08-07 13:47:00 — www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump Renews Effort to Remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook, Repeating Disputed Allegations

Donald Trump is once again seeking to remove US Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook, reviving allegations of mortgage fraud against her despite a recent Supreme Court decision that upheld the central bank’s independence and Cook’s right to remain in her position while contesting the charges.

According to reports, Cook received a letter from the White House this week indicating that Trump is “considering removing” her from her Fed post over the same mortgage fraud claims he raised last summer. The letter, first reported by ABC News, accused Cook of falling “well short of the standard” required of a sitting Fed governor and requested a written response to the allegations within three weeks.

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in June that Cook was entitled to stay on as Fed governor while she fights the president’s allegations, stating in its majority opinion that Trump “failed to afford Cook the procedural protections to which she was entitled by statute.” The justices noted, “Without such protections, she could not properly dispute the charges the president laid against her.”

Trump’s Allegations and Attacks on the Fed

Trump’s drive to oust Cook began last August, when he abruptly fired her in what was widely seen as an unprecedented attack on the central bank’s independence. The White House accused Cook of wrongly designating two separate properties in Georgia and Michigan as her primary residence and failing to report rental income on her Atlanta property for two years. Cook has denied the allegations, describing them as “inadvertent” paperwork errors, and has sued the Trump administration for firing her without cause or proper procedure. Her legal team has argued that the administration is “cherrypicking” facts to support its claims.

Cook’s firing and ongoing legal battles have coincided with Trump’s repeated attacks on the Federal Reserve for not lowering interest rates. Cook, along with then Fed chair Jerome Powell, supported the central bank’s decision not to lower rates, drawing Trump’s ire. Trump disparaged Powell, calling him “too stupid and too political,” and initiated a Justice Department investigation into Powell’s renovations of the Fed’s headquarters, an inquiry that has since been dropped.

Fact-Check and Legal Context

The Supreme Court’s ruling made clear that Trump’s attempt to remove Cook did not follow the required legal procedures, and that Cook is entitled to due process before any removal can take place. Cook’s attorney, Abbe D Lowell, responded to the latest White House letter by calling the allegations “as baseless now as they were a year ago when President Trump tried to remove Governor Cook and interfere with the independence of the Federal Reserve.” Lowell added, “No matter what President Trump tries to do next, this much is clear under the facts and Supreme Court precedent – there is no valid cause for removing Governor Cook.”

Cook, appointed by Joe Biden in 2022 to a 14-year term, is the first Black woman to serve as a Fed governor. Her career includes service on Barack Obama’s council of economic advisers and teaching positions at Harvard and Stanford.

Conclusion

Trump’s renewed effort to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve board continues his pattern of attacking the central bank’s independence and making allegations that have been repeatedly challenged and, so far, rejected by the courts. The Supreme Court’s recent decision underscores the importance of due process and the legal protections afforded to Fed governors, even in the face of presidential opposition. As the legal and political battle continues, the independence of the Federal Reserve remains a central issue.

Source article

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/aug/07/trump-lisa-cook-fed-firing-scotus-ruling